Fossil Fuel-Powered Lawn and Garden Care Equipment - State Purchase, Use, and Contracts - Prohibition
Impact
If enacted, HB 91 will lead to a significant shift in how the state manages its lawn and garden care operations. By limiting the use of fossil fuel-powered tools, the law aims to contribute to environmental protection efforts and reduce carbon emissions associated with the use of these tools. The implications for state contracts are that from the stipulated date, the state will not renew contracts that involve the use of such equipment, again with the provisions for electric alternatives factored in. This change is likely to promote the development and use of more sustainable technologies.
Summary
House Bill 91 is a proposed legislation that addresses the purchase and use of fossil fuel-powered lawn and garden care equipment by the state of Maryland. The bill aims to prohibit the state from purchasing such equipment starting January 1, 2025, with exceptions made only if no electrically powered alternative is available. This legislation specifically defines fossil fuel-powered lawn and garden care equipment as gasoline or diesel-powered tools including leaf blowers, lawn mowers, hedge trimmers, and weed trimmers.
Contention
Debate around HB 91 may arise from differing views on environmental responsibility versus practicality and cost. Supporters may argue that transitioning away from fossil fuels is essential for reducing pollution and combating climate change, while opponents could raise concerns about the availability, cost, and efficiency of replacement electric equipment. Moreover, questions about budget implications and the readiness of the market for electrically powered alternatives may also be sources of contention among stakeholders involved in the legislative process.