Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB415

Introduced
1/18/24  
Refer
1/18/24  
Report Pass
2/19/24  
Engrossed
2/22/24  
Refer
2/26/24  
Report Pass
3/25/24  
Enrolled
3/28/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

State Retirement and Pension System - Administration - Clarification and Technical Correction

Impact

If enacted, HB 415 will streamline the administration of retirement benefits for state law enforcement officers and the management of funds within the State Retirement and Pension System. This clarification is expected to help ensure that retiring officers can receive the benefits they are entitled to without unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles. It modifies existing regulations to better align the pension system procedures with the needs of current law enforcement personnel, providing an updated pathway for adjusting retirement participation based on longer service or age considerations.

Summary

House Bill 415 focuses on clarifying and correcting administrative aspects of the State Retirement and Pension System as well as provisions related to the Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP). The bill specifically allows for the Board of Trustees to pay incentive compensation to the Chief Investment Officer upon retirement, provided certain conditions are met. Additionally, it amends previous legislation to correct age restrictions on members of the Law Enforcement Officers' Pension System participating in DROP, easing the process for these individuals to extend their participation and ensuring they do not exceed age limitations tied to their retirement plans.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 415 appears to be supportive, particularly among law enforcement communities and their representatives. There is an understanding of the importance of providing clarity in pension administration, which is viewed as beneficial for both current officers preparing for retirement and for the state’s financial management concerning pension funds. Stakeholders seem to agree that the bill addresses important safeguards necessary for maintaining a functional retirement system without imposing burdensome restrictions.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is positive, some discussion may arise regarding potential concerns over budget impact or future funding strategies for pension systems, especially as adjustments are made to accommodate extended participation in DROP. Notably, the provisions that allow for the payment of deferred financial incentives upon retirement could lead to scrutiny regarding how these financial incentives are structured and their implications for the state budget and pension sustainability over the long term.

Companion Bills

MD SB320

Crossfiled State Retirement and Pension System - Administration - Clarification and Technical Correction

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.