Maryland Senate Bill SB795

Maryland 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/6/23

Caption

Wicomico County - Alcoholic Beverages - Cigar Lounge License

Impact

By instituting this licensing type, SB795 seeks to facilitate local business growth and boost the economy in Wicomico County by officially recognizing cigar lounges as a distinct category of venue for alcohol service. Proponents of the bill argue that it supports local entrepreneurship and expands customer choice in the county's hospitality scene. Additionally, it aims to bolster tourism by attracting visitors who may be interested in unique leisure experiences that blend alcohol and cigars in a comfortable setting.

Summary

Senate Bill 795 establishes a new Class B-CL (cigar lounge) beer, wine, and liquor license exclusively for Wicomico County. This licensing is designed to allow establishments that qualify as cigar lounges to serve alcohol for on-premises consumption, catering to a niche market that enjoys premium cigars alongside alcoholic beverages. The bill also includes provisions that exempt cigar lounges from certain distance restrictions typically applied to the issuance of alcohol licenses, such as proximity to places of worship or schools, in addition to relieving these lounges from some regulations stipulated by the Clean Indoor Air Act regarding indoor smoking. This new licensing framework is set to take effect on July 1, 2023.

Contention

Despite its intended economic benefits, the bill presents points of contention primarily centered around public health and safety concerns. Critics point out the potential health risks associated with indoor smoking environments and question the decision to exempt cigar lounges from existing clean air regulations. There are also concerns about the implications for neighborhoods surrounding new cigar lounges, as residents may fear increased noise and foot traffic related to alcohol consumption. Local advocacy groups may raise objections regarding the perceived leniency towards cigar lounges, arguing that it could undermine efforts to promote healthier public spaces.