Maryland Senate Bill SB321

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/22
• Refer: 1/20/22

Caption

Environment - Synthetic Turf and Turf Infill - Chain of Custody

Impact

If enacted, SB321 will significantly alter the regulatory landscape governing synthetic turf and turf infill in Maryland. The introduction of a chain of custody tracking system is expected to mitigate environmental concerns associated with the disposal and material composition of synthetic products. The law will create a clear accountability framework for producers and installers, potentially affecting the standard practices within the turf industry. Additionally, the implications of this bill may lead to heightened awareness and scrutiny regarding the environmental consequences of synthetic materials, aligning state policies closer to contemporary environmental standards and regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill 321, titled 'Environment – Synthetic Turf and Turf Infill – Chain of Custody,' aims to establish a structured framework for tracking synthetic turf and turf infill within the state of Maryland. The bill mandates producers of synthetic turf and turf infill to implement a system for monitoring and reporting the chain of custody from manufacture through installation, usage, recycling, and final disposal. This reporting must be submitted to the Maryland Department of the Environment, which is responsible for maintaining comprehensive records on its website. The bill seeks to enhance transparency regarding the products used in landscaping and recreational areas, providing essential information for environmental management and public safety.

Contention

While the bill's intent is broadly supported among environmental advocates for its potential environmental benefits, there may be contention regarding the enforcement of reporting requirements and the imposition of civil penalties for violations. The bill stipulates civil penalties for non-compliance ranging from warnings to fines up to $1,000 for repeated offenses. Some stakeholders in the turf industry may argue against the economic burden these regulations could impose, particularly for small businesses. Thus, the balance between promoting accountability in materials management and ensuring economic feasibility for producers is likely to be a focal point of debate surrounding the bill's implementation.