Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB381

Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
2/19/24  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
5/16/24  

Caption

State Board of Examiners in Optometry - Criminal History Records Checks

Impact

The provisions of HB 381 will alter existing practices for licensure within the field of optometry in Maryland. Specifically, it will mean that criminal history checks become a prerequisite not only for initial licensure but also for renewals starting from January 1, 2026. This could lead to heightened scrutiny of applicants' backgrounds and a potential impact on the number of licenses issued, particularly if applicants have prior offenses. The changes would also necessitate adjustments in current procedural guidelines for the State Board of Examiners in Optometry as they implement these new requirements.

Summary

House Bill 381 seeks to enhance the public safety and regulatory framework for licensed optometrists in Maryland. The bill mandates that all applicants for licensure and certain renewal applicants submit to a state and national criminal history records check. This requirement aims to ensure that individuals practicing optometry meet good moral character standards and do not pose a threat to public safety. By formalizing the process through which criminal history records are checked, the bill intends to bolster consumer confidence and maintain high professional standards within the optometry field.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 381 appears to be generally positive among lawmakers, particularly those prioritizing public health and safety. Supporters of the bill emphasize the importance of ensuring that individuals in health-related professions maintain a high degree of integrity and reliability. While the bill enjoys bipartisan support, there could be concerns raised about the implications for applicants with minor infractions on their records, which may become a point of contention in discussions surrounding fairness and accessibility in licensing.

Contention

Despite the general support for HB 381, some may argue against the implications of strict criminal history checks, suggesting that they may inadvertently exclude qualified candidates with past mistakes. The effectiveness of such background checks may also come into scrutiny, with discussions likely focusing on the balance between ensuring public safety and providing opportunities for rehabilitation and second chances for potential optometrists. The bill emphasizes the importance of moral character but also raises questions about how past criminal conduct is assessed and factored into licensing decisions.

Companion Bills

MD SB175

Crossfiled State Board of Examiners in Optometry - Criminal History Records Checks

Similar Bills

MN HF1032

Board of Pharmacy required to provide the central repository under contract to administer medication repository program with any legislative funding provided for the purpose, conforming changes made related to donations of over-the-counter medications, and money appropriated.

MN SF868

Board of Pharmacy requirement to provide the central repository under contract to administer the medication repository program with any legislative funding provided for the purpose

MN SF4584

Medication repository program requirements modification

MN HF4605

Medication repository program requirements modified.

IN HB1017

Prescription drug donation repositories.

MN SF1785

Medication repository program procedures modifications provision and appropriation

MN HF1103

Medication repository program procedures modified, and money appropriated.

US HB5966

Off-Chain Digital Commodity Transaction Reporting Act of 2023