Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB790

Introduced
2/8/23  

Caption

State Retirement and Pension System - Forfeiture of Benefits

Impact

The implications of HB 790 are profound as it seeks to amend the current structure regarding how public employee pensions are handled in the case of convictions. Specifically, the bill introduces specific guidelines for benefit forfeiture following a final adjudication in a court of law. It ensures that benefits can be reclaimed if the conviction occurs after the employee has begun receiving retirement benefits, thereby preserving the integrity of the pension system against fraud and misconduct by individuals in positions of public trust.

Summary

House Bill 790 aims to establish clearer rules regarding the forfeiture of retirement benefits for public employees in Maryland found guilty of qualifying crimes. The bill ensures that when a public employee is convicted of such crimes, their benefits from the State Retirement and Pension System may be forfeited, thereby preventing individuals convicted of serious offenses from receiving pension payments derived from public service. This is a significant policy shift aimed at promoting accountability among public employees and protecting taxpayer interests.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB 790 include the fairness of penalizing individuals retrospectively, particularly those who may be wrongfully convicted. The legislation permits the restoration of benefits if a conviction is overturned, providing a measure of protection for wrongfully accused. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential impact on families of public employees who may lose retirement benefits without sufficient due process. Debates also revolve around the definition of 'qualifying crimes' and whether the bill should apply retrospectively to actions taken before its enactment. Critics argue for a balanced approach that ensures accountability while safeguarding individual rights.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

HI SB149

Relating To Property Forfeiture.

KS SB237

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that property is subject to forfeiture, remitting proceeds to the state general fund and requiring law enforcement agencies to make forfeiture reports more frequently.

KS HB2396

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture and proof beyond a reasonable doubt that property is subject to forfeiture, remitting proceeds to the state general fund and requiring law enforcement agencies to make forfeiture reports more frequently.

KS HB2380

Requiring a criminal conviction for civil asset forfeiture, remitting proceeds from civil asset forfeiture to the state general fund, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property, making certain property ineligible for forfeiture, providing persons involved in forfeiture proceedings representation by counsel and the ability to demand a jury trial and allowing a person to request a hearing on whether forfeiture is excessive.

KS SB458

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, providing limitations on state and local law enforcement agency requests for federal adoption of a seizure under the act, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence forfeiture proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence, authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants and requiring the Kansas bureau of investigation to submit forfeiture fund financial reports to the legislature.

LA SB359

Provides for civil forfeiture reform. (8/1/22)

KS HB2606

Specifying that certain drug offenses do not give rise to forfeiture under the Kansas standard asset seizure and forfeiture act, requiring courts to make a finding that forfeiture is not excessive, restricting actions prior to commencement of forfeiture proceedings, requiring probable cause affidavit filing and review to commence proceedings, increasing the burden of proof required to forfeit property to clear and convincing evidence and authorizing courts to order payment of attorney fees and costs for certain claimants.

HI HB1965

Relating To Property Forfeiture.