Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB375

Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
3/6/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Refer
3/13/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
4/9/24  

Caption

Port of Baltimore - Renaming

Impact

If passed, the bill will have a direct impact on the relevant statutes within the Annotated Code of Maryland, as references to the Port of Baltimore will be amended to reflect its new designation. The legislation would reinforce the importance of honoring notable individuals who have significantly impacted state infrastructure, thereby setting a precedent for future recognitions. Furthermore, it could inspire additional investments and interest in the maritime capabilities of the port, ultimately benefiting Maryland’s economy and its transport sector.

Summary

House Bill 375 proposes the renaming of the Port of Baltimore to the Helen Delich Bentley Port of Baltimore, encapsulating the significant contributions of Bentley to the Maryland maritime industry. The bill not only honors Bentley’s legacy but also acknowledges her extensive career as a journalist, federal maritime leader, and Congresswoman, where she played a crucial role in enhancing the port's capabilities. The legislation aims to codify this name change officially, reflecting the state's commitment to recognizing key figures in its history.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 375 is positive, characterized by a sense of pride in honoring a prominent Maryland figure. Legislators and community members expressed gratitude for Bentley's contributions and support for recognizing her work through this bill. While there may not be significant contention surrounding the renaming itself, it represents a broader appreciation of the role played by individuals in the development of state resources and economic engines.

Contention

As with any renaming initiative, there are potential discussions about the implications of honoring specific individuals versus broader policies that may be more beneficial for the collective state. However, in this particular case, the bill has garnered overwhelming support, with no expressed opposition noted during discussions or voting. The renaming aligns well with the state's overarching goals to promote and invest in its maritime capabilities while honoring historical figures influential in that process.

Companion Bills

MD SB156

Crossfiled Port of Baltimore - Renaming

Similar Bills

MD SB896

Baltimore Convention and Tourism Redevelopment and Operating Authority Task Force

MD HB897

Baltimore Convention and Tourism Redevelopment and Operating Organization Task Force

MD SB289

Baltimore City - Removal of Debt Ballot Questions

MD SB291

Creation of a State Debt – Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loan of 2022, and the Maryland Consolidated Capital Bond Loans of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021

MD SB156

Port of Baltimore - Renaming

MD HB843

Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force

MD SB880

Baltimore Regional Water Governance Task Force

MD HB1016

Baltimore Convention and Tourism Redevelopment and Operating Authority Task Force - Revisions