Maryland 2022 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB754 Latest Draft

Bill / Chaptered Version Filed 05/19/2022

                             LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 1 – 
Chapter 241 
(Senate Bill 754) 
 
AN ACT concerning 
 
Local Government Cybersecurity – Coordination and Operations  
(Local Cybersecurity Support Act of 2022) 
 
FOR the purpose of establishing the Cyber Preparedness Unit in the Maryland Department 
of Emergency Management; establishing certain responsibilities of the Unit; 
requiring certain local entities local governments to report certain cybersecurity 
incidents in a certain manner and under certain circumstances; requiring the 
Maryland Joint Operations Center State Security Operations Center to notify 
appropriate agencies of a cybersecurity incident in a certain manner; establishing 
the Cybersecurity Fusion Center in the Maryland Department of Emergency 
Management; establishing certain responsibilities of the Fusion Center; establishing 
the Local Cybersecurity Support Fund, the purposes of the Fund, and certain 
eligibility requirements to receive assistance from the Fund; establishing the Office 
of Security Management within the Department of Information Technology and 
certain Office positions; establishing certain responsibilities and authority of the 
Office; requiring each unit of the Legislative or Judicial Branch of State government, 
each unit of local government, and any local agencies that use a certain network to 
certify certain compliance to the Department of Information Technology on or before 
a certain date each year; requiring certain local entities to submit a certain report to 
the Office on or before a certain date each year; in a certain manner; requiring the 
Office to submit a certain report to the Governor and certain committees of the 
General Assembly on or before a certain date each year; requiring the Office to 
submit a certain report to the Governor and certain committees of the General 
Assembly on or before a certain date each year; establishing the Information Sharing 
and Analysis Center in the Department of Information Technology; establishing 
certain responsibilities for the Center; requiring the State Chief Information 
Security Officer and the Secretary of Emergency Management to conduct a certain 
review, make recommendations, establish certain guidance, and submit a certain 
report on or before a certain date; requiring the State Chief Information Security 
Officer to commission a certain feasibility study and report recommendations on or 
before a certain date; requiring the Governor to include an appropriation in a certain 
annual budget to cover the cost of the feasibility study; authorizing funds to be 
transferred by budget amendment from the Dedicated Purpose Account in a certain 
fiscal year to implement the Act; and generally relating to local government 
cybersecurity coordination and operations. 
 
BY renumbering 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
Section 3A–101 through 3A–702, respectively, and the title “Title 3A. Department of 
Information Technology”  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 2 – 
to be Section 3.5–101 through 3.5–702, respectively, and the title “Title 3.5. 
Department of Information Technology” 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – Criminal Procedure 
 Section 10–221(b) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – Health – General 
 Section 21–2C–03(h)(2)(i) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2019 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – Human Services 
 Section 7–806(a), (b)(1), (c)(1), (d)(1) and (2)(i), and (g)(1) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2019 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – Insurance 
 Section 31–103(a)(2)(i) and (b)(2) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2017 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – Natural Resources 
 Section 1–403(c) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 
 Article – Public Safety 
 Section 14–103 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement) 
 
BY adding to 
 Article – Public Safety 
 Section 14–104.1 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2018 Replacement Volume and 2021 Supplement)    LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 3 – 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
 Section 3.5–101(a) and (e) and 3.5–301(a) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 (As enacted by Section 1 of this Act) 
 
BY adding to 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
Section 3.5–2A–01 through 3.5–2A–04 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 2A. 
Office of Security Management”; and 3.5–315, 3.5–405, and 4–308 and  
6–226(a)(2)(ii)146. 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
Section 3.5–301(j), 3.5–302(c), 3.5–303(c)(2)(ii)2., 3.5–307(a)(2), 3.5–309(c)(2), (i)(3), 
and (l)(1)(i), 3.5–311(a)(2)(i), and 3.5–404 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 (As enacted by Section 1 of this Act) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
Section 6–226(a)(2)(i) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – State Finance and Procurement 
 Section 6–226(a)(2)(ii)144. and 145. and 12–107(b)(2)(i)10. and 11. 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 
 Article – State Government 
Section 2–1224(f) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
BY adding to 
 Article – State Government 
Section 2–1224(i) 
 Annotated Code of Maryland  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 4 – 
 (2021 Replacement Volume) 
 
 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 
That Section(s) 3A–101 through 3A–702, respectively, and the title “Title 3A. Department 
of Information Technology” of Article – State Finance and Procurement of the Annotated 
Code of Maryland be renumbered to be Section(s) 3.5–101 through 3.5–702, respectively, 
and the title “Title 3.5. Department of Information Technology”.  
 
 SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the Laws of Maryland read 
as follows: 
 
Article – Criminal Procedure 
 
10–221. 
 
 (b) Subject to Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 of the State Finance and Procurement 
Article, the regulations adopted by the Secretary under subsection (a)(1) of this section and 
the rules adopted by the Court of Appeals under subsection (a)(2) of this section shall: 
 
 (1) regulate the collection, reporting, and dissemination of criminal history 
record information by a court and criminal justice units; 
 
 (2) ensure the security of the criminal justice information system and 
criminal history record information reported to and collected from it; 
 
 (3) regulate the dissemination of criminal history record information in 
accordance with Subtitle 1 of this title and this subtitle; 
 
 (4) regulate the procedures for inspecting and challenging criminal history 
record information; 
 
 (5) regulate the auditing of criminal justice units to ensure that criminal 
history record information is: 
 
 (i) accurate and complete; and 
 
 (ii) collected, reported, and disseminated in accordance with Subtitle 
1 of this title and this subtitle; 
 
 (6) regulate the development and content of agreements between the 
Central Repository and criminal justice units and noncriminal justice units; and 
 
 (7) regulate the development of a fee schedule and provide for the collection 
of the fees for obtaining criminal history record information for other than criminal justice 
purposes. 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 5 – 
Article – Health – General 
 
21–2C–03. 
 
 (h) (2) The Board is subject to the following provisions of the State Finance 
and Procurement Article: 
 
 (i) Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 (Information Processing), to the extent 
that the Secretary of Information Technology determines that an information technology 
project of the Board is a major information technology development project; 
 
Article – Human Services 
 
7–806. 
 
 (a) (1) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, the programs under §  
7–804(a) of this subtitle, § 7–902(a) of this title, and [§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State 
Finance and Procurement Article shall be funded as provided in the State budget. 
 
 (2) For fiscal year 2019 and each fiscal year thereafter, the program under 
[§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State Finance and Procurement Article shall be funded at an 
amount that: 
 
 (i) is equal to the cost that the Department of Aging is expected to 
incur for the upcoming fiscal year to provide the service and administer the program; and 
 
 (ii) does not exceed 5 cents per month for each account out of the 
surcharge amount authorized under subsection (c) of this section. 
 
 (b) (1) There is a Universal Service Trust Fund created for the purpose of 
paying the costs of maintaining and operating the programs under: 
 
 (i) § 7–804(a) of this subtitle, subject to the limitations and controls 
provided in this subtitle; 
 
 (ii) § 7–902(a) of this title, subject to the limitations and controls 
provided in Subtitle 9 of this title; and 
 
 (iii) [§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State Finance and Procurement 
Article, subject to the limitations and controls provided in Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 7 of the 
State Finance and Procurement Article. 
 
 (c) (1) The costs of the programs under § 7–804(a) of this subtitle, § 7–902(a) 
of this title, and [§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State Finance and Procurement Article shall 
be funded by revenues generated by: 
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 6 – 
 (i) a surcharge to be paid by the subscribers to a communications 
service; and 
 
 (ii) other funds as provided in the State budget. 
 
 (d) (1) The Secretary shall annually certify to the Public Service Commission 
the costs of the programs under § 7–804(a) of this subtitle, § 7–902(a) of this title, and [§ 
3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State Finance and Procurement Article to be paid by the 
Universal Service Trust Fund for the following fiscal year. 
 
 (2) (i) The Public Service Commission shall determine the surcharge 
for the following fiscal year necessary to fund the programs under § 7–804(a) of this subtitle, 
§ 7–902(a) of this title, and [§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of the State Finance and Procurement 
Article. 
 
 (g) (1) The Legislative Auditor may conduct postaudits of a fiscal and 
compliance nature of the Universal Service Trust Fund and the expenditures made for 
purposes of § 7–804(a) of this subtitle, § 7–902(a) of this title, and [§ 3A–702] § 3.5–702 of 
the State Finance and Procurement Article. 
 
Article – Insurance 
 
31–103. 
 
 (a) The Exchange is subject to: 
 
 (2) the following provisions of the State Finance and Procurement Article: 
 
 (i) Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 (Information Processing), to the extent 
that the Secretary of Information Technology determines that an information technology 
project of the Exchange is a major information technology development project; 
 
 (b) The Exchange is not subject to: 
 
 (2) Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 (Information Processing) of the State Finance 
and Procurement Article, except to the extent determined by the Secretary of Information 
Technology under subsection (a)(2)(i) of this section; 
 
Article – Natural Resources 
 
1–403. 
 
 (c) The Department shall develop the electronic system consistent with the 
statewide information technology master plan developed under Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 of 
the State Finance and Procurement Article.   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 7 – 
 
Article – Public Safety 
 
14–103. 
 
 (a) There is a Maryland Department of Emergency Management established as a 
principal department of the Executive Branch of State government. 
 
 (b) The Department has primary responsibility and authority for developing 
emergency management policies and is responsible for coordinating disaster risk reduction, 
consequence management, and disaster recovery activities. 
 
 (c) The Department may act to: 
 
 (1) reduce the disaster risk and vulnerability of persons and property 
located in the State; 
 
 (2) develop and coordinate emergency planning and preparedness; and 
 
 (3) coordinate emergency management activities and operations: 
 
 (i) relating to an emergency that involves two or more State 
agencies; 
 
 (ii) between State agencies and political subdivisions; 
 
 (iii) with local governments; 
 
 (iv) with agencies of the federal government and other states; and 
 
 (v) with private and nonprofit entities. 
 
14–104.1. 
 
 (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 
INDICATED. 
 
 (2) “FUND” MEANS THE LOCAL CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT FUND. 
 
 (3) “FUSION CENTER” MEANS THE CYBERSECURITY FUSION 
CENTER. 
 
 (4) (2) “LOCAL GOVERNMENT ” INCLUDES LOCAL SCHOO L 
SYSTEMS, LOCAL SCHOOL BOARDS , AND LOCAL HEALTH DEP ARTMENTS.  
 
 (5) (3) “UNIT” MEANS THE CYBER PREPAREDNESS UNIT.   Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 8 – 
 
 (B) (1) THERE IS A CYBER PREPAREDNESS UNIT IN THE DEPARTMENT .  
 
 (2) IN COORDINATION WITH THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION 
SECURITY OFFICER, THE UNIT SHALL:  
 
 (I) SUPPORT LOCAL GOVERN MENTS IN DEVELOPING A 
VULNERABILITY ASSESS MENT AND CYBER ASSES SMENT THROUGH THE MARYLAND 
NATIONAL GUARD’S INNOVATIVE READINESS TRAINING PROGRAM OR THE U.S. 
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY CYBERSECURITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE 
SECURITY AGENCY, INCLUDING PROVIDING LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WI TH THE 
RESOURCES AND INFORM ATION ON BEST PRACTI CES TO COMPLETE THE 
ASSESSMENTS ;  
 
 (II) DEVELOP AND REGULARL Y UPDATE AN ONLINE D ATABASE 
OF CYBERSECURITY TRA INING RESOURCES FOR LOCAL GOVERNMENT PER SONNEL, 
INCLUDING TECHNICAL TRAINING RESOURCES, CYBERSECURITY CONTIN UITY OF 
OPERATIONS TEMPLATES , CONSEQUENCE MANAGEME NT PLANS, AND TRAININGS ON 
MALWARE AND RANSOMWA RE DETECTION ;  
 
 (III) ESTABLISH AND PROVID E STAFF FOR A STATEW IDE 
HELPLINE TO PROVIDE REAL–TIME EMERGENC Y ASSISTANCE AND RES OURCE 
INFORMATION TO ANY L OCAL GOVERNMENT THAT HAS EXPERIENCED A CY BER 
INCIDENT OR ATTACK ;  
 
 (IV) (III) ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNM ENTS IN: 
 
 1. THE DEVELOPMENT OF C	YBERSECURITY 
PREPAREDNESS AND RES PONSE PLANS; AND 
 
 2. IMPLEMENTING BEST PRACTICES AND G UIDANCE 
DEVELOPED BY THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER; AND  
 
 3. IDENTIFYING AND ACQU IRING RESOURCES TO 
COMPLETE APPROPRIATE CYBERSECURITY VULNER ABILITY ASSESSMENTS ;  
 
 (V) (IV) CONNECT LOCAL GOVERN MENTS TO APPROPRIATE 
RESOURCES FOR ANY OT	HER PURPOSE RELATED 	TO CYBERSECURITY 
PREPAREDNESS AND RES PONSE;  
 
 (VI) DEVELOP APPROPRIATE 	REPORTS ON LOCAL 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS;  
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 9 – 
 (VII) (V) AS NECESSARY AND IN COORDINATION WITH TH E 
NATIONAL GUARD, LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGERS, AND OTHER STATE AND LOCAL 
ENTITIES, CONDUCT REGIONAL CYB ERSECURITY PREPAREDN ESS EXERCISES; AND 
 
 (VIII) (VI) ESTABLISH REGIONAL A SSISTANCE GROUPS TO 
DELIVER AND COORDINA TE SUPPORT SERVICES TO LOCAL GOVERNMENTS , 
AGENCIES, OR REGIONS.  
 
 (3) THE UNIT SHALL SUPPORT TH E OFFICE OF SECURITY 
MANAGEMENT IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DURING 
EMERGENCY RESPONSE E FFORTS.  
 
 (C) (1) EACH LOCAL GOVERNMENT SHALL REPORT A CYBER SECURITY 
INCIDENT, INCLUDING AN ATTACK ON A STATE SYSTEM BEING US ED BY THE LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT , TO THE APPROPRIATE L OCAL EMERGENCY MANAG ER AND THE 
STATE SECURITY OPERATIONS CENTER IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION 
TECHNOLOGY TO THE MARYLAND JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER IN THE 
DEPARTMENT IN ACCORDA NCE WITH PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSEC TION.  
 
 (2) FOR THE REPORTING OF CYBERSECURITY INCIDE NTS UNDER 
PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE DEPARTMENT STATE CHIEF 
INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER SHALL DETERMINE : 
 
 (I) THE CRITERIA FOR DET ERMINING WHEN AN INC IDENT MUST 
BE REPORTED ;  
 
 (II) THE MANNER IN WHICH TO REPORT; AND 
 
 (III) THE TIME PERIOD WITH IN WHICH A REPORT MU ST BE MADE.  
 
 (3) THE MARYLAND JOINT OPERATIONS CENTER STATE SECURITY 
OPERATIONS CENTER SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY APPROPRIATE A GENCIES OF A 
CYBERSECURITY INCIDE NT REPORTE D UNDER THIS SUBSECT ION THROUGH THE 
STATE SECURITY OPERATIONS CENTER.  
 
 (D) (1) FIVE POSITION IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS (PINS) SHALL BE 
CREATED FOR THE PURP OSE OF HIRING STAFF TO CONDUCT THE DUTIE S OF THE 
MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CYBERSECU RITY 
PREPAREDNESS UNIT. 
 
 (2) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024 AND EACH FISCAL YEAR THEREAFTER , 
THE GOVERNOR SHALL INCLUD E IN THE ANNUAL BUDG ET BILL AN APPROPRIA TION 
OF AT LEAST: 
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 10 – 
 (I) $220,335 FOR 3 PINS FOR ADMINISTRATOR III POSITIONS; 
AND 
 
 (II) $137,643 FOR 2 PINS FOR ADMINISTRATOR II POSITIONS.  
 
 (D) (1) THERE IS A CYBERSECURITY FUSION CENTER IN THE 
DEPARTMENT . 
 
 (2) THE FUSION CENTER SHALL: 
 
 (I) COORDINATE INFORMATI ON ON CYBERSECURITY BY 
SERVING AS A CENTRAL LOCATION FOR INFORMA TION SHARING ACROSS STATE AND 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT , FEDERAL GOVERNMENT P ARTNERS, AND PRIVATE ENTITIES ;  
 
 (II) WITH THE OFFICE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT IN THE 
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , SUPPORT CYBERSECURIT Y 
COORDINATION BETWEEN LOCAL UNITS OF GOVER NMENT THROUGH EXISTI NG 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT STAKE HOLDER ORGANIZATIONS ;  
 
 (III) PROVIDE SUPPORT TO T HE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION 
SECURITY OFFICER AND THE UNIT DURING CYBERSECU RITY INCIDENTS THAT 
AFFECT STATE AND LOCAL GOVER NMENTS;  
 
 (IV) SUPPORT RISK –BASED PLANNING FOR T HE USE OF 
FEDERAL RESOURCES ; AND 
 
 (V) CONDUCT ANALYSIS OF CYBERSECURITY INCIDE NTS. 
 
 (E) (1) THERE IS A LOCAL CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT FUND. 
 
 (2) THE PURPOSE OF THE FUND IS TO: 
 
 (I) PROVIDE FINANCIAL AS SISTANCE TO LOCAL GO VERNMENTS 
TO IMPROVE CYBERSECU RITY PREPAREDNESS, INCLUDING:  
 
 1. UPDATING CURRENT DEV ICES AND NETWORKS WI TH 
THE MOST UP–TO–DATE CYBERSECURITY P ROTECTIONS;  
 
 2. SUPPORTING THE PURCH ASE OF NEW HARDWARE , 
SOFTWARE, DEVICES, AND FIREWALLS TO IMP	ROVE CYBERSECURITY 
PREPAREDNESS ;  
 
 3. RECRUITING AND HIRIN	G INFORMATION 
TECHNOLOGY STAFF FOC USED ON CYBERSECURIT Y; AND   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 11 – 
 
 4. PAYING OUTSIDE VENDO RS FOR CYBERSECURITY 
STAFF TRAINING ; AND  
 
 (II) ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNM ENTS APPLYING FOR FE DERAL 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS GRANTS .  
 
 (3) THE SECRETARY SHALL ADMIN ISTER THE FUND.  
 
 (4) (I) THE FUND IS A SPECIAL, NONLAPSING FUND THAT IS NOT 
SUBJECT TO § 7–302 OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE. 
 
 (II) THE STATE TREASURER SHALL HOLD 	THE FUND 
SEPARATELY, AND THE COMPTROLLER SHALL ACCOUNT FOR THE FUND. 
 
 (5) THE FUND CONSISTS OF :  
 
 (I) MONEY APPROPRIATED I N THE STATE BUDGET TO THE 
FUND;  
 
 (II) INTEREST EARNINGS ; AND 
 
 (III) ANY OTHER MONEY FROM ANY OTHER SOURCE ACC EPTED 
FOR THE BENEFIT OF T HE FUND. 
 
 (6) THE FUND MAY BE US ED ONLY:  
 
 (I) TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE TO LOCAL 
GOVERNMENTS TO IMPRO VE CYBERSECURITY PRE PAREDNESS, INCLUDING:  
 
 1. UPDATING CURRENT DEV ICES AND NETWORKS WI TH 
THE MOST UP–TO–DATE CYBERSECURITY P ROTECTIONS;  
 
 2. SUPPORTING THE PURCH ASE OF NEW HARDWARE , 
SOFTWARE, DEVICES, AND FIREWALLS TO IMP	ROVE CYBERSECURITY 
PREPAREDNESS ;  
 
 3. RECRUITING AND HIRIN	G INFORMATION 
TECHNOLOGY STAFF FOC USED ON CYBERSECURIT Y; AND 
 
 4. PAYING OUTSIDE VENDO RS FOR CYBERSECURITY 
STAFF TRAINING ;  
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 12 – 
 (II) TO ASSIST LOCAL GOVERNMEN TS APPLYING FOR FEDE RAL 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS GRANTS ; AND 
 
 (III) FOR ADMINISTRATIVE E XPENSES ASSOCIATED W ITH 
PROVIDING THE ASSIST ANCE DESCRIBED UNDER ITEM (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH .  
 
 (7) (I) THE STATE TREASURER SHALL INVES T THE MONEY OF THE 
FUND IN THE SAME MANN ER AS OTHER STATE MONEY MAY BE IN VESTED. 
 
 (II) ANY INTEREST EARNINGS OF THE FUND SHALL BE 
CREDITED TO THE FUND. 
 
 (8) EXPENDITURES FROM THE FUND MAY BE MADE ONLY IN 
ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATE BUDGET .  
 
 (F) TO BE ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM THE FUND, EACH 
LOCAL GOVERNMENT THA T USES THE NETWORK E STABLISHED IN ACCORD ANCE 
WITH § 3.5–404 OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE SHALL MEET 
THE REQUIREMENTS OF §§ 3.5–404(D) AND 3.5–405 OF THE STATE FINANCE AND 
PROCUREMENT ARTICLE.  
 
Article – State Finance and Procurement 
 
3.5–101. 
 
 (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 
 
 (e) “Unit of State government” means an agency or unit of the Executive Branch 
of State government. 
 
SUBTITLE 2A. OFFICE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT . 
 
3.5–2A–01. 
 
 IN THIS SUBTITLE , “OFFICE” MEANS THE OFFICE OF SECURITY 
MANAGEMENT . 
 
3.5–2A–02. 
 
 THERE IS AN OFFICE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT . 
 
3.5–2A–03. 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 13 – 
 (A) THE HEAD OF THE OFFICE IS THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION 
SECURITY OFFICER. 
 
 (B) THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER SHALL: 
 
 (1) BE APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR WITH THE ADV ICE AND 
CONSENT OF THE SENATE; 
 
 (2) SERVE AT THE PLEASUR E OF THE GOVERNOR; 
 
 (3) BE SUPERVISED BY THE SECRETARY; AND 
 
 (4) SERVE AS THE CHIEF I NFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER OF THE 
DEPARTMENT .  
 
 (C) AN INDIVIDUAL APPOINT ED AS THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION 
SECURITY OFFICER UNDER SUBSECT ION (B) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L: 
 
 (1) AT A MINIMUM, HOLD A BACHELOR ’S DEGREE;  
 
 (2) HOLD APPROPRIATE INF	ORMATION TECHNOLOGY 	OR 
CYBERSECURITY CERTIF ICATIONS;  
 
 (3) HAVE EXPERIENCE :  
 
 (I) IDENTIFYING, IMPLEMENTING , AND OR ASSESSING 
SECURITY CONTROLS ;  
 
 (II) IN INFRASTRUCTURE , SYSTEMS ENGINEERING , AND OR 
CYBERSECURITY ;  
 
 (III) MANAGING HIGHLY TECHNIC AL SECURITY , SECURITY 
OPERATIONS CENTERS , AND INCIDENT RESPONS E TEAMS IN A COMPLEX CLOUD 
ENVIRONMENT AND SUPP ORTING MULTIPLE SITE S; AND 
 
 (IV) WORKING WITH COMMON 	INFORMATION SECURITY 
MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK S;  
 
 (4) HAVE EXTENSIVE KNOW LEDGE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 
AND CYBERSECURITY FI ELD CONCEPTS , BEST PRACTICES , AND PROCEDURES , WITH 
AN UNDERSTANDING OF EXISTING ENTERPRISE CAPABILITIES AND LIM ITATIONS TO 
ENSURE THE SECURE IN TEGRATION AND OPERAT ION OF SECURITY NETW ORKS AND 
SYSTEMS; AND 
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 14 – 
 (5) HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF CU RRENT SECURITY REGUL ATIONS. 
 
 (C) (D) THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER SHALL 
PROVIDE CYBERSECURIT Y ADVICE AND RECOMME NDATIONS TO THE GOVERNOR ON 
REQUEST. 
 
 (D) (E) (1) (I) THERE IS A DIRECTOR OF LOCAL CYBERSECURITY , 
WHO SHALL BE APPOINT ED BY THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY 
OFFICER. 
 
 (II) THE DIRECTOR OF LOCAL CYBERSECURITY SHALL W ORK 
IN COORDINATION WITH THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY 
MANAGEMENT TO PROVIDE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE , COORDINATE RESOURCES , 
AND IMPROVE CYBERSECURIT Y PREPAREDNESS FOR U	NITS OF LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT . 
 
 (2) (I) THERE IS A DIRECTOR OF STATE CYBERSECURITY , WHO 
SHALL BE APPOINTED B Y THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER. 
 
 (II) THE DIRECTOR OF STATE CYBERSECURITY IS 
RESPONSIBLE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TH IS SECTION WITH RESP ECT TO UNITS OF 
STATE GOVERNMENT . 
 
 (E) (F) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROV IDE THE OFFICE WITH 
SUFFICIENT STAFF TO PERFORM THE FUNCTION S OF THIS SUBTITLE. 
 
 (F) THE OFFICE MAY PROCURE RE SOURCES, INCLUDING REGIONAL 
COORDINATORS, NECESSARY TO FULFILL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBTITLE. 
 
3.5–2A–04. 
 
 (A) (1) THE OFFICE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR: 
 
 (1) (I) THE DIRECTION , COORDINATION , AND IMPLEMENTATION 
OF THE OVERALL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGY AN D POLICY FOR UNITS O F STATE 
GOVERNMENT ; AND 
 
 (2) THE COORDINATION OF RESOURCES AND EFFORT S TO 
IMPLEMENT CYBERSECUR ITY BEST PRACTICES A ND IMPROVE OVERALL 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS AND RESPONSE FOR UNITS OF LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT , LOCAL SCHOOL BOARDS , LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEMS , AND LOCAL 
HEALTH DEPARTMENT S.; AND  
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 15 – 
 (II) SUPPORTING THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF 
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CYBER PREPAREDNESS UNIT DURING EMERGENCY 
RESPONSE EFFORTS . 
 
 (2) THE OFFICE IS NOT RESPONS IBLE FOR THE INFORMA TION 
TECHNOLOGY INSTALLAT ION AND MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS NORMALLY 
CONDUCTED BY A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT , A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVE RNMENT, A 
LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD , A LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTE M, OR A LOCAL HEALTH 
DEPARTMENT .  
 
 (B) THE OFFICE SHALL: 
 
 (1) ESTABLISH STANDARDS TO CATEGORIZE ALL IN FORMATION 
COLLECTED OR MAINTAI NED BY OR ON BEHALF OF EACH UNIT OF STATE 
GOVERNMENT ; 
 
 (2) ESTABLISH STANDARDS TO CATEGORIZE ALL IN FORMATION 
SYSTEMS MAINTAINED B Y OR ON BEHALF OF EA CH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 
 
 (3) DEVELOP GUIDELINES G OVERNING THE TYPES O F INFORMATION 
AND INFORMATION SYST EMS TO BE INCLUDED IN EACH C ATEGORY; 
 
 (4) ESTABLISH SECURITY R EQUIREMENTS FOR INFO RMATION AND 
INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN EACH CATEGORY ; 
 
 (5) ASSESS THE CATEGORIZ ATION OF INFORMATION AND 
INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND THE ASSOCIATED I MPLEMENTATION OF THE SECURITY 
REQUIREMENTS ESTABLI SHED UNDER ITEM (4) OF THIS SUBSECTION ; 
 
 (6) IF THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER 
DETERMINES THAT THER E ARE SECURITY VULNE RABILITIES OR DEFICI ENCIES IN 
THE IMPLEMENTATION O F THE SECURITY REQUI REMENTS ESTABLISHED UNDER 
ITEM (4) OF THIS SUBSECTION , DETERMINE WHETHER AN INFORMATION SYSTEM 
SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE TO OPERATE OR BE CONNECTED TO T HE 
NETWORK ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 3.5–404 OF THIS TITLE; ANY 
INFORMATION SYSTEMS , DETERMINE AND DIRECT OR TAKE ACTIONS NE CESSARY TO 
CORRECT OR REMEDIATE THE VULNERABILITIES OR DEFICIENCIES , WHICH MAY 
INCLUDE REQUIRING TH E INFORMATION SYSTEM TO BE DISCONNECTED ;  
 
 (7) IF THE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER 
DETERMINES THAT THER E IS A CYBERSECURITY THREAT CAUSED BY AN ENTITY 
CONNECTED TO THE NET WORK ESTABLISHED UND ER § 3.5–404 OF THIS TITLE THAT 
INTRODUCES A SERIOUS RISK TO ENTITIES CON NECTED TO THE NETWOR K OR TO 
THE STATE, TAKE OR DIRECT ACTIO NS REQUIRED TO MITIG ATE THE THREAT ;   Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 16 – 
 
 (7) (8) MANAGE SECURITY AWAR ENESS TR AINING FOR ALL 
APPROPRIATE EMPLOYEE S OF UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 
 
 (8) (9) ASSIST IN THE DEVELO PMENT OF DATA MANAGE MENT, 
DATA GOVERNANCE , AND DATA SPECIFICATI ON STANDARDS TO PROM OTE 
STANDARDIZATION AND REDUCE RISK;  
 
 (9) (10) ASSIST IN THE DEVELO PMENT OF A DIGITAL IDENTIT Y 
STANDARD AND SPECIFI CATION APPLICABLE TO ALL PARTIES COMMUNIC ATING, 
INTERACTING, OR CONDUCTING BUSINE SS WITH OR ON BEHALF OF A UNIT OF STATE 
GOVERNMENT ;  
 
 (10) (11) DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY 
SECURITY POLICY , STANDARDS, AND GUIDANCE DOCUMEN TS, CONSISTENT WITH 
BEST PRACTICES DEVEL OPED BY THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND 
TECHNOLOGY ;  
 
 (11) (12) TO THE EXTENT PRACTI CABLE, SEEK, IDENTIFY, AND 
INFORM RELEVANT STAK EHOLDERS OF ANY AVAI LABLE FINANCIAL ASSI STANCE 
PROVIDED BY THE FEDERA L GOVERNMENT OR NON –STATE ENTITIES TO SUP PORT 
THE WORK OF THE OFFICE;  
 
 (12) REVIEW AND CERTIFY L OCAL CYBERSECURITY P REPAREDNESS 
AND RESPONSE PLANS ;  
 
 (13) PROVIDE TECHNICAL AS SISTANCE TO LOCALITI ES IN MITIGATING 
AND RECOVERING FROM CYBERSECURITY INCIDE NTS; AND 
 
 (14) PROVIDE TECHNICAL SE RVICES, ADVICE, AND GUIDANCE TO 
UNITS OF LOCAL GOVER NMENT TO IMPROVE CYB ERSECURITY PREPAREDN ESS, 
PREVENTION , RESPONSE, AND RECOVERY PRACTIC ES. 
 
 (C) THE OFFICE, IN COORDINATION WITH THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT 
OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT , SHALL:  
 
 (1) ASSIST LOCAL POLITIC AL SUBDIVISIONS , INCLUDING COUNTIES , 
SCHOOL SYSTEMS , SCHOOL BOARDS , AND LOCAL HEALTH DEP ARTMENTS, IN:  
 
 (I) THE DEVELOPMENT OF C YBERSECURITY PREPARE DNESS 
AND RESPONSE PLANS ; AND 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 17 – 
 (II) IMPLEMENTING BEST PR ACTICES AND GUIDANCE 
DEVELOPED BY THE DEPARTMENT ; AND 
 
 (2) CONNECT LOCAL ENTITI ES TO APPROPRIATE RE SOURCES FOR 
ANY OTHER PURPOSE RE LATED TO CYBERSECURI TY PREPAREDNESS AND 
RESPONSE. 
 
 (D) THE OFFICE, IN COORDINATION WITH THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT 
OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT , MAY:  
 
 (1) CONDUCT REGIONAL EXE	RCISES, AS NECESSARY , IN 
COORDINATION WITH TH E NATIONAL GUARD, LOCAL EMERGENCY MANA GERS, AND 
OTHER STATE AND LOCAL ENTIT IES; AND  
 
 (2) ESTABLISH REGIONAL A SSISTANCE GROUPS TO DELIVER OR 
COORDINATE SUPPORT S ERVICES TO LOCAL POL ITICAL SUBDIVISIONS , AGENCIES, 
OR REGIONS.  
 
 (C) (E) (1) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 31 EACH YEAR, THE OFFICE 
SHALL REPORT TO THE GOVERNOR AND , IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–1257 OF THE 
STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, THE SENATE BUDGET AND TAXATION COMMITTEE, 
THE SENATE EDUCATION, HEALTH, AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE, 
THE HOUSE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE, THE HOUSE HEALTH AND 
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE, AND THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON 
CYBERSECURITY , INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY, AND BIOTECHNOLOGY ON THE 
ACTIVITIES OF THE OFFICE AND THE STATE OF CYBERSECURITY PRE PAREDNESS IN 
MARYLAND, INCLUDING:  
 
 (1) (I) THE ACTIVITIES AND A CCOMPLISHMENTS OF TH E OFFICE 
DURING THE PREVIOUS 12 MONTHS AT THE STATE AND LOCAL LEVEL S; AND 
 
 (2) (II) A COMPILATION AND AN ALYSIS OF THE DATA F ROM THE 
INFORMATION CONTAINE D IN THE REPORTS REC EIVED BY THE OFFICE UNDER § 
3.5–405 OF THIS TITLE, INCLUDING:  
 
 (I) 1. A SUMMARY OF THE ISS UES IDENTIFIED BY TH E 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS ASSESSMENTS C ONDUCTED THAT YEAR;  
 
 (II) 2. THE STATUS OF VULNER ABILITY ASSESSMENTS OF 
ALL UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND A TIMELINE FOR COMPL ETION AND COST 
TO REMEDIATE ANY VUL NERABILITIES EXPOSED ;  
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 18 – 
 (III) 3. RECENT AUDIT FINDING S OF ALL UNITS OF STATE 
GOVERNMENT AND OPTIO NS TO IMPROVE FINDIN GS IN FUTURE AUDITS , INCLUDING 
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR STAFF, BUDGET, AND TIMING;  
 
 (IV) 4. ANALYSIS OF THE STATE’S EXPENDITURE ON 
CYBERSECURITY RELATI VE TO OVERALL INFORM ATION TECHNOLOGY SPEND ING 
FOR THE PRIOR 3 YEARS AND RECOMMENDA TIONS FOR CHANGES TO THE BUDGET, 
INCLUDING AMOUNT , PURPOSE, AND TIMING TO IMPROV E STATE AND LOCAL 
CYBERSECURITY PREPAR EDNESS;  
 
 (V) 5. EFFORTS TO SECURE FI NANCIAL SUPPORT FOR 
CYBER RISK MITIGATION FROM FEDE RAL OR OTHER NON –STATE RESOURCES ; 
 
 (VI) 6. KEY PERFORMANCE INDI	CATORS ON THE 
CYBERSECURITY STRATE GIES IN THE DEPARTMENT ’S INFORMATION TECHNO LOGY 
MASTER PLAN , INCLUDING TIME , BUDGET, AND STAFF REQUIRED F OR 
IMPLEMENTATION ; AND 
 
 (VII) 7. ANY ADDITIONAL RECOM	MENDATIONS FOR 
IMPROVING STATE AND LOCAL CYBER SECURITY PREPAREDNES S.  
 
 (2) A REPORT SUBMITTED UND ER THIS SUBSECTION M AY NOT 
CONTAIN INFORMATION THAT REVEALS CYBERSE CURITY VULNERABILITI ES AND 
RISKS IN THE STATE.  
 
3.5–301. 
 
 (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. 
 
 (j) “Nonvisual access” means the ability, through keyboard control, synthesized 
speech, Braille, or other methods not requiring sight to receive, use, and manipulate 
information and operate controls necessary to access information technology in accordance 
with standards adopted under [§ 3A–303(b)] § 3.5–303(B) of this subtitle. 
 
3.5–302. 
 
 (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, except as provided in subsection 
(a) of this section and [§§ 3A–307(a)(2), 3A–308, and 3A–309] §§ 3.5–307(A)(2), 3.5–308, 
AND 3.5–309 of this subtitle, this subtitle applies to all units of the Executive Branch of 
State government including public institutions of higher education other than Morgan 
State University, the University System of Maryland, St. Mary’s College of Maryland, and 
Baltimore City Community College. 
 
3.5–303.   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 19 – 
 
 (c) On or before January 1, 2020, the Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, shall: 
 
 (2) establish a process for the Secretary or the Secretary’s designee to: 
 
 (ii) 2. for information technology procured by a State unit on or 
after January 1, 2020, enforce the nonvisual access clause developed under [§ 3A–311] § 
3.5–311 of this subtitle, including the enforcement of the civil penalty described in [§  
3A–311(a)(2)(iii)1] § 3.5–311(A)(2)(III)1 of this subtitle. 
 
3.5–307. 
 
 (a) (2) A unit of State government other than a public institution of higher 
education may not make expenditures for major information technology development 
projects OR CYBERSECURITY PRO JECTS except as provided in [§ 3A–308] § 3.5–308 of 
this subtitle. 
 
3.5–309. 
 
 (c) The Secretary: 
 
 (2) subject to the provisions of § 2–201 of this article and [§ 3A–307] §  
3.5–307 of this subtitle, may receive and accept contributions, grants, or gifts of money or 
property. 
 
 (i) The Fund may be used: 
 
 (3) notwithstanding [§ 3A–301(b)(2)] § 3.5–301(B)(2) of this subtitle, for 
the costs of the first 12 months of operation and maintenance of a major information 
technology development project. 
 
 (l) (1) Notwithstanding subsection (b) of this section and in accordance with 
paragraph (2) of this subsection, money paid into the Fund under subsection (e)(2) of this 
section shall be used to support: 
 
 (i) the State telecommunication and computer network established 
under [§ 3A–404] § 3.5–404 of this title, including program development for these 
activities; and 
 
3.5–311. 
 
 (a) (2) On or after January 1, 2020, the nonvisual access clause developed in 
accordance with paragraph (1) of this subsection shall include a statement that: 
 
 (i) within 18 months after the award of the procurement, the 
Secretary, or the Secretary’s designee, will determine whether the information technology  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 20 – 
meets the nonvisual access standards adopted in accordance with [§ 3A–303(b)] §  
3.5–303(B) of this subtitle; 
 
3.5–315. 
 
 (A) THERE IS AN INFORMATION SHARING AND ANALYSIS CENTER IN THE 
DEPARTMENT . 
 
 (B) THE INFORMATION SHARING AND ANALYSIS CENTER SHALL: 
 
 (1) COORDINATE INFORMATI ON ON CYBERSECURITY BY SERVING AS 
A CENTRAL LOCATION F OR INFORMATION SHARI NG ACROSS STATE AND LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT , FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PARTNERS , AND PRIVATE ENTITIES ; 
 
 (2) WITH THE OFFICE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT , SUPPORT 
CYBERSECURITY COORDI NATION BETWEEN LOCAL UNITS OF GOVERNMENT 
THROUGH EXISTING LOC AL GOVERNMENT STAKEH OLDER ORGANIZATIONS ; 
 
 (3) PROVIDE SUPPORT TO T HE STATE CHIEF INFORMATION 
SECURITY OFFICER AND THE CYBER PREPAREDNESS UNIT, IN THE MARYLAND 
DEPARTMENT OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT , DURING CYBERSECURITY 
INCIDENTS THAT AFFEC T STATE AND LOCAL GOVER NMENTS; 
 
 (4) SUPPORT RISK –BASED PLANNING FOR T HE USE OF FEDERAL 
RESOURCES; AND 
 
 (5) CONDUCT ANALYSES OF CYBERSECURITY INCIDE NTS.  
 
3.5–404. 
 
 (a) The General Assembly declares that: 
 
 (1) it is the policy of the State to foster telecommunication and computer 
networking among State and local governments, their agencies, an d educational 
institutions in the State; 
 
 (2) there is a need to improve access, especially in rural areas, to efficient 
telecommunication and computer network connections; 
 
 (3) improvement of telecommunication and computer networking for State 
and local governments and educational institutions promotes economic development, 
educational resource use and development, and efficiency in State and local administration; 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 21 – 
 (4) rates for the intrastate inter–LATA telephone communications needed 
for effective integration of telecommunication and computer resources are prohibitive for 
many smaller governments, agencies, and institutions; and 
 
 (5) the use of improved State telecommunication and computer networking 
under this section is intended not to compete with commercial access to advanced network 
technology, but rather to foster fundamental efficiencies in government and education for 
the public good. 
 
 (b) (1) The Department shall establish a telecommunication and computer 
network in the State. 
 
 (2) The network shall consist of: 
 
 (i) one or more connection facilities for telecommunication and 
computer connection in each local access transport area (LATA) in the State; and 
 
 (ii) facilities, auxiliary equipment, and services required to support 
the network in a reliable and secure manner. 
 
 (c) The network shall be accessible through direct connection and through local 
intra–LATA telecommunications to State and local governments and public and private 
educational institutions in the State. 
 
 (D) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR IN A MANNER AND FREQU ENCY 
ESTABLISHED IN REGUL ATIONS ADOPTED BY TH E DEPARTMENT , EACH UNIT OF THE 
LEGISLATIVE OR JUDICIAL BRANCH OF STATE GOVERNMENT , EACH UNIT OF LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT , AND ANY LOCAL AGENCI ES THAT USE THE NETW ORK ESTABLISHED 
UNDER SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L CERTIFY TO THE DEPARTMENT 
THAT THE UNIT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DEPARTMENT ’S MINIMUM SECURITY 
STANDARDS. 
 
3.5–405. 
 
 (A) THIS SECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO MUNICIPAL G OVERNMENTS . 
 
 (B) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR IN A MANNER AND FREQU ENCY 
ESTABLISHED IN REGUL ATIONS ADOPTED BY TH E DEPARTMENT , EACH COUNTY 
GOVERNMENT , LOCAL SCHOOL SYSTEM , AND LOCAL HEALTH DEP ARTMENT SHALL :  
 
 (1) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE LOCAL EMERGENCY MANAGER, 
CREATE OR UPDATE A C YBERSECURITY PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PLAN AN D 
SUBMIT THE PLAN TO T HE OFFICE OF SECURITY MANAGEMENT FOR APPROV AL;  
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 22 – 
 (2) COMPLETE A CYBERSECU RITY PREPAREDNESS AS SESSMENT AND 
REPORT THE RESULTS T O THE OFFICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GUIDELINES 
DEVELOPED BY THE OFFICE; AND 
 
 (3) REPORT TO THE OFFICE:  
 
 (I) THE NUMBER OF INFORM ATION TECHNOLOGY STA FF 
POSITIONS, INCLUDING VACANCIES ;  
 
 (II) THE ENTITY’S CYBERSECURITY BUDG ET AND OVERALL 
INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY BUDGET;  
 
 (III) THE NUMBER OF EMPLOY EES WHO HAVE RECEIVED 
CYBERSECURITY TRAINI NG; AND 
 
 (IV) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES WITH ACCES S TO THE 
ENTITY’S COMPUTER SYSTEMS A ND DATABASES . 
 
4–308. 
 
 (A) THE DEPARTMENT MAY ESTABL ISH A PROGRAM THAT L EVERAGES 
STATE PURCHASING POWE R TO OFFER FAVORABLE RATES TO U NITS OF LOCAL 
GOVERNMENT TO PROCUR E INFORMATION TECHNO LOGY OR CYBERSECURIT Y 
SERVICES FROM CONTRA CTORS. 
 
 (B) A UNIT OF LOCAL GOVERN MENT MAY NOT BE REQU	IRED TO 
PARTICIPATE IN A PRO GRAM ESTABLISHED UND ER SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS 
SECTION.  
 
6–226. 
 
 (a) (2) (i) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, and unless 
inconsistent with a federal law, grant agreement, or other federal requirement or with the 
terms of a gift or settlement agreement, net interest on all State money allocated by the 
State Treasurer under this section to special funds or accounts, and otherwise entitled to 
receive interest earnings, as accounted for by the Comptroller, shall accrue to the General 
Fund of the State. 
 
 (ii) The provisions of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph do not apply 
to the following funds: 
 
 144. the Health Equity Resource Community Reserve Fund; 
[and] 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 23 – 
 145. the Access to Counsel in Evictions Special Fund; AND 
 
 146. THE LOCAL CYBERSECURITY SUPPORT FUND. 
 
12–107. 
 
 (b) Subject to the authority of the Board, jurisdiction over procurement is as 
follows: 
 
 (2) the Department of General Services may: 
 
 (i) engage in or control procurement of: 
 
 10. information processing equipment and associated 
services, as provided in Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 3 of this article; and 
 
 11. telecommunication equipment, systems, or services, as 
provided in Title [3A] 3.5, Subtitle 4 of this article;  
 
Article – State Government 
 
2–1224. 
 
 (f) [After] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (I) OF THIS SECTION , 
AFTER the expiration of any period that the Joint Audit and Evaluation Committee 
specifies, a report of the Legislative Auditor is available to the public under Title 4, 
Subtitles 1 through 5 of the General Provisions Article. 
 
 (I) A REPORT AUDITING A UN IT OF STATE OR LOCAL GOVERN MENT SHALL 
HAVE ANY CYBERSECURI TY FINDINGS REDACTED IN A MANNER CONSISTE NT WITH 
AUDITING BEST PRACTI CES BEFORE THE REPORT IS MADE AVAILABLE TO TH E 
PUBLIC.  
 
 SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 
2022, the State Chief Information Security Officer and the Secretary of Emergency 
Management shall: 
 
 (1) review the State budget for efficiency and effectiveness of funding and 
resources to ensure that the State is equipped to respond to a cybersecurity attack;  
 
 (2) make recommendations for any changes to the budget needed to 
accomplish the goals under item (1) of this section;  
 
 (3) establish guidance for units of State government on use and access to 
State funding related to cybersecurity preparedness; and 
  Ch. 241 	2022 LAWS OF MARYLAND  
 
– 24 – 
 (4) report any recommendations and guidance to the Governor and, in 
accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly.  
 
 SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 
 
 (a) On or before December 1, 2023, the State Chief Information Security Officer 
shall: 
 
 (1) commission a feasibility study on expanding the operations of the State 
Security Operations Center operated by the Department of Information Technology to 
include cybersecurity monitoring and alert services for units of local government; and  
 
 (2) report any recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 
2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly. 
 
 (b) For fiscal year 2024, the Governor shall include an appropriation in the 
annual budget to cover the cost of the feasibility study required under subsection (a) of this 
section.  
 
 SECTION 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 
1, 2022. 
 
 SECTION 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 
 
 (a) (1) On or before June 30, 2023, each unit of local government shall certify 
to the Office of Security Management compliance with State minimum cybersecurity 
standards established by the Department of Information Technology. 
 
 (2) Certification shall be reviewed by independent auditors, and any 
findings must be remediated. 
 
 (b) If a unit of local government has not remediated any findings pertaining to 
State cybersecurity standards found by the independent audit required under subsection 
(1) of this section by July 1, 2024, the Office of Security Management shall assume 
responsibility for a unit’s cybersecurity through a shared service agreement, administrative 
privileges, or access to Network Maryland notwithstanding any federal law or regulation 
that forbids the Office of Security Management from managing a specific system provide 
guidance for the unit to achieve compliance with the cybersecurity standards. 
 
 SECTION 6. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That for fiscal year 2023, funds 
from the Dedicated Purpose Account may be transfe rred by budget amendment in 
accordance with § 7–310 of the State Finance and Procurement Article to implement this 
Act. 
 
 SECTION 7. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 
   LAWRENCE J. HOGAN, JR., Governor Ch. 241 
 
– 25 – 
 (a) On or before June October 1, 2022, the State Chief Information Security 
Officer shall establish guidelines to determine when a cybersecurity incident shall be 
disclosed to the public. 
 
 (b) On or before November 1, 2022, the State Chief Information Security Officer 
shall submit a report on the guidelines established under subsection (a) of this section to 
the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the House 
Health and Government Operations Committee and the Senate Education, Health, and 
Environmental Affairs Committee. 
 
 SECTION 8. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is an emergency 
measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has 
been passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to 
each of the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is 
enacted.  
 
Approved by the Governor, May 12, 2022.