Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 379 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 379 | |
5 | - | (Senate Bill 642) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | + | *sb0642* | |
8 | 10 | ||
9 | - | Harford County – Vehicle Height Monitoring Systems | |
11 | + | SENATE BILL 642 | |
12 | + | R5, L2 EMERGENCY BILL (2lr2068) | |
13 | + | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | + | — Judicial Proceedings/Environment and Transportation — | |
15 | + | Introduced by Senator Cassilly | |
10 | 16 | ||
11 | - | FOR the purpose of authorizing the use of vehicle height monitoring systems at certain | |
12 | - | locations in Harford County to enforce certain State and local laws restricting the | |
13 | - | presence of certain vehicles during certain times subject to certain requirements; | |
14 | - | and generally relating to vehicle height monitoring systems in Harford County. | |
17 | + | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
15 | 18 | ||
16 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, | |
17 | - | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings | |
18 | - | Section 7–302(e) | |
19 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland | |
20 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) | |
19 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
20 | + | Proofreader. | |
21 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
22 | + | Proofreader. | |
21 | 23 | ||
22 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, | |
23 | - | Article – Transportation | |
24 | - | Section 24–111.3 | |
25 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland | |
26 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) | |
24 | + | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
27 | 25 | ||
28 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, | |
29 | - | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: | |
26 | + | _______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M. | |
30 | 27 | ||
31 | - | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings | |
28 | + | ______________________________________________ | |
29 | + | President. | |
32 | 30 | ||
33 | - | ||
31 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
34 | 32 | ||
35 | - | (e) (1) A citation issued pursuant to § 21–202.1, § 21–706.1, § 21–809, § | |
36 | - | 21–810, or § 24–111.3 of the Transportation Article shall provide that the person receiving | |
37 | - | the citation may elect to stand trial by notifying the issuing agency of the person’s intention | |
38 | - | to stand trial at least 5 days prior to the date of payment as set forth in the citation. On | |
39 | - | receipt of the notice to stand trial, the agency shall forward to the District Court having | |
40 | - | venue a copy of the citation and a copy of the notice from the person who received the | |
41 | - | citation indicating the person’s intention to stand trial. On receipt thereof, the District | |
42 | - | Court shall schedule the case for trial and notify the defendant of the trial date under | |
43 | - | procedures adopted by the Chief Judge of the District Court. | |
33 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
44 | 34 | ||
45 | - | (2) A citation issued as the result of a vehicle height monitoring system, a | |
46 | - | traffic control signal monitoring system, or a speed monitoring system, including a work | |
47 | - | zone speed control system, controlled by a political subdivision or a school bus monitoring | |
48 | - | camera shall provide that, in an uncontested case, the penalty shall be paid directly to that | |
49 | - | political subdivision. A citation issued as the result of a traffic control signal monitoring Ch. 379 2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
35 | + | Harford County – Vehicle Height Monitoring Systems 2 | |
50 | 36 | ||
51 | - | – 2 – | |
52 | - | system or a work zone speed control system controlled by a State agency, or as a result of | |
53 | - | a vehicle height monitoring system, a traffic control signal monitoring system, a speed | |
54 | - | monitoring system, or a school bus monitoring camera in a case contested in District Court, | |
55 | - | shall provide that the penalty shall be paid directly to the District Court. | |
37 | + | FOR the purpose of authorizing the use of vehicle height monitoring systems at certain 3 | |
38 | + | locations in Harford County to enforce certain State and local laws restricting the 4 | |
39 | + | presence of certain vehicles during certain times subject to certain requirements; 5 | |
40 | + | and generally relating to vehicle height monitoring systems in Harford County. 6 | |
56 | 41 | ||
57 | - | ||
58 | - | ||
59 | - | ||
60 | - | ||
61 | - | ||
42 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 7 | |
43 | + | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 8 | |
44 | + | Section 7–302(e) 9 | |
45 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 10 | |
46 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 11 | |
62 | 47 | ||
63 | - | (4) (i) From the fines collected by a political subdivision as a result of | |
64 | - | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems or school bus monitoring cameras, a | |
65 | - | political subdivision: | |
48 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 12 | |
49 | + | Article – Transportation 13 2 SENATE BILL 642 | |
66 | 50 | ||
67 | - | 1. May recover the costs of implementing and administering | |
68 | - | the speed monitoring systems or school bus monitoring cameras; and | |
69 | 51 | ||
70 | - | ||
71 | - | ||
72 | - | ||
52 | + | Section 24–111.3 1 | |
53 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 2 | |
54 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 3 | |
73 | 55 | ||
74 | - | (ii) 1. For any fiscal year, if the balance remaining from the fines | |
75 | - | collected by a political subdivision as a result of violations enforced by speed monitoring | |
76 | - | systems, after the costs of implementing and administering the systems are recovered in | |
77 | - | accordance with subparagraph (i)1 of this paragraph, is greater than 10% of the total | |
78 | - | revenues of the political subdivision for the fiscal year, the political subdivision shall remit | |
79 | - | any funds that exceed 10% of the total revenues to the Comptroller. | |
56 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 4 | |
57 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 5 | |
80 | 58 | ||
81 | - | 2. The Comptroller shall deposit any money remitted under | |
82 | - | this subparagraph to the General Fund of the State. | |
59 | + | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 6 | |
83 | 60 | ||
84 | - | (iii) The fines collected by Prince George’s County as a result of | |
85 | - | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 210 shall be remitted | |
86 | - | to the Comptroller for distribution to the State Highway Administration to be used solely | |
87 | - | to assist in covering the costs of: | |
61 | + | 7–302. 7 | |
88 | 62 | ||
89 | - | 1. Examining the engineering, infrastructure, and other | |
90 | - | relevant factors that may contribute to safety issues on Maryland Route 210 in Prince | |
91 | - | George’s County; | |
63 | + | (e) (1) A citation issued pursuant to § 21–202.1, § 21–706.1, § 21–809, § 8 | |
64 | + | 21–810, or § 24–111.3 of the Transportation Article shall provide that the person receiving 9 | |
65 | + | the citation may elect to stand trial by notifying the issuing agency of the person’s intention 10 | |
66 | + | to stand trial at least 5 days prior to the date of payment as set forth in the citation. On 11 | |
67 | + | receipt of the notice to stand trial, the agency shall forward to the District Court having 12 | |
68 | + | venue a copy of the citation and a copy of the notice from the person who received the 13 | |
69 | + | citation indicating the person’s intention to stand trial. On receipt thereof, the District 14 | |
70 | + | Court shall schedule the case for trial and notify the defendant of the trial date under 15 | |
71 | + | procedures adopted by the Chief Judge of the District Court. 16 | |
92 | 72 | ||
93 | - | 2. Reporting its findings and recommendations on any | |
94 | - | solutions to these safety issues; and | |
73 | + | (2) A citation issued as the result of a vehicle height monitoring system, a 17 | |
74 | + | traffic control signal monitoring system, or a speed monitoring system, including a work 18 | |
75 | + | zone speed control system, controlled by a political subdivision or a school bus monitoring 19 | |
76 | + | camera shall provide that, in an uncontested case, the penalty shall be paid directly to that 20 | |
77 | + | political subdivision. A citation issued as the result of a traffic control signal monitoring 21 | |
78 | + | system or a work zone speed control system controlled by a State agency, or as a result of 22 | |
79 | + | a vehicle height monitoring system, a traffic control signal monitoring system, a speed 23 | |
80 | + | monitoring system, or a school bus monitoring camera in a case contested in District Court, 24 | |
81 | + | shall provide that the penalty shall be paid directly to the District Court. 25 | |
95 | 82 | ||
96 | - | 3. Implementing any solutions to these safety issues. | |
97 | - | LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 379 | |
83 | + | (3) Civil penalties resulting from citations issued using a vehicle height 26 | |
84 | + | monitoring system, traffic control signal monitoring system, speed monitoring system, 27 | |
85 | + | work zone speed control system, or school bus monitoring camera that are collected by the 28 | |
86 | + | District Court shall be collected in accordance with subsection (a) of this section and 29 | |
87 | + | distributed in accordance with § 12–118 of the Transportation Article. 30 | |
98 | 88 | ||
99 | - | – 3 – | |
100 | - | (iv) 1. From the fines collected by Baltimore City as a result of | |
101 | - | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Interstate 83, any balance remaining | |
102 | - | after the allocation of fines under subparagraph (i)1 of this paragraph shall be remitted to | |
103 | - | the Comptroller for distribution to the Baltimore City Department of Transportation to be | |
104 | - | used solely to assist in covering the cost of roadway improvements on Interstate 83 in | |
105 | - | Baltimore City. | |
89 | + | (4) (i) From the fines collected by a political subdivision as a result of 31 | |
90 | + | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems or school bus monitoring cameras, a 32 | |
91 | + | political subdivision: 33 | |
106 | 92 | ||
107 | - | 2. Fines remitted to the Baltimore City Department of | |
108 | - | Transportation under subparagraph (iv)1 of this paragraph are supplemental to and are | |
109 | - | not intended to take the place of funding that would otherwise be appropriated for uses | |
110 | - | described under subparagraph (iv)1 of this paragraph. | |
93 | + | 1. May recover the costs of implementing and administering 34 | |
94 | + | the speed monitoring systems or school bus monitoring cameras; and 35 | |
111 | 95 | ||
112 | - | (v) From the fines collected by Anne Arundel County as a result of | |
113 | - | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) | |
114 | - | between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard | |
115 | - | County line, any balance remaining after the allocation of fines under subparagraph (i)1 of | |
116 | - | this paragraph shall be remitted to the Comptroller for distribution to the State Highway | |
117 | - | Administration to be used solely to assist in covering the cost of speed reduction measures | |
118 | - | and roadway and pedestrian safety improvements on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) | |
119 | - | between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard | |
120 | - | County line. | |
96 | + | 2. Subject to subparagraphs (ii), (iii), and (iv) of this 36 | |
97 | + | paragraph, may spend any remaining balance solely for public safety purposes, including 37 | |
98 | + | pedestrian safety programs. 38 SENATE BILL 642 3 | |
121 | 99 | ||
122 | - | (5) From the fines collected by Baltimore City as a result of violations | |
123 | - | enforced by vehicle height monitoring systems, Baltimore City may: | |
124 | 100 | ||
125 | - | (i) Recover the costs of implementing and administering the vehicle | |
126 | - | height monitoring systems; and | |
127 | 101 | ||
128 | - | (ii) Spend the remaining balance solely on roadway improvements. | |
102 | + | (ii) 1. For any fiscal year, if the balance remaining from the fines 1 | |
103 | + | collected by a political subdivision as a result of violations enforced by speed monitoring 2 | |
104 | + | systems, after the costs of implementing and administering the systems are recovered in 3 | |
105 | + | accordance with subparagraph (i)1 of this paragraph, is greater than 10% of the total 4 | |
106 | + | revenues of the political subdivision for the fiscal year, the political subdivision shall remit 5 | |
107 | + | any funds that exceed 10% of the total revenues to the Comptroller. 6 | |
129 | 108 | ||
130 | - | Article – Transportation | |
109 | + | 2. The Comptroller shall deposit any money remitted under 7 | |
110 | + | this subparagraph to the General Fund of the State. 8 | |
131 | 111 | ||
132 | - | 24–111.3. | |
112 | + | (iii) The fines collected by Prince George’s County as a result of 9 | |
113 | + | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 210 shall be remitted 10 | |
114 | + | to the Comptroller for distribution to the State Highway Administration to be used solely 11 | |
115 | + | to assist in covering the costs of: 12 | |
133 | 116 | ||
134 | - | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. | |
117 | + | 1. Examining the engineering, infrastructure, and other 13 | |
118 | + | relevant factors that may contribute to safety issues on Maryland Route 210 in Prince 14 | |
119 | + | George’s County; 15 | |
135 | 120 | ||
136 | - | (2) “Local government agency” means an agency of a local jurisdiction that | |
137 | - | is authorized to issue a citation for a violation of the Maryland Vehicle Law or of local traffic | |
138 | - | laws or regulations. | |
121 | + | 2. Reporting its findings and recommendations on any 16 | |
122 | + | solutions to these safety issues; and 17 | |
139 | 123 | ||
140 | - | | |
124 | + | 3. Implementing any solutions to these safety issues. 18 | |
141 | 125 | ||
142 | - | (4) (i) “Owner” means the registered owner of a motor vehicle. | |
126 | + | (iv) 1. From the fines collected by Baltimore City as a result of 19 | |
127 | + | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Interstate 83, any balance remaining 20 | |
128 | + | after the allocation of fines under subparagraph (i)1 of this paragraph shall be remitted to 21 | |
129 | + | the Comptroller for distribution to the Baltimore City Department of Transportation to be 22 | |
130 | + | used solely to assist in covering the cost of roadway improvements on Interstate 83 in 23 | |
131 | + | Baltimore City. 24 | |
143 | 132 | ||
144 | - | (ii) In Baltimore County, “owner” does not include: | |
145 | - | Ch. 379 2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
133 | + | 2. Fines remitted to the Baltimore City Department of 25 | |
134 | + | Transportation under subparagraph (iv)1 of this paragraph are supplemental to and are 26 | |
135 | + | not intended to take the place of funding that would otherwise be appropriated for uses 27 | |
136 | + | described under subparagraph (iv)1 of this paragraph. 28 | |
146 | 137 | ||
147 | - | – 4 – | |
148 | - | 1. A motor vehicle rental or leasing company; or | |
138 | + | (v) From the fines collected by Anne Arundel County as a result of 29 | |
139 | + | violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) 30 | |
140 | + | between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard 31 | |
141 | + | County line, any balance remaining after the allocation of fines under subparagraph (i)1 of 32 | |
142 | + | this paragraph shall be remitted to the Comptroller for distribution to the State Highway 33 | |
143 | + | Administration to be used solely to assist in covering the cost of speed reduction measures 34 | |
144 | + | and roadway and pedestrian safety improvements on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) 35 | |
145 | + | between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard 36 | |
146 | + | County line. 37 | |
147 | + | 4 SENATE BILL 642 | |
149 | 148 | ||
150 | - | 2. The holder of an interchangeable registration under Title | |
151 | - | 13, Subtitle 9, Part III of this article. | |
152 | 149 | ||
153 | - | (5) | |
154 | - | monitoring | |
150 | + | (5) From the fines collected by Baltimore City as a result of violations 1 | |
151 | + | enforced by vehicle height monitoring systems, Baltimore City may: 2 | |
155 | 152 | ||
156 | - | (i) On: | |
153 | + | (i) Recover the costs of implementing and administering the vehicle 3 | |
154 | + | height monitoring systems; and 4 | |
157 | 155 | ||
158 | - | | |
156 | + | (ii) Spend the remaining balance solely on roadway improvements. 5 | |
159 | 157 | ||
160 | - | ||
158 | + | Article – Transportation 6 | |
161 | 159 | ||
162 | - | ||
160 | + | 24–111.3. 7 | |
163 | 161 | ||
164 | - | | |
162 | + | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 8 | |
165 | 163 | ||
166 | - | 5. Any other medium; and | |
164 | + | (2) “Local government agency” means an agency of a local jurisdiction that 9 | |
165 | + | is authorized to issue a citation for a violation of the Maryland Vehicle Law or of local traffic 10 | |
166 | + | laws or regulations. 11 | |
167 | 167 | ||
168 | - | ( | |
168 | + | (3) “Local jurisdiction” means a county or municipal corporation. 12 | |
169 | 169 | ||
170 | - | 1. The front or side of a motor vehicle or combination of | |
171 | - | vehicles; | |
170 | + | (4) (i) “Owner” means the registered owner of a motor vehicle. 13 | |
172 | 171 | ||
173 | - | 2. At least two time–stamped images of the motor vehicle or | |
174 | - | combination of vehicles that include the same stationary object near the motor vehicle or | |
175 | - | combination of vehicles; and | |
172 | + | (ii) In Baltimore County, “owner” does not include: 14 | |
176 | 173 | ||
177 | - | 3. On at least one image or portion of tape, a clear and legible | |
178 | - | identification of the entire registration plate number of the motor vehicle. | |
174 | + | 1. A motor vehicle rental or leasing company; or 15 | |
179 | 175 | ||
180 | - | (6) “Vehicle height monitoring system” means a device with one or more | |
181 | - | motor vehicle sensors that is capable of producing recorded images of vehicles whose height | |
182 | - | exceeds a predetermined limit. | |
176 | + | 2. The holder of an interchangeable registration under Title 16 | |
177 | + | 13, Subtitle 9, Part III of this article. 17 | |
183 | 178 | ||
184 | - | ( | |
185 | - | ||
179 | + | (5) “Recorded image” means an image re corded by a vehicle height 18 | |
180 | + | monitoring system: 19 | |
186 | 181 | ||
187 | - | (c) (1) A vehicle height monitoring system may be used to record images of | |
188 | - | vehicles traveling on a highway in a local jurisdiction under this section only if the use of | |
189 | - | vehicle height monitoring systems is authorized by local law adopted by the governing body | |
190 | - | of the local jurisdiction after reasonable notice and a public hearing. | |
182 | + | (i) On: 20 | |
191 | 183 | ||
192 | - | (2) IN HARFORD COUNTY, A VEHICLE HEIGHT MON ITORING SYSTEM | |
193 | - | MAY BE USED, SUBJECT TO THE REQUI REMENTS OF THIS SECT ION, ONLY ON: LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 379 | |
184 | + | 1. A photograph; 21 | |
194 | 185 | ||
195 | - | ||
186 | + | 2. A microphotograph; 22 | |
196 | 187 | ||
197 | - | (I) SPESUTIA ROAD, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF SPESUTIA | |
198 | - | ROAD AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF SPESUTIA ROAD AND | |
199 | - | MARYLAND ROUTE 159; | |
188 | + | 3. An electronic image; 23 | |
200 | 189 | ||
201 | - | (II) MITCHELL LANE, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF MITCHELL | |
202 | - | LANE AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF MITCHELL LANE AND | |
203 | - | SPESUTIA ROAD; AND | |
190 | + | 4. Videotape; or 24 | |
204 | 191 | ||
205 | - | (III) OLD STEPNEY ROAD, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF OLD | |
206 | - | STEPNEY ROAD AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF OLD STEPNEY ROAD | |
207 | - | AND SPESUTIA ROAD. | |
192 | + | 5. Any other medium; and 25 | |
208 | 193 | ||
209 | - | ||
210 | - | ||
194 | + | (ii) Showing: 26 | |
195 | + | SENATE BILL 642 5 | |
211 | 196 | ||
212 | - | (i) Conduct an analysis to determine the appropriateness of the | |
213 | - | location; and | |
214 | 197 | ||
215 | - | | |
216 | - | ||
198 | + | 1. The front or side of a motor vehicle or combination of 1 | |
199 | + | vehicles; 2 | |
217 | 200 | ||
218 | - | [(3)] (4) Before activating a vehicle height monitoring system, a local | |
219 | - | jurisdiction shall: | |
201 | + | 2. At least two time–stamped images of the motor vehicle or 3 | |
202 | + | combination of vehicles that include the same stationary object near the motor vehicle or 4 | |
203 | + | combination of vehicles; and 5 | |
220 | 204 | ||
221 | - | | |
222 | - | ||
205 | + | 3. On at least one image or portion of tape, a clear and legible 6 | |
206 | + | identification of the entire registration plate number of the motor vehicle. 7 | |
223 | 207 | ||
224 | - | ( | |
225 | - | ||
226 | - | ||
208 | + | (6) “Vehicle height monitoring system” means a device with one or more 8 | |
209 | + | motor vehicle sensors that is capable of producing recorded images of vehicles whose height 9 | |
210 | + | exceeds a predetermined limit. 10 | |
227 | 211 | ||
228 | - | 1. Are in accordance with the manual and specifications for | |
229 | - | a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration | |
230 | - | under § 25–104 of this article; and | |
212 | + | (b) This section applies only in Baltimore City, Baltimore County, HARFORD 11 | |
213 | + | COUNTY, and Prince George’s County. 12 | |
231 | 214 | ||
232 | - | 2. Indicate that a vehicle height monitoring system is in use. | |
215 | + | (c) (1) A vehicle height monitoring system may be used to record images of 13 | |
216 | + | vehicles traveling on a highway in a local jurisdiction under this section only if the use of 14 | |
217 | + | vehicle height monitoring systems is authorized by local law adopted by the governing body 15 | |
218 | + | of the local jurisdiction after reasonable notice and a public hearing. 16 | |
233 | 219 | ||
234 | - | ( | |
235 | - | ||
220 | + | (2) IN HARFORD COUNTY, A VEHICLE HEIGHT MON ITORING SYSTEM 17 | |
221 | + | MAY BE USED, SUBJECT TO THE REQUI REMENTS OF THIS SECT ION, ONLY ON: 18 | |
236 | 222 | ||
237 | - | ( | |
238 | - | ||
239 | - | ||
223 | + | (I) SPESUTIA ROAD, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF SPESUTIA 19 | |
224 | + | ROAD AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF SPESUTIA ROAD AND 20 | |
225 | + | MARYLAND ROUTE 159; 21 | |
240 | 226 | ||
241 | - | (2) Shall be kept on file; and Ch. 379 2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
227 | + | (II) MITCHELL LANE, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF MITCHELL 22 | |
228 | + | LANE AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF MITCHELL LANE AND 23 | |
229 | + | SPESUTIA ROAD; AND 24 | |
242 | 230 | ||
243 | - | – 6 – | |
231 | + | (III) OLD STEPNEY ROAD, FROM THE INTERSECTIO N OF OLD 25 | |
232 | + | STEPNEY ROAD AND U.S. ROUTE 40 TO THE INTERSECTION OF OLD STEPNEY ROAD 26 | |
233 | + | AND SPESUTIA ROAD. 27 | |
244 | 234 | ||
245 | - | (3) | |
246 | - | ||
235 | + | [(2)] (3) Before a local jurisdiction places or installs a vehicle height 28 | |
236 | + | monitoring system at a particular location, it shall: 29 | |
247 | 237 | ||
248 | - | (e) (1) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle or combination of vehicles | |
249 | - | received a citation from a police officer at the time of the violation, the owner of a motor | |
250 | - | vehicle or combination of vehicles is subject to a civil penalty if the motor vehicle or | |
251 | - | combination of vehicles is recorded by a vehicle height monitoring system while being | |
252 | - | operated in violation of a State or local law restricting the presence of certain vehicles | |
253 | - | during certain times. | |
238 | + | (i) Conduct an analysis to determine the appropriateness of the 30 | |
239 | + | location; and 31 | |
254 | 240 | ||
255 | - | (2) A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed: | |
241 | + | (ii) Obtain the approval of the chief official of the local government 32 | |
242 | + | agency or the chief official’s designee. 33 | |
243 | + | 6 SENATE BILL 642 | |
256 | 244 | ||
257 | - | (i) For a second violation by the owner of the motor vehicle, $250; | |
258 | - | and | |
259 | 245 | ||
260 | - | ( | |
261 | - | ||
246 | + | [(3)] (4) Before activating a vehicle height monitoring system, a local 1 | |
247 | + | jurisdiction shall: 2 | |
262 | 248 | ||
263 | - | (3) For purposes of this section, the District Court shall prescribe: | |
249 | + | (i) Publish notice of the location of the vehicle height monitoring 3 | |
250 | + | system on its website and in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction; and 4 | |
264 | 251 | ||
265 | - | (i) A uniform citation form consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2) of | |
266 | - | this subsection and § 7–302 of the Courts Article; and | |
252 | + | (ii) Ensure that all signs stating restrictions on the presence of 5 | |
253 | + | certain vehicles during certain times approaching and within the segment of highway on 6 | |
254 | + | which the vehicle height monitoring system is located include signs that: 7 | |
267 | 255 | ||
268 | - | (ii) A civil penalty, which shall be indicated on the citation, to be paid | |
269 | - | by persons who choose to prepay the civil penalty without appearing in District Court. | |
256 | + | 1. Are in accordance with the manual and specifications for 8 | |
257 | + | a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration 9 | |
258 | + | under § 25–104 of this article; and 10 | |
270 | 259 | ||
271 | - | (f) (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, a | |
272 | - | local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City Department of | |
273 | - | Transportation shall mail to an owner liable under this section a citation that shall include: | |
260 | + | 2. Indicate that a vehicle height monitoring system is in use. 11 | |
274 | 261 | ||
275 | - | ( | |
276 | - | vehicle | |
262 | + | (d) A vehicle height monitoring system operator shall fill out and sign a daily 12 | |
263 | + | set–up log for a vehicle height monitoring system that: 13 | |
277 | 264 | ||
278 | - | (ii) The registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the | |
279 | - | violation; | |
265 | + | (1) States that the operator successful ly performed the 14 | |
266 | + | manufacturer–specified self–test of the vehicle height monitoring system before producing 15 | |
267 | + | a recorded image; 16 | |
280 | 268 | ||
281 | - | ( | |
269 | + | (2) Shall be kept on file; and 17 | |
282 | 270 | ||
283 | - | (iv) The location at which the violation occurred; | |
271 | + | (3) Shall be admitted as evidence in any court proceeding for a violation of 18 | |
272 | + | this section. 19 | |
284 | 273 | ||
285 | - | (v) The date and time of the violation; | |
274 | + | (e) (1) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle or combination of vehicles 20 | |
275 | + | received a citation from a police officer at the time of the violation, the owner of a motor 21 | |
276 | + | vehicle or combination of vehicles is subject to a civil penalty if the motor vehicle or 22 | |
277 | + | combination of vehicles is recorded by a vehicle height monitoring system while being 23 | |
278 | + | operated in violation of a State or local law restricting the presence of certain vehicles 24 | |
279 | + | during certain times. 25 | |
286 | 280 | ||
287 | - | (vi) A copy of the recorded image; | |
288 | - | LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 379 | |
281 | + | (2) A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed: 26 | |
289 | 282 | ||
290 | - | – 7 – | |
291 | - | (vii) The amount of the civil penalty imposed and the date by which | |
292 | - | the civil penalty should be paid; | |
283 | + | (i) For a second violation by the owner of the motor vehicle, $250; 27 | |
284 | + | and 28 | |
293 | 285 | ||
294 | - | (viii) A signed statement by a duly authorized law enforcement officer | |
295 | - | commissioned by the local government agency that, based on inspection of the recorded | |
296 | - | image, the motor vehicle or combination of vehicles was being operated in violation of a | |
297 | - | State or local law restricting the presence of certain vehicles during certain times; | |
286 | + | (ii) For a third or subsequent violation by the owner of the motor 29 | |
287 | + | vehicle, $500. 30 | |
298 | 288 | ||
299 | - | ( | |
289 | + | (3) For purposes of this section, the District Court shall prescribe: 31 | |
300 | 290 | ||
301 | - | (x) Information advising the owner alleged to be liable under this | |
302 | - | section of the manner and time in which liability as alleged in the citation may be contested | |
303 | - | in the District Court; and | |
291 | + | (i) A uniform citation form consistent with paragraphs (1) and (2) of 32 | |
292 | + | this subsection and § 7–302 of the Courts Article; and 33 SENATE BILL 642 7 | |
304 | 293 | ||
305 | - | (xi) Information advising the owner alleged to be liable under this | |
306 | - | section that failure to pay the civil penalty or to contest liability in a timely manner is an | |
307 | - | admission of liability. | |
308 | 294 | ||
309 | - | (2) A local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City | |
310 | - | Department of Transportation shall, for a first violation, mail a warning notice instead of | |
311 | - | a citation to an owner liable under this section. | |
312 | 295 | ||
313 | - | ( | |
314 | - | ||
296 | + | (ii) A civil penalty, which shall be indicated on the citation, to be paid 1 | |
297 | + | by persons who choose to prepay the civil penalty without appearing in District Court. 2 | |
315 | 298 | ||
316 | - | (4) A person who receives a citation under this section may: | |
299 | + | (f) (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) and (3) of this subsection, a 3 | |
300 | + | local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City Department of 4 | |
301 | + | Transportation shall mail to an owner liable under this section a citation that shall include: 5 | |
317 | 302 | ||
318 | - | (i) | |
319 | - | ||
303 | + | (i) The name and address of the registered owner of the motor 6 | |
304 | + | vehicle; 7 | |
320 | 305 | ||
321 | - | (ii) Elect to stand trial in the District Court for the alleged violation. | |
306 | + | (ii) The registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the 8 | |
307 | + | violation; 9 | |
322 | 308 | ||
323 | - | (g) (1) A certificate alleging that a violation of a State or local law restricting | |
324 | - | the presence of certain vehicles during certain times occurred and that the requirements | |
325 | - | under subsections (c) and (d) of this section have been affirmed by a duly authorized law | |
326 | - | enforcement officer commissioned by a local government agency, based on inspection of the | |
327 | - | recorded image produced by the vehicle height monitoring system, shall be: | |
309 | + | (iii) The violation charged; 10 | |
328 | 310 | ||
329 | - | ( | |
311 | + | (iv) The location at which the violation occurred; 11 | |
330 | 312 | ||
331 | - | (ii) Admissible in a proceeding alleging a violation under this section | |
332 | - | without the presence or testimony of the vehicle height monitoring system operator. | |
313 | + | (v) The date and time of the violation; 12 | |
333 | 314 | ||
334 | - | (2) If a person who received a citation under this section desires the vehicle | |
335 | - | height monitoring system operator to be present and testify at trial, the person shall notify | |
336 | - | the court and the State in writing no later than 20 days before trial. Ch. 379 2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
315 | + | (vi) A copy of the recorded image; 13 | |
337 | 316 | ||
338 | - | – 8 – | |
317 | + | (vii) The amount of the civil penalty imposed and the date by which 14 | |
318 | + | the civil penalty should be paid; 15 | |
339 | 319 | ||
340 | - | (3) Adjudication of liability shall be based on a preponderance of evidence. | |
320 | + | (viii) A signed statement by a duly authorized law enforcement officer 16 | |
321 | + | commissioned by the local government agency that, based on inspection of the recorded 17 | |
322 | + | image, the motor vehicle or combination of vehicles was being operated in violation of a 18 | |
323 | + | State or local law restricting the presence of certain vehicles during certain times; 19 | |
341 | 324 | ||
342 | - | ( | |
325 | + | (ix) A statement that the recorded image is evidence of the violation; 20 | |
343 | 326 | ||
344 | - | ( | |
345 | - | ||
346 | - | ||
327 | + | (x) Information advising the owner alleged to be liable under this 21 | |
328 | + | section of the manner and time in which liability as alleged in the citation may be contested 22 | |
329 | + | in the District Court; and 23 | |
347 | 330 | ||
348 | - | (ii) Any other issues and evidence that the District Court deems | |
349 | - | pertinent. | |
331 | + | (xi) Information advising the owner alleged to be liable under this 24 | |
332 | + | section that failure to pay the civil penalty or to contest liability in a timely manner is an 25 | |
333 | + | admission of liability. 26 | |
350 | 334 | ||
351 | - | (2) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle or the registration plates were | |
352 | - | stolen before the violation occurred and were not under the control or possession of the | |
353 | - | owner at the time of the violation, the owner shall submit proof that a police report | |
354 | - | regarding the stolen motor vehicle or registration plates was filed in a timely manner. | |
335 | + | (2) A local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City 27 | |
336 | + | Department of Transportation shall, for a first violation, mail a warning notice instead of 28 | |
337 | + | a citation to an owner liable under this section. 29 | |
355 | 338 | ||
356 | - | (i) A violation for which a civil penalty is imposed under this section: | |
339 | + | (3) A citation issued under this section shall be mailed no later than 30 30 | |
340 | + | days after the alleged violation. 31 | |
341 | + | 8 SENATE BILL 642 | |
357 | 342 | ||
358 | - | (1) Is not a moving violation for the purpose of assessing points under § | |
359 | - | 16–402 of this article; | |
360 | 343 | ||
361 | - | (2) May not be recorded by the Administration on the driving record of the | |
362 | - | owner of the vehicle; | |
344 | + | (4) A person who receives a citation under this section may: 1 | |
363 | 345 | ||
364 | - | ( | |
365 | - | ||
346 | + | (i) Pay the civil penalty, in accordance with instructions on the 2 | |
347 | + | citation, directly to the local jurisdiction; or 3 | |
366 | 348 | ||
367 | - | (4) May not be considered in the provision of motor vehicle insurance | |
368 | - | coverage. | |
349 | + | (ii) Elect to stand trial in the District Court for the alleged violation. 4 | |
369 | 350 | ||
370 | - | (j) In consultation with the appropriate local government agency, the Chief Judge | |
371 | - | of the District Court shall adopt procedures for the issuance of citations, the trial of civil | |
372 | - | violations, and the collection of civil penalties under this section. | |
351 | + | (g) (1) A certificate alleging that a violation of a State or local law restricting 5 | |
352 | + | the presence of certain vehicles during certain times occurred and that the requirements 6 | |
353 | + | under subsections (c) and (d) of this section have been affirmed by a duly authorized law 7 | |
354 | + | enforcement officer commissioned by a local government agency, based on inspection of the 8 | |
355 | + | recorded image produced by the vehicle height monitoring system, shall be: 9 | |
373 | 356 | ||
374 | - | (k) (1) A local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City | |
375 | - | Department of Transportation, or a contractor designated by the local government agency | |
376 | - | or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City Department of Transportation, shall administer | |
377 | - | and process civil citations issued under this section in coordination with the District Court. | |
357 | + | (i) Evidence of the facts contained in the certificate; and 10 | |
378 | 358 | ||
379 | - | (2) If a contractor operates a vehicle height monitoring system on behalf of | |
380 | - | a local jurisdiction, the contractor’s fee may not be contingent on the number of citations | |
381 | - | issued or paid. | |
359 | + | (ii) Admissible in a proceeding alleging a violation under this section 11 | |
360 | + | without the presence or testimony of the vehicle height monitoring system operator. 12 | |
382 | 361 | ||
383 | - | (l) (1) This subsection applies only in Baltimore County AND HARFORD | |
384 | - | COUNTY. LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 379 | |
362 | + | (2) If a person who received a citation under this section desires the vehicle 13 | |
363 | + | height monitoring system operator to be present and testify at trial, the person shall notify 14 | |
364 | + | the court and the State in writing no later than 20 days before trial. 15 | |
385 | 365 | ||
386 | - | ||
366 | + | (3) Adjudication of liability shall be based on a preponderance of evidence. 16 | |
387 | 367 | ||
388 | - | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the | |
389 | - | governing body of the local jurisdiction shall: | |
368 | + | (h) (1) The District Court may consider in defense of a violation: 17 | |
390 | 369 | ||
391 | - | (i) Establish a workgroup including commercial transportation | |
392 | - | industry representatives to assist the local government in: | |
370 | + | (i) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, that the motor vehicle 18 | |
371 | + | or the registration plates of the motor vehicle were stolen before the violation occurred and 19 | |
372 | + | were not under the control or possession of the owner at the time of the violation; and 20 | |
393 | 373 | ||
394 | - | 1. Evaluating existing truck routes; | |
374 | + | (ii) Any other issues and evidence that the District Court deems 21 | |
375 | + | pertinent. 22 | |
395 | 376 | ||
396 | - | 2. Identifying areas for vehicle height monitoring | |
397 | - | enforcement; and | |
377 | + | (2) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle or the registration plates were 23 | |
378 | + | stolen before the violation occurred and were not under the control or possession of the 24 | |
379 | + | owner at the time of the violation, the owner shall submit proof that a police report 25 | |
380 | + | regarding the stolen motor vehicle or registration plates was filed in a timely manner. 26 | |
398 | 381 | ||
399 | - | 3. Evaluating existing signage and identifying locations | |
400 | - | where signage could be improved; and | |
382 | + | (i) A violation for which a civil penalty is imposed under this section: 27 | |
401 | 383 | ||
402 | - | ( | |
403 | - | ||
384 | + | (1) Is not a moving violation for the purpose of assessing points under § 28 | |
385 | + | 16–402 of this article; 29 | |
404 | 386 | ||
405 | - | ( | |
406 | - | ||
407 | - | ||
387 | + | (2) May not be recorded by the Administration on the driving record of the 30 | |
388 | + | owner of the vehicle; 31 | |
389 | + | SENATE BILL 642 9 | |
408 | 390 | ||
409 | - | (m) (1) This subsection applies only in Prince George’s County. | |
410 | 391 | ||
411 | - | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the | |
412 | - | governing body of Prince George’s County and the President of the Prince George’s County | |
413 | - | Municipal Association shall jointly establish a workgroup to assist in: | |
392 | + | (3) May not be treated as a parking violation for purposes of § 26–305 of 1 | |
393 | + | this article; and 2 | |
414 | 394 | ||
415 | - | (i) Identifying the entity responsible for the installation costs, | |
416 | - | collection of revenue, and distribution of revenue relating to vehicle height monitoring | |
417 | - | enforcement; | |
395 | + | (4) May not be considered in the provision of motor vehicle insurance 3 | |
396 | + | coverage. 4 | |
418 | 397 | ||
419 | - | (ii) Evaluating existing signage and identifying any locations where | |
420 | - | signage could be improved; | |
398 | + | (j) In consultation with the appropriate local government agency, the Chief Judge 5 | |
399 | + | of the District Court shall adopt procedures for the issuance of citations, the trial of civil 6 | |
400 | + | violations, and the collection of civil penalties under this section. 7 | |
421 | 401 | ||
422 | - | (iii) Determining the overall number of vehicle height monitoring | |
423 | - | systems that may be placed within a municipal corporation; and | |
402 | + | (k) (1) A local government agency or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City 8 | |
403 | + | Department of Transportation, or a contractor designated by the local government agency 9 | |
404 | + | or, in Baltimore City, the Baltimore City Department of Transportation, shall administer 10 | |
405 | + | and process civil citations issued under this section in coordination with the District Court. 11 | |
424 | 406 | ||
425 | - | (iv) Clarifying which vehicles may be exempt from enforcement of | |
426 | - | height restrictions. | |
407 | + | (2) If a contractor operates a vehicle height monitoring system on behalf of 12 | |
408 | + | a local jurisdiction, the contractor’s fee may not be contingent on the number of citations 13 | |
409 | + | issued or paid. 14 | |
427 | 410 | ||
428 | - | (n) (1) This subsection applies only in Prince George’s County. | |
411 | + | (l) (1) This subsection applies only in Baltimore County AND HARFORD 15 | |
412 | + | COUNTY. 16 | |
429 | 413 | ||
430 | - | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the | |
431 | - | governing body of the local jurisdiction shall: | |
432 | - | Ch. 379 2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
414 | + | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the 17 | |
415 | + | governing body of the local jurisdiction shall: 18 | |
433 | 416 | ||
434 | - | – 10 – | |
435 | - | (i) Establish a workgroup including commercial transportation | |
436 | - | industry representatives to assist the local government in: | |
417 | + | (i) Establish a workgroup including commercial transportation 19 | |
418 | + | industry representatives to assist the local government in: 20 | |
437 | 419 | ||
438 | - | 1. Evaluating existing truck routes; | |
420 | + | 1. Evaluating existing truck routes; 21 | |
439 | 421 | ||
440 | - | 2. Identifying areas for vehicle height monitoring | |
441 | - | enforcement; and | |
422 | + | 2. Identifying areas for vehicle height monitoring 22 | |
423 | + | enforcement; and 23 | |
442 | 424 | ||
443 | - | 3. Evaluating existing signage and identifying locations | |
444 | - | where signage could be improved; and | |
425 | + | 3. Evaluating existing signage and identifying locations 24 | |
426 | + | where signage could be improved; and 25 | |
445 | 427 | ||
446 | - | (ii) Adopt a local law limiting the overall number of vehicle height | |
447 | - | monitoring systems that may be placed in the local jurisdiction. | |
428 | + | (ii) Adopt a local law limiting the overall number of vehicle height 26 | |
429 | + | monitoring systems that may be placed in the local jurisdiction. 27 | |
448 | 430 | ||
449 | - | (3) The governing body of the local jurisdiction may adopt a local law | |
450 | - | exempting certain vehicles from the enforcement of height restrictions by a vehicle height | |
451 | - | monitoring system in the local jurisdiction. | |
431 | + | (3) The governing body of the local jurisdiction may adopt a local law 28 | |
432 | + | exempting certain vehicles from the enforcement of height restrictions by a vehicle height 29 | |
433 | + | monitoring system in the local jurisdiction. 30 | |
452 | 434 | ||
453 | - | | |
454 | - | ||
435 | + | (m) (1) This subsection applies only in Prince George’s County. 31 | |
436 | + | 10 SENATE BILL 642 | |
455 | 437 | ||
456 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is an emergency | |
457 | - | measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has been | |
458 | - | passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to each of | |
459 | - | the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is enacted. | |
460 | 438 | ||
461 | - | Approved by the Governor, May 16, 2022. | |
439 | + | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the 1 | |
440 | + | governing body of Prince George’s County and the President of the Prince George’s County 2 | |
441 | + | Municipal Association shall jointly establish a workgroup to assist in: 3 | |
442 | + | ||
443 | + | (i) Identifying the entity responsible for the installation costs, 4 | |
444 | + | collection of revenue, and distribution of revenue relating to vehicle height monitoring 5 | |
445 | + | enforcement; 6 | |
446 | + | ||
447 | + | (ii) Evaluating existing signage and identifying any locations where 7 | |
448 | + | signage could be improved; 8 | |
449 | + | ||
450 | + | (iii) Determining the overall number of vehicle height monitoring 9 | |
451 | + | systems that may be placed within a municipal corporation; and 10 | |
452 | + | ||
453 | + | (iv) Clarifying which vehicles may be exempt from enforcement of 11 | |
454 | + | height restrictions. 12 | |
455 | + | ||
456 | + | (n) (1) This subsection applies only in Prince George’s County. 13 | |
457 | + | ||
458 | + | (2) Before the installation of any vehicle height monitoring systems, the 14 | |
459 | + | governing body of the local jurisdiction shall: 15 | |
460 | + | ||
461 | + | (i) Establish a workgroup including commercial transportation 16 | |
462 | + | industry representatives to assist the local government in: 17 | |
463 | + | ||
464 | + | 1. Evaluating existing truck routes; 18 | |
465 | + | ||
466 | + | 2. Identifying areas for vehicle height monitoring 19 | |
467 | + | enforcement; and 20 | |
468 | + | ||
469 | + | 3. Evaluating existing signage and identifying locations 21 | |
470 | + | where signage could be improved; and 22 | |
471 | + | ||
472 | + | (ii) Adopt a local law limiting the overall number of vehicle height 23 | |
473 | + | monitoring systems that may be placed in the local jurisdiction. 24 | |
474 | + | ||
475 | + | (3) The governing body of the local jurisdiction may adopt a local law 25 | |
476 | + | exempting certain vehicles from the enforcement of height restrictions by a vehicle height 26 | |
477 | + | monitoring system in the local jurisdiction. 27 | |
478 | + | ||
479 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FUR THER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 28 | |
480 | + | October 1, 2022. 29 | |
481 | + | ||
482 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is an emergency 30 | |
483 | + | measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has been 31 | |
484 | + | passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to each of 32 | |
485 | + | the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is enacted. 33 |