Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW . | |
4 | 4 | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | - | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | - | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | - | amendment. | |
8 | 5 | *hb1271* | |
9 | 6 | ||
10 | 7 | HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
11 | 8 | S1, P2, K3 4lr2598 | |
12 | 9 | CF SB 818 | |
13 | - | By: Delegates J. Lewis, Hill, and Kaiser Kaiser, Alston, Bagnall, Bhandari, | |
14 | - | Chisholm, Cullison, Guzzone, Hutchinson, S. Johnson, Kerr, Kipke, | |
15 | - | R. Lewis, Lopez, Martinez, M. Morgan, Pena–Melnyk, Reilly, Rosenberg, | |
16 | - | Szeliga, Taveras, White Holland, and Woods | |
10 | + | By: Delegates J. Lewis, Hill, and Kaiser | |
17 | 11 | Introduced and read first time: February 8, 2024 | |
18 | 12 | Assigned to: Health and Government Operations | |
19 | - | Committee Report: Favorable with amendments | |
20 | - | House action: Adopted | |
21 | - | Read second time: March 22, 2024 | |
22 | 13 | ||
23 | - | ||
14 | + | A BILL ENTITLED | |
24 | 15 | ||
25 | 16 | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
26 | 17 | ||
27 | 18 | Information Technology – Artificial Intelligence – Policies and Procedures 2 | |
28 | 19 | (Artificial Intelligence Governance Act of 2024) 3 | |
29 | 20 | ||
30 | 21 | FOR the purpose of requiring each unit of State government to conduct a certain annual 4 | |
31 | 22 | data inventory, a certain annual inventory of systems that employ artificial 5 | |
32 | 23 | intelligence, and a certain impact assessment on or before a certain date; requiring 6 | |
33 | - | prohibiting the Department of Information Technology from making certain 7 | |
34 | - | information publicly available under certain circumstances to conduct ongoing 8 | |
35 | - | monitoring of certain systems under certain circumstances ; requiring the 9 | |
36 | - | Department of Information Technology, in consultation with the Governor’s 10 | |
37 | - | Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, to adopt 11 | |
38 | - | policies and procedures concerning the development, procurement, implementation 12 | |
39 | - | deployment, use, and assessment of systems that employ artificial intelligence by 13 | |
40 | - | units of State government; prohibiting a unit of State government from 14 | |
41 | - | implementing deploying or using a system that employs artificial intelligence under 15 | |
42 | - | certain circumstances beginning on a certain date; requiring a unit of State 16 | |
43 | - | government to conduct certain regular impact assessments under certain 17 | |
44 | - | circumstances; exempting the Office of the Attorney General, the Comptroller, the 18 | |
45 | - | Treasurer, and certain public institutions of higher education from certain 19 | |
46 | - | provisions; establishing the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the 20 | |
47 | - | Governor’s Executive Council; establishing competitive proof of concept procurement 21 | |
48 | - | as a formal competitive procurement method for the procurement of certain products 22 2 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
24 | + | the Department of Information Technology to conduct ongoing monitoring of certain 7 | |
25 | + | systems under certain circumstances; requiring the Department of Information 8 | |
26 | + | Technology to adopt policies and procedures concerning the development, 9 | |
27 | + | procurement, implementation, use, and assessment of systems that employ artificial 10 | |
28 | + | intelligence by units of State government; prohibiting a unit of State government 11 | |
29 | + | from implementing or using a system that employs artificial intelligence under 12 | |
30 | + | certain circumstances beginning on a certain date; establishing the Governor’s 13 | |
31 | + | Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council; establishing 14 | |
32 | + | competitive proof of concept procurement as a formal competitive procurement 15 | |
33 | + | method for the procurement of certain products and services; exempting certain 16 | |
34 | + | competitive proof of concept procurements from oversight by the Board of Public 17 | |
35 | + | Works; requiring the Department of General Services, in consultation with the 18 | |
36 | + | Department of Information Technology, to develop certain policies and procedures 19 | |
37 | + | for the development and implementation of competitive proof of concept 20 | |
38 | + | procurements; and generally relating to the use of artificial intelligence by units of 21 | |
39 | + | State government. 22 | |
40 | + | ||
41 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 23 | |
42 | + | Article – State Finance and Procurement 24 | |
43 | + | Section 3.5–101(a), (c), (d), and (f) 25 | |
44 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 26 | |
45 | + | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 27 | |
46 | + | ||
47 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 28 | |
48 | + | Article – State Finance and Procurement 29 2 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
49 | 49 | ||
50 | 50 | ||
51 | - | and services; exempting certain competitive proof of concept procurements from 1 | |
52 | - | oversight by the Board of Public Works; requiring the Department of General 2 | |
53 | - | Services, in consultation with the Department of Information Technology, to develop 3 | |
54 | - | certain policies and procedures for the development and implementation of 4 | |
55 | - | competitive proof of concept procurements; requiring the Subcabinet to develop a 5 | |
56 | - | certain roadmap; and generally relating to the use of artificial intelligence by units 6 | |
57 | - | of State government. 7 | |
51 | + | Section 3.5–301, 3.5–303(a), and 12–101 1 | |
52 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 2 | |
53 | + | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 3 | |
58 | 54 | ||
59 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 8 | |
60 | - | Article – State Finance and Procurement 9 | |
61 | - | Section 3.5–101(a), (c), (d), and (f) 10 | |
62 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 11 | |
63 | - | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 12 | |
55 | + | BY adding to 4 | |
56 | + | Article – State Finance and Procurement 5 | |
57 | + | Section 3.5–318; 3.5–801 through 3.5–805 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 8. 6 | |
58 | + | Artificial Intelligence”; and 13–116 7 | |
59 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 8 | |
60 | + | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 9 | |
64 | 61 | ||
65 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 13 | |
66 | - | Article – State Finance and Procurement 14 | |
67 | - | Section 3.5–301, 3.5–303(a), and 12–101 Section 3.5–301 and 3.5–303(a) 15 | |
68 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 16 | |
69 | - | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 17 | |
62 | + | Preamble 10 | |
70 | 63 | ||
71 | - | BY adding to 18 | |
72 | - | Article – State Finance and Procurement 19 | |
73 | - | Section 3.5–318; 3.5–801 through 3.5–805 3.5–806 to be under the new subtitle 20 | |
74 | - | “Subtitle 8. Artificial Intelligence”; and 13–116 21 | |
75 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 22 | |
76 | - | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 23 | |
64 | + | WHEREAS, Artificial intelligence is transforming society and work, and the pace of 11 | |
65 | + | that change will present new opportunities and risks for the State’s residents, workers, and 12 | |
66 | + | economy; and 13 | |
77 | 67 | ||
78 | - | Preamble 24 | |
68 | + | WHEREAS, The State must ensure the re sponsible, ethical, beneficial, and 14 | |
69 | + | trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in State government; and 15 | |
79 | 70 | ||
80 | - | WHEREAS, Artificial intelligence | |
81 | - | ||
82 | - | ||
71 | + | WHEREAS, The State is home to a rich and growing artificial intelligence ecosystem 16 | |
72 | + | of academic, industry, government, and civil society experts, researchers, builders, 17 | |
73 | + | organizers, and stakeholders; and 18 | |
83 | 74 | ||
84 | - | WHEREAS, The State must ensure the responsible, ethical, beneficial, and 28 | |
85 | - | trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in State government; and 29 | |
75 | + | WHEREAS, To foster an environment for innovation while respecting individuals, 19 | |
76 | + | employees, and civil rights, as artificial intelligence technologies are developed and evolve, 20 | |
77 | + | the technologies should be analyzed and monitored by government officials, industry 21 | |
78 | + | experts, consumer protection advocates, and other stakeholders; and 22 | |
86 | 79 | ||
87 | - | WHEREAS, The State is home to a rich and growing artificial intelligence ecosystem 30 | |
88 | - | of academic, industry, government, and civil society experts, researchers, builders, 31 | |
89 | - | organizers, and stakeholders; and 32 | |
80 | + | WHEREAS, Given the rapid rate of change in artificial intelligence technologies and 23 | |
81 | + | industry, the State must chart a principled yet adaptable, pragmatic path forward, so that 24 | |
82 | + | the technologies’ benefits can be confidently harnessed on behalf of Marylanders and in 25 | |
83 | + | service of the Governor’s mission to Leave No One Behind; and 26 | |
90 | 84 | ||
91 | - | WHEREAS, To foster an environment for innovation while respecting individuals, 33 | |
92 | - | employees, and civil rights, as artificial intelligence technologies are developed and evolve, 34 | |
93 | - | the technologies should be analyzed and monitored by government officials, industry 35 | |
94 | - | experts, consumer protection advocates, and other stakeholders; and 36 | |
85 | + | WHEREAS, Leaders across State government share a common in terest in 27 | |
86 | + | establishing effective artificial intelligence governance and are committed to working 28 | |
87 | + | together to develop the legal and policy framework for its responsible use in the State; and 29 | |
95 | 88 | ||
96 | - | WHEREAS, Given the rapid rate of change in artificial intelligence technologies and 37 | |
97 | - | industry, the State must chart a principled yet adaptable, pragmatic path forward, so that 38 HOUSE BILL 1271 3 | |
89 | + | WHEREAS, Automated systems should be safe and effective, develop ed with 30 | |
90 | + | consultation from diverse communities, stakeholders, and domain experts to identify 31 | |
91 | + | concerns, risks, and potential impacts of the systems; and 32 | |
92 | + | ||
93 | + | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should take 33 | |
94 | + | proactive and continuous measures to protect individuals and communities from 34 | |
95 | + | algorithmic discrimination and to use and design systems in an equitable way; and 35 | |
96 | + | HOUSE BILL 1271 3 | |
98 | 97 | ||
99 | 98 | ||
100 | - | the technologies’ benefits can be confidently harnessed on behalf of Marylanders and in 1 | |
101 | - | service of the Governor’s mission to Leave No One Behind; and 2 | |
99 | + | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should seek 1 | |
100 | + | permission and respect decisions regarding collection, use, access, transfer, and deletion of 2 | |
101 | + | data in appropriate ways and to the greatest extent possible; where not possible, alternative 3 | |
102 | + | privacy by design safeguards should be used; and 4 | |
102 | 103 | ||
103 | - | WHEREAS, Leaders across State government share a common interest in 3 | |
104 | - | establishing effective artificial intelligence governance and are committed to working 4 | |
105 | - | together to develop the legal and policy framework for its responsible use in the State; and 5 | |
104 | + | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 5 | |
105 | + | provide generally accessible plain language documentation including clear descriptions of 6 | |
106 | + | the overall system functioning and the role automation plays, notice that such systems are 7 | |
107 | + | in use, the individual or organization responsible for the system, and explanations of 8 | |
108 | + | outcomes that are clear, timely, and accessible; and 9 | |
106 | 109 | ||
107 | - | WHEREAS, Automated systems should be safe and effective, developed with 6 | |
108 | - | consultation from diverse communities, stakeholders, and domain experts to identify 7 | |
109 | - | concerns, risks, and potential impacts of the systems; and 8 | |
110 | + | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 10 | |
111 | + | consider the specific types of actions for which a human alternative is appropriate, 11 | |
112 | + | commensurate with the magnitude of the action and risk of harm, along with the extent to 12 | |
113 | + | which a human alternative would be beneficial to individuals and the public interest; now, 13 | |
114 | + | therefore, 14 | |
110 | 115 | ||
111 | - | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should take 9 | |
112 | - | proactive and continuous measures to protect individuals and communities from 10 | |
113 | - | algorithmic discrimination and to use and design systems in an equitable way; and 11 | |
116 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 15 | |
117 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 16 | |
114 | 118 | ||
115 | - | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should seek 12 | |
116 | - | permission and respect decisions regarding collection, use, access, transfer, and deletion of 13 | |
117 | - | data in appropriate ways and to the greatest extent possible; where not possible, alternative 14 | |
118 | - | privacy by design safeguards should be used; and 15 | |
119 | + | Article – State Finance and Procurement 17 | |
119 | 120 | ||
120 | - | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 16 | |
121 | - | provide generally accessible plain language documentation including clear descriptions of 17 | |
122 | - | the overall system functioning and the role automation plays, notice that such systems are 18 | |
123 | - | in use, the individual or organization responsible for the system, and explanations of 19 | |
124 | - | outcomes that are clear, timely, and accessible; and 20 | |
121 | + | 3.5–101. 18 | |
125 | 122 | ||
126 | - | WHEREAS, Designers, developers, and deployers of automated systems should 21 | |
127 | - | consider the specific types of actions for which a human alternative is appropriate, 22 | |
128 | - | commensurate with the magnitude of the action and risk of harm, along with the extent to 23 | |
129 | - | which a human alternative would be beneficial to individuals and the public interest; now, 24 | |
130 | - | therefore, 25 | |
123 | + | (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 19 | |
131 | 124 | ||
132 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 26 | |
133 | - | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 27 | |
125 | + | (c) “Department” means the Department of Information Technology. 20 | |
134 | 126 | ||
135 | - | ||
127 | + | (d) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Information Technology. 21 | |
136 | 128 | ||
137 | - | 3.5–101. 29 | |
129 | + | (f) “Unit of State government” means an agency or unit of the Executive Branch 22 | |
130 | + | of State government. 23 | |
138 | 131 | ||
139 | - | ||
132 | + | 3.5–301. 24 | |
140 | 133 | ||
141 | - | ( | |
134 | + | (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. 25 | |
142 | 135 | ||
143 | - | (d) “Secretary” means the Secretary of Information Technology. 32 | |
136 | + | (B) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” HAS THE MEANI NG STATED IN § 3.5–801 26 | |
137 | + | OF THIS TITLE. 27 | |
144 | 138 | ||
145 | - | (f) “Unit of State government” means an agency or unit of the Executive Branch 33 | |
146 | - | of State government. 34 4 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
139 | + | [(b)] (C) “Cybersecurity” means processes or capabilities wherein systems, 28 | |
140 | + | communications, and information are protected and defended against damage, 29 | |
141 | + | unauthorized use or modification, and exploitation. 30 | |
142 | + | ||
143 | + | [(c)] (D) “Cybersecurity strategy” means a vision, a plan of action, or guiding 31 | |
144 | + | principles. 32 | |
145 | + | 4 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
146 | + | ||
147 | + | ||
148 | + | [(d)] (E) (1) “Development” means all expenditures for a new information 1 | |
149 | + | technology system or an enhancement to an existing system including system: 2 | |
150 | + | ||
151 | + | (i) planning; 3 | |
152 | + | ||
153 | + | (ii) creation; 4 | |
154 | + | ||
155 | + | (iii) installation; 5 | |
156 | + | ||
157 | + | (iv) testing; and 6 | |
158 | + | ||
159 | + | (v) initial training. 7 | |
160 | + | ||
161 | + | (2) “Development” does not include: 8 | |
162 | + | ||
163 | + | (i) ongoing operating costs, software or hardware maintenance, 9 | |
164 | + | routine upgrades, or modifications that merely allow for a continuation of the existing level 10 | |
165 | + | of functionality; or 11 | |
166 | + | ||
167 | + | (ii) expenditures made after a new or enhanced system has been 12 | |
168 | + | legally accepted by the user and is being used for the business process for which it was 13 | |
169 | + | intended. 14 | |
170 | + | ||
171 | + | [(e)] (F) “Fund” means the Major Information Technology Development Project 15 | |
172 | + | Fund. 16 | |
173 | + | ||
174 | + | [(f)] (G) “Information technology” means all electronic information processing, 17 | |
175 | + | including: 18 | |
176 | + | ||
177 | + | (1) maintenance; 19 | |
178 | + | ||
179 | + | (2) telecommunications; 20 | |
180 | + | ||
181 | + | (3) hardware; 21 | |
182 | + | ||
183 | + | (4) software; and 22 | |
184 | + | ||
185 | + | (5) associated services. 23 | |
186 | + | ||
187 | + | [(g)] (H) “Information technology services” means information provided by 24 | |
188 | + | electronic means by or on behalf of a unit of State government. 25 | |
189 | + | ||
190 | + | [(h)] (I) “Major information technology development project” means any 26 | |
191 | + | information technology development project that meets one or more of the following 27 | |
192 | + | criteria: 28 | |
193 | + | ||
194 | + | (1) the estimated total cost of development equals or exceeds $1,000,000; 29 HOUSE BILL 1271 5 | |
147 | 195 | ||
148 | 196 | ||
149 | 197 | ||
150 | - | 3.5–301. 1 | |
198 | + | (2) the project is undertaken to support a critical business function 1 | |
199 | + | associated with the public health, education, safety, or financial well–being of the citizens 2 | |
200 | + | of Maryland; or 3 | |
151 | 201 | ||
152 | - | (a) In this subtitle the following words have the meanings indicated. 2 | |
202 | + | (3) the Secretary determines that the project requires the special attention 4 | |
203 | + | and consideration given to a major information technology development project due to: 5 | |
153 | 204 | ||
154 | - | (B) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 3.5–801 3 | |
155 | - | OF THIS TITLE. 4 | |
205 | + | (i) the significance of the project’s potential benefits or risks; 6 | |
156 | 206 | ||
157 | - | [(b)] (C) “Cybersecurity” means processes or capabilities wherein systems, 5 | |
158 | - | communications, and information are protected and defended against damage, 6 | |
159 | - | unauthorized use or modification, and exploitation. 7 | |
207 | + | (ii) the impact of the project on the public or local governments; 7 | |
160 | 208 | ||
161 | - | [(c)] (D) “Cybersecurity strategy” means a vision, a plan of action, or guiding 8 | |
162 | - | principles. 9 | |
209 | + | (iii) the public visibility of the project; or 8 | |
163 | 210 | ||
164 | - | [(d)] (E) (1) “Development” means all expenditures for a new information 10 | |
165 | - | technology system or an enhancement to an existing system including system: 11 | |
211 | + | (iv) other reasons as determined by the Secretary. 9 | |
166 | 212 | ||
167 | - | (i) planning; 12 | |
213 | + | [(i)] (J) “Master plan” means the statewide information technology master plan 10 | |
214 | + | and statewide cybersecurity strategy. 11 | |
168 | 215 | ||
169 | - | (ii) creation; 13 | |
216 | + | [(j)] (K) “Nonvisual access” means the ability, through keyboard control, 12 | |
217 | + | synthesized speech, Braille, or other methods not requiring sight to receive, use, and 13 | |
218 | + | manipulate information and operate controls necessary to access information technology in 14 | |
219 | + | accordance with standards adopted under § 3.5–303(b) of this subtitle. 15 | |
170 | 220 | ||
171 | - | (iii) installation; 14 | |
221 | + | [(k)] (L) “Resource sharing” means the utilization of a State resource by private 16 | |
222 | + | industry in exchange for the provision to the State of a communication service or other 17 | |
223 | + | consideration. 18 | |
172 | 224 | ||
173 | - | (iv) testing; and 15 | |
225 | + | [(l)] (M) “Systems development life cycle plan” means a plan that defines all 19 | |
226 | + | actions, functions, or activities to be performed by a unit of State government in the 20 | |
227 | + | definition, planning, acquisition, development, testing, implementation, operation, 21 | |
228 | + | enhancement, and modification of information technology systems. 22 | |
174 | 229 | ||
175 | - | ||
230 | + | 3.5–303. 23 | |
176 | 231 | ||
177 | - | ( | |
232 | + | (a) The Secretary is responsible for carrying out the following duties: 24 | |
178 | 233 | ||
179 | - | (i) ongoing operating costs, software or hardware maintenance, 18 | |
180 | - | routine upgrades, or modifications that merely allow for a continuation of the existing level 19 | |
181 | - | of functionality; or 20 | |
234 | + | (1) developing, maintaining, revising, and enforcing information 25 | |
235 | + | technology policies, procedures, and standards; 26 | |
182 | 236 | ||
183 | - | (ii) expenditures made after a new or enhanced system has been 21 | |
184 | - | legally accepted by the user and is being used for the business process for which it was 22 | |
185 | - | intended. 23 | |
237 | + | (2) providing technical assistance, advice, and recommendations to the 27 | |
238 | + | Governor and any unit of State government concerning information technology matters; 28 | |
186 | 239 | ||
187 | - | [(e)] (F) “Fund” means the Major Information Technology Development Project 24 | |
188 | - | Fund. 25 | |
189 | - | ||
190 | - | [(f)] (G) “Information technology” means all electronic information processing, 26 | |
191 | - | including: 27 | |
192 | - | ||
193 | - | (1) maintenance; 28 | |
194 | - | HOUSE BILL 1271 5 | |
240 | + | (3) reviewing the annual project plan for each unit of State government to 29 | |
241 | + | make information and services available to the public over the Internet; 30 | |
242 | + | 6 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
195 | 243 | ||
196 | 244 | ||
197 | - | (2) telecommunications; 1 | |
245 | + | (4) developing and maintaining a statewide information technology master 1 | |
246 | + | plan that will: 2 | |
198 | 247 | ||
199 | - | (3) hardware; 2 | |
248 | + | (i) centralize the management and direction of information 3 | |
249 | + | technology policy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 4 | |
250 | + | Department; 5 | |
200 | 251 | ||
201 | - | (4) software; and 3 | |
252 | + | (ii) include all aspects of State information technology including 6 | |
253 | + | telecommunications, security, data processing, and information management; 7 | |
202 | 254 | ||
203 | - | (5) associated services. 4 | |
255 | + | (iii) consider interstate transfers as a result of federal legislation and 8 | |
256 | + | regulation; 9 | |
204 | 257 | ||
205 | - | [(g)] (H) “Information technology services” means information provided by 5 | |
206 | - | electronic means by or on behalf of a unit of State government. 6 | |
258 | + | (iv) ensure that the State information technology plan and related 10 | |
259 | + | policies and standards are consistent with State goals, objectives, and resources, and 11 | |
260 | + | represent a long–range vision for using information technology to improve the overall 12 | |
261 | + | effectiveness of State government; 13 | |
207 | 262 | ||
208 | - | [(h)] (I) “Major information technology development project” means any 7 | |
209 | - | information technology development project that meets one or more of the following 8 | |
210 | - | criteria: 9 | |
263 | + | (v) include standards to assure nonvisual access to the information 14 | |
264 | + | and services made available to the public over the Internet; and 15 | |
211 | 265 | ||
212 | - | (1) the estimated total cost of development equals or exceeds $1,000,000; 10 | |
266 | + | (vi) allows a State agency to maintain the agency’s own information 16 | |
267 | + | technology unit that provides for information technology services to support the mission of 17 | |
268 | + | the agency; 18 | |
213 | 269 | ||
214 | - | (2) the project is undertaken to support a critical business function 11 | |
215 | - | associated with the public health, education, safety, or financial well–being of the citizens 12 | |
216 | - | of Maryland; or 13 | |
270 | + | (5) developing and maintaining a statewide cybersecurity strategy that 19 | |
271 | + | will: 20 | |
217 | 272 | ||
218 | - | (3) the Secretary determines that the project requires the special attention 14 | |
219 | - | and consideration given to a major information technology development project due to: 15 | |
273 | + | (i) centralize the management and direction of cybersecurity 21 | |
274 | + | strategy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 22 | |
275 | + | Department; and 23 | |
220 | 276 | ||
221 | - | (i) the significance of the project’s potential benefits or risks; 16 | |
277 | + | (ii) serve as the basis for budget allocations for cybersecurity 24 | |
278 | + | preparedness for the Executive Branch of State government; 25 | |
222 | 279 | ||
223 | - | (ii) the impact of the project on the public or local governments; 17 | |
280 | + | (6) adopting by regulation and enforcing nonvisual access standards to be 26 | |
281 | + | used in the procurement of information technology services by or on behalf of units of State 27 | |
282 | + | government in accordance with subsection (c) of this section; 28 | |
224 | 283 | ||
225 | - | (iii) the public visibility of the project; or 18 | |
284 | + | (7) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 29 | |
285 | + | advising and overseeing a consistent cybersecurity strategy for units of State government, 30 | |
286 | + | including institutions under the control of the governing boards of the public institutions 31 | |
287 | + | of higher education; 32 | |
226 | 288 | ||
227 | - | (iv) other reasons as determined by the Secretary. 19 | |
228 | - | ||
229 | - | [(i)] (J) “Master plan” means the statewide information technology master plan 20 | |
230 | - | and statewide cybersecurity strategy. 21 | |
231 | - | ||
232 | - | [(j)] (K) “Nonvisual access” means the ability, through keyboard control, 22 | |
233 | - | synthesized speech, Braille, or other methods not requiring sight to receive, use, and 23 | |
234 | - | manipulate information and operate controls necessary to access information technology in 24 | |
235 | - | accordance with standards adopted under § 3.5–303(b) of this subtitle. 25 | |
236 | - | ||
237 | - | [(k)] (L) “Resource sharing” means the utilization of a State resource by private 26 | |
238 | - | industry in exchange for the provision to the State of a communication service or other 27 | |
239 | - | consideration. 28 | |
240 | - | ||
241 | - | [(l)] (M) “Systems development life cycle plan” means a plan that defines all 29 | |
242 | - | actions, functions, or activities to be performed by a unit of State government in the 30 6 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
289 | + | (8) advising and consulting with the Legislative and Judicial branches of 33 | |
290 | + | State government regarding a cybersecurity strategy; 34 | |
291 | + | HOUSE BILL 1271 7 | |
243 | 292 | ||
244 | 293 | ||
245 | - | definition, planning, acquisition, development, testing, implementation, operation, 1 | |
246 | - | enhancement, and modification of information technology systems. 2 | |
294 | + | (9) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 1 | |
295 | + | developing guidance on consistent cybersecurity strategies for counties, municipal 2 | |
296 | + | corporations, school systems, and all other political subdivisions of the State; 3 | |
247 | 297 | ||
248 | - | 3.5–303. 3 | |
298 | + | (10) upgrading information technology and cybersecurity–related State 4 | |
299 | + | government infrastructure; [and] 5 | |
249 | 300 | ||
250 | - | ( | |
301 | + | (11) annually evaluating: 6 | |
251 | 302 | ||
252 | - | (1) developing, maintaining, revising, and enforcing information 5 | |
253 | - | technology policies, procedures, and standards; 6 | |
303 | + | (i) the feasibility of units of State government providing public 7 | |
304 | + | services using artificial intelligence, machine learning, commercial cloud computer 8 | |
305 | + | services, device–as–a–service procurement models, and other emerging technologies; and 9 | |
254 | 306 | ||
255 | - | ( | |
256 | - | ||
307 | + | (ii) the development of data analytics capabilities to enable 10 | |
308 | + | data–driven policymaking by units of State government; AND 11 | |
257 | 309 | ||
258 | - | (3) reviewing the annual project plan for each unit of State government to 9 | |
259 | - | make information and services available to the public over the Internet; 10 | |
310 | + | (12) CONDUCTING INVENTORI ES AND ONGOING ASSES SMENTS OF 12 | |
311 | + | SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENC E THAT ARE USED BY A UNIT OF 13 | |
312 | + | STATE GOVERNMENT AS R EQUIRED UNDER § 3.5–318 OF THIS SUBTITLE . 14 | |
260 | 313 | ||
261 | - | (4) developing and maintaining a statewide information technology master 11 | |
262 | - | plan that will: 12 | |
314 | + | 3.5–318. 15 | |
263 | 315 | ||
264 | - | (i) centralize the management and direction of information 13 | |
265 | - | technology policy within the Executive Branch of State government under the control of the 14 | |
266 | - | Department; 15 | |
316 | + | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 16 | |
317 | + | EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT A DATA INV ENTORY THAT 17 | |
318 | + | IDENTIFIES DATA THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA ESTABLI SHED BY THE CHIEF DATA 18 | |
319 | + | OFFICER AND THAT IS : 19 | |
267 | 320 | ||
268 | - | (ii) include all aspects of State information technology including 16 | |
269 | - | telecommunications, security, data processing, and information management; 17 | |
321 | + | (1) (I) NECESSARY FOR THE OP ERATION OF THE UNIT ; OR 20 | |
270 | 322 | ||
271 | - | (iii) consider interstate transfers as a result of federal legislation and 18 | |
272 | - | regulation; 19 | |
323 | + | (II) OTHERWISE REQUIRED T O BE COLLECTED : 21 | |
273 | 324 | ||
274 | - | (iv) ensure that the State information technology plan and related 20 | |
275 | - | policies and standards are consistent with State goals, objectives, and resources, and 21 | |
276 | - | represent a long–range vision for using information technology to improve the overall 22 | |
277 | - | effectiveness of State government; 23 | |
325 | + | 1. AS A CONDITION TO RE CEIVE FEDERAL FUNDS ; OR 22 | |
278 | 326 | ||
279 | - | (v) include standards to assure nonvisual access to the information 24 | |
280 | - | and services made available to the public over the Internet; and 25 | |
327 | + | 2. BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW; AND 23 | |
281 | 328 | ||
282 | - | (vi) allows a State agency to maintain the agency’s own information 26 | |
283 | - | technology unit that provides for information technology services to support the mission of 27 | |
284 | - | the agency; 28 | |
329 | + | (2) IN A FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, 24 | |
330 | + | INCLUDING WHEN THE D ATA IS USED IN ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 25 | |
285 | 331 | ||
286 | - | ( | |
287 | - | ||
332 | + | (B) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVE LOP AND PUBLISH GUID ANCE ON THE 26 | |
333 | + | POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES FOR THE INVENTOR Y. 27 | |
288 | 334 | ||
289 | - | ||
290 | - | ||
291 | - | ||
335 | + | SUBTITLE 8. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 28 | |
336 | + | ||
337 | + | 3.5–801. 29 8 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
292 | 338 | ||
293 | 339 | ||
294 | 340 | ||
295 | - | ( | |
296 | - | ||
341 | + | (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 1 | |
342 | + | INDICATED. 2 | |
297 | 343 | ||
298 | - | (6) adopting by regulation and enforcing nonvisual access standards to be 3 | |
299 | - | used in the procurement of information technology services by or on behalf of units of State 4 | |
300 | - | government in accordance with subsection (c) of this section; 5 | |
344 | + | (B) (1) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” MEANS A COMPUTATIONA L 3 | |
345 | + | PROCESS THAT FACILIT ATES DECISION MAKING . 4 | |
301 | 346 | ||
302 | - | (7) in consultation with the Maryland Cybersecurity Coordinating Council, 6 | |
303 | - | advising and overseeing a consistent cybersecurity strategy for units of State government, 7 | |
304 | - | including institutions under the control of the governing boards of the public institutions 8 | |
305 | - | of higher education; 9 | |
347 | + | (2) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” INCLUDES DECISIONS 5 | |
348 | + | DERIVED FROM MACHINE S, STATISTICS, FACIAL RECOGNITION , AND DECISIONS ON 6 | |
349 | + | PAPER. 7 | |
306 | 350 | ||
307 | - | (8) advising and consulting with the Legislative and Judicial branches of 10 | |
308 | - | State government regarding a cybersecurity strategy; 11 | |
351 | + | (C) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” MEANS A MACHINE –BASED SYSTEM THAT : 8 | |
309 | 352 | ||
310 | - | ( | |
311 | - | ||
312 | - | ||
353 | + | (1) CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF H UMAN–DEFINED OBJECTIVES , MAKE 9 | |
354 | + | PREDICTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS , OR DECISIONS INFLUENCING RE AL OR VIRTUAL 10 | |
355 | + | ENVIRONMENTS ; 11 | |
313 | 356 | ||
314 | - | (10) upgrading information technology and cybersecurity–related State 15 | |
315 | - | government infrastructure; [and] 16 | |
357 | + | (2) USES MACHINE AND HUM AN–BASED INPUTS TO PERC EIVE REAL 12 | |
358 | + | AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONM ENTS AND ABSTRACTS T HOSE PERCEPTIONS INT O MODELS 13 | |
359 | + | THROUGH ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER ; AND 14 | |
316 | 360 | ||
317 | - | (11) annually evaluating: 17 | |
361 | + | (3) USES MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FO R 15 | |
362 | + | INFORMATION OR ACTIO N. 16 | |
318 | 363 | ||
319 | - | (i) the feasibility of units of State government providing public 18 | |
320 | - | services using artificial intelligence, machine learning, commercial cloud computer 19 | |
321 | - | services, device–as–a–service procurement models, and other emerging technologies; and 20 | |
364 | + | (D) “HIGH–RISK” MEANS AN ACT THAT IS LIKELY TO: 17 | |
322 | 365 | ||
323 | - | (ii) the development of data analytics capabilities to enable 21 | |
324 | - | data–driven policymaking by units of State government; AND 22 | |
366 | + | (1) RESULT IN ANY UNLAWF UL DISCRIMINATION ; 18 | |
325 | 367 | ||
326 | - | (12) CONDUCTING INVENTORI ES AND ONGOING ASSESSME NTS OF 23 | |
327 | - | SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE THAT ARE USED BY A UNIT OF 24 | |
328 | - | STATE GOVERNMENT AS R EQUIRED UNDER § 3.5–318 OF THIS SUBTITLE § 3.5–803 25 | |
329 | - | OF THIS TITLE. 26 | |
368 | + | (2) HAVE AN UNLAWFUL DIS PARATE IMPACT ON ANY INDIVIDUAL OR 19 | |
369 | + | GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS ON THE BASIS OF ANY ACTUAL OR PE RCEIVED 20 | |
370 | + | CHARACTERISTIC ; OR 21 | |
330 | 371 | ||
331 | - | 3.5–318. 27 | |
372 | + | (3) HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPA CT ON THE HEALTH , SAFETY, OR 22 | |
373 | + | WELL–BEING OF AN INDIVIDU AL. 23 | |
332 | 374 | ||
333 | - | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 28 | |
334 | - | EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHALL CON DUCT A DATA INVENTOR Y THAT 29 | |
335 | - | IDENTIFIES DATA THAT MEETS THE CRITERIA E STABLISHED BY THE CHIEF DATA 30 | |
336 | - | OFFICER AND THAT IS : 31 | |
375 | + | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS A DOCUMENTED R ISK–BASED 24 | |
376 | + | EVALUATION OF A SYST EM THAT EMPLOYS ARTI FICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 25 | |
337 | 377 | ||
338 | - | (1) (I) NECESSARY FOR THE OP ERATION OF THE UNIT ; OR 32 | |
339 | - | 8 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
378 | + | 3.5–802. 26 | |
340 | 379 | ||
341 | - | ||
342 | - | (II) OTHERWISE REQUIRED T O BE COLLECTED : 1 | |
343 | - | ||
344 | - | 1. AS A CONDITION TO RECEIVE FEDE RAL FUNDS; OR 2 | |
345 | - | ||
346 | - | 2. BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW; AND 3 | |
347 | - | ||
348 | - | (2) IN A FORM PRESCRIBED BY THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, 4 | |
349 | - | INCLUDING WHEN THE D ATA IS USED IN ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 5 | |
350 | - | ||
351 | - | (B) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVE LOP AND PUBLISH GUID ANCE ON THE 6 | |
352 | - | POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE INVENTORY . 7 | |
353 | - | ||
354 | - | SUBTITLE 8. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 8 | |
355 | - | ||
356 | - | 3.5–801. 9 | |
357 | - | ||
358 | - | (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 10 | |
359 | - | INDICATED. 11 | |
360 | - | ||
361 | - | (B) (1) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” MEANS A COMPUTATIONA L 12 | |
362 | - | PROCESS THAT FACILIT ATES DECISION MAKI NG. 13 | |
363 | - | ||
364 | - | (2) “ALGORITHMIC DECISION SYSTEM” INCLUDES DECISIONS 14 | |
365 | - | DERIVED FROM MACHINE S, STATISTICS, FACIAL RECOGNITION , AND DECISIONS ON 15 | |
366 | - | PAPER. 16 | |
367 | - | ||
368 | - | (C) “ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGEN CE” MEANS A MACHINE –BASED SYSTEM THAT : 17 | |
369 | - | ||
370 | - | (1) CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF H UMAN–DEFINED OBJECTIVES, MAKE 18 | |
371 | - | PREDICTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS , OR DECISIONS INFLUEN CING REAL OR VIRTUAL 19 | |
372 | - | ENVIRONMENTS ; 20 | |
373 | - | ||
374 | - | (2) USES MACHINE AND HUM AN–BASED INPUTS TO PERC EIVE REAL 21 | |
375 | - | AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONM ENTS AND ABSTRACTS T HOSE PERCEPTIONS INT O MODELS 22 | |
376 | - | THROUGH ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER ; AND 23 | |
377 | - | ||
378 | - | (3) USES MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FOR 24 | |
379 | - | INFORMATION OR ACTIO N. 25 | |
380 | - | ||
381 | - | (D) “HIGH–RISK” MEANS AN ACT THAT IS LIKELY TO: 26 | |
382 | - | ||
383 | - | (1) RESULT IN ANY UNLAWF UL DISCRIMINATION ; 27 | |
384 | - | HOUSE BILL 1271 9 | |
385 | - | ||
386 | - | ||
387 | - | (2) HAVE AN UNLAWFUL DIS PARATE IMPACT ON ANY INDIVIDUAL OR 1 | |
388 | - | GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS O N THE BASIS OF ANY A CTUAL OR PERCEIVED 2 | |
389 | - | CHARACTERISTIC ; OR 3 | |
390 | - | ||
391 | - | (3) HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPA CT ON THE HEALTH , SAFETY, OR 4 | |
392 | - | WELL–BEING OF AN INDIVIDU AL. 5 | |
393 | - | ||
394 | - | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS A DOCUMENTED R ISK–BASED 6 | |
395 | - | EVALUATION OF A SYST EM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE. 7 | |
396 | - | ||
397 | - | (D) (1) “HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 8 | |
398 | - | INTELLIGENCE THAT IS A RISK TO INDIVIDUAL S OR COMMUNITIES , AS DEFINED 9 | |
399 | - | UNDER REGULATIONS AD OPTED BY THE DEPARTMENT IN CONSULT ATION WITH THE 10 | |
400 | - | GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET. 11 | |
401 | - | ||
402 | - | (2) “HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE” INCLUDES 12 | |
403 | - | RIGHTS–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND SAF ETY–IMPACTING 13 | |
404 | - | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE. 14 | |
405 | - | ||
406 | - | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS AN ASSESSMENT OF ARTIFICIAL 15 | |
407 | - | INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS MADE UNDER REGULATIO NS ADOPTED BY THE 16 | |
408 | - | DEPARTMENT IN CONSULT ATION WITH THE GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL 17 | |
409 | - | INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET AND REQUIR ED UNDER § 3.5–803 OF THIS SUBTITLE. 18 | |
410 | - | ||
411 | - | (F) “PUBLIC SENIOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTIO N” MEANS: 19 | |
412 | - | ||
413 | - | (1) THE CONSTITUENT INST ITUTIONS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM 20 | |
414 | - | OF MARYLAND AND THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CENTER FOR 21 | |
415 | - | ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; 22 | |
416 | - | ||
417 | - | (2) MORGAN STATE UNIVERSITY; OR 23 | |
418 | - | ||
419 | - | (3) ST. MARY’S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND. 24 | |
420 | - | ||
421 | - | (G) “RIGHTS–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 25 | |
422 | - | INTELLIGENCE WHOSE O UTPUT SERVES AS A BA SIS FOR DECISION OR ACTION THAT 26 | |
423 | - | IS SIGNIFICANTLY LIK ELY TO AFFECT CIVIL RIGHTS, CIVIL LIBERTIES, EQUAL 27 | |
424 | - | OPPORTUNITIES , ACCESS TO CRITICAL R ESOURCES, OR PRIVACY. 28 | |
425 | - | ||
426 | - | (H) “SAFETY–IMPACTING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE” MEANS ARTIFICIAL 29 | |
427 | - | INTELLIGENCE THAT HA S THE POTENTIAL TO S IGNIFICANTLY IMPACT THE SAFETY 30 | |
428 | - | OF HUMAN LIFE , WELL–BEING, OR CRITICAL INFRASTR UCTURE. 31 | |
429 | - | ||
430 | - | 3.5–802. 32 10 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
380 | + | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, AND ANNUALLY THEREAF TER, 27 | |
381 | + | EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT AN INVENTO RY OF SYSTEMS 28 | |
382 | + | THAT EMPLOY ARTIFICI AL INTELLIGENCE . 29 HOUSE BILL 1271 9 | |
431 | 383 | ||
432 | 384 | ||
433 | 385 | ||
434 | - | ( | |
435 | - | ||
386 | + | (B) FOR EACH SYSTEM , THE INVENTORY REQUIR ED BY THIS SECTION S HALL 1 | |
387 | + | INCLUDE: 2 | |
436 | 388 | ||
437 | - | ( | |
389 | + | (1) THE NAME OF THE S YSTEM; 3 | |
438 | 390 | ||
439 | - | ( | |
391 | + | (2) THE VENDOR THAT PROV IDED THE SYSTEM , IF APPLICABLE; 4 | |
440 | 392 | ||
441 | - | ( | |
393 | + | (3) A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM; 5 | |
442 | 394 | ||
443 | - | (2) ON OR BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025, EACH ENTITY LISTED U NDER 6 | |
444 | - | PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION S HALL ESTABLISH POLIC IES AND 7 | |
445 | - | PROCEDURES THAT ARE FUNCTIONALLY COMPATI BLE WITH THE POLICIE S AND 8 | |
446 | - | PROCEDURES ADOPTED U NDER § 3.5–804(A) OF THIS SUBTITLE FOR THE 9 | |
447 | - | DEVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF 10 | |
448 | - | SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 11 | |
395 | + | (4) A STATEMENT OF THE P URPOSE AND THE INTEN DED USES OF THE 6 | |
396 | + | SYSTEM; 7 | |
449 | 397 | ||
450 | - | (B) (1) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 12 | |
451 | - | THIS SUBTITLE APPLIE S TO EACH PUBLIC SEN IOR HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION 13 | |
452 | - | AND BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE. 14 | |
398 | + | (5) WHETHER THE SYSTEM U NDERWENT AN IMPACT A SSESSMENT 8 | |
399 | + | PRIOR TO BEING IMPLEMENTED ; 9 | |
453 | 400 | ||
454 | - | (2) THIS SUBTITLE DOES NO T APPLY TO ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE 15 | |
455 | - | DEPLOYED BY A PUBLIC SENIOR HIGHER EDUCAT ION INSTITUTION OR BALTIMORE 16 | |
456 | - | CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE THAT IS USED SOLELY FOR A RESEARC H OR ACADEMIC 17 | |
457 | - | PURPOSE, INCLUDING IN PARTNERSHIP WITH A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT FOR 18 | |
458 | - | THE DEVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , OR USE OF ARTIFICIAL 19 | |
459 | - | INTELLIGENCE . 20 | |
401 | + | (6) WHETHER THE SYSTEM I S USED TO INDEPENDEN TLY MAKE A 10 | |
402 | + | DECISION OR JUDGMENT OR TO INFORM OR SUPP ORT A DECISION OR JU DGMENT 11 | |
403 | + | DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO INVOLVE A HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 12 | |
460 | 404 | ||
461 | - | (3) ON OR BEFORE JUNE 1, 2025, EACH PUBLIC SENIOR H IGHER 21 | |
462 | - | EDUCATION INSTITUTIO N AND BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE SHALL 22 | |
463 | - | ESTABLISH POLICIES AND P ROCEDURES THAT ARE F UNCTIONALLY COMPATIB LE 23 | |
464 | - | WITH THE POLICIES AN D PROCEDURES ADOPTED UNDER § 3.5–804(A) OF THIS 24 | |
465 | - | SUBTITLE FOR THE DEV ELOPMENT, PROCUREMENT , DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND 25 | |
466 | - | ONGOING ASSESSMENT O F SYSTEMS THAT EMPLO Y HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIA L 26 | |
467 | - | INTELLIGENCE USED SO LELY FOR A RESEARCH OR ACADEMIC PURPOSE . 27 | |
405 | + | (7) A DETERMINATION OF T HE RISK THAT USE OF A SYSTEM MAY BE 13 | |
406 | + | HIGH–RISK. 14 | |
468 | 407 | ||
469 | - | (4) ON OR BEFORE SEPTEMBER 1, 2025, AND EACH YEAR 28 | |
470 | - | THEREAFTER , EACH PUBLIC SENIOR H IGHER EDUCATION INST ITUTION AND 29 | |
471 | - | BALTIMORE CITY COMMUNITY COLLEGE SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DEPARTMENT A 30 | |
472 | - | REPORT ON ALL HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE PROCURED AN D DEPLOYED 31 | |
473 | - | FOR A RESEARCH OR AC ADEMIC PURPOSE . 32 | |
408 | + | (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE EACH INVENTORY REQUI RED BY THIS 15 | |
409 | + | SECTION PUBLICLY AVA ILABLE ON ITS WEBSIT E. 16 | |
474 | 410 | ||
475 | - | 3.5–803. 33 | |
411 | + | (D) ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1, 2025, EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT 17 | |
412 | + | SHALL CONDUCT AN IMP ACT ASSESSMENT OF A SYSTEM THA T INVOLVES A 18 | |
413 | + | HIGH–RISK ACTION. 19 | |
414 | + | ||
415 | + | 3.5–803. 20 | |
416 | + | ||
417 | + | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ADOP T 21 | |
418 | + | POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES CONCERNING THE D EVELOPMENT , PROCUREMENT , 22 | |
419 | + | IMPLEMENTATION , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF SYSTEMS THAT E MPLOY 23 | |
420 | + | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY A UN IT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 24 | |
421 | + | ||
422 | + | (B) THE POLICIES AND PROC EDURES REQUIRED BY T HIS SECTION SHALL : 25 | |
423 | + | ||
424 | + | (1) SUBJECT TO ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW , GOVERN THE 26 | |
425 | + | PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION , AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF SYSTEMS THAT 27 | |
426 | + | EMPLOY ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE BY A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 28 | |
427 | + | 10 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
428 | + | ||
429 | + | ||
430 | + | (2) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 1 | |
431 | + | EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY ANY U NIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS N OT 2 | |
432 | + | HIGH–RISK; 3 | |
433 | + | ||
434 | + | (3) REQUIRE EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT TO A SSESS THE 4 | |
435 | + | LIKELY IMPACT OF ANY SYSTEM THAT E MPLOYS ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE BEFORE 5 | |
436 | + | IMPLEMENTING THE SYS TEM; 6 | |
437 | + | ||
438 | + | (4) REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO : 7 | |
439 | + | ||
440 | + | (I) NOTIFY AN INDIVIDUAL OR A GROUP OF INDIVI DUALS 8 | |
441 | + | DETERMINED TO HAVE B EEN NEGATIVELY IMPAC TED BY A SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS 9 | |
442 | + | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; AND 10 | |
443 | + | ||
444 | + | (II) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO AN INDIVIDUAL OR A G ROUP OF 11 | |
445 | + | INDIVIDUALS DETERMIN ED TO HAVE BEEN NEGA TIVELY IMPACTED BY A SYSTEM 12 | |
446 | + | THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFIC IAL INTELLIGENCE ON AVAILABLE OPTIONS TO OPT OUT OF 13 | |
447 | + | THE SYSTEM; AND 14 | |
448 | + | ||
449 | + | (5) PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ON 15 | |
450 | + | PROCUREMENT OF A SYS TEM THAT EMPLOYS ART IFICIAL INTELLIGENCE THAT 16 | |
451 | + | ENSURES DATA PRIVACY AND COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE STATUTES AND 17 | |
452 | + | REGULATIONS . 18 | |
453 | + | ||
454 | + | (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES 19 | |
455 | + | REQUIRED BY THIS SEC TION PUBLICLY AVAILABLE ON ITS WEBSITE. 20 | |
456 | + | ||
457 | + | 3.5–804. 21 | |
458 | + | ||
459 | + | BEGINNING JULY 1, 2025, A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT PROCURE 22 | |
460 | + | OR IMPLEMENT A SYSTE M THAT EMPLOYS ARTIF ICIAL INTELLIGENCE U NLESS THE 23 | |
461 | + | SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES ADOPTED UNDE R § 24 | |
462 | + | 3.5–803 OF THIS SUBTITLE . 25 | |
463 | + | ||
464 | + | 3.5–805. 26 | |
465 | + | ||
466 | + | (A) THERE IS A GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF 27 | |
467 | + | THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 28 | |
468 | + | ||
469 | + | (B) THE PURPOSE OF THE SUBCABINET IS TO FACI LITATE AND ENHANCE 29 | |
470 | + | COOPERATION AMONG UN ITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH 30 | |
471 | + | ACADEMIC INSTITUTION S AND INDUSTRIES UTI LIZING ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE. 31 | |
476 | 472 | HOUSE BILL 1271 11 | |
477 | 473 | ||
478 | 474 | ||
479 | - | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024 2025, AND ANNUALLY REGULARLY 1 | |
480 | - | THEREAFTER , EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L: 2 | |
475 | + | (C) THE SUBCABINET CONSISTS O F THE FOLLOWING MEMB ERS: 1 | |
481 | 476 | ||
482 | - | (1) CONDUCT AN INVENTORY OF SYSTEMS THAT EMPL OY HIGH–RISK 3 | |
483 | - | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE; AND 4 | |
477 | + | (1) THE SECRETARY, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 2 | |
484 | 478 | ||
485 | - | (2) | |
486 | - | ||
479 | + | (2) THE SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT , OR THE 3 | |
480 | + | SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 4 | |
487 | 481 | ||
488 | - | ( | |
489 | - | ||
482 | + | (3) THE SECRETARY OF GENERAL SERVICES, OR THE SECRETARY’S 5 | |
483 | + | DESIGNEE; 6 | |
490 | 484 | ||
491 | - | ( | |
485 | + | (4) THE SECRETARY OF LABOR, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 7 | |
492 | 486 | ||
493 | - | (2) THE VENDOR THAT PROV IDED THE SYSTEM , IF APPLICABLE; 10 | |
487 | + | (5) THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, OR THE SECRETARY’S 8 | |
488 | + | DESIGNEE; 9 | |
494 | 489 | ||
495 | - | (3) A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAPABILITIES OF THE SYSTEM; 11 | |
490 | + | (6) THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HOMELAND 10 | |
491 | + | SECURITY, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; 11 | |
496 | 492 | ||
497 | - | ( | |
498 | - | ||
493 | + | (7) THE CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF PRIVACY 12 | |
494 | + | OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 13 | |
499 | 495 | ||
500 | - | ( | |
501 | - | ||
496 | + | (8) THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER’S 14 | |
497 | + | DESIGNEE; 15 | |
502 | 498 | ||
503 | - | (6) WHETHER THE SYSTEM I S USED TO INDEPENDEN TLY MAKE A 16 | |
504 | - | DECISION OR JUDGMENT OR TO INFORM OR SUPP ORT A DECISION OR JU DGMENT 17 | |
505 | - | DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT TO INVOLVE A HIGH–RISK ACTION HIGH–RISK 18 | |
506 | - | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ; AND 19 | |
499 | + | (9) THE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF 16 | |
500 | + | INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 17 | |
507 | 501 | ||
508 | - | ( | |
509 | - | ||
502 | + | (10) THE GOVERNOR’S SENIOR ADVISOR FOR RESPONSIBLE 18 | |
503 | + | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , OR THE SENIOR ADVISOR’S DESIGNEE; AND 19 | |
510 | 504 | ||
511 | - | (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE EACH INVENTORY REQUI RED BY THIS 22 | |
512 | - | SECTION AN AGGREGATED STATEW IDE INVENTORY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE O N ITS 23 | |
513 | - | WEBSITE. 24 | |
505 | + | (11) ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, 20 | |
506 | + | APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR. 21 | |
514 | 507 | ||
515 | - | (D) (1) THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT MA KE PUBLICLY AVAILABL E ON THE 25 | |
516 | - | DEPARTMENT ’S WEBSITE INFORMATIO N FROM THE INVENTORI ES REQUIRED BY 26 | |
517 | - | THIS SECTION THAT RE LATE TO THE SAFETY A ND SECURITY OF STATE SYSTEMS IF 27 | |
518 | - | THE PUBLICATION O F THE INFORMATION IS LIKELY TO COMPROMISE THE SECURITY 28 | |
519 | - | OR INTEGRITY OF THE SYSTEM. 29 | |
508 | + | (D) THE SECRETARY SHALL CHAIR THE SUBCABINET. 22 | |
509 | + | ||
510 | + | (E) THE SUBCABINET SHALL : 23 | |
511 | + | ||
512 | + | (1) DEVELOP STRATEGY , POLICY, AND MONITORING PROCE SSES FOR 24 | |
513 | + | RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 25 | |
514 | + | ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 26 | |
515 | + | ||
516 | + | (2) OVERSEE THE STATE’S IMPLEMENTATION OF : 27 | |
520 | 517 | 12 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
521 | 518 | ||
522 | 519 | ||
523 | - | (2) ON REQUEST , THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PROV IDE TO THE 1 | |
524 | - | GOVERNOR, MEMBERS OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY, AND LAW ENFORCEMENT THE 2 | |
525 | - | INFORMATION DESCRIBE D IN PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION. 3 | |
520 | + | (I) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE INVENTORY ; 1 | |
526 | 521 | ||
527 | - | (E) (1) ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 1, 2025, DECEMBER 31, 2026, EACH 4 | |
528 | - | UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT SHAL L CONDUCT AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF A 5 | |
529 | - | SYSTEM PROCURED ON OR AFTER FEBRUARY 1, 2026, THAT INVOLVES A HIGH–RISK 6 | |
530 | - | ACTION HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 7 | |
522 | + | (II) DATA INVENTORY ; 2 | |
531 | 523 | ||
532 | - | (2) ON OR BEFORE JULY 1, 2027, EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT 8 | |
533 | - | SHALL CONDUCT AN IMP ACT ASSESSMENT OF A SYSTEM PROCURED BEFO RE 9 | |
534 | - | FEBRUARY 1, 2026, THAT INVOLVES HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE. 10 | |
524 | + | (III) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE IMPACT ASSESSMEN TS; 3 | |
535 | 525 | ||
536 | - | 3.5–803. 3.5–804. 11 | |
526 | + | (IV) MONITORING OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VOLVING A 4 | |
527 | + | HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 5 | |
537 | 528 | ||
538 | - | (A) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1, 2024, THE DEPARTMENT, IN 12 | |
539 | - | CONSULTATION WITH TH E GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET, 13 | |
540 | - | SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES CONCE RNING THE DEVELOPMEN T, 14 | |
541 | - | PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION DEPLOYMENT , USE, AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT 15 | |
542 | - | OF SYSTEMS THAT EMPL OY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE BY A UN IT OF 16 | |
543 | - | STATE GOVERNMENT . 17 | |
529 | + | (V) COMPLIANCE WITH STATE POLICIES AND PR OCEDURES; 6 | |
544 | 530 | ||
545 | - | ( | |
546 | - | ||
531 | + | (3) SUPPORT ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE AND DATA INNOVATION 7 | |
532 | + | ACROSS UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTOR EN TERPRISE BY: 8 | |
547 | 533 | ||
548 | - | (1) SUBJECT TO ANY OTHER APPLICABLE LAW , GOVERN THE 20 | |
549 | - | PROCUREMENT , IMPLEMENTATION DEPLOYMENT , AND ONGOING ASSESSME NT OF 21 | |
550 | - | SYSTEMS THAT EMPLOY HIGH–RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE BY A UNIT OF STATE 22 | |
551 | - | GOVERNMENT ; 23 | |
534 | + | (I) IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING BEST USES O F ARTIFICIAL 9 | |
535 | + | INTELLIGENCE IN EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PR IVATE SECTOR 10 | |
536 | + | ENTERPRISE; 11 | |
552 | 537 | ||
553 | - | (2) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 24 | |
554 | - | EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY ANY U NIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS N OT 25 | |
555 | - | HIGH–RISK; 26 | |
538 | + | (II) TESTING PROOFS OF CO NCEPT OF PRIORITY AR TIFICIAL 12 | |
539 | + | INTELLIGENCE USE IN PROTOTYPING ; 13 | |
556 | 540 | ||
557 | - | (3) REQUIRE EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT TO A SSESS THE 27 | |
558 | - | LIKELY IMPACT OF ANY SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE BEFORE 28 | |
559 | - | IMPLEMENTING THE SYS TEM; 29 | |
541 | + | (III) REDUCING BARRIERS TO THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF 14 | |
542 | + | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE AND STATE DATA; 15 | |
560 | 543 | ||
561 | - | ( | |
562 | - | ||
544 | + | (IV) DEVELOPING SUCCESSFUL ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE 16 | |
545 | + | PILOTS INTO PRODUCTI ON; AND 17 | |
563 | 546 | ||
564 | - | (3) BE SUFFICIENT TO ENS URE THAT THE USE OF ANY SYSTEM THAT 32 | |
565 | - | EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE BY A UNI T OF STATE GOVERNMENT IS 33 HOUSE BILL 1271 13 | |
547 | + | (V) TRAINING AND WORKFOR CE DEVELOPMENT ; 18 | |
548 | + | ||
549 | + | (4) DEVELOP AND IMPLEMEN T A COMPREHENSIVE AC TION PLAN FOR 19 | |
550 | + | RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 20 | |
551 | + | ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 21 | |
552 | + | ||
553 | + | (5) ESTABLISH PARTNERSHI PS, MEMORANDA OF UNDERST ANDING, 22 | |
554 | + | AND CONTRACTS TO SUP PORT THE AIMS OF THI S SECTION; 23 | |
555 | + | ||
556 | + | (6) PROMOTE ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE KNOWLEDG E, SKILLS, AND 24 | |
557 | + | TALENT IN STATE GOVERNMENT BY : 25 | |
558 | + | ||
559 | + | (I) IDENTIFYING AND OFFE RING TRAINING PROGRAMS FO R 26 | |
560 | + | STATE WORKERS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE AND PARTI CULARLY 27 | |
561 | + | GENERATIVE ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE ; AND 28 | |
562 | + | HOUSE BILL 1271 13 | |
566 | 563 | ||
567 | 564 | ||
568 | - | GOVERNED BY ADEQUATE GUARDRAILS TO PROTEC T INDIVIDUALS AND 1 | |
569 | - | COMMUNITIES ; 2 | |
565 | + | (II) EXPLORING WAYS TO PR OVIDE EXTERNAL ARTIF ICIAL 1 | |
566 | + | INTELLIGENCE TALENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO SE RVE THE STATE AND UNITS OF 2 | |
567 | + | STATE GOVERNMENT IN TAR GETED, SHORT–TERM PROJECTS , INCLUDING BY 3 | |
568 | + | LEVERAGING INSTITUTI ONS OF HIGHER EDUCAT ION OR INDUSTRY ; AND 4 | |
570 | 569 | ||
571 | - | (4) IF THE DEPARTMENT IS NOTIFIE D THAT AN INDIVIDUAL OR 3 | |
572 | - | GROUP OF INDIVIDUALS MAY HAVE BEEN NEGATI VELY IMPACTED BY A S YSTEM THAT 4 | |
573 | - | EMPLOYS HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTE LLIGENCE, REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT TO : 5 | |
570 | + | (7) IDENTIFY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE USE CAS ES AND BUILD 5 | |
571 | + | FOUNDATIONAL INFRAST RUCTURE BY REQUIRING : 6 | |
574 | 572 | ||
575 | - | (I) | |
576 | - | ||
577 | - | ||
573 | + | (I) THE DEPARTMENT TO EVALUA TE RELEVANT 7 | |
574 | + | INFRASTRUCTURE TO SA FELY, SECURELY, AND EFFICIENTLY TEST ARTIFICIAL 8 | |
575 | + | INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S; 9 | |
578 | 576 | ||
579 | - | (II) | |
580 | - | ||
581 | - | ||
582 | - | ||
577 | + | (II) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN 10 | |
578 | + | CONSULTATION WITH TH E DEPARTMENT , TO CREATE A MODEL FO R RUNNING AND 11 | |
579 | + | PROCURING ARTIFIC IAL INTELLIGENCE PRO OFS OF CONCEPT AND P ILOTS, IN 12 | |
580 | + | ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAWS, REGULATIONS , AND POLICIES; AND 13 | |
583 | 581 | ||
584 | - | ( | |
585 | - | ||
586 | - | ||
587 | - | ||
582 | + | (III) THE DEPARTMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH THE 14 | |
583 | + | SUBCABINET, TO COORDINATE WITH A GENCIES TO PROVIDE S UPPORT IN 15 | |
584 | + | IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING USE CASES AND EXECUTING P ROOFS OF CONCEPT 16 | |
585 | + | AND PILOTS ALIGNED W ITH THE GOVERNOR’S PRIORITIES. 17 | |
588 | 586 | ||
589 | - | (C) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAKE THE POLICIES AND PRO CEDURES 17 | |
590 | - | REQUIRED BY SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION PUBLICL Y AVAILABLE ON ITS 18 | |
591 | - | WEBSITE WITHIN 45 DAYS AFTER THE POLIC IES AND PROCEDURES A RE ADOPTED. 19 | |
587 | + | (F) THE GOVERNOR SHALL PROVID E THE SUBCABINET WITH SUFFI CIENT 18 | |
588 | + | RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF THI S SECTION. 19 | |
592 | 589 | ||
593 | - | 3.5–804. 3.5–805. 20 | |
590 | + | (G) FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR , THE GOVERNOR MAY INCLUDE IN THE ANNUAL 20 | |
591 | + | BUDGET BILL AN APPRO PRIATION OF UP TO $3,000,000 FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND 21 | |
592 | + | CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE FUNCTIONS REQUIR ED IN THIS SECTION. 22 | |
594 | 593 | ||
595 | - | (A) BEGINNING JULY 1, 2025, A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT 21 | |
596 | - | PROCURE OR IMPLEMENT A DEPLOY A NEW SYSTEM THAT EMPLOYS ARTIFICIAL 22 | |
597 | - | INTELLIGENCE UNLESS THE SYSTEM COMPLIES WITH THE POLICIES AN D 23 | |
598 | - | PROCEDURES ADOPTED U NDER § 3.5–803 3.5–804 OF THIS SUBTITLE. 24 | |
594 | + | 12–101. 23 | |
599 | 595 | ||
600 | - | (B) A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT THAT EMPLOYS HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL 25 | |
601 | - | INTELLIGENCE SHALL C ONDUCT REGULAR IMPAC T ASSESSMENTS , AS DETERMINED 26 | |
602 | - | BY THE GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF THE 27 | |
603 | - | GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 28 | |
596 | + | (a) This section does not apply to: 24 | |
604 | 597 | ||
605 | - | 3.5–805. 3.5–806. 29 | |
598 | + | (1) capital expenditures by the Department of Transportation or the 25 | |
599 | + | Maryland Transportation Authority, in connection with State roads, bridges, or highways, 26 | |
600 | + | as provided in § 12–202 of this title; [or] 27 | |
606 | 601 | ||
607 | - | (A) THERE IS A GOVERNOR’S ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUBCABINET OF 30 | |
608 | - | THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL. 31 | |
609 | - | 14 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
602 | + | (2) procurements by the Department of General Services AND THE 28 | |
603 | + | DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY for the purpose of modernizing 29 | |
604 | + | INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY AND cybersecurity infrastructure for the State valued 30 | |
605 | + | below $1,000,000; OR 31 | |
610 | 606 | ||
611 | - | ||
612 | - | (B) THE PURPOSE OF THE SUBCABINET IS TO FACI LITATE AND ENHANCE 1 | |
613 | - | COOPERATION AMONG UN ITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH 2 | |
614 | - | ACADEMIC INSTITU TIONS AND INDUSTRIES UTILIZING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE . 3 | |
615 | - | ||
616 | - | (C) THE SUBCABINET CONSISTS O F THE FOLLOWING MEMB ERS: 4 | |
617 | - | ||
618 | - | (1) THE SECRETARY, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 5 | |
619 | - | ||
620 | - | (2) THE SECRETARY OF BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT , OR THE 6 | |
621 | - | SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 7 | |
622 | - | ||
623 | - | (3) THE SECRETARY OF GENERAL SERVICES, OR THE SECRETARY’S 8 | |
624 | - | DESIGNEE; 9 | |
625 | - | ||
626 | - | (4) THE SECRETARY OF LABOR, OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE; 10 | |
627 | - | ||
628 | - | (5) THE SECRETARY OF COMMERCE, OR THE SECRETARY’S 11 | |
629 | - | DESIGNEE; 12 | |
630 | - | ||
631 | - | (6) THE DIRECTOR OF THE GOVERNOR’S OFFICE OF HOMELAND 13 | |
632 | - | SECURITY, OR THE DIRECTOR’S DESIGNEE; 14 | |
633 | - | ||
634 | - | (7) THE CHIEF PRIVACY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF PRIVACY 15 | |
635 | - | OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 16 | |
636 | - | ||
637 | - | (8) THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF DATA OFFICER’S 17 | |
638 | - | DESIGNEE; 18 | |
639 | - | ||
640 | - | (9) THE CHIEF INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER, OR THE CHIEF 19 | |
641 | - | INFORMATION SECURITY OFFICER’S DESIGNEE; 20 | |
642 | - | ||
643 | - | (10) THE GOVERNOR’S SENIOR ADVISOR FOR RESPONSIBLE 21 | |
644 | - | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , OR THE SENIOR ADVISOR’S DESIGNEE; AND 22 | |
645 | - | ||
646 | - | (11) ANY OTHER MEMBER OF THE GOVERNOR’S EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, 23 | |
647 | - | APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR. 24 | |
648 | - | ||
649 | - | (D) THE SECRETARY SHALL CHAI R THE SUBCABINET. 25 | |
650 | - | ||
651 | - | (E) THE SUBCABINET SHALL : 26 | |
652 | - | ||
653 | - | (1) DEVELOP STRATEGY , POLICY, AND MONITORING PROCE SSES FOR 27 | |
654 | - | RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AN D 28 | |
655 | - | ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 29 | |
656 | - | HOUSE BILL 1271 15 | |
657 | - | ||
658 | - | ||
659 | - | (2) OVERSEE THE STATE’S IMPLEMENTATIO N OF: 1 | |
660 | - | ||
661 | - | (I) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE INVENTORY ; 2 | |
662 | - | ||
663 | - | (II) DATA INVENTORY ; 3 | |
664 | - | ||
665 | - | (III) ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE IMPACT ASSESSMEN TS; 4 | |
666 | - | ||
667 | - | (IV) MONITORING OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE IN VOLVING A 5 | |
668 | - | HIGH–RISK ACTION; AND 6 | |
669 | - | ||
670 | - | (III) MONITORING OF HIGH –RISK ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ; 7 | |
671 | - | AND 8 | |
672 | - | ||
673 | - | (V) (IV) COMPLIANCE WITH STATE POLICIES AND 9 | |
674 | - | PROCEDURES ; 10 | |
675 | - | ||
676 | - | (3) SUPPORT ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE AND DATA INNOVATION 11 | |
677 | - | ACROSS UNITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTO R ENTERPRISE BY :; 12 | |
678 | - | ||
679 | - | (I) IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING BEST USES OF ARTIFICIAL 13 | |
680 | - | INTELLIGENCE IN EACH UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT AND IN PRIVATE SECTOR 14 | |
681 | - | ENTERPRISE; 15 | |
682 | - | ||
683 | - | (II) TESTING PROOFS OF CO NCEPT OF PRIORITY AR TIFICIAL 16 | |
684 | - | INTELLIGENCE USE IN PROTOTYPING ; 17 | |
685 | - | ||
686 | - | (III) REDUCING BARRIERS TO THE RESPONSIBLE USE OF 18 | |
687 | - | ARTIFICIAL INTEL LIGENCE AND STATE DATA; 19 | |
688 | - | ||
689 | - | (IV) DEVELOPING SUCCESSFU L ARTIFICIAL INTELLI GENCE 20 | |
690 | - | PILOTS INTO PRODUCTI ON; AND 21 | |
691 | - | ||
692 | - | (V) TRAINING AND WORKFOR CE DEVELOPMENT ; 22 | |
693 | - | ||
694 | - | (4) DEVELOP AND IMPLEMEN T A COMPREHENSIVE AC TION PLAN FOR 23 | |
695 | - | RESPONSIBLE AND PROD UCTIVE USE OF ARTIFI CIAL INTELLIGENCE AND 24 | |
696 | - | ASSOCIATED DATA BY U NITS OF STATE GOVERNMENT ; 25 | |
697 | - | ||
698 | - | (5) ESTABLISH PARTNERSHI PS, MEMORANDA OF UNDERST ANDING, 26 | |
699 | - | AND CONTRACTS TO SUP PORT THE AIMS OF THI S SECTION; 27 | |
700 | - | ||
701 | - | (6) PROMOTE ARTIFICIAL I NTELLIGENCE KNOWLEDG E, SKILLS, AND 28 | |
702 | - | TALENT IN STATE GOVERNMENT BY: 29 | |
703 | - | 16 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
704 | - | ||
705 | - | ||
706 | - | (I) IDENTIFYING AND OFFE RING TRAINING PROGRA MS FOR 1 | |
707 | - | STATE WORKERS ON THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL IN TELLIGENCE AND PARTI CULARLY 2 | |
708 | - | GENERATIVE ARTIFICIA L INTELLIGENCE ; AND 3 | |
709 | - | ||
710 | - | (II) EXPLORING WAYS TO PR OVIDE EXTERNAL ARTIF ICIAL 4 | |
711 | - | INTELLIGENCE TALENT AN OPPORTUNITY TO SE RVE THE STATE AND UNITS OF 5 | |
712 | - | STATE GOVERNMENT IN T ARGETED, SHORT–TERM PROJECTS , INCLUDING BY 6 | |
713 | - | LEVERAGING INSTITUTI ONS OF HIGHER EDUCAT ION OR INDUSTRY ; AND 7 | |
714 | - | ||
715 | - | (7) IDENTIFY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGE NCE USE CASES AND BU ILD 8 | |
716 | - | FOUNDATIONAL INFRAST RUCTURE BY REQUIRING : 9 | |
717 | - | ||
718 | - | (I) THE DEPARTMENT TO EVALUAT E RELEVANT 10 | |
719 | - | INFRASTRUCTURE TO SA FELY, SECURELY, AND EFFICIENTLY TEST ARTIFICIAL 11 | |
720 | - | INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S; 12 | |
721 | - | ||
722 | - | (II) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN 13 | |
723 | - | CONSULTATION WITH TH E DEPARTMENT , TO CREATE A MODEL FO R RUNNING AND 14 | |
724 | - | PROCURING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE PROOFS OF CONCEPT AND PILOT S, IN 15 | |
725 | - | ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAWS, REGULATIONS , AND POLICIES; AND 16 | |
726 | - | ||
727 | - | (III) THE DEPARTMENT , IN CONSULTATION WITH TH E 17 | |
728 | - | SUBCABINET, TO COORDINATE WITH A GENCIES TO PROVIDE S UPPORT IN 18 | |
729 | - | IDENTIFYING AND PRIO RITIZING USE CASES A ND EXECUTING PROOFS OF CONCEPT 19 | |
730 | - | AND PILOTS ALIGNED W ITH THE GOVERNOR’S PRIORITIES. 20 | |
731 | - | ||
732 | - | (F) THE GOVERNOR SHALL PROVID E THE SUBCABINET W ITH SUFFICIENT 21 | |
733 | - | RESOURCES TO PERFORM THE FUNCTIONS OF THI S SECTION. 22 | |
734 | - | ||
735 | - | (G) FOR EACH FISCAL YEAR , THE GOVERNOR MAY INCLUDE IN THE ANNUAL 23 | |
736 | - | BUDGET BILL AN APPRO PRIATION OF UP TO $3,000,000 FOR PARTNERSHIPS AND 24 | |
737 | - | CONTRACTS TO SUPPORT THE FUNCTIONS REQUIR ED IN THIS SECTION. 25 | |
738 | - | ||
739 | - | 12–101. 26 | |
740 | - | ||
741 | - | (a) This section does not apply to: 27 | |
742 | - | ||
743 | - | (1) capital expenditures by the Department of Transportation or the 28 | |
744 | - | Maryland Transportation Authority, in connection with State roads, bridges, or highways, 29 | |
745 | - | as provided in § 12–202 of this title; [or] 30 | |
746 | - | ||
747 | - | (2) procurements by the Department of General Services AND THE 31 | |
748 | - | DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY for the purpose of modernizing 32 HOUSE BILL 1271 17 | |
749 | - | ||
750 | - | ||
751 | - | INFORMATION TECHNOLO GY AND cybersecurity infrastructure for the State valued 1 | |
752 | - | below $1,000,000; OR 2 | |
753 | - | ||
754 | - | (3) COMPETITIVE P ROOF OF CONCEPT PROC UREMENTS VALUED 3 | |
755 | - | BELOW $1,000,000 MADE UNDER § 13–116 OF THIS ARTICLE . 4 | |
756 | - | ||
757 | - | (b) (1) The Board may control procurement by units. 5 | |
758 | - | ||
759 | - | (2) To implement the provisions of this Division II, the Board may: 6 | |
760 | - | ||
761 | - | (i) set policy; 7 | |
762 | - | ||
763 | - | (ii) adopt regulations, in accordance with Title 10, Subtitle 1 of the 8 | |
764 | - | State Government Article; and 9 | |
765 | - | ||
766 | - | (iii) establish internal operational procedures consistent with this 10 | |
767 | - | Division II. 11 | |
768 | - | ||
769 | - | (3) The Board shall ensure that the regulations of the primary 12 | |
770 | - | procurement units provide for procedures that are consistent with this Division II and Title 13 | |
771 | - | 13, Subtitle 4 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article and, to the extent the 14 | |
772 | - | circumstances of a particular type of procurement or a particular unit do not require 15 | |
773 | - | otherwise, are substantially the same. 16 | |
774 | - | ||
775 | - | (4) The Board may delegate any of its authority that it determines to be 17 | |
776 | - | appropriate for delegation and may require prior Board approval for specified procurement 18 | |
777 | - | actions. 19 | |
778 | - | ||
779 | - | (5) Except as limited by the Maryland Constitution, the Board may 20 | |
780 | - | exercise any control authority conferred on a primary procurement unit by this Division II 21 | |
781 | - | and, to the extent that its action conflicts with the action of the primary procurement unit, 22 | |
782 | - | the action of the Board shall prevail. 23 | |
783 | - | ||
784 | - | (c) On or before December 1 each year, the Department of General Services shall 24 | |
785 | - | submit a report to the Board on procurements made under subsection (a)(2) of this section 25 | |
786 | - | that shall include for each procurement: 26 | |
787 | - | ||
788 | - | (1) the purpose of the procurement; 27 | |
789 | - | ||
790 | - | (2) the name of the contractor; 28 | |
791 | - | ||
792 | - | (3) the contract amount; 29 | |
793 | - | ||
794 | - | (4) the method of procurement utilized; 30 | |
795 | - | ||
796 | - | (5) the number of bidders who bid on the procurement; and 31 | |
797 | - | 18 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
798 | - | ||
799 | - | ||
800 | - | (6) the contract term. 1 | |
801 | - | ||
802 | - | (D) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR, THE DEPARTMENT OF 2 | |
803 | - | GENERAL SERVICES SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO T HE BOARD ON PROCUREMENTS 3 | |
804 | - | MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (A)(3) OF THIS SECTION THAT SHALL INCLUDE FOR EA CH 4 | |
805 | - | PROCUREMENT : 5 | |
806 | - | ||
807 | - | (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE P ROCUREMENT ; 6 | |
808 | - | ||
809 | - | (2) THE NAME OF THE CONT RACTOR; 7 | |
810 | - | ||
811 | - | (3) THE CONTRACT AMOUNT ; 8 | |
812 | - | ||
813 | - | (4) THE NUMBER OF P ROPOSALS RECEIVED ON THE PROCUREMENT ; 9 | |
814 | - | AND 10 | |
815 | - | ||
816 | - | (5) THE CONTRACT TERM . 11 | |
817 | - | ||
818 | - | 13–116. 12 | |
819 | - | ||
820 | - | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “PROOF OF CONCEPT ” MEANS A TEST, EVALUATION, 13 | |
821 | - | DEMONSTRATION , OR PILOT PROJECT OF A GOOD OR SERVICE GOOD, SERVICE, OR 14 | |
822 | - | TECHNOLOGY IN A REAL–WORLD ENVIRONMENT TO EVALUATE WHETHER THE GOOD 15 | |
823 | - | OR SERVICE GOOD, SERVICE, OR TECHNOLOGY CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY DEPLOYED 16 | |
824 | - | AND IS BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 17 | |
825 | - | ||
826 | - | (B) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IS A FORMAL 18 | |
827 | - | COMPETITIVE PROCUREM ENT METHOD TH AT MAY BE USED TO SO LICIT PROPOSALS 19 | |
828 | - | FOR THE CONDUCT OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT PRI OR TO FULL IMPLEMENT ATION 20 | |
829 | - | WHEN THE HEAD OF A U NIT DETERMINES THE P ROCESS TO BE APPROPR IATE AND IN 21 | |
830 | - | THE BEST INTERESTS O F THE UNIT, INCLUDING: 22 | |
831 | - | ||
832 | - | (I) TESTING SOFTWARE –AS–A–SERVICE OR OFF–THE–SHELF 23 | |
833 | - | SOFTWARE; 24 | |
834 | - | ||
835 | - | (II) TESTING NEW, INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES; OR 25 | |
836 | - | ||
837 | - | (III) TESTING A PRODUCT OR SERVICE CONCEPTUALIZ ED OR 26 | |
838 | - | CONCEIVED OF BY A UN IT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 27 | |
839 | - | ||
840 | - | (2) (I) AFTER OBTAINING THE A PPROVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE 28 | |
841 | - | UNIT AND BEFORE COND UCTING A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT 29 | |
842 | - | PROCUREMENT , THE UNIT SHALL OBTAI N APPROVAL FROM THE SECRETARY OF 30 | |
843 | - | INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE. 31 HOUSE BILL 1271 19 | |
607 | + | (3) COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENTS VALUED 32 | |
608 | + | BELOW $1,000,000 MADE UNDER § 13–116 OF THIS ARTICLE . 33 14 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
844 | 609 | ||
845 | 610 | ||
846 | 611 | ||
847 | - | (II) THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MAY 1 | |
848 | - | GRANT APPROVAL FOR A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IF THE 2 | |
849 | - | UNIT: 3 | |
612 | + | (b) (1) The Board may control procurement by units. 1 | |
850 | 613 | ||
851 | - | 1. HAS SUFFICIENT INTER NAL RESOURCES TO MAN AGE 4 | |
852 | - | THE PROOF OF CONCEPT , INCLUDING HUMAN CAPI TAL, SUBJECT MATTER 5 | |
853 | - | EXPERTISE, AND TECHNOLOGICAL IN FRASTRUCTURE , OR HAS THE MEANS TO 6 | |
854 | - | OBTAIN THESE RESOURC ES; AND 7 | |
614 | + | (2) To implement the provisions of this Division II, the Board may: 2 | |
855 | 615 | ||
856 | - | 2. ENTERS INTO A MEMORA NDUM OF UNDERSTANDIN G 8 | |
857 | - | WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY THAT REQUI RES 9 | |
858 | - | REGULAR STATUS UPDAT ES, VENDOR CAPACITY , AND ANY OTHER INFORM ATION 10 | |
859 | - | NECESSARY FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY TO EVALUAT E 11 | |
860 | - | WHETHER THE PROOF OF CONCEPT CAN BE SUCCE SSFULLY DEPLOYED AND IS 12 | |
861 | - | BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 13 | |
616 | + | (i) set policy; 3 | |
862 | 617 | ||
863 | - | (C) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT MAY BE 14 | |
864 | - | CONDUCTED THROUGH TH E ISSUANCE OF A SOLI CITATION BY ANY METH OD OF 15 | |
865 | - | PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZE D UNDER THIS DIVISION II. 16 | |
618 | + | (ii) adopt regulations, in accordance with Title 10, Subtitle 1 of the 4 | |
619 | + | State Government Article; and 5 | |
866 | 620 | ||
867 | - | ( | |
868 | - | ||
621 | + | (iii) establish internal operational procedures consistent with this 6 | |
622 | + | Division II. 7 | |
869 | 623 | ||
870 | - | (I) THE SCOPE OF WORK OR PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 19 | |
871 | - | INCLUDING THE INTEND ED USE, QUANTITY, ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR THE 20 | |
872 | - | PROOF OF CONCEPT , AND ANTICIPATED NUMB ER OF PROOF OF CONCE PT AWARDS 21 | |
873 | - | THAT WILL BE MADE ; AND 22 | |
624 | + | (3) The Board shall ensure that the regulations of the primary 8 | |
625 | + | procurement units provide for procedures that are consistent with this Division II and Title 9 | |
626 | + | 13, Subtitle 4 of the State Personnel and Pensions Article and, to the extent the 10 | |
627 | + | circumstances of a particular type of procurement or a particular unit do not require 11 | |
628 | + | otherwise, are substantially the same. 12 | |
874 | 629 | ||
875 | - | (II) THE FACTORS , INCLUDING PRICE , THAT WILL BE USED IN 23 | |
876 | - | EVALUATING PROPOSALS AND THE RELATIVE IMP ORTANCE OF EACH . 24 | |
630 | + | (4) The Board may delegate any of its authority that it determines to be 13 | |
631 | + | appropriate for delegation and may require prior Board approval for specified procurement 14 | |
632 | + | actions. 15 | |
877 | 633 | ||
878 | - | (3) A SOLICITATION MAY BE DISTRIBUTED TO VE NDORS KNOWN TO 25 | |
879 | - | OFFER GOODS OR SERVI CES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROOF OF CONC EPT AND 26 | |
880 | - | SHALL, EXCEPT FOR PROCUREME NTS UNDER $15,000 NOT OTHERWISE REQUIR ED 27 | |
881 | - | BY LAW TO BE POSTED , BE POSTED ON EMARYLAND MARKETPLACE ADVANTAGE, IN 28 | |
882 | - | ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES AND P ROCEDURES UNDER SUBS ECTION (G) OF 29 | |
883 | - | THIS SECTION. 30 | |
634 | + | (5) Except as limited by the Maryland Constitution, the Board may 16 | |
635 | + | exercise any control authority conferred on a primary procurement unit by this Division II 17 | |
636 | + | and, to the extent that its action conflicts with the action of the primary procurement unit, 18 | |
637 | + | the action of the Board shall prevail. 19 | |
884 | 638 | ||
885 | - | (D) AFTER RECEIPT OF PROP OSALS BUT BEFORE AWA RD OF A 31 | |
886 | - | PROCUREMENT CONTRACT , A UNIT MAY: 32 | |
639 | + | (c) On or before December 1 each year, the Department of General Services shall 20 | |
640 | + | submit a report to the Board on procurements made under subsection (a)(2) of this section 21 | |
641 | + | that shall include for each procurement: 22 | |
887 | 642 | ||
888 | - | (1) CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH AN OFFEROR TO E NSURE FULL 33 | |
889 | - | UNDERSTANDING OF : 34 20 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
643 | + | (1) the purpose of the procurement; 23 | |
644 | + | ||
645 | + | (2) the name of the contractor; 24 | |
646 | + | ||
647 | + | (3) the contract amount; 25 | |
648 | + | ||
649 | + | (4) the method of procurement utilized; 26 | |
650 | + | ||
651 | + | (5) the number of bidders who bid on the procurement; and 27 | |
652 | + | ||
653 | + | (6) the contract term. 28 | |
654 | + | ||
655 | + | (D) ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 1 EACH YEAR, THE DEPARTMENT OF 29 | |
656 | + | GENERAL SERVICES SHALL SUBMIT A REPORT TO THE BOARD ON PROCUREMENTS 30 HOUSE BILL 1271 15 | |
657 | + | ||
658 | + | ||
659 | + | MADE UNDER SUBSECTION (A)(3) OF THIS SECTION THAT SHALL INCLUDE FOR EA CH 1 | |
660 | + | PROCUREMENT : 2 | |
661 | + | ||
662 | + | (1) THE PURPOSE OF THE P ROCUREMENT ; 3 | |
663 | + | ||
664 | + | (2) THE NAME OF THE CONT RACTOR; 4 | |
665 | + | ||
666 | + | (3) THE CONTRACT AMOUNT ; 5 | |
667 | + | ||
668 | + | (4) THE NUMBER OF PROPOS ALS RECEIVED ON THE PROCUREMENT ; 6 | |
669 | + | AND 7 | |
670 | + | ||
671 | + | (5) THE CONTRACT TERM. 8 | |
672 | + | ||
673 | + | 13–116. 9 | |
674 | + | ||
675 | + | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “PROOF OF CONCEPT ” MEANS A TEST, EVALUATION, 10 | |
676 | + | OR PILOT PROJECT OF A GOOD OR SERVICE IN A REAL–WORLD ENVIRONMENT TO 11 | |
677 | + | EVALUATE WHETHER THE GOOD OR SERVICE CAN BE SUCCESSFULLY DEPL OYED 12 | |
678 | + | AND IS BENEFICIAL TO THE STATE. 13 | |
679 | + | ||
680 | + | (B) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT IS A FORMAL 14 | |
681 | + | COMPETITIVE PROCUREM ENT METHOD THAT MAY BE USED TO SOLICIT P ROPOSALS 15 | |
682 | + | FOR THE CONDUCT OF A PROOF OF CONCEPT PRI OR TO FULL IMPLEMENT ATION 16 | |
683 | + | WHEN THE HEAD OF A U NIT DETERMINES THE P ROCESS TO BE APP ROPRIATE AND IN 17 | |
684 | + | THE BEST INTERESTS O F THE UNIT, INCLUDING: 18 | |
685 | + | ||
686 | + | (I) TESTING SOFTWARE –AS–A–SERVICE OR OFF –THE–SHELF 19 | |
687 | + | SOFTWARE; 20 | |
688 | + | ||
689 | + | (II) TESTING NEW, INNOVATIVE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES; OR 21 | |
690 | + | ||
691 | + | (III) TESTING A PRODUCT OR SERVICE CONCEPTUALIZ ED OR 22 | |
692 | + | CONCEIVED OF BY A UNIT OF STATE GOVERNMENT . 23 | |
693 | + | ||
694 | + | (2) AFTER OBTAINING THE A PPROVAL OF THE HEAD OF THE UNIT 24 | |
695 | + | AND BEFORE CONDUCTIN G A COMPETITIVE PROO F OF CONCEPT PROCURE MENT, 25 | |
696 | + | THE UNIT SHALL OBTAI N APPROVAL FROM THE SECRETARY OF INFORMATION 26 | |
697 | + | TECHNOLOGY , OR THE SECRETARY’S DESIGNEE. 27 | |
698 | + | ||
699 | + | (C) (1) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT MAY BE 28 | |
700 | + | CONDUCTED THROUGH TH E ISSUANCE OF A SOLI CITATION BY ANY METH OD OF 29 | |
701 | + | PROCUREMENT AUTHORIZ ED UNDER THIS DIVISION II. 30 16 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
890 | 702 | ||
891 | 703 | ||
892 | 704 | ||
893 | - | ( | |
894 | - | ||
705 | + | (2) A COMPETITIVE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT 1 | |
706 | + | SOLICITATION SHALL I NCLUDE A STATEMENT OF : 2 | |
895 | 707 | ||
896 | - | (II) THE PROPOSAL SUBMITT ED BY THE OFFEROR ; AND 3 | |
708 | + | (I) THE SCOPE OF WORK OR PROJECT DESCRIPTION , 3 | |
709 | + | INCLUDING THE INTEND ED USE, QUANTITY, ESTIMATED TIME FRAME FOR THE 4 | |
710 | + | PROOF OF CONCEPT , AND ANTICIPATED NUMB ER OF PROOF OF CONCE PT AWARDS 5 | |
711 | + | THAT WILL BE MADE ; AND 6 | |
897 | 712 | ||
898 | - | (2) REQUEST PRODUCT SAMP LES FOR TESTING BY T HE UNIT OR A 4 | |
899 | - | DEMONSTRATION OF A P RODUCT OR SERVICE AN D USE THESE SAMPLES OR 5 | |
900 | - | DEMONSTRATIONS IN IT S EVALUATION PROCESS. 6 | |
713 | + | (II) THE FACTORS , INCLUDING PRICE, THAT WILL BE USED IN 7 | |
714 | + | EVALUATING PROPOSALS AND THE RELATIVE IMP ORTANCE OF EACH . 8 | |
901 | 715 | ||
902 | - | (E) A REQUEST FOR PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING OR DEMONSTRATION 7 | |
903 | - | MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (D)(2) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L BE ISSUED TO ALL 8 | |
904 | - | OFFERORS DEEMED REAS ONABLE AT THE TIME O F THE REQUEST . 9 | |
716 | + | (3) A SOLICITATION MAY BE DISTRIBUTED TO VENDO RS KNOWN TO 9 | |
717 | + | OFFER GOODS OR SERVI CES WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE PROOF OF CONC EPT AND 10 | |
718 | + | SHALL, EXCEPT FOR PROCUREME NTS UNDER $15,000 NOT OTHERWISE REQUIR ED 11 | |
719 | + | BY LAW TO BE POSTED , BE POSTED ON EMARYLAND MARKETPLACE ADVANTAGE, IN 12 | |
720 | + | ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICIES AND PROCEDU RES UNDER SUBSECTION (G) OF 13 | |
721 | + | THIS SECTION. 14 | |
905 | 722 | ||
906 | - | (F) A UNIT MAY: 10 | |
723 | + | (D) AFTER RECEIPT OF PROP OSALS BUT BEFORE AWA RD OF A 15 | |
724 | + | PROCUREMENT CONTRACT , A UNIT MAY: 16 | |
907 | 725 | ||
908 | - | (1) | |
909 | - | ||
726 | + | (1) CONDUCT DISCUSSIONS WITH AN OFFEROR TO E NSURE FULL 17 | |
727 | + | UNDERSTANDING OF : 18 | |
910 | 728 | ||
911 | - | ( | |
912 | - | ||
729 | + | (I) THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIT, AS SET FORTH IN THE 19 | |
730 | + | REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL S; AND 20 | |
913 | 731 | ||
914 | - | (G) A VENDOR AWARDED A PRO OF OF CONCEPT PROCUR EMENT SHALL BE 15 | |
915 | - | ELIGIBLE TO BID ON A PROCUREMENT TO IMPLE MENT A PROPOSAL RELATED TO 16 | |
916 | - | THE PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMENT . 17 | |
732 | + | (II) THE PROPOSAL SUBMITT ED BY THE OFFEROR ; AND 21 | |
917 | 733 | ||
918 | - | (H) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN CONSULTATION WITH 18 | |
919 | - | THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND 19 | |
920 | - | PROCEDURES FOR THE D EVELOPMENT AND IMPLE MENTATION OF COMPETI TIVE 20 | |
921 | - | PROOF OF CONCEPT PROCUREMEN TS. 21 | |
734 | + | (2) REQUEST PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING BY THE UNIT OR A 22 | |
735 | + | DEMONSTRATION OF A P RODUCT OR SERVICE AN D USE THESE SAMPLES OR 23 | |
736 | + | DEMONSTRATIONS IN IT S EVALUATION PROCESS . 24 | |
922 | 737 | ||
923 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 22 | |
924 | - | 2024, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, 23 | |
925 | - | in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, shall submit an interim report and 24 | |
926 | - | recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2 –1257 of the State 25 | |
927 | - | Government Article, the General Assembly on the risks and opportunities and associated 26 | |
928 | - | recommendations related to: 27 | |
738 | + | (E) A REQUEST FOR PRODUCT SAMPLES FOR TESTING OR DEMONSTRATION 25 | |
739 | + | MADE UNDER SUBSECTIO N (D)(2) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L BE ISSUED TO ALL 26 | |
740 | + | OFFERORS DEEMED REAS ONABLE AT THE TIME O F THE REQUEST . 27 | |
929 | 741 | ||
930 | - | (1) use of artificial intelligence to support job and business creation and 28 | |
931 | - | growth in the State; 29 | |
742 | + | (F) A UNIT MAY: 28 | |
932 | 743 | ||
933 | - | (2) in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Labor and, as 30 | |
934 | - | appropriate, external experts, workers, labor unions, businesses, and civil society, use of 31 | |
935 | - | artificial intelligence by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 32 | |
936 | - | workforce; 33 HOUSE BILL 1271 21 | |
744 | + | (1) AWARD ONE OR MORE OF THE PROPOSALS A CONT RACT FOR THE 29 | |
745 | + | PROOF OF CONCEPT ; AND 30 | |
746 | + | HOUSE BILL 1271 17 | |
937 | 747 | ||
938 | 748 | ||
749 | + | (2) PROVIDE AN OPTION FO R THE STATE TO PROCEED WITH A FULL 1 | |
750 | + | IMPLEMENTATION OF AN AWARDED PROPOSAL . 2 | |
939 | 751 | ||
940 | - | (3) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Emergency 1 | |
941 | - | Management, the Public Service Commission, the Department of the Environment, and the 2 | |
942 | - | Department of Transportation, use of artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure and 3 | |
943 | - | guidelines for owners and operators to incorporate risk management into critical 4 | |
944 | - | infrastructure, including mapping emergent cyber and physical security and resiliency 5 | |
945 | - | risks to the State infrastructure and residents stemming from artificial intelligence; 6 | |
752 | + | (G) THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, IN CONSULTATION WITH 3 | |
753 | + | THE DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY , SHALL ADOPT POLICIES AND 4 | |
754 | + | PROCEDURES FOR THE D EVELOPMENT AND IMPLE MENTATION OF COMPETI TIVE 5 | |
755 | + | PROOF OF CONCEPT PRO CUREMENTS . 6 | |
946 | 756 | ||
947 | - | (4) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Health, the U.S. 7 | |
948 | - | Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, use of 8 | |
949 | - | systems that employ artificial intelligence in health care delivery and human services; 9 | |
757 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 7 | |
758 | + | 2024, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council, 8 | |
759 | + | in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, shall submit an interim report and 9 | |
760 | + | recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State 10 | |
761 | + | Government Article, the General Assembly on the risks and opportunities and associated 11 | |
762 | + | recommendations related to: 12 | |
950 | 763 | ||
951 | - | (5) in consultation with the Department of Information Technology Office 10 | |
952 | - | of Security Management and the Chief Privacy Officer, use of artificial intelligence in the 11 | |
953 | - | discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in cybersecurity and data management across 12 | |
954 | - | State and local government, including school systems; 13 | |
764 | + | (1) use of artificial intelligence to support job and business creation and 13 | |
765 | + | growth in the State; 14 | |
955 | 766 | ||
956 | - | (6) in consultation with the State Chief Privacy Officer and an independent 14 | |
957 | - | contractor identified by the Subcabinet, data privacy, specifically regarding the potential 15 | |
958 | - | to train systems that employ artificial intelligence; 16 | |
767 | + | (2) in collaboration with the Maryland Department of Labor and, as 15 | |
768 | + | appropriate, external experts, workers, labor unions, businesses, and civil society, use of 16 | |
769 | + | artificial intelligence by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 17 | |
770 | + | workforce; 18 | |
959 | 771 | ||
960 | - | (7) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Labor, the 17 | |
961 | - | Department of Commerce, and the Governor’s Office of Small, Minority, and Women 18 | |
962 | - | Business Affairs, use of artificial intelligence in workforce training and hiring of talent with 19 | |
963 | - | expertise in artificial intelligence, employment practices, and workforce development 20 | |
964 | - | implications; 21 | |
772 | + | (3) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Emergency 19 | |
773 | + | Management, the Public Service Commission, the Department of the Environment, and the 20 | |
774 | + | Department of Transportation, use of artificial intelligence in critical infrastructure and 21 | |
775 | + | guidelines for owners and operators to incorporate risk management into critical 22 | |
776 | + | infrastructure, including mapping emergent cyber and physical security and resiliency 23 | |
777 | + | risks to the State infrastructure and residents stemming from artificial intelligence; 24 | |
965 | 778 | ||
966 | - | ( | |
967 | - | ||
968 | - | ||
779 | + | (4) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Health, the U.S. 25 | |
780 | + | Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, use of 26 | |
781 | + | systems that employ artificial intelligence in health care delivery and human services; 27 | |
969 | 782 | ||
970 | - | (9) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 25 | |
971 | - | including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 26 | |
972 | - | privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 27 | |
783 | + | (5) in consultation with the Department of Information Technology Office 28 | |
784 | + | of Security Management and the Chief Privacy Officer, use of artificial intelligence in the 29 | |
785 | + | discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in cybersecurity and data management across 30 | |
786 | + | State and local government, including school systems; 31 | |
973 | 787 | ||
974 | - | (10) use of artificial intelligence by occupations licensed and certified by the 28 | |
975 | - | State, in consultation with the boards, identifying ways for the regulatory board to identify 29 | |
976 | - | and manage the risks of opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate 30 | |
977 | - | permitted use and supervision by licensees; and 31 | |
788 | + | (6) in consultation with the State Chief Privacy Officer and an independent 32 | |
789 | + | contractor identified by the Subcabinet, data privacy, specifically regarding the potential 33 | |
790 | + | to train systems that employ artificial intelligence; 34 | |
978 | 791 | ||
979 | - | (11) use of artificial intelligence in local school systems, including 32 | |
980 | - | recommendations to the State on the responsible and productive use of artificial 33 | |
981 | - | intelligence based on a review of the federal Department of Education Office of Educational 34 | |
982 | - | Technology’s report entitled “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and 35 | |
983 | - | Learning: Insights and Recommendations”, in collaboration with the State Department of 36 | |
984 | - | Education. 37 | |
985 | - | 22 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
792 | + | (7) in consultation with the Maryland Department of Labor, the 35 | |
793 | + | Department of Commerce, and the Governor’s Office of Small, Minority, and Women 36 | |
794 | + | Business Affairs, use of artificial intelligence in workforce training and hiring of talent with 37 18 HOUSE BILL 1271 | |
986 | 795 | ||
987 | 796 | ||
988 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 1 | |
797 | + | expertise in artificial intelligence, employment practices, and workforce development 1 | |
798 | + | implications; 2 | |
989 | 799 | ||
990 | - | (a) The Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive 2 | |
991 | - | Council, in consultation with the appropriate units of State government, shall: 3 | |
800 | + | (8) in consultation with the Office of the Attorney General and the Judicial 3 | |
801 | + | Branch, use of artificial intelligence in the criminal justice system, including whether and 4 | |
802 | + | how such technology should be used, in what contexts, and with what safeguards; 5 | |
992 | 803 | ||
993 | - | (1) develop a roadmap to review the risks and opportunities associated 4 | |
994 | - | with the use of artificial intelligence in State services; and 5 | |
804 | + | (9) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 6 | |
805 | + | including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 7 | |
806 | + | privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 8 | |
995 | 807 | ||
996 | - | (2) on or before December 1, 2024, submit the roadmap to the Governor 6 | |
997 | - | and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly. 7 | |
808 | + | (10) use of artificial intelligence by occupations licensed and certified by the 9 | |
809 | + | State, in consultation with the boards, identifying ways for the regulatory board to identify 10 | |
810 | + | and manage the risks of opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate 11 | |
811 | + | permitted use and supervision by licensees; and 12 | |
998 | 812 | ||
999 | - | (b) The roadmap developed under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 8 | |
813 | + | (11) use of artificial intelligence in local school systems, including 13 | |
814 | + | recommendations to the State on the responsible and product ive use of artificial 14 | |
815 | + | intelligence based on a review of the federal Department of Education Office of Educational 15 | |
816 | + | Technology’s report entitled “Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Teaching and 16 | |
817 | + | Learning: Insights and Recommendations”, in collaboration with the State Department of 17 | |
818 | + | Education. 18 | |
1000 | 819 | ||
1001 | - | (1) a plan to study the use of artificial intelligence: 9 | |
820 | + | SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 19 | |
821 | + | 2025, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council 20 | |
822 | + | shall submit a report and recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 21 | |
823 | + | 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly on the sufficiency of the 22 | |
824 | + | Subcabinet to accomplish the artificial intelligence goals of the State and the efficacy of the 23 | |
825 | + | potential transition of the Subcabinet to a department or independent unit of State 24 | |
826 | + | government. 25 | |
1002 | 827 | ||
1003 | - | (i) to support job and business creation and growth in the State; 10 | |
1004 | - | ||
1005 | - | (ii) by the State workforce, including opportunities to upskill the 11 | |
1006 | - | workforce; 12 | |
1007 | - | ||
1008 | - | (iii) in critical infrastructure, including guidelines for owners and 13 | |
1009 | - | operators to incorporate risk management into critical infrastructure; 14 | |
1010 | - | ||
1011 | - | (iv) in health care delivery and human services; 15 | |
1012 | - | ||
1013 | - | (v) in the discovery and remediation of vulnerabilities in 16 | |
1014 | - | cybersecurity and data management across State and local government, including school 17 | |
1015 | - | systems; 18 | |
1016 | - | ||
1017 | - | (vi) in data privacy, specifically regarding the ability to train systems 19 | |
1018 | - | that employ artificial intelligence; 20 | |
1019 | - | ||
1020 | - | (vii) in workforce training; 21 | |
1021 | - | ||
1022 | - | (viii) in the criminal justice system and for public safety purposes, 22 | |
1023 | - | including whether and how such technology should be used, in what contexts, and with 23 | |
1024 | - | what safeguards; 24 | |
1025 | - | ||
1026 | - | (ix) by occupations licensed and certified by the State, including 25 | |
1027 | - | identifying ways for State regulatory boards to identify and manage the risks and 26 | |
1028 | - | opportunities of artificial intelligence and determine appropriate permitted use and 27 | |
1029 | - | supervision of licensees; 28 | |
1030 | - | ||
1031 | - | (x) in local school systems, including recommendations to the State 29 | |
1032 | - | on the responsible and productive use of artificial intelligence; 30 | |
1033 | - | HOUSE BILL 1271 23 | |
1034 | - | ||
1035 | - | ||
1036 | - | (xi) in the conduct of elections, including reducing or eliminating the 1 | |
1037 | - | spread of misinformation; and 2 | |
1038 | - | ||
1039 | - | (xii) any other State service identified by the Subcabinet; 3 | |
1040 | - | ||
1041 | - | (2) a plan to study: 4 | |
1042 | - | ||
1043 | - | (i) the hiring of talent with expertise in artificial intelligence, 5 | |
1044 | - | employment practices, and workforce development implications; 6 | |
1045 | - | ||
1046 | - | (ii) methods to ensure that there is diversity in contract awards and 7 | |
1047 | - | training programs related to artificial intelligence in the State, including racial diversity; 8 | |
1048 | - | and 9 | |
1049 | - | ||
1050 | - | (iii) the procurement of systems that employ artificial intelligence, 10 | |
1051 | - | including efforts to increase competition and assurance that contracts retain sufficient data 11 | |
1052 | - | privacy protection against vendor lock–in; 12 | |
1053 | - | ||
1054 | - | (3) a prioritization of the study topics listed under this subsection, 13 | |
1055 | - | including the methodology for the prioritization; 14 | |
1056 | - | ||
1057 | - | (4) a list of appropriate stakeholders identified to participate in each study 15 | |
1058 | - | topic; and 16 | |
1059 | - | ||
1060 | - | (5) the projected timeline to complete each study topic. 17 | |
1061 | - | ||
1062 | - | SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That, on or before December 1, 18 | |
1063 | - | 2025, the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet of the Governor’s Executive Council 19 | |
1064 | - | shall submit a report and recommendations to the Governor and, in accordance with § 20 | |
1065 | - | 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly on the sufficiency of the 21 | |
1066 | - | Subcabinet to accomplish the artificial intelligence goals of the State and the efficacy of the 22 | |
1067 | - | potential transition of the Subcabinet to a department or independent unit of State 23 | |
1068 | - | government. 24 | |
1069 | - | ||
1070 | - | SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That it is the intent of the 25 | |
1071 | - | Maryland General Assembly, contingent on the passage of Chapter __ (S.B. 955/H.B. 1174) 26 | |
1072 | - | of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2024 by both Houses of the General Assembly, that 27 | |
1073 | - | the Governor’s Artificial Intelligence Subcabinet consult with the Technology Advisory 28 | |
1074 | - | Commission established under Chapter __ (S.B. 955/H.B. 1174) of the Acts of the General 29 | |
1075 | - | Assembly of 2024 in the performance of its duties under Sections 1 and 2 of this Act. 30 | |
1076 | - | ||
1077 | - | SECTION 4. 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 31 | |
1078 | - | July 1, 2024. 32 | |
1079 | - | ||
828 | + | SECTION 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 26 | |
829 | + | 1, 2024. 27 |