Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB1271 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
11
22
33 EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW .
44 [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
5- Underlining indicates amendments to bill.
6- Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by
7-amendment.
85 *hb1271*
96
107 HOUSE BILL 1271
118 S1, P2, K3 4lr2598
129 CF SB 818
13-By: Delegates J. Lewis, Hill, and Kaiser Kaiser, Alston, Bagnall, Bhandari,
14-Chisholm, Cullison, Guzzone, Hutchinson, S. Johnson, Kerr, Kipke,
15-R. Lewis, Lopez, Martinez, M. Morgan, Pena–Melnyk, Reilly, Rosenberg,
16-Szeliga, Taveras, White Holland, and Woods
10+By: Delegates J. Lewis, Hill, and Kaiser
1711 Introduced and read first time: February 8, 2024
1812 Assigned to: Health and Government Operations
19-Committee Report: Favorable with amendments
20-House action: Adopted
21-Read second time: March 22, 2024
2213
23-CHAPTER ______
14+A BILL ENTITLED
2415
2516 AN ACT concerning 1
2617
2718 Information Technology – Artificial Intelligence – Policies and Procedures 2
2819 (Artificial Intelligence Governance Act of 2024) 3
2920
3021 FOR the purpose of requiring each unit of State government to conduct a certain annual 4
3122 data inventory, a certain annual inventory of systems that employ artificial 5
3223 intelligence, and a certain impact assessment on or before a certain date; requiring 6
33-prohibiting the Department of Information Technology from making certain 7
34-information publicly available under certain circumstances to conduct ongoing 8
35-monitoring of certain systems under certain circumstances ; requiring the 9
36-Department of Information Technology, in consultation with the Governor’s 10
37-Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, to adopt 11
38-policies and procedures concerning the development, procurement, implementation 12
39-deployment, use, and assessment of systems that employ artificial intelligence by 13
40-units of State government; prohibiting a unit of State government from 14
41-implementing deploying or using a system that employs artificial intelligence under 15
42-certain circumstances beginning on a certain date; requiring a unit of State 16
43-government to conduct certain regular impact assessments under certain 17
44-circumstances; exempting the Office of the Attorney General, the Comptroller, the 18
45-Treasurer, and certain public institutions of higher education from certain 19
46-provisions; establishing the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the 20
47-Governor’s Executive Council; establishing competitive proof of concept procurement 21
48-as a formal competitive procurement method for the procurement of certain products 22 2 HOUSE BILL 1271
24+the Department of Information Technology to conduct ongoing monitoring of certain 7
25+systems under certain circumstances; requiring the Department of Information 8
26+Technology to adopt policies and procedures concerning the development, 9
27+procurement, implementation, use, and assessment of systems that employ artificial 10
28+intelligence by units of State government; prohibiting a unit of State government 11
29+from implementing or using a system that employs artificial intelligence under 12
30+certain circumstances beginning on a certain date; establishing the Governor’s 13
31+Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council; establishing 14
32+competitive proof of concept procurement as a formal competitive procurement 15
33+method for the procurement of certain products and services; exempting certain 16
34+competitive proof of concept procurements from oversight by the Board of Public 17
35+Works; requiring the Department of General Services, in consultation with the 18
36+Department of Information Technology, to develop certain policies and procedures 19
37+for the development and implementation of competitive proof of concept 20
38+procurements; and generally relating to the use of artificial intelligence by units of 21
39+State government. 22
40+
41+BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 23
42+ Article – State Finance and Procurement 24
43+ Section 3.5–101(a), (c), (d), and (f) 25
44+ Annotated Code of Maryland 26
45+ (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 27
46+
47+BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 28
48+ Article – State Finance and Procurement 29 2 HOUSE BILL 1271
4949
5050
51-and services; exempting certain competitive proof of concept procurements from 1
52-oversight by the Board of Public Works; requiring the Department of General 2
53-Services, in consultation with the Department of Information Technology, to develop 3
54-certain policies and procedures for the development and implementation of 4
55-competitive proof of concept procurements; requiring the Subcabinet to develop a 5
56-certain roadmap; and generally relating to the use of artificial intelligence by units 6
57-of State government. 7
51+ Section 3.5–301, 3.5–303(a), and 12–101 1
52+ Annotated Code of Maryland 2
53+ (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 3
5854
59-BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 8
60- Article – State Finance and Procurement 9
61- Section 3.5–101(a), (c), (d), and (f) 10
62- Annotated Code of Maryland 11
63- (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 12
55+BY adding to 4
56+ Article – State Finance and Procurement 5
57+Section 3.5–318; 3.5–801 through 3.5–805 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 8. 6
58+Artificial Intelligence”; and 13–116 7
59+ Annotated Code of Maryland 8
60+ (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 9
6461
65-BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 13
66- Article – State Finance and Procurement 14
67- Section 3.5–301, 3.5–303(a), and 12–101 Section 3.5–301 and 3.5–303(a) 15
68- Annotated Code of Maryland 16
69- (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 17
62+Preamble 10
7063
71-BY adding to 18
72- Article – State Finance and Procurement 19
73-Section 3.5–318; 3.5–801 through 3.5–805 3.5–806 to be under the new subtitle 20
74-“Subtitle 8. Artificial Intelligence”; and 13–116 21
75- Annotated Code of Maryland 22
76- (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 23
64+ WHEREAS, Artificial intelligence is transforming society and work, and the pace of 11
65+that change will present new opportunities and risks for the State’s residents, workers, and 12
66+economy; and 13
7767
78-Preamble 24
68+ WHEREAS, The State must ensure the re sponsible, ethical, beneficial, and 14
69+trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in State government; and 15
7970
80- WHEREAS, Artificial intelligence is transforming society and work, and the pace of 25
81-that change will present new opportunities and risks for the State’s residents, workers, and 26
82-economy; and 27
71+ WHEREAS, The State is home to a rich and growing artificial intelligence ecosystem 16
72+of academic, industry, government, and civil society experts, researchers, builders, 17
73+organizers, and stakeholders; and 18
8374
84- WHEREAS, The State must ensure the responsible, ethical, beneficial, and 28
85-trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in State government; and 29
75+ WHEREAS, To foster an environment for innovation while respecting individuals, 19
76+employees, and civil rights, as artificial intelligence technologies are developed and evolve, 20
77+the technologies should be analyzed and monitored by government officials, industry 21
78+experts, consumer protection advocates, and other stakeholders; and 22
8679
87- WHEREAS, The State is home to a rich and growing artificial intelligence ecosystem 30
88-of academic, industry, government, and civil society experts, researchers, builders, 31
89-organizers, and stakeholders; and 32
80+ WHEREAS, Given the rapid rate of change in artificial intelligence technologies and 23
81+industry, the State must chart a principled yet adaptable, pragmatic path forward, so that 24
82+the technologies’ benefits can be confidently harnessed on behalf of Marylanders and in 25
83+service of the Governor’s mission to Leave No One Behind; and 26
9084
91- WHEREAS, To foster an environment for innovation while respecting individuals, 33
92-employees, and civil rights, as artificial intelligence technologies are developed and evolve, 34
93-the technologies should be analyzed and monitored by government officials, industry 35
94-experts, consumer protection advocates, and other stakeholders; and 36
85+ WHEREAS, Leaders across State government share a common in terest in 27
86+establishing effective artificial intelligence governance and are committed to working 28
87+together to develop the legal and policy framework for its responsible use in the State; and 29
9588
96- WHEREAS, Given the rapid rate of change in artificial intelligence technologies and 37
97-industry, the State must chart a principled yet adaptable, pragmatic path forward, so that 38 HOUSE BILL 1271 3
89+ WHEREAS, Automated systems should be safe and effective, develop ed with 30
90+consultation from diverse communities, stakeholders, and domain experts to identify 31
91+concerns, risks, and potential impacts of the systems; and 32
92+
93+ WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should take 33
94+proactive and continuous measures to protect individuals and communities from 34
95+algorithmic discrimination and to use and design systems in an equitable way; and 35
96+ HOUSE BILL 1271 3
9897
9998
100-the technologies’ benefits can be confidently harnessed on behalf of Marylanders and in 1
101-service of the Governor’s mission to Leave No One Behind; and 2
99+ WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should seek 1
100+permission and respect decisions regarding collection, use, access, transfer, and deletion of 2
101+data in appropriate ways and to the greatest extent possible; where not possible, alternative 3
102+privacy by design safeguards should be used; and 4
102103
103- WHEREAS, Leaders across State government share a common interest in 3
104-establishing effective artificial intelligence governance and are committed to working 4
105-together to develop the legal and policy framework for its responsible use in the State; and 5
104+ WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 5
105+provide generally accessible plain language documentation including clear descriptions of 6
106+the overall system functioning and the role automation plays, notice that such systems are 7
107+in use, the individual or organization responsible for the system, and explanations of 8
108+outcomes that are clear, timely, and accessible; and 9
106109
107- WHEREAS, Automated systems should be safe and effective, developed with 6
108-consultation from diverse communities, stakeholders, and domain experts to identify 7
109-concerns, risks, and potential impacts of the systems; and 8
110+ WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 10
111+consider the specific types of actions for which a human alternative is appropriate, 11
112+commensurate with the magnitude of the action and risk of harm, along with the extent to 12
113+which a human alternative would be beneficial to individuals and the public interest; now, 13
114+therefore, 14
110115
111- WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should take 9
112-proactive and continuous measures to protect individuals and communities from 10
113-algorithmic discrimination and to use and design systems in an equitable way; and 11
116+ SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 15
117+That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 16
114118
115- WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should seek 12
116-permission and respect decisions regarding collection, use, access, transfer, and deletion of 13
117-data in appropriate ways and to the greatest extent possible; where not possible, alternative 14
118-privacy by design safeguards should be used; and 15
119+Article – State Finance and Procurement 17
119120
120- WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 16
121-provide generally accessible plain language documentation including clear descriptions of 17
122-the overall system functioning and the role automation plays, notice that such systems are 18
123-in use, the individual or organization responsible for the system, and explanations of 19
124-outcomes that are clear, timely, and accessible; and 20
121+3.5–101. 18
125122
126- WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 21
127-consider the specific types of actions for which a human alternative is appropriate, 22
128-commensurate with the magnitude of the action and risk of harm, along with the extent to 23
129-which a human alternative would be beneficial to individuals and the public interest; now, 24
130-therefore, 25
123+ (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 19
131124
132- SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 26
133-That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 27
125+ (c) “Department” means the Department of Information Technology. 20
134126
135-Article – State Finance and Procurement 28
127+ (d) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Information Technology. 21
136128
137-3.5–101. 29
129+ (f) “Unit of State government” means an agency or unit of the Executive Branch 22
130+of State government. 23
138131
139- (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 30
132+3.5–301. 24
140133
141- (c) “Department” means the Department of Information Technology. 31
134+ (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. 25
142135
143- (d) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Information Technology. 32
136+ (B) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” HAS THE MEANI NG STATED IN § 3.5–801 26
137+OF THIS TITLE. 27
144138
145- (f) “Unit of State government” means an agency or unit of the Executive Branch 33
146-of State government. 34 4 HOUSE BILL 1271
139+ [(b)] (C) “Cybersecurity” means processes or capabilities wherein systems, 28
140+communications, and information are protected and defended against damage, 29
141+unauthorized use or modification, and exploitation. 30
142+
143+ [(c)] (D) “Cybersecurity strategy” means a vision, a plan of action, or guiding 31
144+principles. 32
145+ 4 HOUSE BILL 1271
146+
147+
148+ [(d)] (E) (1) “Development” means all expenditures for a new information 1
149+technology system or an enhancement to an existing system including system: 2
150+
151+ (i) planning; 3
152+
153+ (ii) creation; 4
154+
155+ (iii) installation; 5
156+
157+ (iv) testing; and 6
158+
159+ (v) initial training. 7
160+
161+ (2) “Development” does not include: 8
162+
163+ (i) ongoing operating costs, software or hardware maintenance, 9
164+routine upgrades, or modifications that merely allow for a continuation of the existing level 10
165+of functionality; or 11
166+
167+ (ii) expenditures made after a new or enhanced system has been 12
168+legally accepted by the user and is being used for the business process for which it was 13
169+intended. 14
170+
171+ [(e)] (F) “Fund” means the Major Information Technology Development Project 15
172+Fund. 16
173+
174+ [(f)] (G) “Information technology” means all electronic information processing, 17
175+including: 18
176+
177+ (1) maintenance; 19
178+
179+ (2) telecommunications; 20
180+
181+ (3) hardware; 21
182+
183+ (4) software; and 22
184+
185+ (5) associated services. 23
186+
187+ [(g)] (H) “Information technology services” means information provided by 24
188+electronic means by or on behalf of a unit of State government. 25
189+
190+ [(h)] (I) “Major information technology development project” means any 26
191+information technology development project that meets one or more of the following 27
192+criteria: 28
193+
194+ (1) the estimated total cost of development equals or exceeds $1,000,000; 29 HOUSE BILL 1271 5
147195
148196
149197
150-3.5–301. 1
198+ (2) the project is undertaken to support a critical business function 1
199+associated with the public health, education, safety, or financial well–being of the citizens 2
200+of Maryland; or 3
151201
152- (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. 2
202+ (3) the Secretary determines that the project requires the special attention 4
203+and consideration given to a major information technology development project due to: 5
153204
154- (B) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 3.5–801 3
155-OF THIS TITLE. 4
205+ (i) the significance of the project’s potential benefits or risks; 6
156206
157- [(b)] (C) “Cybersecurity” means processes or capabilities wherein systems, 5
158-communications, and information are protected and defended against damage, 6
159-unauthorized use or modification, and exploitation. 7
207+ (ii) the impact of the project on the public or local governments; 7
160208
161- [(c)] (D) “Cybersecurity strategy” means a vision, a plan of action, or guiding 8
162-principles. 9
209+ (iii) the public visibility of the project; or 8
163210
164- [(d)] (E) (1) “Development” means all expenditures for a new information 10
165-technology system or an enhancement to an existing system including system: 11
211+ (iv) other reasons as determined by the Secretary. 9
166212
167- (i) planning; 12
213+ [(i)] (J) “Master plan” means the statewide information technology master plan 10
214+and statewide cybersecurity strategy. 11
168215
169- (ii) creation; 13
216+ [(j)] (K) “Nonvisual access” means the ability, through keyboard control, 12
217+synthesized speech, Braille, or other methods not requiring sight to receive, use, and 13
218+manipulate information and operate controls necessary to access information technology in 14
219+accordance with standards adopted under § 3.5–303(b) of this subtitle. 15
170220
171- (iii) installation; 14
221+ [(k)] (L) “Resource sharing” means the utilization of a State resource by private 16
222+industry in exchange for the provision to the State of a communication service or other 17
223+consideration. 18
172224
173- (iv) testing; and 15
225+ [(l)] (M) “Systems development life cycle plan” means a plan that defines all 19
226+actions, functions, or activities to be performed by a unit of State government in the 20
227+definition, planning, acquisition, development, testing, implementation, operation, 21
228+enhancement, and modification of information technology systems. 22
174229
175- (v) initial training. 16
230+3.5–303. 23
176231
177- (2) “Development” does not include: 17
232+ (a) The Secretary is responsible for carrying out the following duties: 24
178233
179- (i) ongoing operating costs, software or hardware maintenance, 18
180-routine upgrades, or modifications that merely allow for a continuation of the existing level 19
181-of functionality; or 20
234+ (1) developing, maintaining, revising, and enforcing information 25
235+technology policies, procedures, and standards; 26
182236
183- (ii) expenditures made after a new or enhanced system has been 21
184-legally accepted by the user and is being used for the business process for which it was 22
185-intended. 23
237+ (2) providing technical assistance, advice, and recommendations to the 27
238+Governor and any unit of State government concerning information technology matters; 28
186239
187- [(e)] (F) “Fund” means the Major Information Technology Development Project 24
188-Fund. 25
189-
190- [(f)] (G) “Information technology” means all electronic information processing, 26
191-including: 27
192-
193- (1) maintenance; 28
194- HOUSE BILL 1271 5
240+ (3) reviewing the annual project plan for each unit of State government to 29
241+make information and services available to the public over the Internet; 30
242+ 6 HOUSE BILL 1271
195243
196244
197- (2) telecommunications; 1
245+ (4) developing and maintaining a statewide information technology master 1
246+plan that will: 2
198247
199- (3) hardware; 2
248+ (i) centralize the management and direction of information 3
249+technology policy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 4
250+Department; 5
200251
201- (4) software; and 3
252+ (ii) include all aspects of State information technology including 6
253+telecommunications, security, data processing, and information management; 7
202254
203- (5) associated services. 4
255+ (iii) consider interstate transfers as a result of federal legislation and 8
256+regulation; 9
204257
205- [(g)] (H) “Information technology services” means information provided by 5
206-electronic means by or on behalf of a unit of State government. 6
258+ (iv) ensure that the State information technology plan and related 10
259+policies and standards are consistent with State goals, objectives, and resources, and 11
260+represent a long–range vision for using information technology to improve the overall 12
261+effectiveness of State government; 13
207262
208- [(h)] (I) “Major information technology development project” means any 7
209-information technology development project that meets one or more of the following 8
210-criteria: 9
263+ (v) include standards to assure nonvisual access to the information 14
264+and services made available to the public over the Internet; and 15
211265
212- (1) the estimated total cost of development equals or exceeds $1,000,000; 10
266+ (vi) allows a State agency to maintain the agency’s own information 16
267+technology unit that provides for information technology services to support the mission of 17
268+the agency; 18
213269
214- (2) the project is undertaken to support a critical business function 11
215-associated with the public health, education, safety, or financial well–being of the citizens 12
216-of Maryland; or 13
270+ (5) developing and maintaining a statewide cybersecurity strategy that 19
271+will: 20
217272
218- (3) the Secretary determines that the project requires the special attention 14
219-and consideration given to a major information technology development project due to: 15
273+ (i) centralize the management and direction of cybersecurity 21
274+strategy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 22
275+Department; and 23
220276
221- (i) the significance of the project’s potential benefits or risks; 16
277+ (ii) serve as the basis for budget allocations for cybersecurity 24
278+preparedness for the Executive Branch of State government; 25
222279
223- (ii) the impact of the project on the public or local governments; 17
280+ (6) adopting by regulation and enforcing nonvisual access standards to be 26
281+used in the procurement of information technology services by or on behalf of units of State 27
282+government in accordance with subsection (c) of this section; 28
224283
225- (iii) the public visibility of the project; or 18
284+ (7) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 29
285+advising and overseeing a consistent cybersecurity strategy for units of State government, 30
286+including institutions under the control of the governing boards of the public institutions 31
287+of higher education; 32
226288
227- (iv) other reasons as determined by the Secretary. 19
228-
229- [(i)] (J) “Master plan” means the statewide information technology master plan 20
230-and statewide cybersecurity strategy. 21
231-
232- [(j)] (K) “Nonvisual access” means the ability, through keyboard control, 22
233-synthesized speech, Braille, or other methods not requiring sight to receive, use, and 23
234-manipulate information and operate controls necessary to access information technology in 24
235-accordance with standards adopted under § 3.5–303(b) of this subtitle. 25
236-
237- [(k)] (L) “Resource sharing” means the utilization of a State resource by private 26
238-industry in exchange for the provision to the State of a communication service or other 27
239-consideration. 28
240-
241- [(l)] (M) “Systems development life cycle plan” means a plan that defines all 29
242-actions, functions, or activities to be performed by a unit of State government in the 30 6 HOUSE BILL 1271
289+ (8) advising and consulting with the Legislative and Judicial branches of 33
290+State government regarding a cybersecurity strategy; 34
291+ HOUSE BILL 1271 7
243292
244293
245-definition, planning, acquisition, development, testing, implementation, operation, 1
246-enhancement, and modification of information technology systems. 2
294+ (9) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 1
295+developing guidance on consistent cybersecurity strategies for counties, municipal 2
296+corporations, school systems, and all other political subdivisions of the State; 3
247297
248-3.5–303. 3
298+ (10) upgrading information technology and cybersecurity–related State 4
299+government infrastructure; [and] 5
249300
250- (a) The Secretary is responsible for carrying out the following duties: 4
301+ (11) annually evaluating: 6
251302
252- (1) developing, maintaining, revising, and enforcing information 5
253-technology policies, procedures, and standards; 6
303+ (i) the feasibility of units of State government providing public 7
304+services using artificial intelligence, machine learning, commercial cloud computer 8
305+services, device–as–a–service procurement models, and other emerging technologies; and 9
254306
255- (2) providing technical assistance, advice, and recommendations to the 7
256-Governor and any unit of State government concerning information technology matters; 8
307+ (ii) the development of data analytics capabilities to enable 10
308+data–driven policymaking by units of State government; AND 11
257309
258- (3) reviewing the annual project plan for each unit of State government to 9
259-make information and services available to the public over the Internet; 10
310+ (12) CONDUCTING INVENTORI ES AND ONGOING ASSES SMENTS OF 12
311+SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENC E THAT ARE USED BY A UNIT OF 13
312+STATE GOVERNMENT AS R EQUIRED UNDER § 3.5–318 OF THIS SUBTITLE . 14
260313
261- (4) developing and maintaining a statewide information technology master 11
262-plan that will: 12
314+3.5–318. 15
263315
264- (i) centralize the management and direction of information 13
265-technology policy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 14
266-Department; 15
316+ (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 16
317+EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT A DATA INV ENTORY THAT 17
318+IDENTIFIES DATA THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA ESTABLI SHED BY THE CHIEF DATA 18
319+OFFICER AND THAT IS : 19
267320
268- (ii) include all aspects of State information technology including 16
269-telecommunications, security, data processing, and information management; 17
321+ (1) (I) NECESSARY FOR THE OP ERATION OF THE UNIT ; OR 20
270322
271- (iii) consider interstate transfers as a result of federal legislation and 18
272-regulation; 19
323+ (II) OTHERWISE REQUIRED T O BE COLLECTED : 21
273324
274- (iv) ensure that the State information technology plan and related 20
275-policies and standards are consistent with State goals, objectives, and resources, and 21
276-represent a long–range vision for using information technology to improve the overall 22
277-effectiveness of State government; 23
325+ 1. AS A CONDITION TO RE CEIVE FEDERAL FUNDS ; OR 22
278326
279- (v) include standards to assure nonvisual access to the information 24
280-and services made available to the public over the Internet; and 25
327+ 2. BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW; AND 23
281328
282- (vi) allows a State agency to maintain the agency’s own information 26
283-technology unit that provides for information technology services to support the mission of 27
284-the agency; 28
329+ (2) IN A FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, 24
330+INCLUDING WHEN THE D ATA IS USED IN ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 25
285331
286- (5) developing and maintaining a statewide cybersecurity strategy that 29
287-will: 30
332+ (B) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVE LOP AND PUBLISH GUID ANCE ON THE 26
333+POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES FOR THE INVENTOR Y. 27
288334
289- (i) centralize the management and direction of cybersecurity 31
290-strategy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 32
291-Department; and 33 HOUSE BILL 1271 7
335+SUBTITLE 8. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 28
336+
337+3.5–801. 29 8 HOUSE BILL 1271
292338
293339
294340
295- (ii) serve as the basis for budget allocations for cybersecurity 1
296-preparedness for the Executive Branch of State government; 2
341+ (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 1
342+INDICATED. 2
297343
298- (6) adopting by regulation and enforcing nonvisual access standards to be 3
299-used in the procurement of information technology services by or on behalf of units of State 4
300-government in accordance with subsection (c) of this section; 5
344+ (B) (1) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” MEANS A COMPUTATIONA L 3
345+PROCESS THAT FACILIT ATES DECISION MAKING . 4
301346
302- (7) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 6
303-advising and overseeing a consistent cybersecurity strategy for units of State government, 7
304-including institutions under the control of the governing boards of the public institutions 8
305-of higher education; 9
347+ (2) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” INCLUDES DECISIONS 5
348+DERIVED FROM MACHINE S, STATISTICS, FACIAL RECOGNITION , AND DECISIONS ON 6
349+PAPER. 7
306350
307- (8) advising and consulting with the Legislative and Judicial branches of 10
308-State government regarding a cybersecurity strategy; 11
351+ (C) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” MEANS A MACHINE –BASED SYSTEM THAT : 8
309352
310- (9) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 12
311-developing guidance on consistent cybersecurity strategies for counties, municipal 13
312-corporations, school systems, and all other political subdivisions of the State; 14
353+ (1) CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF H UMAN–DEFINED OBJECTIVES , MAKE 9
354+PREDICTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS , OR DECISIONS INFLUENCING RE AL OR VIRTUAL 10
355+ENVIRONMENTS ; 11
313356
314- (10) upgrading information technology and cybersecurity–related State 15
315-government infrastructure; [and] 16
357+ (2) USES MACHINE AND HUM AN–BASED INPUTS TO PERC EIVE REAL 12
358+AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONM ENTS AND ABSTRACTS T HOSE PERCEPTIONS INT O MODELS 13
359+THROUGH ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER ; AND 14
316360
317- (11) annually evaluating: 17
361+ (3) USES MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FO R 15
362+INFORMATION OR ACTIO N. 16
318363
319- (i) the feasibility of units of State government providing public 18
320-services using artificial intelligence, machine learning, commercial cloud computer 19
321-services, device–as–a–service procurement models, and other emerging technologies; and 20
364+ (D) “HIGH–RISK” MEANS AN ACT THAT IS LIKELY TO: 17
322365
323- (ii) the development of data analytics capabilities to enable 21
324-data–driven policymaking by units of State government; AND 22
366+ (1) RESULT IN ANY UNLAWF UL DISCRIMINATION ; 18
325367
326- (12) CONDUCTING INVENTORI ES AND ONGOING ASSESSME NTS OF 23
327-SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE THAT ARE USED BY A UNIT OF 24
328-STATE GOVERNMENT AS R EQUIRED UNDER § 3.5–318 OF THIS SUBTITLE § 3.5–803 25
329-OF THIS TITLE. 26
368+ (2) HAVE AN UNLAWFUL DIS PARATE IMPACT ON ANY INDIVIDUAL OR 19
369+GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS ON THE BASIS OF ANY ACTUAL OR PE RCEIVED 20
370+CHARACTERISTIC ; OR 21
330371
331-3.5–318. 27
372+ (3) HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPA CT ON THE HEALTH , SAFETY, OR 22
373+WELL–BEING OF AN INDIVIDU AL. 23
332374
333- (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 28
334-EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHALL CON DUCT A DATA INVENTOR Y THAT 29
335-IDENTIFIES DATA THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA E STABLISHED BY THE CHIEF DATA 30
336-OFFICER AND THAT IS : 31
375+ (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS A DOCUMENTED R ISK–BASED 24
376+EVALUATION OF A SYST EM THAT EMPLOYS ARTI FICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 25
337377
338- (1) (I) NECESSARY FOR THE OP ERATION OF THE UNIT ; OR 32
339- 8 HOUSE BILL 1271
378+3.5–802. 26
340379
341-
342- (II) OTHERWISE REQUIRED T O BE COLLECTED : 1
343-
344- 1. AS A CONDITION TO RECEIVE FEDE RAL FUNDS; OR 2
345-
346- 2. BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW; AND 3
347-
348- (2) IN A FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, 4
349-INCLUDING WHEN THE D ATA IS USED IN ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 5
350-
351- (B) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVE LOP AND PUBLISH GUID ANCE ON THE 6
352-POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE INVENTORY . 7
353-
354-SUBTITLE 8. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 8
355-
356-3.5–801. 9
357-
358- (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 10
359-INDICATED. 11
360-
361- (B) (1) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” MEANS A COMPUTATIONA L 12
362-PROCESS THAT FACILIT ATES DECISION MAKI NG. 13
363-
364- (2) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” INCLUDES DECISIONS 14
365-DERIVED FROM MACHINE S, STATISTICS, FACIAL RECOGNITION , AND DECISIONS ON 15
366-PAPER. 16
367-
368- (C) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” MEANS A MACHINE –BASED SYSTEM THAT : 17
369-
370- (1) CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF H UMAN–DEFINED OBJECTIVES, MAKE 18
371-PREDICTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS , OR DECISIONS INFLUEN CING REAL OR VIRTUAL 19
372-ENVIRONMENTS ; 20
373-
374- (2) USES MACHINE AND HUM AN–BASED INPUTS TO PERC EIVE REAL 21
375-AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONM ENTS AND ABSTRACTS T HOSE PERCEPTIONS INT O MODELS 22
376-THROUGH ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER ; AND 23
377-
378- (3) USES MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FOR 24
379-INFORMATION OR ACTIO N. 25
380-
381- (D) “HIGH–RISK” MEANS AN ACT THAT IS LIKELY TO: 26
382-
383- (1) RESULT IN ANY UNLAWF UL DISCRIMINATION ; 27
384- HOUSE BILL 1271 9
385-
386-
387- (2) HAVE AN UNLAWFUL DIS PARATE IMPACT ON ANY INDIVIDUAL OR 1
388-GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS O N THE BASIS OF ANY A CTUAL OR PERCEIVED 2
389-CHARACTERISTIC ; OR 3
390-
391- (3) HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPA CT ON THE HEALTH , SAFETY, OR 4
392-WELL–BEING OF AN INDIVIDU AL. 5
393-
394- (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS A DOCUMENTED R ISK–BASED 6
395-EVALUATION OF A SYST EM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE. 7
396-
397- (D) (1) “HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 8
398-INTELLIGENCE THAT IS A RISK TO INDIVIDUAL S OR COMMUNITIES , AS DEFINED 9
399-UNDER REGULATIONS AD OPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT IN CONSULT ATION WITH THE 10
400-GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET. 11
401-
402- (2) “HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE” INCLUDES 12
403-RIGHTS–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SAF ETY–IMPACTING 13
404-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE. 14
405-
406- (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS AN ASSESSMENT OF ARTIFICIAL 15
407-INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS MADE UNDER REGULATIO NS ADOPTED BY THE 16
408-DEPARTMENT IN CONSULT ATION WITH THE GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL 17
409-INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET AND REQUIR ED UNDER § 3.5–803 OF THIS SUBTITLE. 18
410-
411- (F) “PUBLIC SENIOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIO N” MEANS: 19
412-
413- (1) THE CONSTITUENT INST ITUTIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 20
414-OF MARYLAND AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR 21
415-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; 22
416-
417- (2) MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; OR 23
418-
419- (3) ST. MARY’S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND. 24
420-
421- (G) “RIGHTS–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 25
422-INTELLIGENCE WHOSE O UTPUT SERVES AS A BA SIS FOR DECISION OR ACTION THAT 26
423-IS SIGNIFICANTLY LIK ELY TO AFFECT CIVIL RIGHTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES, EQUAL 27
424-OPPORTUNITIES , ACCESS TO CRITICAL R ESOURCES, OR PRIVACY. 28
425-
426- (H) “SAFETY–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 29
427-INTELLIGENCE THAT HA S THE POTENTIAL TO S IGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE SAFETY 30
428-OF HUMAN LIFE , WELL–BEING, OR CRITICAL INFRASTR UCTURE. 31
429-
430-3.5–802. 32 10 HOUSE BILL 1271
380+ (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 27
381+EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT AN INVENTO RY OF SYSTEMS 28
382+THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICI AL INTELLIGENCE . 29 HOUSE BILL 1271 9
431383
432384
433385
434- (A) (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 1
435-THIS SUBTITLE DOES N OT APPLY TO: 2
386+ (B) FOR EACH SYSTEM , THE INVENTORY REQUIR ED BY THIS SECTION S HALL 1
387+INCLUDE: 2
436388
437- (I) THE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL; 3
389+ (1) THE NAME OF THE S YSTEM; 3
438390
439- (II) THE COMPTROLLER ; OR 4
391+ (2) THE VENDOR THAT PROV IDED THE SYSTEM , IF APPLICABLE; 4
440392
441- (III) THE STATE TREASURER. 5
393+ (3) A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM; 5
442394
443- (2) ON OR BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025, EACH ENTITY LISTED U NDER 6
444-PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION S HALL ESTABLISH POLIC IES AND 7
445-PROCEDURES THAT ARE FUNCTIONALLY COMPATI BLE WITH THE POLICIE S AND 8
446-PROCEDURES ADOPTED U NDER § 3.5–804(A) OF THIS SUBTITLE FOR THE 9
447-DEVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF 10
448-SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 11
395+ (4) A STATEMENT OF THE P URPOSE AND THE INTEN DED USES OF THE 6
396+SYSTEM; 7
449397
450- (B) (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 12
451-THIS SUBTITLE APPLIE S TO EACH PUBLIC SEN IOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION 13
452-AND BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE. 14
398+ (5) WHETHER THE SYSTEM U NDERWENT AN IMPACT A SSESSMENT 8
399+PRIOR TO BEING IMPLEMENTED ; 9
453400
454- (2) THIS SUBTITLE DOES NO T APPLY TO ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE 15
455-DEPLOYED BY A PUBLIC SENIOR HIGHER EDUCAT ION INSTITUTION OR BALTIMORE 16
456-CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE THAT IS USED SOLELY FOR A RESEARC H OR ACADEMIC 17
457-PURPOSE, INCLUDING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT FOR 18
458-THE DEVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , OR USE OF ARTIFICIAL 19
459-INTELLIGENCE . 20
401+ (6) WHETHER THE SYSTEM I S USED TO INDEPENDEN TLY MAKE A 10
402+DECISION OR JUDGMENT OR TO INFORM OR SUPP ORT A DECISION OR JU DGMENT 11
403+DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO INVOLVE A HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 12
460404
461- (3) ON OR BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025, EACH PUBLIC SENIOR H IGHER 21
462-EDUCATION INSTITUTIO N AND BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE SHALL 22
463-ESTABLISH POLICIES AND P ROCEDURES THAT ARE F UNCTIONALLY COMPATIB LE 23
464-WITH THE POLICIES AN D PROCEDURES ADOPTED UNDER § 3.5–804(A) OF THIS 24
465-SUBTITLE FOR THE DEV ELOPMENT, PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND 25
466-ONGOING ASSESSMENT O F SYSTEMS THAT EMPLO Y HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIA L 26
467-INTELLIGENCE USED SO LELY FOR A RESEARCH OR ACADEMIC PURPOSE . 27
405+ (7) A DETERMINATION OF T HE RISK THAT USE OF A SYSTEM MAY BE 13
406+HIGH–RISK. 14
468407
469- (4) ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 1, 2025, AND EACH YEAR 28
470-THEREAFTER , EACH PUBLIC SENIOR H IGHER EDUCATION INST ITUTION AND 29
471-BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT A 30
472-REPORT ON ALL HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE PROCURED AN D DEPLOYED 31
473-FOR A RESEARCH OR AC ADEMIC PURPOSE . 32
408+ (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE EACH INVENTORY REQUI RED BY THIS 15
409+SECTION PUBLICLY AVA ILABLE ON ITS WEBSIT E. 16
474410
475-3.5–803. 33
411+ (D) ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1, 2025, EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT 17
412+SHALL CONDUCT AN IMP ACT ASSESSMENT OF A SYSTEM THA T INVOLVES A 18
413+HIGH–RISK ACTION. 19
414+
415+3.5–803. 20
416+
417+ (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ADOP T 21
418+POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES CONCERNING THE D EVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , 22
419+IMPLEMENTATION , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF SYSTEMS THAT E MPLOY 23
420+ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY A UN IT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 24
421+
422+ (B) THE POLICIES AND PROC EDURES REQUIRED BY T HIS SECTION SHALL : 25
423+
424+ (1) SUBJECT TO ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW , GOVERN THE 26
425+PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION , AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF SYSTEMS THAT 27
426+EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE BY A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 28
427+ 10 HOUSE BILL 1271
428+
429+
430+ (2) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 1
431+EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY ANY U NIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS N OT 2
432+HIGH–RISK; 3
433+
434+ (3) REQUIRE EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT TO A SSESS THE 4
435+LIKELY IMPACT OF ANY SYSTEM THAT E MPLOYS ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE BEFORE 5
436+IMPLEMENTING THE SYS TEM; 6
437+
438+ (4) REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO : 7
439+
440+ (I) NOTIFY AN INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP OF INDIVI DUALS 8
441+DETERMINED TO HAVE B EEN NEGATIVELY IMPAC TED BY A SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS 9
442+ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AND 10
443+
444+ (II) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO AN INDIVIDUAL OR A G ROUP OF 11
445+INDIVIDUALS DETERMIN ED TO HAVE BEEN NEGA TIVELY IMPACTED BY A SYSTEM 12
446+THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFIC IAL INTELLIGENCE ON AVAILABLE OPTIONS TO OPT OUT OF 13
447+THE SYSTEM; AND 14
448+
449+ (5) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ON 15
450+PROCUREMENT OF A SYS TEM THAT EMPLOYS ART IFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT 16
451+ENSURES DATA PRIVACY AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND 17
452+REGULATIONS . 18
453+
454+ (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES 19
455+REQUIRED BY THIS SEC TION PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ON ITS WEBSITE. 20
456+
457+3.5–804. 21
458+
459+ BEGINNING JULY 1, 2025, A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT PROCURE 22
460+OR IMPLEMENT A SYSTE M THAT EMPLOYS ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE U NLESS THE 23
461+SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES ADOPTED UNDE R § 24
462+3.5–803 OF THIS SUBTITLE . 25
463+
464+3.5–805. 26
465+
466+ (A) THERE IS A GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF 27
467+THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 28
468+
469+ (B) THE PURPOSE OF THE SUBCABINET IS TO FACI LITATE AND ENHANCE 29
470+COOPERATION AMONG UN ITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH 30
471+ACADEMIC INSTITUTION S AND INDUSTRIES UTI LIZING ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE. 31
476472 HOUSE BILL 1271 11
477473
478474
479- (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024 2025, AND ANNUALLY REGULARLY 1
480-THEREAFTER , EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L: 2
475+ (C) THE SUBCABINET CONSISTS O F THE FOLLOWING MEMB ERS: 1
481476
482- (1) CONDUCT AN INVENTORY OF SYSTEMS THAT EMPL OY HIGH–RISK 3
483-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE; AND 4
477+ (1) THE SECRETARY, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 2
484478
485- (2) PROVIDE THE INVENTOR Y TO THE DEPARTMENT IN A FORMA T 5
486-REQUIRED BY THE DEPARTMENT . 6
479+ (2) THE SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT , OR THE 3
480+SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 4
487481
488- (B) FOR EACH SYSTEM , THE INVENTORY REQUIR ED BY THIS SECTION S HALL 7
489-INCLUDE: 8
482+ (3) THE SECRETARY OF GENERAL SERVICES, OR THE SECRETARY’S 5
483+DESIGNEE; 6
490484
491- (1) THE NAME OF THE SYST EM; 9
485+ (4) THE SECRETARY OF LABOR, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 7
492486
493- (2) THE VENDOR THAT PROV IDED THE SYSTEM , IF APPLICABLE; 10
487+ (5) THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, OR THE SECRETARY’S 8
488+DESIGNEE; 9
494489
495- (3) A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM; 11
490+ (6) THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HOMELAND 10
491+SECURITY, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; 11
496492
497- (4) A STATEMENT OF THE P URPOSE AND THE INTEN DED USES OF THE 12
498-SYSTEM; 13
493+ (7) THE CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF PRIVACY 12
494+OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 13
499495
500- (5) WHETHER THE SYSTEM U NDERWENT AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT 14
501-PRIOR TO BEING IMPLEMENTED DEPLOYED; 15
496+ (8) THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER’S 14
497+DESIGNEE; 15
502498
503- (6) WHETHER THE SYSTEM I S USED TO INDEPENDEN TLY MAKE A 16
504-DECISION OR JUDGMENT OR TO INFORM OR SUPP ORT A DECISION OR JU DGMENT 17
505-DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO INVOLVE A HIGH–RISK ACTION HIGH–RISK 18
506-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ; AND 19
499+ (9) THE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF 16
500+INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 17
507501
508- (7) A DETERMINATION OF THE RISK THAT USE OF A S YSTEM MAY BE 20
509-HIGH–RISK SUMMARY OF THE RESUL TS OF THE MOST RECEN T IMPACT ASSESSMENT . 21
502+ (10) THE GOVERNOR’S SENIOR ADVISOR FOR RESPONSIBLE 18
503+ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , OR THE SENIOR ADVISOR’S DESIGNEE; AND 19
510504
511- (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE EACH INVENTORY REQUI RED BY THIS 22
512-SECTION AN AGGREGATED STATEW IDE INVENTORY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE O N ITS 23
513-WEBSITE. 24
505+ (11) ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, 20
506+APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR. 21
514507
515- (D) (1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT MA KE PUBLICLY AVAILABL E ON THE 25
516-DEPARTMENT ’S WEBSITE INFORMATIO N FROM THE INVENTORI ES REQUIRED BY 26
517-THIS SECTION THAT RE LATE TO THE SAFETY A ND SECURITY OF STATE SYSTEMS IF 27
518-THE PUBLICATION O F THE INFORMATION IS LIKELY TO COMPROMISE THE SECURITY 28
519-OR INTEGRITY OF THE SYSTEM. 29
508+ (D) THE SECRETARY SHALL CHAIR THE SUBCABINET. 22
509+
510+ (E) THE SUBCABINET SHALL : 23
511+
512+ (1) DEVELOP STRATEGY , POLICY, AND MONITORING PROCE SSES FOR 24
513+RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 25
514+ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 26
515+
516+ (2) OVERSEE THE STATE’S IMPLEMENTATION OF : 27
520517 12 HOUSE BILL 1271
521518
522519
523- (2) ON REQUEST , THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROV IDE TO THE 1
524-GOVERNOR, MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT THE 2
525-INFORMATION DESCRIBE D IN PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION. 3
520+ (I) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE INVENTORY ; 1
526521
527- (E) (1) ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1, 2025, DECEMBER 31, 2026, EACH 4
528-UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A 5
529-SYSTEM PROCURED ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026, THAT INVOLVES A HIGH–RISK 6
530-ACTION HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 7
522+ (II) DATA INVENTORY ; 2
531523
532- (2) ON OR BEFORE JULY 1, 2027, EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT 8
533-SHALL CONDUCT AN IMP ACT ASSESSMENT OF A SYSTEM PROCURED BEFO RE 9
534-FEBRUARY 1, 2026, THAT INVOLVES HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 10
524+ (III) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE IMPACT ASSESSMEN TS; 3
535525
536-3.5–803. 3.5–804. 11
526+ (IV) MONITORING OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VOLVING A 4
527+HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 5
537528
538- (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, THE DEPARTMENT, IN 12
539-CONSULTATION WITH TH E GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET, 13
540-SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCE RNING THE DEVELOPMEN T, 14
541-PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT 15
542-OF SYSTEMS THAT EMPL OY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY A UN IT OF 16
543-STATE GOVERNMENT . 17
529+ (V) COMPLIANCE WITH STATE POLICIES AND PR OCEDURES; 6
544530
545- (B) THE POLICIES AND PROC EDURES REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (A) OF 18
546-THIS SECTION SHALL : 19
531+ (3) SUPPORT ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE AND DATA INNOVATION 7
532+ACROSS UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTOR EN TERPRISE BY: 8
547533
548- (1) SUBJECT TO ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW , GOVERN THE 20
549-PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION DEPLOYMENT , AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF 21
550-SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE BY A UNIT OF STATE 22
551-GOVERNMENT ; 23
534+ (I) IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING BEST USES O F ARTIFICIAL 9
535+INTELLIGENCE IN EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PR IVATE SECTOR 10
536+ENTERPRISE; 11
552537
553- (2) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 24
554-EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY ANY U NIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS N OT 25
555-HIGH–RISK; 26
538+ (II) TESTING PROOFS OF CO NCEPT OF PRIORITY AR TIFICIAL 12
539+INTELLIGENCE USE IN PROTOTYPING ; 13
556540
557- (3) REQUIRE EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT TO A SSESS THE 27
558-LIKELY IMPACT OF ANY SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE BEFORE 28
559-IMPLEMENTING THE SYS TEM; 29
541+ (III) REDUCING BARRIERS TO THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF 14
542+ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE AND STATE DATA; 15
560543
561- (2) DEFINE THE CRITERIA FOR AN INVENTORY OF SYSTEMS THAT 30
562-EMPLOY HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ; 31
544+ (IV) DEVELOPING SUCCESSFUL ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE 16
545+PILOTS INTO PRODUCTI ON; AND 17
563546
564- (3) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 32
565-EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY A UNI T OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS 33 HOUSE BILL 1271 13
547+ (V) TRAINING AND WORKFOR CE DEVELOPMENT ; 18
548+
549+ (4) DEVELOP AND IMPLEMEN T A COMPREHENSIVE AC TION PLAN FOR 19
550+RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 20
551+ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 21
552+
553+ (5) ESTABLISH PARTNERSHI PS, MEMORANDA OF UNDERST ANDING, 22
554+AND CONTRACTS TO SUP PORT THE AIMS OF THI S SECTION; 23
555+
556+ (6) PROMOTE ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE KNOWLEDG E, SKILLS, AND 24
557+TALENT IN STATE GOVERNMENT BY : 25
558+
559+ (I) IDENTIFYING AND OFFE RING TRAINING PROGRAMS FO R 26
560+STATE WORKERS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE AND PARTI CULARLY 27
561+GENERATIVE ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE ; AND 28
562+ HOUSE BILL 1271 13
566563
567564
568-GOVERNED BY ADEQUATE GUARDRAILS TO PROTEC T INDIVIDUALS AND 1
569-COMMUNITIES ; 2
565+ (II) EXPLORING WAYS TO PR OVIDE EXTERNAL ARTIF ICIAL 1
566+INTELLIGENCE TALENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO SE RVE THE STATE AND UNITS OF 2
567+STATE GOVERNMENT IN TAR GETED, SHORT–TERM PROJECTS , INCLUDING BY 3
568+LEVERAGING INSTITUTI ONS OF HIGHER EDUCAT ION OR INDUSTRY ; AND 4
570569
571- (4) IF THE DEPARTMENT IS NOTIFIE D THAT AN INDIVIDUAL OR 3
572-GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS MAY HAVE BEEN NEGATI VELY IMPACTED BY A S YSTEM THAT 4
573-EMPLOYS HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE, REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO : 5
570+ (7) IDENTIFY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USE CAS ES AND BUILD 5
571+FOUNDATIONAL INFRAST RUCTURE BY REQUIRING : 6
574572
575- (I) NOTIFY AN INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP OF INDIVI DUALS 6
576-DETERMINED TO HAVE B EEN NEGATIVELY IMPAC TED BY A SYSTEM THAT EMP LOYS 7
577-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE; AND 8
573+ (I) THE DEPARTMENT TO EVALUA TE RELEVANT 7
574+INFRASTRUCTURE TO SA FELY, SECURELY, AND EFFICIENTLY TEST ARTIFICIAL 8
575+INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S; 9
578576
579- (II) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO AN INDIVIDUAL OR A G ROUP OF 9
580-INDIVIDUALS DETERMIN ED TO HAVE BEEN NEGA TIVELY IMPACTE D BY A SYSTEM 10
581-THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFIC IAL INTELLIGENCE ON AVAILABLE OPTIONS TO OPT OUT OF 11
582-THE SYSTEM; AND 12
577+ (II) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN 10
578+CONSULTATION WITH TH E DEPARTMENT , TO CREATE A MODEL FO R RUNNING AND 11
579+PROCURING ARTIFIC IAL INTELLIGENCE PRO OFS OF CONCEPT AND P ILOTS, IN 12
580+ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAWS, REGULATIONS , AND POLICIES; AND 13
583581
584- (5) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ON 13
585-PROCUREMENT OF A SYS TEM THAT EMPLOYS HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE 14
586-THAT ENSURES DATA PR IVACY AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND 15
587-REGULATIONS . 16
582+ (III) THE DEPARTMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH THE 14
583+SUBCABINET, TO COORDINATE WITH A GENCIES TO PROVIDE S UPPORT IN 15
584+IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING USE CASES AND EXECUTING P ROOFS OF CONCEPT 16
585+AND PILOTS ALIGNED W ITH THE GOVERNOR’S PRIORITIES. 17
588586
589- (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES 17
590-REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION PUBLICL Y AVAILABLE ON ITS 18
591-WEBSITE WITHIN 45 DAYS AFTER THE POLIC IES AND PROCEDURES A RE ADOPTED. 19
587+ (F) THE GOVERNOR SHALL PROVID E THE SUBCABINET WITH SUFFI CIENT 18
588+RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF THI S SECTION. 19
592589
593-3.5–804. 3.5–805. 20
590+ (G) FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR , THE GOVERNOR MAY INCLUDE IN THE ANNUAL 20
591+BUDGET BILL AN APPRO PRIATION OF UP TO $3,000,000 FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND 21
592+CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE FUNCTIONS REQUIR ED IN THIS SECTION. 22
594593
595- (A) BEGINNING JULY 1, 2025, A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT 21
596-PROCURE OR IMPLEMENT A DEPLOY A NEW SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL 22
597-INTELLIGENCE UNLESS THE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH THE POLICIES AN D 23
598-PROCEDURES ADOPTED U NDER § 3.5–803 3.5–804 OF THIS SUBTITLE. 24
594+12–101. 23
599595
600- (B) A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT THAT EMPLOYS HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL 25
601-INTELLIGENCE SHALL C ONDUCT REGULAR IMPAC T ASSESSMENTS , AS DETERMINED 26
602-BY THE GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF THE 27
603-GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 28
596+ (a) This section does not apply to: 24
604597
605-3.5–805. 3.5–806. 29
598+ (1) capital expenditures by the Department of Transportation or the 25
599+Maryland Transportation Authority, in connection with State roads, bridges, or highways, 26
600+as provided in § 12–202 of this title; [or] 27
606601
607- (A) THERE IS A GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF 30
608-THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 31
609- 14 HOUSE BILL 1271
602+ (2) procurements by the Department of General Services AND THE 28
603+DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY for the purpose of modernizing 29
604+INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY AND cybersecurity infrastructure for the State valued 30
605+below $1,000,000; OR 31
610606
611-
612- (B) THE PURPOSE OF THE SUBCABINET IS TO FACI LITATE AND ENHANCE 1
613-COOPERATION AMONG UN ITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH 2
614-ACADEMIC INSTITU TIONS AND INDUSTRIES UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 3
615-
616- (C) THE SUBCABINET CONSISTS O F THE FOLLOWING MEMB ERS: 4
617-
618- (1) THE SECRETARY, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 5
619-
620- (2) THE SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT , OR THE 6
621-SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 7
622-
623- (3) THE SECRETARY OF GENERAL SERVICES, OR THE SECRETARY’S 8
624-DESIGNEE; 9
625-
626- (4) THE SECRETARY OF LABOR, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 10
627-
628- (5) THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, OR THE SECRETARY’S 11
629-DESIGNEE; 12
630-
631- (6) THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HOMELAND 13
632-SECURITY, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; 14
633-
634- (7) THE CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF PRIVACY 15
635-OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 16
636-
637- (8) THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER’S 17
638-DESIGNEE; 18
639-
640- (9) THE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF 19
641-INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 20
642-
643- (10) THE GOVERNOR’S SENIOR ADVISOR FOR RESPONSIBLE 21
644-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , OR THE SENIOR ADVISOR’S DESIGNEE; AND 22
645-
646- (11) ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, 23
647-APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR. 24
648-
649- (D) THE SECRETARY SHALL CHAI R THE SUBCABINET. 25
650-
651- (E) THE SUBCABINET SHALL : 26
652-
653- (1) DEVELOP STRATEGY , POLICY, AND MONITORING PROCE SSES FOR 27
654-RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 28
655-ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 29
656- HOUSE BILL 1271 15
657-
658-
659- (2) OVERSEE THE STATE’S IMPLEMENTATIO N OF: 1
660-
661- (I) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE INVENTORY ; 2
662-
663- (II) DATA INVENTORY ; 3
664-
665- (III) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE IMPACT ASSESSMEN TS; 4
666-
667- (IV) MONITORING OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VOLVING A 5
668-HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 6
669-
670- (III) MONITORING OF HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ; 7
671-AND 8
672-
673- (V) (IV) COMPLIANCE WITH STATE POLICIES AND 9
674-PROCEDURES ; 10
675-
676- (3) SUPPORT ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE AND DATA INNOVATION 11
677-ACROSS UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTO R ENTERPRISE BY :; 12
678-
679- (I) IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING BEST USES OF ARTIFICIAL 13
680-INTELLIGENCE IN EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTOR 14
681-ENTERPRISE; 15
682-
683- (II) TESTING PROOFS OF CO NCEPT OF PRIORITY AR TIFICIAL 16
684-INTELLIGENCE USE IN PROTOTYPING ; 17
685-
686- (III) REDUCING BARRIERS TO THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF 18
687-ARTIFICIAL INTEL LIGENCE AND STATE DATA; 19
688-
689- (IV) DEVELOPING SUCCESSFU L ARTIFICIAL INTELLI GENCE 20
690-PILOTS INTO PRODUCTI ON; AND 21
691-
692- (V) TRAINING AND WORKFOR CE DEVELOPMENT ; 22
693-
694- (4) DEVELOP AND IMPLEMEN T A COMPREHENSIVE AC TION PLAN FOR 23
695-RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AND 24
696-ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 25
697-
698- (5) ESTABLISH PARTNERSHI PS, MEMORANDA OF UNDERST ANDING, 26
699-AND CONTRACTS TO SUP PORT THE AIMS OF THI S SECTION; 27
700-
701- (6) PROMOTE ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE KNOWLEDG E, SKILLS, AND 28
702-TALENT IN STATE GOVERNMENT BY: 29
703- 16 HOUSE BILL 1271
704-
705-
706- (I) IDENTIFYING AND OFFE RING TRAINING PROGRA MS FOR 1
707-STATE WORKERS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE AND PARTI CULARLY 2
708-GENERATIVE ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE ; AND 3
709-
710- (II) EXPLORING WAYS TO PR OVIDE EXTERNAL ARTIF ICIAL 4
711-INTELLIGENCE TALENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO SE RVE THE STATE AND UNITS OF 5
712-STATE GOVERNMENT IN T ARGETED, SHORT–TERM PROJECTS , INCLUDING BY 6
713-LEVERAGING INSTITUTI ONS OF HIGHER EDUCAT ION OR INDUSTRY ; AND 7
714-
715- (7) IDENTIFY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE USE CASES AND BU ILD 8
716-FOUNDATIONAL INFRAST RUCTURE BY REQUIRING : 9
717-
718- (I) THE DEPARTMENT TO EVALUAT E RELEVANT 10
719-INFRASTRUCTURE TO SA FELY, SECURELY, AND EFFICIENTLY TEST ARTIFICIAL 11
720-INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S; 12
721-
722- (II) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN 13
723-CONSULTATION WITH TH E DEPARTMENT , TO CREATE A MODEL FO R RUNNING AND 14
724-PROCURING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S, IN 15
725-ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAWS, REGULATIONS , AND POLICIES; AND 16
726-
727- (III) THE DEPARTMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH TH E 17
728-SUBCABINET, TO COORDINATE WITH A GENCIES TO PROVIDE S UPPORT IN 18
729-IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING USE CASES A ND EXECUTING PROOFS OF CONCEPT 19
730-AND PILOTS ALIGNED W ITH THE GOVERNOR’S PRIORITIES. 20
731-
732- (F) THE GOVERNOR SHALL PROVID E THE SUBCABINET W ITH SUFFICIENT 21
733-RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF THI S SECTION. 22
734-
735- (G) FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR , THE GOVERNOR MAY INCLUDE IN THE ANNUAL 23
736-BUDGET BILL AN APPRO PRIATION OF UP TO $3,000,000 FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND 24
737-CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE FUNCTIONS REQUIR ED IN THIS SECTION. 25
738-
739-12–101. 26
740-
741- (a) This section does not apply to: 27
742-
743- (1) capital expenditures by the Department of Transportation or the 28
744-Maryland Transportation Authority, in connection with State roads, bridges, or highways, 29
745-as provided in § 12–202 of this title; [or] 30
746-
747- (2) procurements by the Department of General Services AND THE 31
748-DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY for the purpose of modernizing 32 HOUSE BILL 1271 17
749-
750-
751-INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY AND cybersecurity infrastructure for the State valued 1
752-below $1,000,000; OR 2
753-
754- (3) COMPETITIVE P ROOF OF CONCEPT PROC UREMENTS VALUED 3
755-BELOW $1,000,000 MADE UNDER § 13–116 OF THIS ARTICLE . 4
756-
757- (b) (1) The Board may control procurement by units. 5
758-
759- (2) To implement the provisions of this Division II, the Board may: 6
760-
761- (i) set policy; 7
762-
763- (ii) adopt regulations, in accordance with Title 10, Subtitle 1 of the 8
764-State Government Article; and 9
765-
766- (iii) establish internal operational procedures consistent with this 10
767-Division II. 11
768-
769- (3) The Board shall ensure that the regulations of the primary 12
770-procurement units provide for procedures that are consistent with this Division II and Title 13
771-13, Subtitle 4 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article and, to the extent the 14
772-circumstances of a particular type of procurement or a particular unit do not require 15
773-otherwise, are substantially the same. 16
774-
775- (4) The Board may delegate any of its authority that it determines to be 17
776-appropriate for delegation and may require prior Board approval for specified procurement 18
777-actions. 19
778-
779- (5) Except as limited by the Maryland Constitution, the Board may 20
780-exercise any control authority conferred on a primary procurement unit by this Division II 21
781-and, to the extent that its action conflicts with the action of the primary procurement unit, 22
782-the action of the Board shall prevail. 23
783-
784- (c) On or before December 1 each year, the Department of General Services shall 24
785-submit a report to the Board on procurements made under subsection (a)(2) of this section 25
786-that shall include for each procurement: 26
787-
788- (1) the purpose of the procurement; 27
789-
790- (2) the name of the contractor; 28
791-
792- (3) the contract amount; 29
793-
794- (4) the method of procurement utilized; 30
795-
796- (5) the number of bidders who bid on the procurement; and 31
797- 18 HOUSE BILL 1271
798-
799-
800- (6) the contract term. 1
801-
802- (D) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR, THE DEPARTMENT OF 2
803-GENERAL SERVICES SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO T HE BOARD ON PROCUREMENTS 3
804-MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (A)(3) OF THIS SECTION THAT SHALL INCLUDE FOR EA CH 4
805-PROCUREMENT : 5
806-
807- (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE P ROCUREMENT ; 6
808-
809- (2) THE NAME OF THE CONT RACTOR; 7
810-
811- (3) THE CONTRACT AMOUNT ; 8
812-
813- (4) THE NUMBER OF P ROPOSALS RECEIVED ON THE PROCUREMENT ; 9
814-AND 10
815-
816- (5) THE CONTRACT TERM . 11
817-
818-13–116. 12
819-
820- (A) IN THIS SECTION, “PROOF OF CONCEPT ” MEANS A TEST, EVALUATION, 13
821-DEMONSTRATION , OR PILOT PROJECT OF A GOOD OR SERVICE GOOD, SERVICE, OR 14
822-TECHNOLOGY IN A REAL–WORLD ENVIRONMENT TO EVALUATE WHETHER THE GOOD 15
823-OR SERVICE GOOD, SERVICE, OR TECHNOLOGY CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED 16
824-AND IS BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 17
825-
826- (B) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IS A FORMAL 18
827-COMPETITIVE PROCUREM ENT METHOD TH AT MAY BE USED TO SO LICIT PROPOSALS 19
828-FOR THE CONDUCT OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT PRI OR TO FULL IMPLEMENT ATION 20
829-WHEN THE HEAD OF A U NIT DETERMINES THE P ROCESS TO BE APPROPR IATE AND IN 21
830-THE BEST INTERESTS O F THE UNIT, INCLUDING: 22
831-
832- (I) TESTING SOFTWARE –AS–A–SERVICE OR OFF–THE–SHELF 23
833-SOFTWARE; 24
834-
835- (II) TESTING NEW, INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES; OR 25
836-
837- (III) TESTING A PRODUCT OR SERVICE CONCEPTUALIZ ED OR 26
838-CONCEIVED OF BY A UN IT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 27
839-
840- (2) (I) AFTER OBTAINING THE A PPROVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE 28
841-UNIT AND BEFORE COND UCTING A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT 29
842-PROCUREMENT , THE UNIT SHALL OBTAI N APPROVAL FROM THE SECRETARY OF 30
843-INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE. 31 HOUSE BILL 1271 19
607+ (3) COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENTS VALUED 32
608+BELOW $1,000,000 MADE UNDER § 13–116 OF THIS ARTICLE . 33 14 HOUSE BILL 1271
844609
845610
846611
847- (II) THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MAY 1
848-GRANT APPROVAL FOR A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IF THE 2
849-UNIT: 3
612+ (b) (1) The Board may control procurement by units. 1
850613
851- 1. HAS SUFFICIENT INTER NAL RESOURCES TO MAN AGE 4
852-THE PROOF OF CONCEPT , INCLUDING HUMAN CAPI TAL, SUBJECT MATTER 5
853-EXPERTISE, AND TECHNOLOGICAL IN FRASTRUCTURE , OR HAS THE MEANS TO 6
854-OBTAIN THESE RESOURC ES; AND 7
614+ (2) To implement the provisions of this Division II, the Board may: 2
855615
856- 2. ENTERS INTO A MEMORA NDUM OF UNDERSTANDIN G 8
857-WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY THAT REQUI RES 9
858-REGULAR STATUS UPDAT ES, VENDOR CAPACITY , AND ANY OTHER INFORM ATION 10
859-NECESSARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO EVALUAT E 11
860-WHETHER THE PROOF OF CONCEPT CAN BE SUCCE SSFULLY DEPLOYED AND IS 12
861-BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 13
616+ (i) set policy; 3
862617
863- (C) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT MAY BE 14
864-CONDUCTED THROUGH TH E ISSUANCE OF A SOLI CITATION BY ANY METH OD OF 15
865-PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZE D UNDER THIS DIVISION II. 16
618+ (ii) adopt regulations, in accordance with Title 10, Subtitle 1 of the 4
619+State Government Article; and 5
866620
867- (2) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT 17
868-SOLICITATION SHALL I NCLUDE A STATEMENT O F: 18
621+ (iii) establish internal operational procedures consistent with this 6
622+Division II. 7
869623
870- (I) THE SCOPE OF WORK OR PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 19
871-INCLUDING THE INTEND ED USE, QUANTITY, ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR THE 20
872-PROOF OF CONCEPT , AND ANTICIPATED NUMB ER OF PROOF OF CONCE PT AWARDS 21
873-THAT WILL BE MADE ; AND 22
624+ (3) The Board shall ensure that the regulations of the primary 8
625+procurement units provide for procedures that are consistent with this Division II and Title 9
626+13, Subtitle 4 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article and, to the extent the 10
627+circumstances of a particular type of procurement or a particular unit do not require 11
628+otherwise, are substantially the same. 12
874629
875- (II) THE FACTORS , INCLUDING PRICE , THAT WILL BE USED IN 23
876-EVALUATING PROPOSALS AND THE RELATIVE IMP ORTANCE OF EACH . 24
630+ (4) The Board may delegate any of its authority that it determines to be 13
631+appropriate for delegation and may require prior Board approval for specified procurement 14
632+actions. 15
877633
878- (3) A SOLICITATION MAY BE DISTRIBUTED TO VE NDORS KNOWN TO 25
879-OFFER GOODS OR SERVI CES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROOF OF CONC EPT AND 26
880-SHALL, EXCEPT FOR PROCUREME NTS UNDER $15,000 NOT OTHERWISE REQUIR ED 27
881-BY LAW TO BE POSTED , BE POSTED ON EMARYLAND MARKETPLACE ADVANTAGE, IN 28
882-ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES AND P ROCEDURES UNDER SUBS ECTION (G) OF 29
883-THIS SECTION. 30
634+ (5) Except as limited by the Maryland Constitution, the Board may 16
635+exercise any control authority conferred on a primary procurement unit by this Division II 17
636+and, to the extent that its action conflicts with the action of the primary procurement unit, 18
637+the action of the Board shall prevail. 19
884638
885- (D) AFTER RECEIPT OF PROP OSALS BUT BEFORE AWA RD OF A 31
886-PROCUREMENT CONTRACT , A UNIT MAY: 32
639+ (c) On or before December 1 each year, the Department of General Services shall 20
640+submit a report to the Board on procurements made under subsection (a)(2) of this section 21
641+that shall include for each procurement: 22
887642
888- (1) CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH AN OFFEROR TO E NSURE FULL 33
889-UNDERSTANDING OF : 34 20 HOUSE BILL 1271
643+ (1) the purpose of the procurement; 23
644+
645+ (2) the name of the contractor; 24
646+
647+ (3) the contract amount; 25
648+
649+ (4) the method of procurement utilized; 26
650+
651+ (5) the number of bidders who bid on the procurement; and 27
652+
653+ (6) the contract term. 28
654+
655+ (D) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR, THE DEPARTMENT OF 29
656+GENERAL SERVICES SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE BOARD ON PROCUREMENTS 30 HOUSE BILL 1271 15
657+
658+
659+MADE UNDER SUBSECTION (A)(3) OF THIS SECTION THAT SHALL INCLUDE FOR EA CH 1
660+PROCUREMENT : 2
661+
662+ (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE P ROCUREMENT ; 3
663+
664+ (2) THE NAME OF THE CONT RACTOR; 4
665+
666+ (3) THE CONTRACT AMOUNT ; 5
667+
668+ (4) THE NUMBER OF PROPOS ALS RECEIVED ON THE PROCUREMENT ; 6
669+AND 7
670+
671+ (5) THE CONTRACT TERM. 8
672+
673+13–116. 9
674+
675+ (A) IN THIS SECTION, “PROOF OF CONCEPT ” MEANS A TEST, EVALUATION, 10
676+OR PILOT PROJECT OF A GOOD OR SERVICE IN A REAL–WORLD ENVIRONMENT TO 11
677+EVALUATE WHETHER THE GOOD OR SERVICE CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY DEPL OYED 12
678+AND IS BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 13
679+
680+ (B) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IS A FORMAL 14
681+COMPETITIVE PROCUREM ENT METHOD THAT MAY BE USED TO SOLICIT P ROPOSALS 15
682+FOR THE CONDUCT OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT PRI OR TO FULL IMPLEMENT ATION 16
683+WHEN THE HEAD OF A U NIT DETERMINES THE P ROCESS TO BE APP ROPRIATE AND IN 17
684+THE BEST INTERESTS O F THE UNIT, INCLUDING: 18
685+
686+ (I) TESTING SOFTWARE –AS–A–SERVICE OR OFF –THE–SHELF 19
687+SOFTWARE; 20
688+
689+ (II) TESTING NEW, INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES; OR 21
690+
691+ (III) TESTING A PRODUCT OR SERVICE CONCEPTUALIZ ED OR 22
692+CONCEIVED OF BY A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 23
693+
694+ (2) AFTER OBTAINING THE A PPROVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE UNIT 24
695+AND BEFORE CONDUCTIN G A COMPETITIVE PROO F OF CONCEPT PROCURE MENT, 25
696+THE UNIT SHALL OBTAI N APPROVAL FROM THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION 26
697+TECHNOLOGY , OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE. 27
698+
699+ (C) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT MAY BE 28
700+CONDUCTED THROUGH TH E ISSUANCE OF A SOLI CITATION BY ANY METH OD OF 29
701+PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZ ED UNDER THIS DIVISION II. 30 16 HOUSE BILL 1271
890702
891703
892704
893- (I) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIT, AS SET FORTH IN THE 1
894-REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL S; AND 2
705+ (2) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT 1
706+SOLICITATION SHALL I NCLUDE A STATEMENT OF : 2
895707
896- (II) THE PROPOSAL SUBMITT ED BY THE OFFEROR ; AND 3
708+ (I) THE SCOPE OF WORK OR PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 3
709+INCLUDING THE INTEND ED USE, QUANTITY, ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR THE 4
710+PROOF OF CONCEPT , AND ANTICIPATED NUMB ER OF PROOF OF CONCE PT AWARDS 5
711+THAT WILL BE MADE ; AND 6
897712
898- (2) REQUEST PRODUCT SAMP LES FOR TESTING BY T HE UNIT OR A 4
899-DEMONSTRATION OF A P RODUCT OR SERVICE AN D USE THESE SAMPLES OR 5
900-DEMONSTRATIONS IN IT S EVALUATION PROCESS. 6
713+ (II) THE FACTORS , INCLUDING PRICE, THAT WILL BE USED IN 7
714+EVALUATING PROPOSALS AND THE RELATIVE IMP ORTANCE OF EACH . 8
901715
902- (E) A REQUEST FOR PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING OR DEMONSTRATION 7
903-MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (D)(2) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L BE ISSUED TO ALL 8
904-OFFERORS DEEMED REAS ONABLE AT THE TIME O F THE REQUEST . 9
716+ (3) A SOLICITATION MAY BE DISTRIBUTED TO VENDO RS KNOWN TO 9
717+OFFER GOODS OR SERVI CES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROOF OF CONC EPT AND 10
718+SHALL, EXCEPT FOR PROCUREME NTS UNDER $15,000 NOT OTHERWISE REQUIR ED 11
719+BY LAW TO BE POSTED , BE POSTED ON EMARYLAND MARKETPLACE ADVANTAGE, IN 12
720+ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES UNDER SUBSECTION (G) OF 13
721+THIS SECTION. 14
905722
906- (F) A UNIT MAY: 10
723+ (D) AFTER RECEIPT OF PROP OSALS BUT BEFORE AWA RD OF A 15
724+PROCUREMENT CONTRACT , A UNIT MAY: 16
907725
908- (1) AWARD ONE OR MORE OF THE PROPOSAL S A CONTRACT FOR THE 11
909-PROOF OF CONCEPT ; AND 12
726+ (1) CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH AN OFFEROR TO E NSURE FULL 17
727+UNDERSTANDING OF : 18
910728
911- (2) PROVIDE AN OPTION FO R THE STATE TO PROCEED WITH A FULL 13
912-IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AWARDED PROPOSAL . 14
729+ (I) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIT, AS SET FORTH IN THE 19
730+REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL S; AND 20
913731
914- (G) A VENDOR AWARDED A PRO OF OF CONCEPT PROCUR EMENT SHALL BE 15
915-ELIGIBLE TO BID ON A PROCUREMENT TO IMPLE MENT A PROPOSAL RELATED TO 16
916-THE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT . 17
732+ (II) THE PROPOSAL SUBMITT ED BY THE OFFEROR ; AND 21
917733
918- (H) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN CONSULTATION WITH 18
919-THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND 19
920-PROCEDURES FOR THE D EVELOPMENT AND IMPLE MENTATION OF COMPETI TIVE 20
921-PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMEN TS. 21
734+ (2) REQUEST PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING BY THE UNIT OR A 22
735+DEMONSTRATION OF A P RODUCT OR SERVICE AN D USE THESE SAMPLES OR 23
736+DEMONSTRATIONS IN IT S EVALUATION PROCESS . 24
922737
923- SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 22
924-2024, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, 23
925-in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, shall submit an interim report and 24
926-recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2 –1257 of the State 25
927-Government Article, the General Assembly on the risks and opportunities and associated 26
928-recommendations related to: 27
738+ (E) A REQUEST FOR PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING OR DEMONSTRATION 25
739+MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (D)(2) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L BE ISSUED TO ALL 26
740+OFFERORS DEEMED REAS ONABLE AT THE TIME O F THE REQUEST . 27
929741
930- (1) use of artificial intelligence to support job and business creation and 28
931-growth in the State; 29
742+ (F) A UNIT MAY: 28
932743
933- (2) in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Labor and, as 30
934-appropriate, external experts, workers, labor unions, businesses, and civil society, use of 31
935-artificial intelligence by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 32
936-workforce; 33 HOUSE BILL 1271 21
744+ (1) AWARD ONE OR MORE OF THE PROPOSALS A CONT RACT FOR THE 29
745+PROOF OF CONCEPT ; AND 30
746+ HOUSE BILL 1271 17
937747
938748
749+ (2) PROVIDE AN OPTION FO R THE STATE TO PROCEED WITH A FULL 1
750+IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AWARDED PROPOSAL . 2
939751
940- (3) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Emergency 1
941-Management, the Public Service Commission, the Department of the Environment, and the 2
942-Department of Transportation, use of artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure and 3
943-guidelines for owners and operators to incorporate risk management into critical 4
944-infrastructure, including mapping emergent cyber and physical security and resiliency 5
945-risks to the State infrastructure and residents stemming from artificial intelligence; 6
752+ (G) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN CONSULTATION WITH 3
753+THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND 4
754+PROCEDURES FOR THE D EVELOPMENT AND IMPLE MENTATION OF COMPETI TIVE 5
755+PROOF OF CONCEPT PRO CUREMENTS . 6
946756
947- (4) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Health, the U.S. 7
948-Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, use of 8
949-systems that employ artificial intelligence in health care delivery and human services; 9
757+ SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 7
758+2024, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, 8
759+in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, shall submit an interim report and 9
760+recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State 10
761+Government Article, the General Assembly on the risks and opportunities and associated 11
762+recommendations related to: 12
950763
951- (5) in consultation with the Department of Information Technology Office 10
952-of Security Management and the Chief Privacy Officer, use of artificial intelligence in the 11
953-discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in cybersecurity and data management across 12
954-State and local government, including school systems; 13
764+ (1) use of artificial intelligence to support job and business creation and 13
765+growth in the State; 14
955766
956- (6) in consultation with the State Chief Privacy Officer and an independent 14
957-contractor identified by the Subcabinet, data privacy, specifically regarding the potential 15
958-to train systems that employ artificial intelligence; 16
767+ (2) in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Labor and, as 15
768+appropriate, external experts, workers, labor unions, businesses, and civil society, use of 16
769+artificial intelligence by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 17
770+workforce; 18
959771
960- (7) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Labor, the 17
961-Department of Commerce, and the Governor’s Office of Small, Minority, and Women 18
962-Business Affairs, use of artificial intelligence in workforce training and hiring of talent with 19
963-expertise in artificial intelligence, employment practices, and workforce development 20
964-implications; 21
772+ (3) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Emergency 19
773+Management, the Public Service Commission, the Department of the Environment, and the 20
774+Department of Transportation, use of artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure and 21
775+guidelines for owners and operators to incorporate risk management into critical 22
776+infrastructure, including mapping emergent cyber and physical security and resiliency 23
777+risks to the State infrastructure and residents stemming from artificial intelligence; 24
965778
966- (8) in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General and the Judicial 22
967-Branch, use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system, including whether and 23
968-how such technology should be used, in what contexts, and with what safeguards; 24
779+ (4) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Health, the U.S. 25
780+Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, use of 26
781+systems that employ artificial intelligence in health care delivery and human services; 27
969782
970- (9) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 25
971-including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 26
972-privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 27
783+ (5) in consultation with the Department of Information Technology Office 28
784+of Security Management and the Chief Privacy Officer, use of artificial intelligence in the 29
785+discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in cybersecurity and data management across 30
786+State and local government, including school systems; 31
973787
974- (10) use of artificial intelligence by occupations licensed and certified by the 28
975-State, in consultation with the boards, identifying ways for the regulatory board to identify 29
976-and manage the risks of opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate 30
977-permitted use and supervision by licensees; and 31
788+ (6) in consultation with the State Chief Privacy Officer and an independent 32
789+contractor identified by the Subcabinet, data privacy, specifically regarding the potential 33
790+to train systems that employ artificial intelligence; 34
978791
979- (11) use of artificial intelligence in local school systems, including 32
980-recommendations to the State on the responsible and productive use of artificial 33
981-intelligence based on a review of the federal Department of Education Office of Educational 34
982-Technology’s report entitled “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and 35
983-Learning: Insights and Recommendations”, in collaboration with the State Department of 36
984-Education. 37
985- 22 HOUSE BILL 1271
792+ (7) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Labor, the 35
793+Department of Commerce, and the Governor’s Office of Small, Minority, and Women 36
794+Business Affairs, use of artificial intelligence in workforce training and hiring of talent with 37 18 HOUSE BILL 1271
986795
987796
988- SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 1
797+expertise in artificial intelligence, employment practices, and workforce development 1
798+implications; 2
989799
990- (a) The Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive 2
991-Council, in consultation with the appropriate units of State government, shall: 3
800+ (8) in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General and the Judicial 3
801+Branch, use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system, including whether and 4
802+how such technology should be used, in what contexts, and with what safeguards; 5
992803
993- (1) develop a roadmap to review the risks and opportunities associated 4
994-with the use of artificial intelligence in State services; and 5
804+ (9) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 6
805+including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 7
806+privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 8
995807
996- (2) on or before December 1, 2024, submit the roadmap to the Governor 6
997-and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly. 7
808+ (10) use of artificial intelligence by occupations licensed and certified by the 9
809+State, in consultation with the boards, identifying ways for the regulatory board to identify 10
810+and manage the risks of opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate 11
811+permitted use and supervision by licensees; and 12
998812
999- (b) The roadmap developed under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 8
813+ (11) use of artificial intelligence in local school systems, including 13
814+recommendations to the State on the responsible and product ive use of artificial 14
815+intelligence based on a review of the federal Department of Education Office of Educational 15
816+Technology’s report entitled “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and 16
817+Learning: Insights and Recommendations”, in collaboration with the State Department of 17
818+Education. 18
1000819
1001- (1) a plan to study the use of artificial intelligence: 9
820+ SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 19
821+2025, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council 20
822+shall submit a report and recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 21
823+2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly on the sufficiency of the 22
824+Subcabinet to accomplish the artificial intelligence goals of the State and the efficacy of the 23
825+potential transition of the Subcabinet to a department or independent unit of State 24
826+government. 25
1002827
1003- (i) to support job and business creation and growth in the State; 10
1004-
1005- (ii) by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 11
1006-workforce; 12
1007-
1008- (iii) in critical infrastructure, including guidelines for owners and 13
1009-operators to incorporate risk management into critical infrastructure; 14
1010-
1011- (iv) in health care delivery and human services; 15
1012-
1013- (v) in the discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in 16
1014-cybersecurity and data management across State and local government, including school 17
1015-systems; 18
1016-
1017- (vi) in data privacy, specifically regarding the ability to train systems 19
1018-that employ artificial intelligence; 20
1019-
1020- (vii) in workforce training; 21
1021-
1022- (viii) in the criminal justice system and for public safety purposes, 22
1023-including whether and how such technology should be used, in what contexts, and with 23
1024-what safeguards; 24
1025-
1026- (ix) by occupations licensed and certified by the State, including 25
1027-identifying ways for State regulatory boards to identify and manage the risks and 26
1028-opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate permitted use and 27
1029-supervision of licensees; 28
1030-
1031- (x) in local school systems, including recommendations to the State 29
1032-on the responsible and productive use of artificial intelligence; 30
1033- HOUSE BILL 1271 23
1034-
1035-
1036- (xi) in the conduct of elections, including reducing or eliminating the 1
1037-spread of misinformation; and 2
1038-
1039- (xii) any other State service identified by the Subcabinet; 3
1040-
1041- (2) a plan to study: 4
1042-
1043- (i) the hiring of talent with expertise in artificial intelligence, 5
1044-employment practices, and workforce development implications; 6
1045-
1046- (ii) methods to ensure that there is diversity in contract awards and 7
1047-training programs related to artificial intelligence in the State, including racial diversity; 8
1048-and 9
1049-
1050- (iii) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 10
1051-including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 11
1052-privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 12
1053-
1054- (3) a prioritization of the study topics listed under this subsection, 13
1055-including the methodology for the prioritization; 14
1056-
1057- (4) a list of appropriate stakeholders identified to participate in each study 15
1058-topic; and 16
1059-
1060- (5) the projected timeline to complete each study topic. 17
1061-
1062- SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 18
1063-2025, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council 19
1064-shall submit a report and recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 20
1065-2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly on the sufficiency of the 21
1066-Subcabinet to accomplish the artificial intelligence goals of the State and the efficacy of the 22
1067-potential transition of the Subcabinet to a department or independent unit of State 23
1068-government. 24
1069-
1070- SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That it is the intent of the 25
1071-Maryland General Assembly, contingent on the passage of Chapter __ (S.B. 955/H.B. 1174) 26
1072-of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2024 by both Houses of the General Assembly, that 27
1073-the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet consult with the Technology Advisory 28
1074-Commission established under Chapter __ (S.B. 955/H.B. 1174) of the Acts of the General 29
1075-Assembly of 2024 in the performance of its duties under Sections 1 and 2 of this Act. 30
1076-
1077- SECTION 4. 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 31
1078-July 1, 2024. 32
1079-
828+ SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 26
829+1, 2024. 27