The introduction of SB912 is intended to provide a more equitable funding mechanism for counties that may struggle with insufficient student populations and corresponding financial support. By implementing a structured funding approach, it aims to remedy educational disparities that low-density counties face compared to their urban counterparts. This could strengthen educational opportunities for students in these areas and contribute to improved educational outcomes.
Summary
Senate Bill 912, titled 'Education – Low-Density Calculation – Mandated Funding', aims to address the funding needs of counties with low density and limited student enrollment. Specifically, the bill mandates that, for the fiscal years 2025 through 2027, the Governor must include in the annual budget an appropriation that reflects the low-density calculation for eligible counties. These counties must have a population density of less than 100 and a full-time equivalent student enrollment of fewer than 2,000. This legislation seeks to ensure that such counties receive adequate financial resources to support their educational systems.
Contention
While SB912 is primarily framed as a support mechanism for low-density counties, there may be points of contention regarding the adequacy and sustainability of the mandated funding levels. Questions could arise about the criteria for determining eligibility and whether the funding provided will meet the diverse needs of the counties in question. Additionally, concerns around fiscal impact on the state budget might emerge, as allocating funds could affect other areas of public spending.
Provisions
If enacted, SB912 would implement a specific formula for determining the low-density calculation based on student enrollment and county size. This formula is fiscal year-specific, with per-pupil amounts increasing from $1.06 in 2025 to $2.34 by 2027. The bill provides a five-year framework for its provisions, after which it is set to expire unless further action is taken by the General Assembly, thus ensuring that its effectiveness can be evaluated against ongoing educational needs.
School funding; State Aid; calculation; increasing percentages of allowable general fund carryover; weighted calculations; effective date; conditional effect.