Maryland Senate Bill SB37

Maryland 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/22
• Refer: 1/12/22
• Report Pass: 2/22/22
• Engrossed: 2/24/22
• Refer: 2/25/22
• Report Pass: 3/30/22
• Enrolled: 4/1/22
• Chaptered: 5/29/22

Caption

Health Occupations – State Board of Massage Therapy Examiners – Requiring License to Practice and Other Revisions

Impact

This bill transforms the legal framework for massage therapy practitioners by eliminating the option to register for practice outside of regulated health care environments. It raises the standards for education and training required to attain a license, stipulating a minimum of 750 contact hours in various subjects related to massage therapy. The bill aims to promote safer practice standards, thereby enhancing the professionalism within the industry and potentially preventing unqualified individuals from practicing, which can pose risks to consumers.

Summary

Senate Bill 37 addresses the regulations surrounding the practice of massage therapy in Maryland. It establishes requirements for licensing with the State Board of Massage Therapy Examiners and outlines the necessary educational qualifications and processes for becoming a licensed massage therapist. The bill mandates that practitioners must be licensed or registered to practice in the state, replacing previous options for registration in non-health care settings, emphasizing the importance of working within health-related environments to ensure public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding SB 37 appears to be generally supportive among the legislative body, as evidenced by its unanimous passage. Proponents argue that the enhanced educational requirements will lead to better-trained professionals, ultimately benefiting both practitioners and clients. However, there may be concerns among some existing practitioners who have been working under different standards and may find the new requirements challenging or unnecessary.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the phasing out of previous registration options, which could impact those who have been practicing under different guidelines. Additionally, the bill introduces significant penalties for practicing without a license, raising concerns about the potential for harsh repercussions for those who inadvertently violate the new regulations. This could be perceived as an excessive approach to regulation by some stakeholders in the industry.