Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB46

Introduced
1/12/22  
Refer
1/12/22  
Report Pass
3/14/22  
Engrossed
3/17/22  

Caption

Housing and Community Development - Programs and Projects - Requirements

Impact

The bill's implications are significant for housing policy in the state as it mandates timely notifications to local lawmakers. This development indicates a push for greater transparency and potentially more robust local oversight of housing initiatives. By requiring this communication, the bill could lead to increased community engagement and allow local representatives to address constituent concerns regarding housing projects. Local governments are also expected to foster partnerships in community development programs, which might enhance local control over housing policy.

Summary

Senate Bill 46, titled 'Housing and Community Development - Programs and Projects - Requirements', primarily aims to enhance communication and procedural clarity in the application processes for federal low-income housing tax credits and state-funded housing projects. The bill establishes a requirement for the Department of Housing and Community Development to notify local delegations of the General Assembly regarding applications for various housing programs, including the Rental Housing Program and Community Legacy Program, thus ensuring that state representatives are informed about housing developments in their districts.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB46 appears generally supportive as it promotes accountability and transparency in housing transactions. Legislators from both sides recognize the importance of local engagement in community development initiatives, which tends to resonate well with constituents concerned about housing quality and availability. However, there are concerns among some community advocacy groups regarding whether increased governmental oversight might slow down necessary housing developments, reflecting a cautious approach to the bill's overall implementation.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions on the balance between state oversight and local autonomy. Critics argue that more regulations might inadvertently delay the development of critical housing projects needed in many communities. Furthermore, there are ongoing debates about the adequacy of resources and support that should accompany such initiatives to ensure they effectively serve low-income families and promote sustainable community development. The requirement for legislative notifications and public input could either enhance or complicate the process depending on how it is executed.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT SB00657

An Act Concerning The Fields Of Membership Of Connecticut Credit Unions.

CA AB1199

Homes for Families and Corporate Monopoly Transparency Excise Tax: qualified property: reporting requirements.

CA AB30

Environmental quality: judicial review: strip mall conversion housing projects.

CA AB903

School accountability: local control and accountability plans: education technology: best practices: School Technology Empowerment Advisory Committee.

CA AB2090

Office of Farm to Fork: food deserts: transportation.

CA SB5

Affordable Housing and Community Development Investment Program.

CT SB00456

An Act Establishing A Pilot Program For The Development And Implementation Of Ten-year Plans To Eradicate Concentrated Poverty In The State.

TX SB1861

Relating to the transfer of powers, duties, and programs to, and the continuation of, the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, to the establishment and administration of certain other programs and divisions within the department, and to other provisions relating to fair or affordable housing.