Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB859

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
2/6/23  
Report Pass
3/17/23  
Engrossed
3/17/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Report Pass
4/6/23  
Enrolled
4/7/23  
Chaptered
5/3/23  

Caption

Reproductive Health Protection Act

Impact

The bill's passage is expected to bolster state laws surrounding reproductive health by providing clearer boundaries for legal proceedings involving interstate regulations and protecting practitioners from potential legal repercussions related to legally provided health care services. It signifies a strong stance in favor of reproductive rights, particularly in a context where such rights may face scrutiny from other states with more restrictive laws.

Summary

Senate Bill 859, known as the Reproductive Health Protection Act, aims to strengthen protections for reproductive health services within the state. It prohibits judges from compelling individuals to testify or produce evidence in other states regarding reproductive health matters unless the acts would be considered a crime in Maryland. Additionally, the bill outlines specific conditions under which out-of-state subpoenas related to these issues can be issued, ensuring that individuals cannot be penalized for actions that are legal in Maryland.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment surrounding SB859 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocates for reproductive rights and health care providers. Proponents argue that it safeguards individual freedoms and health care access, asserting that the bill is crucial in an increasingly polarized national landscape regarding reproductive health issues. However, concerns have been raised by some groups about the implications of interstate legal disputes and the balance of power between state and federal law.

Contention

Notably, the bill sparked debates regarding its potential conflicts with existing laws in other states, along with concerns from those who fear that it may create legal ambiguities regarding judgments from other jurisdictions. Critics argue that while the bill aims to protect reproductive health rights, it also complicates interstate legal cooperation and the processes by which health care issues may be litigated across state lines. This contention highlights the ongoing national dialogue around health care regulations and individual rights.

Companion Bills

MD HB808

Crossfiled Reproductive Health Protection Act

Similar Bills

MD HB808

Reproductive Health Protection Act

MD SB26

Davis Martinez Public Employee Safety and Health Act

MD SB195

Family Law - Child Support

MD HB218

Family Law – Child Support

MD HB176

Davis Martinez Public Employee Safety and Health Act

MD HB314

Wiretapping and Electronic Surveillance - Intercepted Communications - Admissibility of Evidence

MD HB126

Criminal Law - Theft - Mail and Packages (Porch Piracy Act of 2025)

MD HB714

Crimes – Interception of Wire, Oral, or Electronic Communications – Exception for Imminent Danger and Admission as Evidence