Maryland 2023 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB87

Introduced
1/11/23  
Refer
1/11/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Engrossed
3/29/23  

Caption

Office of the Attorney General - Correctional Ombudsman Unit

Impact

The implementation of SB87 is expected to significantly impact the state's correctional laws by creating a structured mechanism for oversight. It establishes protocols for handling complaints and grievances from incarcerated individuals and sets standards for the Department's operations. By requiring reports on investigations and actions taken based on the Ombudsman's findings, the bill promotes transparency and accountability, which could pave the way for further reforms in correctional policy.

Summary

Senate Bill 87 establishes the Correctional Ombudsman Unit within the Office of the Attorney General, aimed at enhancing oversight and accountability in the state's correctional facilities. This legislation grants the Ombudsman authority to investigate administrative acts by the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, conduct reviews, and assess the treatment and conditions of individuals confined in facilities. It mandates the Ombudsman to address grievances and ensures that necessary actions are taken when standards are not met. The bill is seen as a critical step towards reforming and improving the conditions within the state's correctional system.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB87 appears cautiously optimistic among supporters, especially those advocating for prisoners' rights and better correctional conditions. Proponents argue that an independent Ombudsman is essential for ensuring that corrections facilities operate within legal and ethical standards. However, there remains some apprehension among critics who are concerned about the effectiveness of the Ombudsman’s investigations and the potential for political interference in the process.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the concern that the Ombudsman’s office may face challenges in obtaining full cooperation from correctional facilities and the Department of Public Safety. Critics argue that while oversight is necessary, the bill's effectiveness depends heavily on the transparency and willingness of these entities to comply with investigations. Additionally, the funding and resources allocated for the Ombudsman Unit remain points of discussion, as these factors will directly influence its operational capacity and effectiveness.

Companion Bills

MD HB64

Crossfiled Office of the Attorney General - Correctional Ombudsman

MD SB512

Carry Over Office of the Attorney General – Correctional Ombudsman

Similar Bills

MD SB512

Office of the Attorney General – Correctional Ombudsman

MD HB604

Office of the Attorney General - Correctional Ombudsman

MD HB64

Office of the Attorney General - Correctional Ombudsman

MI SB0493

Legislature: legislative agencies; office of legislative corrections ombudsman; expand powers and duties and rename to office of legislative corrections ombudsperson. Amends title & secs. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 & 14 of 1975 PA 46 (MCL 4.351 et seq.).

MI HB4638

Children: services; powers and duties of the child advocate; modify. Amends title & secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of 1994 PA 204 (MCL 722.921 et seq.).

MI SB0432

Children: services; children's ombudsman; rename, and modify powers and duties. Amends title & secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5a, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 & 12 of 1994 PA 204 (MCL 722.921 et seq.).

MD SB134

Office of the Correctional Ombudsman - Establishment and Funding

IL HB2767

CD CORR-DJJ OMBUDSMAN-CTY JUV