Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB398

Introduced
1/17/24  
Refer
1/17/24  
Report Pass
3/6/24  
Engrossed
3/12/24  
Refer
3/13/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
5/16/24  

Caption

Prince George's County - Taxes on Telecommunications Services - Use of Revenue PG 406-24

Impact

The enactment of HB 398 will primarily influence the funding structure for the education sector in Prince George’s County. By allowing the county to impose this new tax, the bill helps address educational financial needs by ensuring a stable revenue stream. This funding can also contribute to various educational programs, including support for disruptive or low-performing students, bilingual education initiatives, and necessary capital improvements for school facilities. Importantly, the measure does not allow these proceeds to supplant existing state or county education funds, thereby ensuring that local investments in education are maintained.

Summary

House Bill 398, concerning Prince George’s County, authorizes the County Council to impose an excise tax on telecommunications services, either as an addition to or an alternative for the existing sales and use tax. The bill specifies that the county may set a tax rate of at least 5% or a maximum of $3.50 monthly for each telephone line. This legislative action is aimed at generating revenue to support local education funding requirements, as the proceeds from this tax are primarily directed towards operating expenditures for the Prince George's County school system, with at least 90% of the proceeds allocated for this purpose.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 398 appears to be generally supportive among local education advocates and the county council, who see the tax as a crucial resource to improve educational outcomes and facilities within the county. However, there may be concerns among residents regarding the potential financial impact of new taxes on telecommunications services, particularly if customers perceive this as an additional burden in their monthly bills. Overall, the bill has garnered legislative support, evidenced by the passing vote of 38 to 9.

Contention

While there is overall agreement on the need for more funding for education, the implementation of an excise tax on telecommunications could face contention regarding its acceptance among consumers and businesses. The specifics of how this tax will be presented on bills and its impact on telecommunications pricing remains a point of discussion. Moreover, any future changes in local tax policy and how they affect overall tax burdens will likely continue to be a point of scrutiny and debate among stakeholders, including residents and local government officials.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AZ SB1027

Critical telecommunications infrastructure; construction requirements

CO SB151

Telecommunications Security

CA AB2421

Land use: permitting: wireless communications: emergency standby generators.

CA SB649

Wireless telecommunications facilities.

CA AB1100

Communications service: disasters: reports.

FL S0344

Telecommunications Access System Act of 1991

AZ SB1208

Critical telecommunications infrastructure; construction requirements

NJ S744

Removes requirement that local units may only provide broadband telecommunication service via wireless community network.