Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 179 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 179 | |
5 | - | (House Bill 843) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | + | *hb0843* | |
8 | 10 | ||
9 | - | Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force | |
11 | + | HOUSE BILL 843 | |
12 | + | M3, C5, L6 EMERGENCY BILL (3lr2442) | |
13 | + | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | + | — Environment and Transportation/Education, Energy, and the Environment — | |
15 | + | Introduced by Delegates Smith, Ebersole, Addison, Allen, Amprey, Attar, Bhandari, | |
16 | + | Boyce, Cardin, Conaway, Edelson, Embry, Forbes, Guyton, Jackson, | |
17 | + | R. Lewis, Mangione, McCaskill, Metzgar, Pasteur, Ruth, Stein, White, and | |
18 | + | Young | |
10 | 19 | ||
11 | - | FOR the purpose of establishing the Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force to | |
12 | - | study approaches to water and wastewater governance in the Baltimore region; and | |
13 | - | generally relating to water supply and wastewater treatment in the Baltimore | |
14 | - | region. | |
20 | + | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
15 | 21 | ||
16 | - | Preamble | |
22 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
23 | + | Proofreader. | |
24 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
25 | + | Proofreader. | |
17 | 26 | ||
18 | - | WHEREAS, The General Assembly of Maryland granted general authority to | |
19 | - | Baltimore City to develop a water supply system within and outside of its borders, impound | |
20 | - | and withdraw water from the Gunpowder River, the Patapsco River, and the Little | |
21 | - | Gunpowder River, and withdraw water from the Susquehanna River; and | |
27 | + | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
22 | 28 | ||
23 | - | WHEREAS, The water supply system developed by Baltimore City has supported | |
24 | - | the development and expansion of adjacent regional counties; and | |
29 | + | _______ day of _______________ at ______________________ __ o’clock, ________M. | |
25 | 30 | ||
26 | - | WHEREAS, Chapter 539 of 1924 established a Metropolitan District within | |
27 | - | Baltimore County authorizing Baltimore County to construct, maintain, and operate | |
28 | - | wastewater systems within the Metropolitan District and required Baltimore City to | |
29 | - | extend the water supply lines within the Metropolitan District; and | |
31 | + | ______________________________________________ | |
32 | + | Speaker. | |
30 | 33 | ||
31 | - | WHEREAS, Chapter 729 of 1939 authorized Baltimore County to enter into | |
32 | - | contractual agreements with Baltimore City for the disposal of wastewater and for the | |
33 | - | establishment, construction, operation, and maintenance of and costs associated with the | |
34 | - | water supply and wastewater systems; and | |
34 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
35 | 35 | ||
36 | - | WHEREAS, Baltimore County and Baltimore City entered into agreements in 1945 | |
37 | - | and 1963, and, most recently, in 1972 and 1974 recognizing that “substantial increases in | |
38 | - | population, volume of sewage, operation and maintenance costs, and costs of construction” | |
39 | - | for the jointly–used water and wastewater systems compelled updates to the jurisdiction | |
40 | - | management and funding of the systems; and | |
36 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
41 | 37 | ||
42 | - | WHEREAS, In 1991, arbitration clarified that individuals who use water services | |
43 | - | within the Metropolitan District were customers of Baltimore City’s water system and were | |
44 | - | principals of Baltimore County in the provision of water services; and | |
38 | + | Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force 2 | |
45 | 39 | ||
46 | - | ||
47 | - | ||
48 | - | ||
49 | - | ||
40 | + | FOR the purpose of establishing the Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force to 3 | |
41 | + | study approaches to water and wastewater governance in the Baltimore region; and 4 | |
42 | + | generally relating to water supply and wastewater treatment in the Baltimore 5 | |
43 | + | region. 6 | |
50 | 44 | ||
51 | - | ||
45 | + | Preamble 7 | |
52 | 46 | ||
53 | - | WHEREAS, In accordance with Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Environment Article, | |
54 | - | Baltimore City alone develops the plans for water supply and wastewater systems, | |
55 | - | including operations, maintenance, and capital investments, while Baltimore County pays | |
56 | - | their proportionate share of the costs; and | |
47 | + | WHEREAS, The General Assembly of Maryland granted general authority to 8 | |
48 | + | Baltimore City to develop a water supply system within and outside of its borders, impound 9 2 HOUSE BILL 843 | |
57 | 49 | ||
58 | - | WHEREAS, Baltimore City and Baltimore County jointly engaged consultants to | |
59 | - | conduct a comprehensive business process review to identify strengths and weaknesses of | |
60 | - | the current governance, planning, data management, and operations of the water and | |
61 | - | wastewater utilities, to identify opportunities to improve interjurisdictional collaboration, | |
62 | - | and to understand the current state of the structures and processes for the delivery of water | |
63 | - | and wastewater services, including operations, planning, and billing, the results of which | |
64 | - | were finalized in July 2021 in the Water/Sewer Services Comprehensive Business Process | |
65 | - | Review; and | |
66 | 50 | ||
67 | - | WHEREAS, The consultants provided several models of governance and operations | |
68 | - | that may provide optimal customer service, system reliability, or interjurisdictional | |
69 | - | collaboration, and specifically recommended the exploration of alternative governance | |
70 | - | structures; and | |
51 | + | and withdraw water from the Gunpowder River, the Patapsco River, and the Little 1 | |
52 | + | Gunpowder River, and withdraw water from the Susquehanna River; and 2 | |
71 | 53 | ||
72 | - | WHEREAS, The consultants highlighted the development, operations, and | |
73 | - | governance of several existing regional models for water and wastewater across the | |
74 | - | country; now, therefore, | |
54 | + | WHEREAS, The water supply system developed by Baltimore City has supported 3 | |
55 | + | the development and expansion of adjacent regional counties; and 4 | |
75 | 56 | ||
76 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENER AL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, | |
77 | - | That: | |
57 | + | WHEREAS, Chapter 539 of 1924 established a Metr opolitan District within 5 | |
58 | + | Baltimore County authorizing Baltimore County to construct, maintain, and operate 6 | |
59 | + | wastewater systems within the Metropolitan District and required Baltimore City to 7 | |
60 | + | extend the water supply lines within the Metropolitan District; and 8 | |
78 | 61 | ||
79 | - | (a) There is a Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force. | |
62 | + | WHEREAS, Chapter 729 of 1939 authorized Baltimore County to enter into 9 | |
63 | + | contractual agreements with Baltimore City for the disposal of wastewater and for the 10 | |
64 | + | establishment, construction, operation, and maintenance of and costs associated with the 11 | |
65 | + | water supply and wastewater systems; and 12 | |
80 | 66 | ||
81 | - | (b) (1) The Task Force consists of the following members: | |
67 | + | WHEREAS, Baltimore County and Baltimore City entered into agreements in 1945 13 | |
68 | + | and 1963, and, most recently, in 1972 and 1974 recognizing that “substantial increases in 14 | |
69 | + | population, volume of sewage, operation and maintenance costs, and costs of construction” 15 | |
70 | + | for the jointly–used water and wastewater systems compelled updates to the jurisdiction 16 | |
71 | + | management and funding of the systems; and 17 | |
82 | 72 | ||
83 | - | (i) one member of the Senate of Maryland, appointed by the | |
84 | - | President of the Senate; | |
73 | + | WHEREAS, In 1991, arbitration clarified that individuals who use water services 18 | |
74 | + | within the Metropolitan District were customers of Baltimore City’s water system and were 19 | |
75 | + | principals of Baltimore County in the provision of water services; and 20 | |
85 | 76 | ||
86 | - | (ii) one member of the House of Delegates, appointed by the Speaker | |
87 | - | of the House; | |
77 | + | WHEREAS, Due to regional population growth, Baltimore City’s water and 21 | |
78 | + | wastewater system now provides water and wastewater service to additional jurisdictions, 22 | |
79 | + | including Anne Arundel County, Carroll County, Harford County, and Howard County and 23 | |
80 | + | now serves more than 1.8 million regional residents; and 24 | |
88 | 81 | ||
89 | - | (iii) two members appointed by the Governor; | |
82 | + | WHEREAS, In accordance with Title 9, Subtitle 5 of the Environment Article, 25 | |
83 | + | Baltimore City alone develops the plans for water supply and wastewater systems, 26 | |
84 | + | including operations, maintenance, and capital investments, while Baltimore County pays 27 | |
85 | + | their proportionate share of the costs; and 28 | |
90 | 86 | ||
91 | - | (iv) five members appointed by the Mayor of Baltimore City; | |
87 | + | WHEREAS, Baltimore City and Baltimore County jointly engaged consultants to 29 | |
88 | + | conduct a comprehensive business process review to identify strengths and weaknesses of 30 | |
89 | + | the current governance, planning, data management, and operations of the water and 31 | |
90 | + | wastewater utilities, to identify opportunities to improve interjurisdictional collaboration, 32 | |
91 | + | and to understand the current state of the structures and processes for the delivery of water 33 | |
92 | + | and wastewater services, including operations, planning, and billing, the results of which 34 | |
93 | + | were finalized in July 2021 in the Water/Sewer Services Comprehensive Business Process 35 | |
94 | + | Review; and 36 | |
92 | 95 | ||
93 | - | (v) three members appointed by the County Executive of Baltimore | |
94 | - | County; and | |
95 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 179 | |
96 | + | WHEREAS, The consultants provided several models of governance and operations 37 | |
97 | + | that may provide optimal customer service, system reliability, or interjurisdictional 38 HOUSE BILL 843 3 | |
96 | 98 | ||
97 | - | – 3 – | |
98 | - | (vi) one member from either Anne Arundel County, Carroll County, | |
99 | - | Howard County, or Harford County, appointed by the Chair of the Baltimore Metropolitan | |
100 | - | Council. | |
101 | 99 | ||
102 | - | (2) Each member shall: | |
100 | + | collaboration, and specifically recommended the exploration of alternative governance 1 | |
101 | + | structures; and 2 | |
103 | 102 | ||
104 | - | (i) have knowledge of: | |
103 | + | WHEREAS, The consultants highlighted the development, operations, and 3 | |
104 | + | governance of several existing regional models for water and wastewater across the 4 | |
105 | + | country; now, therefore, 5 | |
105 | 106 | ||
106 | - | 1. water; | |
107 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 6 | |
108 | + | That: 7 | |
107 | 109 | ||
108 | - | | |
110 | + | (a) There is a Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force. 8 | |
109 | 111 | ||
110 | - | | |
112 | + | (b) (1) The Task Force consists of the following members: 9 | |
111 | 113 | ||
112 | - | (ii) represent ratepayers in their respective jurisdictions. | |
114 | + | (i) one member of the Senate of Maryland, appointed by the 10 | |
115 | + | President of the Senate; 11 | |
113 | 116 | ||
114 | - | ( | |
115 | - | ||
117 | + | (ii) one member of the House of Delegates, appointed by the Speaker 12 | |
118 | + | of the House; 13 | |
116 | 119 | ||
117 | - | (d) The Mayor of Baltimore City and the County Executive of Baltimore County | |
118 | - | shall jointly provide staff for the Task Force. | |
120 | + | (iii) two members appointed by the Governor; 14 | |
119 | 121 | ||
120 | - | ( | |
122 | + | (iv) five members appointed by the Mayor of Baltimore City; 15 | |
121 | 123 | ||
122 | - | (1) may not receive compensation as a member of the Task Force; but | |
124 | + | (v) three members appointed by the County Executive of Baltimore 16 | |
125 | + | County; and 17 | |
123 | 126 | ||
124 | - | (2) is entitled to reimbursement for expenses under the Standard State | |
125 | - | Travel Regulations, as provided in the State budget. | |
127 | + | (vi) one member from either Anne Arundel County, Carroll County, 18 | |
128 | + | Howard County, or Harford County, appointed by the Chair of the Baltimore Metropolitan 19 | |
129 | + | Council. 20 | |
126 | 130 | ||
127 | - | ( | |
131 | + | (2) Each member shall: 21 | |
128 | 132 | ||
129 | - | ( | |
133 | + | (i) have knowledge of: 22 | |
130 | 134 | ||
131 | - | | |
135 | + | 1. water; 23 | |
132 | 136 | ||
133 | - | (1) review the findings under Task 2 (Review the City and County | |
134 | - | Organizational Structure and Governance Models) of the Water/Sewer Services | |
135 | - | Comprehensive Business Process Review for Baltimore City and Baltimore County, as | |
136 | - | finalized in July 2021; | |
137 | + | 2. wastewater; or 24 | |
137 | 138 | ||
138 | - | (2) review the findings under Task 2.4 (Governance Model Examples and | |
139 | - | Case Reviews) of the Water/Sewer Services Comprehensive Business Process Review for | |
140 | - | Baltimore City and Baltimore County, as finalized in July 2021, and other existing regional | |
141 | - | water and wastewater governance models to assess how different regional approaches may | |
142 | - | improve: | |
143 | - | Ch. 179 2023 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
139 | + | 3. financing of water or wastewater infrastructure; or 25 | |
144 | 140 | ||
145 | - | – 4 – | |
146 | - | (i) management; | |
141 | + | (ii) represent ratepayers in their respective jurisdictions. 26 | |
147 | 142 | ||
148 | - | (ii) operations; | |
143 | + | (c) The Mayor of Baltimore City and the County Executive of Baltimore County 27 | |
144 | + | shall jointly designate a chair of the Task Force. 28 | |
145 | + | 4 HOUSE BILL 843 | |
149 | 146 | ||
150 | - | (iii) employee recruitment; | |
151 | 147 | ||
152 | - | (iv) retention and training; | |
148 | + | (d) The Mayor of Baltimore City and the County Executive of Baltimore County 1 | |
149 | + | shall jointly provide staff for the Task Force. 2 | |
153 | 150 | ||
154 | - | ( | |
151 | + | (e) A member of the Task Force: 3 | |
155 | 152 | ||
156 | - | ( | |
153 | + | (1) may not receive compensation as a member of the Task Force; but 4 | |
157 | 154 | ||
158 | - | (vii) emergency management; and | |
155 | + | (2) is entitled to reimbursement for expenses under the Standard State 5 | |
156 | + | Travel Regulations, as provided in the State budget. 6 | |
159 | 157 | ||
160 | - | ( | |
158 | + | (f) (1) The Task Force shall strive for consensus among its members. 7 | |
161 | 159 | ||
162 | - | (3) assess alternative governance structures for the Baltimore region’s | |
163 | - | water and wastewater utility, including frameworks for: | |
160 | + | (2) An affirmative vote of 10 members is needed for the Task Force to act. 8 | |
164 | 161 | ||
165 | - | ( | |
162 | + | (g) The Task Force shall: 9 | |
166 | 163 | ||
167 | - | (ii) financing; | |
164 | + | (1) review the findings under Task 2 (Review the City and County 10 | |
165 | + | Organizational Structure and Governance Models) of the Water/Sewer Services 11 | |
166 | + | Comprehensive Business Process Review for Baltimore City and Baltimore County, as 12 | |
167 | + | finalized in July 2021; 13 | |
168 | 168 | ||
169 | - | (iii) capital planning; | |
169 | + | (2) review the findings under Task 2.4 (Governance Model Examples and 14 | |
170 | + | Case Reviews) of the Water/Sewer Services Comprehensive Business Process Review for 15 | |
171 | + | Baltimore City and Baltimore County, as finalized in July 2021, and other existing regional 16 | |
172 | + | water and wastewater governance models to assess how different regional approaches may 17 | |
173 | + | improve: 18 | |
170 | 174 | ||
171 | - | ( | |
175 | + | (i) management; 19 | |
172 | 176 | ||
173 | - | ( | |
177 | + | (ii) operations; 20 | |
174 | 178 | ||
175 | - | (vi) ongoing operations and maintenance of safe, efficient, equitable, | |
176 | - | and affordable water and wastewater systems serving the Baltimore region; | |
179 | + | (iii) employee recruitment; 21 | |
177 | 180 | ||
178 | - | (4) analyze the fiscal implications and efficiencies of each alternative | |
179 | - | governance structure, including estimated short– and long–term costs, 10–year historical | |
180 | - | costs that both jurisdictions have paid to the utility, and cost–savings associated with: | |
181 | + | (iv) retention and training; 22 | |
181 | 182 | ||
182 | - | ( | |
183 | + | (v) billing and collections; 23 | |
183 | 184 | ||
184 | - | ( | |
185 | + | (vi) planning for capital improvements; 24 | |
185 | 186 | ||
186 | - | (iii) rate restructuring for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and | |
187 | - | other wholesale stakeholders; | |
187 | + | (vii) emergency management; and 25 | |
188 | 188 | ||
189 | - | ( | |
189 | + | (viii) rate stability for customers; 26 | |
190 | 190 | ||
191 | - | (v) staffing and pension liabilities; and WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 179 | |
191 | + | (3) assess alternative governance structures for the Baltimore region’s 27 | |
192 | + | water and wastewater utility, including frameworks for: 28 | |
192 | 193 | ||
193 | - | ||
194 | + | (i) governance; 29 HOUSE BILL 843 5 | |
194 | 195 | ||
195 | - | (vi) other relevant costs to jurisdictions or customers served by the | |
196 | - | shared systems; and | |
197 | 196 | ||
198 | - | (5) recommend the governance model best suited for water and wastewater | |
199 | - | systems in the Baltimore region and the necessary legislation and funding to establish the | |
200 | - | recommended model. | |
201 | 197 | ||
202 | - | (h) In developing the recommendations and report required under this section, | |
203 | - | the Task Force shall consult with the Department of the Environment and the Maryland | |
204 | - | Environmental Service. | |
198 | + | (ii) financing; 1 | |
205 | 199 | ||
206 | - | (i) It is the intent of the General Assembly that the Task Force strengthen the | |
207 | - | governance of the Baltimore region’s water and wastewater utility as a public asset. | |
200 | + | (iii) capital planning; 2 | |
208 | 201 | ||
209 | - | (j) On or before January 30, 2024, the Task Force shall report its findings and | |
210 | - | recommendations to the Mayor of Baltimore City, the County Executive of Baltimore | |
211 | - | County, the Governor, and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, | |
212 | - | the General Assembly. | |
202 | + | (iv) future system capacity expansion; 3 | |
213 | 203 | ||
214 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, T hat this Act is an emergency | |
215 | - | measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has | |
216 | - | been passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to | |
217 | - | each of the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is | |
218 | - | enacted. It shall remain effective through June 30, 2024, and, at the end of June 30, 2024, | |
219 | - | this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and | |
220 | - | of no further force and effect. | |
204 | + | (v) decision–making processes; and 4 | |
221 | 205 | ||
222 | - | Approved by the Governor, April 24, 2023. | |
206 | + | (vi) ongoing operations and maintenance of safe, efficient, equitable, 5 | |
207 | + | and affordable water and wastewater systems serving the Baltimore region; 6 | |
208 | + | ||
209 | + | (4) analyze the fiscal implications and efficiencies of each alternative 7 | |
210 | + | governance structure, including estimated short– and long–term costs, 10–year historical 8 | |
211 | + | costs that both jurisdictions have paid to the utility, and cost–savings associated with: 9 | |
212 | + | ||
213 | + | (i) systems transitions; 10 | |
214 | + | ||
215 | + | (ii) asset leases and capital planning; 11 | |
216 | + | ||
217 | + | (iii) rate restructuring for Baltimore City, Baltimore County, and 12 | |
218 | + | other wholesale stakeholders; 13 | |
219 | + | ||
220 | + | (iv) debt consolidation and extension; 14 | |
221 | + | ||
222 | + | (v) staffing and pension liabilities; and 15 | |
223 | + | ||
224 | + | (vi) other relevant costs to jurisdictions or customers served by the 16 | |
225 | + | shared systems; and 17 | |
226 | + | ||
227 | + | (5) recommend the governance model best suited for water and wastewater 18 | |
228 | + | systems in the Baltimore region and the necessary legislation and funding to establish the 19 | |
229 | + | recommended model. 20 | |
230 | + | ||
231 | + | (h) In developing the recommendations and report required under this section, 21 | |
232 | + | the Task Force shall consult with the Department of the Environment and the Maryland 22 | |
233 | + | Environmental Service. 23 | |
234 | + | ||
235 | + | (i) It is the intent of the General Assembly that the Task Force strengthen the 24 | |
236 | + | governance of the Baltimore region’s water and wastewater utility as a public asset. 25 | |
237 | + | ||
238 | + | (j) On or before January 30, 2024, the Task Force shall report its findings and 26 | |
239 | + | recommendations to the Mayor of Baltimore City, the County Executive of Baltimore 27 | |
240 | + | County, the Governor, and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, 28 | |
241 | + | the General Assembly. 29 | |
242 | + | 6 HOUSE BILL 843 | |
243 | + | ||
244 | + | ||
245 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act is an emergency 1 | |
246 | + | measure, is necessary for the immediate preservation of the public health or safety, has 2 | |
247 | + | been passed by a yea and nay vote supported by three–fifths of all the members elected to 3 | |
248 | + | each of the two Houses of the General Assembly, and shall take effect from the date it is 4 | |
249 | + | enacted. It shall remain effective through June 30, 2024, and, at the end of June 30, 2024, 5 | |
250 | + | this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and 6 | |
251 | + | of no further force and effect. 7 | |
252 | + | ||
253 | + | ||
254 | + | ||
255 | + | ||
256 | + | Approved: | |
257 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
258 | + | Governor. | |
259 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
260 | + | Speaker of the House of Delegates. | |
261 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
262 | + | President of the Senate. |