Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB151

Introduced
1/16/23  
Refer
1/16/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Engrossed
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/7/23  
Enrolled
4/8/23  
Chaptered
4/24/23  

Caption

Real Property - Residential Leases - Notification of Rent Increases

Impact

The bill impacts state laws concerning tenant and landlord interactions, specifically in the realm of notification practices for rent increases. By establishing a clear framework for notification, it enhances tenant protections and promotes transparency in rental agreements. Additionally, the bill requires local jurisdictions that adopt laws limiting rent increases to report on the number of building permits issued for rental properties, fostering an environment of accountability and oversight. This provision is aimed at monitoring the balance between tenant protections and housing supply dynamics.

Summary

House Bill 151, also known as the 'Real Property – Residential Leases – Notification of Rent Increases', aims to modify the requirements for landlords regarding notification of rent increases to tenants. The bill prohibits landlords from requiring tenants to accept notices of rent increases through electronic delivery exclusively and mandates that landlords provide written or email notices at least 120 days before raising the rent by more than 4%. This legislation is designed to ensure that tenants have adequate notice of significant rent increases, thus allowing them to make informed decisions about their housing.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 151 appears largely supportive among tenant advocacy groups, who view it as a necessary step in safeguarding tenants from abrupt and unaffordable rent hikes. However, some landlords and real estate interests may perceive the bill as an additional regulatory burden that could complicate landlord-tenant relationships. The discussion reflects a broader debate on housing affordability, tenant protections, and the responsibilities of landlords in Maryland.

Contention

Notably, there are concerns among certain stakeholders regarding the potential limitations on landlords’ ability to communicate changes effectively. Opponents may argue that the restriction on using electronic notifications could hinder efficiency and modernize communication methods in an increasingly digital world. The requirement for landlords to follow specific notification processes could also lead to disagreements regarding compliance and enforcement, highlighting ongoing tensions in landlord-tenant law.

Companion Bills

MD HB551

Carry Over Real Property - Residential Leases - Notification of Rent Increases

Similar Bills

CA AB2219

Landlord-tenant: 3rd-party payments.

CA AB2493

Tenancy: application screening fee.

CA AB878

Victims of abuse or violence: reasonable accommodations.

CA AB12

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2801

Tenancy: security deposits.

CA AB2785

Tenancy: applications and security deposits.

CA AB414

Residential tenancies: return of security.