1 | 1 | | |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. |
---|
4 | 4 | | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. |
---|
5 | 5 | | *hb0956* |
---|
6 | 6 | | |
---|
7 | 7 | | HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
8 | 8 | | P2, P1 4lr3082 |
---|
9 | 9 | | HB 1201/23 – ENT & APP |
---|
10 | 10 | | By: Delegate Solomon |
---|
11 | 11 | | Introduced and read first time: February 2, 2024 |
---|
12 | 12 | | Assigned to: Environment and Transportation and Appropriations |
---|
13 | 13 | | |
---|
14 | 14 | | A BILL ENTITLED |
---|
15 | 15 | | |
---|
16 | 16 | | AN ACT concerning 1 |
---|
17 | 17 | | |
---|
18 | 18 | | Public–Private Partnership (P3) Oversight and Accountability Act 2 |
---|
19 | 19 | | |
---|
20 | 20 | | FOR the purpose of establishing the Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review Board; 3 |
---|
21 | 21 | | requiring the Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review Board to study and 4 |
---|
22 | 22 | | make recommendations regarding certain matters; authorizing the Public–Private 5 |
---|
23 | 23 | | Partnership Oversight Review Board to request technical assistance from certain 6 |
---|
24 | 24 | | persons, when appropriate; requiring a reporting agency to submit certain 7 |
---|
25 | 25 | | presolicitation reports to the Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review Board; 8 |
---|
26 | 26 | | requiring a reporting agency to submit a separate presolicitation report for each 9 |
---|
27 | 27 | | phase of a project that will develop in phases; providing that the total value of a 10 |
---|
28 | 28 | | public–private partnership developed in phases is equal to the sum of the total value 11 |
---|
29 | 29 | | of each phase of the project; requiring a certain reporting agency to include in 12 |
---|
30 | 30 | | presolicitation reports for certain public–private partnerships presolicitation reports 13 |
---|
31 | 31 | | of certain contracts; requiring the Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review 14 |
---|
32 | 32 | | Board, within a certain number of days after receiving a presolicitation report, to 15 |
---|
33 | 33 | | report and make certain recommendations to the Board of Public Works and certain 16 |
---|
34 | 34 | | budget committees; requiring that before the Board of Public Works may make a 17 |
---|
35 | 35 | | certain designation certain budget committees have a certain number of days to 18 |
---|
36 | 36 | | review and comment on a certain report; requiring certain proposed public–private 19 |
---|
37 | 37 | | partnership agreements to be submitted to the Legislative Policy Committee and the 20 |
---|
38 | 38 | | Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review Board; prohibiting the Board of Public 21 |
---|
39 | 39 | | Works from approving a proposed agreement until the Legislative Policy Committee 22 |
---|
40 | 40 | | has reviewed and commented on the public–private partnership if a certain review 23 |
---|
41 | 41 | | and comment period is during a certain time and until certain independent 24 |
---|
42 | 42 | | assessments of the impact on the State’s credit rating and certain risk analyses are 25 |
---|
43 | 43 | | completed under certain circumstances; requiring a certain risk analysis to include 26 |
---|
44 | 44 | | certain information; requiring the proposed agreement to include certain financial 27 |
---|
45 | 45 | | information; requiring approval of the General Assembly for certain public–private 28 |
---|
46 | 46 | | partnership agreements; requiring a reporting agency to notify the Legislative Policy 29 |
---|
47 | 47 | | Committee on receiving a certain unsolicited proposal; requiring a reporting agency 30 |
---|
48 | 48 | | to consult with the Public–Private Partnership Oversight Review Board in reviewing 31 2 HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
49 | 49 | | |
---|
50 | 50 | | |
---|
51 | 51 | | a certain unsolicited proposal; requiring certain terms in a public–private 1 |
---|
52 | 52 | | partnership agreement; requiring, under certain circumstances, the terms of a 2 |
---|
53 | 53 | | public–private partnership to contain certain provisions; extending a certain 3 |
---|
54 | 54 | | prohibition on noncompete clauses in certain public–private partnership agreements 4 |
---|
55 | 55 | | to all transit or road maintenance projects regardless of funding source; and 5 |
---|
56 | 56 | | generally relating to public–private partnerships. 6 |
---|
57 | 57 | | |
---|
58 | 58 | | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 7 |
---|
59 | 59 | | Article – State Finance and Procurement 8 |
---|
60 | 60 | | Section 10A–101(a) 9 |
---|
61 | 61 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 10 |
---|
62 | 62 | | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 11 |
---|
63 | 63 | | |
---|
64 | 64 | | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 12 |
---|
65 | 65 | | Article – State Finance and Procurement 13 |
---|
66 | 66 | | Section 10A–101(b), 10A–201(a), 10A–203(a), 10A–301, and 10A–401(a) and (c) 14 |
---|
67 | 67 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 15 |
---|
68 | 68 | | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 16 |
---|
69 | 69 | | |
---|
70 | 70 | | BY adding to 17 |
---|
71 | 71 | | Article – State Finance and Procurement 18 |
---|
72 | 72 | | Section 10A–101(i), 10A–106, and 10A–203(c) 19 |
---|
73 | 73 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 20 |
---|
74 | 74 | | (2021 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 21 |
---|
75 | 75 | | |
---|
76 | 76 | | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 22 |
---|
77 | 77 | | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 23 |
---|
78 | 78 | | |
---|
79 | 79 | | Article – State Finance and Procurement 24 |
---|
80 | 80 | | |
---|
81 | 81 | | 10A–101. 25 |
---|
82 | 82 | | |
---|
83 | 83 | | (a) In this title the following words have the meanings indicated. 26 |
---|
84 | 84 | | |
---|
85 | 85 | | (b) “Budget committees” means the Senate Budget and Taxation Committee, the 27 |
---|
86 | 86 | | House [Committee on Ways and Means ] ENVIRONMENT AND TRANSPORTATION 28 |
---|
87 | 87 | | COMMITTEE, and the House Appropriations Committee. 29 |
---|
88 | 88 | | |
---|
89 | 89 | | (I) “TRANSPORTATION FACILI TIES PROJECT” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED 30 |
---|
90 | 90 | | IN § 4–101 OF THE TRANSPORTATION ARTICLE. 31 |
---|
91 | 91 | | |
---|
92 | 92 | | 10A–106. 32 |
---|
93 | 93 | | |
---|
94 | 94 | | (A) IN THIS SECTION, “BOARD” MEANS THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE 33 |
---|
95 | 95 | | PARTNERSHIP OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD. 34 |
---|
96 | 96 | | HOUSE BILL 956 3 |
---|
97 | 97 | | |
---|
98 | 98 | | |
---|
99 | 99 | | (B) THERE IS A PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OVERSIGHT REVIEW 1 |
---|
100 | 100 | | BOARD. 2 |
---|
101 | 101 | | |
---|
102 | 102 | | (C) THE BOARD CONSISTS OF THE FOLLOWING MEMBERS: 3 |
---|
103 | 103 | | |
---|
104 | 104 | | (1) TWO MEMBERS OF THE SENATE OF MARYLAND, APPOINTED BY 4 |
---|
105 | 105 | | THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE; 5 |
---|
106 | 106 | | |
---|
107 | 107 | | (2) TWO MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES, APPOINTED BY 6 |
---|
108 | 108 | | THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE; AND 7 |
---|
109 | 109 | | |
---|
110 | 110 | | (3) THREE MEMBERS , APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR, WHO SHALL 8 |
---|
111 | 111 | | HAVE EXPERI ENCE IN THE FIELDS O F TRANSPORTATION LAW , PUBLIC POLICY , 9 |
---|
112 | 112 | | FINANCE, OR MANAGEMENT CONSUL TING. 10 |
---|
113 | 113 | | |
---|
114 | 114 | | (D) THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE 11 |
---|
115 | 115 | | SHALL JOINTLY DESIGN ATE THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD. 12 |
---|
116 | 116 | | |
---|
117 | 117 | | (E) THE DEPARTMENT OF LEGISLATIVE SERVICES SHALL PROVIDE STAFF 13 |
---|
118 | 118 | | FOR THE BOARD. 14 |
---|
119 | 119 | | |
---|
120 | 120 | | (F) THE BOARD SHALL: 15 |
---|
121 | 121 | | |
---|
122 | 122 | | (1) REVIEW PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PRESOLICITATION 16 |
---|
123 | 123 | | REPORTS; 17 |
---|
124 | 124 | | |
---|
125 | 125 | | (2) MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE DESIGN ATION OF A 18 |
---|
126 | 126 | | PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTUR E ASSET AS A PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ; 19 |
---|
127 | 127 | | |
---|
128 | 128 | | (3) CONSULT WITH A REPORTING AGENCY I N REVIEWING ANY 20 |
---|
129 | 129 | | UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL S FOR A PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ; 21 |
---|
130 | 130 | | |
---|
131 | 131 | | (4) REVIEW BEST PRACTICE S REGARDING PUBLIC –PRIVATE 22 |
---|
132 | 132 | | PARTNERSHIPS FROM OT HER STATES AND INTER NATIONALLY; AND 23 |
---|
133 | 133 | | |
---|
134 | 134 | | (5) MONITOR THE IMPLEMEN TATION AND OPERATION OF EXISTING 24 |
---|
135 | 135 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS . 25 |
---|
136 | 136 | | |
---|
137 | 137 | | (G) THE BOARD MAY REQUEST TEC HNICAL ASSISTANCE FR OM THE STATE 26 |
---|
138 | 138 | | TREASURER, THE COMPTROLLER , OR THE APPROPRIATE A DMINISTRATIVE 27 |
---|
139 | 139 | | AGENCY, WHEN APPROPRIATE . 28 |
---|
140 | 140 | | |
---|
141 | 141 | | 10A–201. 29 |
---|
142 | 142 | | |
---|
143 | 143 | | (a) (1) (i) Except as provided in subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph AND 30 4 HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
144 | 144 | | |
---|
145 | 145 | | |
---|
146 | 146 | | SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGR APH (III) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AN D PARAGRAPH (3) OF 1 |
---|
147 | 147 | | THIS SUBSECTION , a reporting agency may not issue a public notice of solicitation for a 2 |
---|
148 | 148 | | public–private partnership until a presolicitation report concerning the proposed 3 |
---|
149 | 149 | | public–private partnership is submitted to the Comptroller, the State Treasurer, the 4 |
---|
150 | 150 | | budget committees, and the Department of Legislative Services, in accordance with § 5 |
---|
151 | 151 | | 2–1257 of the State Government Article. 6 |
---|
152 | 152 | | |
---|
153 | 153 | | (ii) 1. A reporting agency may not issue a public notice of 7 |
---|
154 | 154 | | solicitation for a public–private partnership for a transportation facilities project[, as 8 |
---|
155 | 155 | | defined in § 4–101(h) of the Transportation Article,] until a presolicitation report 9 |
---|
156 | 156 | | concerning the proposed public–private partnership is submitted to the budget committees 10 |
---|
157 | 157 | | and the Department of Legislative Services, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State 11 |
---|
158 | 158 | | Government Article. 12 |
---|
159 | 159 | | |
---|
160 | 160 | | 2. FOR A TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES PROJECT WI TH 13 |
---|
161 | 161 | | A TOTAL VALUE THAT E XCEEDS $500,000,000, THE REPORTING AGENCY SHALL 14 |
---|
162 | 162 | | SUBMIT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–1257 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, 15 |
---|
163 | 163 | | THE PRESOLICITATION REPORT TO THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 16 |
---|
164 | 164 | | OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD. 17 |
---|
165 | 165 | | |
---|
166 | 166 | | (III) 1. IF A REPORTING AGENCY HAS DETERMINED THAT A 18 |
---|
167 | 167 | | PROJECT THAT IS SUBJ ECT TO A PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WILL BE 19 |
---|
168 | 168 | | DEVELOPED IN SEPARAT E PHASES, THE REPORTING AGENCY SHALL SUBMIT A 20 |
---|
169 | 169 | | SEPARATE PRESOLICITA TION REPORT IN ACCOR DANCE WITH THIS SECT ION FOR 21 |
---|
170 | 170 | | EACH PHASE O F THE PROJECT. 22 |
---|
171 | 171 | | |
---|
172 | 172 | | 2. FOR THE PURPOSES OF D ETERMINING THE TOTAL 23 |
---|
173 | 173 | | VALUE OF A PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP FOR A PROJECT THAT W ILL BE 24 |
---|
174 | 174 | | DEVELOPED IN PHASES , THE TOTAL VALUE OF T HE PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 25 |
---|
175 | 175 | | SHALL BE EQUAL TO TH E SUM OF THE TOTAL V ALUE OF EACH PH ASE OF THE 26 |
---|
176 | 176 | | PROJECT. 27 |
---|
177 | 177 | | |
---|
178 | 178 | | (2) (i) [The] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH (4) OF THIS 28 |
---|
179 | 179 | | SUBSECTION, THE budget committees may not have more than 45 days to review and 29 |
---|
180 | 180 | | comment on the presolicitation report submitted in accordance with paragraph (1) of this 30 |
---|
181 | 181 | | subsection. 31 |
---|
182 | 182 | | |
---|
183 | 183 | | (ii) 1. If the total value of a proposed public–private partnership 32 |
---|
184 | 184 | | reported in the presolicitation report under paragraph (b)(1) of this subsection exceeds 33 |
---|
185 | 185 | | $500,000,000, the budget committees [may request] SHALL, AFTER MAKING A REQUE ST 34 |
---|
186 | 186 | | SUBJECT TO SUBSUBPAR AGRAPH 2 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH , BE GRANTED an 35 |
---|
187 | 187 | | additional 15 days to review and comment on the presolicitation report. 36 |
---|
188 | 188 | | |
---|
189 | 189 | | 2. The request for additional time under this subparagraph 37 |
---|
190 | 190 | | shall: 38 HOUSE BILL 956 5 |
---|
191 | 191 | | |
---|
192 | 192 | | |
---|
193 | 193 | | |
---|
194 | 194 | | A. be made in writing to the Governor, the Department of 1 |
---|
195 | 195 | | Budget and Management, and the reporting agency; and 2 |
---|
196 | 196 | | |
---|
197 | 197 | | B. include the reason for the request and any preliminary 3 |
---|
198 | 198 | | issues the budget committees have. 4 |
---|
199 | 199 | | |
---|
200 | 200 | | (3) FOR A PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITH A TOTAL VALUE 5 |
---|
201 | 201 | | THAT EXCEEDS $500,000,000, THE REPORTING AGENCY SHALL INCLUDE IN THE 6 |
---|
202 | 202 | | PRESOLICITATION REPO RT REQUIRED UNDER PA RAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION 7 |
---|
203 | 203 | | A PRESOLICITATION RE PORT OF EACH CONTRAC T UNDER THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE 8 |
---|
204 | 204 | | PARTNERSHIP . 9 |
---|
205 | 205 | | |
---|
206 | 206 | | (4) (I) WITHIN 60 DAYS AFTER RECEIVING A PRESOLIC ITATION 10 |
---|
207 | 207 | | REPORT UNDER PARAGRA PH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE 11 |
---|
208 | 208 | | PARTNERSHIP OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD SHALL REPORT AN D MAKE 12 |
---|
209 | 209 | | RECOMMENDATIONS ON T HE PRESOLICITATION R EPORT TO THE BOARD OF PUBLIC 13 |
---|
210 | 210 | | WORKS AND, IN ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–1257 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT 14 |
---|
211 | 211 | | ARTICLE, THE BUDGET COMMITTEE S OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY. 15 |
---|
212 | 212 | | |
---|
213 | 213 | | (II) THE BUDGET COMMITTEES , IN CONSULTATION WITH THE 16 |
---|
214 | 214 | | APPROPRIATE POLICY C OMMITTEES, SHALL HAVE 60 DAYS TO REVIEW AND 17 |
---|
215 | 215 | | COMMENT ON THE REPOR T AND RECOMMENDATION S OF THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE 18 |
---|
216 | 216 | | PARTNERSHIP OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD BEFORE THE BOARD OF PUBLIC 19 |
---|
217 | 217 | | WORKS MAY DESIGNATE T HE PUBLIC INFRASTRUC TURE ASSET AS A 20 |
---|
218 | 218 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP UNDER SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION. 21 |
---|
219 | 219 | | |
---|
220 | 220 | | 10A–203. 22 |
---|
221 | 221 | | |
---|
222 | 222 | | (a) (1) Except as provided in [paragraph (2)] PARAGRAPHS (2) AND (5) of 23 |
---|
223 | 223 | | this subsection, the Board of Public Works may not approve a public–private partnership 24 |
---|
224 | 224 | | agreement until: 25 |
---|
225 | 225 | | |
---|
226 | 226 | | (i) a copy of the proposed agreement is submitted simultaneously 26 |
---|
227 | 227 | | to: 27 |
---|
228 | 228 | | |
---|
229 | 229 | | 1. the Comptroller, the State Treasurer, the budget 28 |
---|
230 | 230 | | committees, and the Department of Legislative Services, in accordance with § 2–1257 of 29 |
---|
231 | 231 | | the State Government Article; AND 30 |
---|
232 | 232 | | |
---|
233 | 233 | | 2. FOR A PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITH A TOTAL 31 |
---|
234 | 234 | | VALUE THAT EXCEEDS $500,000,000, THE LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE, IN 32 |
---|
235 | 235 | | ACCORDANCE WITH § 2–1257 OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT ARTICLE, AND THE 33 |
---|
236 | 236 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD; 34 |
---|
237 | 237 | | 6 HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
238 | 238 | | |
---|
239 | 239 | | |
---|
240 | 240 | | (ii) the State Treasurer, in coordination with the Comptroller, 1 |
---|
241 | 241 | | analyzes the impact on the State’s capital debt affordability limits of the proposed 2 |
---|
242 | 242 | | public–private partnership agreement; 3 |
---|
243 | 243 | | |
---|
244 | 244 | | (iii) the State Treasurer submits the analysis to the budget 4 |
---|
245 | 245 | | committees and the Department of Legislative Services, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the 5 |
---|
246 | 246 | | State Government Article; [and] 6 |
---|
247 | 247 | | |
---|
248 | 248 | | (iv) the budget committees have reviewed and commented on the 7 |
---|
249 | 249 | | agreement in accordance with paragraph (3) of this subsection; AND 8 |
---|
250 | 250 | | |
---|
251 | 251 | | (V) FOR A PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITH A TOTAL 9 |
---|
252 | 252 | | VALUE THAT EXCEEDS $500,000,000: 10 |
---|
253 | 253 | | |
---|
254 | 254 | | 1. IF THE REVIEW AND CO MMENT PERIOD FOR THE 11 |
---|
255 | 255 | | BUDGET COMMITTEES IS DURING A PERIOD WHEN THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY IS NOT 12 |
---|
256 | 256 | | IN SESSION, THE LEGISLATIVE POLICY COMMITTEE HAS REVIEWE D AND 13 |
---|
257 | 257 | | COMMENTED ON THE PUB LIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP ; 14 |
---|
258 | 258 | | |
---|
259 | 259 | | 2. INDEPENDENT ASSESSME NTS OF THE IMPACT ON THE 15 |
---|
260 | 260 | | STATE’S CREDIT RATING ARE COMPLETED FOR EACH C ONTRACT UNDER THE 16 |
---|
261 | 261 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP BY A FINANCIAL ADVISO R CHOSEN BY THE STATE 17 |
---|
262 | 262 | | TREASURER; AND 18 |
---|
263 | 263 | | |
---|
264 | 264 | | 3. IN ACCORDANCE WITH P ARAGRAPH (4) OF THIS 19 |
---|
265 | 265 | | SUBSECTION, A RISK ANALYSIS IS C OMPLETED FOR EACH CO NTRACT UNDER THE 20 |
---|
266 | 266 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP BY A FINANCIAL ADVIS OR CHOSEN BY THE STATE 21 |
---|
267 | 267 | | TREASURER. 22 |
---|
268 | 268 | | |
---|
269 | 269 | | (2) The Board of Public Works may not approve a public –private 23 |
---|
270 | 270 | | partnership agreement for a transportation facilities project[, as defined in § 4–101(h) of 24 |
---|
271 | 271 | | the Transportation Article,] until the proposed agreement is submitted to the budget 25 |
---|
272 | 272 | | committees and the Department of Legislative Services, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the 26 |
---|
273 | 273 | | State Government Article. 27 |
---|
274 | 274 | | |
---|
275 | 275 | | (3) (i) The period for review, analysis, and comment under paragraphs 28 |
---|
276 | 276 | | (1) and (2) of this subsection may not exceed a total of 30 days from the date the proposed 29 |
---|
277 | 277 | | public–private partnership agreement is submitted simultaneously to the State Treasurer, 30 |
---|
278 | 278 | | the Comptroller, the budget committees, and the Department of Legislative Services. 31 |
---|
279 | 279 | | |
---|
280 | 280 | | (ii) The budget committees may facilitate a faster review and 32 |
---|
281 | 281 | | comment period by sending a letter to the Board of Public Works supporting a proposed 33 |
---|
282 | 282 | | public–private partnership agreement in advance of the expiration of the 30–day review 34 |
---|
283 | 283 | | period. 35 |
---|
284 | 284 | | HOUSE BILL 956 7 |
---|
285 | 285 | | |
---|
286 | 286 | | |
---|
287 | 287 | | (4) THE RISK ANALYSIS REQUIRED UNDER PARAG RAPH (1) OF THIS 1 |
---|
288 | 288 | | SUBSECTION SHALL INC LUDE: 2 |
---|
289 | 289 | | |
---|
290 | 290 | | (I) AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RISKS TO THE STATE POSED BY THE 3 |
---|
291 | 291 | | PROPOSED AGREEMENT , INCLUDING ECONOMIC , LEGAL, AND TECHNOLOGICAL 4 |
---|
292 | 292 | | RISKS; AND 5 |
---|
293 | 293 | | |
---|
294 | 294 | | (II) AN EVALUATION OF THE SECURITY PACKAGE PROVIDED BY 6 |
---|
295 | 295 | | THE PRIVATE ENTITY A ND PRIVATE FUNDING S OURCE, INCLUDING ANY PAYMEN T 7 |
---|
296 | 296 | | AND PERFORMANCE BOND S, LETTERS OF CREDIT , PARENT COMPANY GUARA NTEES, 8 |
---|
297 | 297 | | AND LENDER OR EQUITY PARTNER GUARANTEES . 9 |
---|
298 | 298 | | |
---|
299 | 299 | | (5) (I) A PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH A 10 |
---|
300 | 300 | | TOTAL VALUE THAT EXCE EDS $1,000,000,000 REQUIRES AN AFFIRMAT IVE VOTE OF 11 |
---|
301 | 301 | | THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY BEFORE THE BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS MAY ACT TO 12 |
---|
302 | 302 | | APPROVE THE AGREEMEN T. 13 |
---|
303 | 303 | | |
---|
304 | 304 | | (II) A VOTE OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TO APPROVE A 14 |
---|
305 | 305 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WITH A TOTAL VALUE THAT EXCEEDS 15 |
---|
306 | 306 | | $1,000,000,000 SHALL OCCUR AFTER CO MPLETION OF THE PERI OD FOR REVIEW , 16 |
---|
307 | 307 | | ANALYSIS, AND COMMENT REQUIRED UNDER PARAGRAPHS (1) AND (2) OF THIS 17 |
---|
308 | 308 | | SUBSECTION. 18 |
---|
309 | 309 | | |
---|
310 | 310 | | (C) THE PROPOSED PUBLIC –PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT SHALL 19 |
---|
311 | 311 | | INCLUDE FINANCIAL IN FORMATION REGARDING EACH CONTRACTOR AND ANY 20 |
---|
312 | 312 | | SUBCONTRACTOR THAT W ILL PROVIDE PRODUCTS OR SERVICES UNDER TH E 21 |
---|
313 | 313 | | PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT . 22 |
---|
314 | 314 | | |
---|
315 | 315 | | 10A–301. 23 |
---|
316 | 316 | | |
---|
317 | 317 | | (a) A reporting agency may accept, reject, or evaluate an unsolicited proposal for 24 |
---|
318 | 318 | | a public–private partnership that will assist the reporting agency in implementing its 25 |
---|
319 | 319 | | functions in a manner consistent with State policy. 26 |
---|
320 | 320 | | |
---|
321 | 321 | | (b) A REPORTING AGENCY SHA LL NOTIFY THE LEGISLATIVE POLICY 27 |
---|
322 | 322 | | COMMITTEE ON RECEIVIN G AN UNSOLICITED PRO POSAL. 28 |
---|
323 | 323 | | |
---|
324 | 324 | | (C) (1) A reporting agency shall establish the process for determining whether 29 |
---|
325 | 325 | | an unsolicited proposal meets a need of the reporting agency or is otherwise advantageous 30 |
---|
326 | 326 | | to the reporting agency. 31 |
---|
327 | 327 | | |
---|
328 | 328 | | (2) NOTWITHSTANDING PARAG RAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION , A 32 |
---|
329 | 329 | | REPORTING AGENCY SHA LL CONSULT WITH THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP 33 |
---|
330 | 330 | | OVERSIGHT REVIEW BOARD IN REVIEWING AN UNSOLICITED PROPOSAL . 34 8 HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
331 | 331 | | |
---|
332 | 332 | | |
---|
333 | 333 | | |
---|
334 | 334 | | [(c)] (D) (1) A reporting agency may establish by regulation an application 1 |
---|
335 | 335 | | fee for submitting an unsolicited proposal. 2 |
---|
336 | 336 | | |
---|
337 | 337 | | (2) For an unsolicited proposal that does not address a project already in 3 |
---|
338 | 338 | | the State’s Capital Improvement Program or Consolidated Transportation Program 4 |
---|
339 | 339 | | planning documents, a reporting agency may require a higher application fee. 5 |
---|
340 | 340 | | |
---|
341 | 341 | | [(d)] (E) If a reporting agency determines that an unsolicited proposal meets a 6 |
---|
342 | 342 | | need of the reporting agency or is otherwise advantageous to the reporting agency, the 7 |
---|
343 | 343 | | reporting agency shall: 8 |
---|
344 | 344 | | |
---|
345 | 345 | | (1) conduct a competitive solicitation process as described under Subtitle 2 9 |
---|
346 | 346 | | of this title; 10 |
---|
347 | 347 | | |
---|
348 | 348 | | (2) protect proprietary information included in the unsolicited proposal to 11 |
---|
349 | 349 | | the same extent proprietary information is protected under § 10A–203(b) of this title; and 12 |
---|
350 | 350 | | |
---|
351 | 351 | | (3) comply with all of the other procedural requirements set forth in this 13 |
---|
352 | 352 | | title. 14 |
---|
353 | 353 | | |
---|
354 | 354 | | [(e)] (F) An individual or firm that has submitted an unsolicited proposal under 15 |
---|
355 | 355 | | this title may participate in any subsequent competitive solicitation process. 16 |
---|
356 | 356 | | |
---|
357 | 357 | | 10A–401. 17 |
---|
358 | 358 | | |
---|
359 | 359 | | (a) (1) Whenever applicable, a public–private partnership agreement shall 18 |
---|
360 | 360 | | include the following provisions: 19 |
---|
361 | 361 | | |
---|
362 | 362 | | [(1)] (I) the method and terms for approval of any assignment, 20 |
---|
363 | 363 | | reassignment, or other transfer of interest related to the public–private partnership 21 |
---|
364 | 364 | | agreement; 22 |
---|
365 | 365 | | |
---|
366 | 366 | | [(2)] (II) the methods and terms for setting and adjusting tolls, fares, fees, 23 |
---|
367 | 367 | | and other charges related to the public infrastructure asset; 24 |
---|
368 | 368 | | |
---|
369 | 369 | | [(3)] (III) the method and terms for revenue–sharing or other sharing in 25 |
---|
370 | 370 | | fees or charges, in which the public participates in the financial upside of asset performance 26 |
---|
371 | 371 | | of the public infrastructure asset; 27 |
---|
372 | 372 | | |
---|
373 | 373 | | [(4)] (IV) minimum quality standards, performance criteria, incentives, 28 |
---|
374 | 374 | | and disincentives; 29 |
---|
375 | 375 | | |
---|
376 | 376 | | [(5)] (V) operations and maintenance standards; 30 |
---|
377 | 377 | | |
---|
378 | 378 | | [(6)] (VI) the rights for inspection by the State; 31 HOUSE BILL 956 9 |
---|
379 | 379 | | |
---|
380 | 380 | | |
---|
381 | 381 | | |
---|
382 | 382 | | [(7)] (VII) the terms and conditions under which the reporting agency may 1 |
---|
383 | 383 | | provide services for a fee sufficient to cover both direct and indirect costs; 2 |
---|
384 | 384 | | |
---|
385 | 385 | | [(8)] (VIII) provisions for oversight and remedies and penalties for default; 3 |
---|
386 | 386 | | |
---|
387 | 387 | | [(9)] (IX) the terms and conditions under which the reporting agency 4 |
---|
388 | 388 | | originating the public–private partnership shall be responsible for ongoing oversight; 5 |
---|
389 | 389 | | |
---|
390 | 390 | | [(10)] (X) the terms and conditions for audits by the State, including the 6 |
---|
391 | 391 | | Office of Legislative Audits, related to the agreement’s financial records and performance; 7 |
---|
392 | 392 | | |
---|
393 | 393 | | [(11)] (XI) the terms and conditions under which the public infrastructure 8 |
---|
394 | 394 | | assets shall be returned to the State at the expiration or termination of the agreement; 9 |
---|
395 | 395 | | [and] 10 |
---|
396 | 396 | | |
---|
397 | 397 | | [(12)] (XII) requirements for the private entity to provide performance 11 |
---|
398 | 398 | | security and payment security in a form and in an amount determined by the responsible 12 |
---|
399 | 399 | | public entity, except that: 13 |
---|
400 | 400 | | |
---|
401 | 401 | | [(i)] 1. requirements for the payment security for construction 14 |
---|
402 | 402 | | contracts shall be in accordance with Title 17, Subtitle 1 of this article; and 15 |
---|
403 | 403 | | |
---|
404 | 404 | | [(ii)] 2. requirements for the amount of the payment security and 16 |
---|
405 | 405 | | any performance security in the form of a performance bond for a construction contract 17 |
---|
406 | 406 | | shall be based on the value of the respective construction elements of the public–private 18 |
---|
407 | 407 | | partnership agreement and not on the total value of the public–private partnership 19 |
---|
408 | 408 | | agreement; AND 20 |
---|
409 | 409 | | |
---|
410 | 410 | | (XIII) IF NEGOTIATED AS AN ELEMENT OF THE PUBLI C–PRIVATE 21 |
---|
411 | 411 | | PARTNERSHIP , THE TERMS ESTABLISHI NG A GUARANTEED RATE OF RETURN FOR 22 |
---|
412 | 412 | | THE PRIVATE ENTITY . 23 |
---|
413 | 413 | | |
---|
414 | 414 | | (2) IF THE PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT REQUIRES 24 |
---|
415 | 415 | | THE STATE OR A SUCCESSOR ENTITY TO TAKE OVER OPERATIONS AND 25 |
---|
416 | 416 | | MAINTENANCE OF A PRO JECT, THE TERMS FOR APPROV AL OF ANY ASSIGNMENT , 26 |
---|
417 | 417 | | REASSIGNMENT , OR OTHER TRANSFER OF INTERESTS IN THE PRO JECT SHALL 27 |
---|
418 | 418 | | INCLUDE A REQUIREMEN T THAT ALL TOLL REVENU E OR OTHER CHARGES R ELATED 28 |
---|
419 | 419 | | TO THE PROJECT BE AS SIGNED TO THE STATE OR A SUCCESSOR ENTITY TO APPLY 29 |
---|
420 | 420 | | TO THE OPERATIONS AN D MAINTENANCE OF THE PROJECT. 30 |
---|
421 | 421 | | |
---|
422 | 422 | | (3) THE TERMS OF THE PUBL IC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT 31 |
---|
423 | 423 | | PROVIDING FOR REVENU E–SHARING OR OTHER SHARING IN FEES OR CHARGES I N 32 |
---|
424 | 424 | | WHICH THE PUBLIC PAR TICIPATES IN THE FIN ANCIAL UPSIDE OF ASS ET 33 |
---|
425 | 425 | | PERFORMANCE OF THE P UBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE ASSET SHALL REQUIRE THE 34 10 HOUSE BILL 956 |
---|
426 | 426 | | |
---|
427 | 427 | | |
---|
428 | 428 | | REIMBURSEMENT OF THE STATE FOR ADVANCED PR OJECT EXPENSES . 1 |
---|
429 | 429 | | |
---|
430 | 430 | | (c) A public–private partnership agreement for a project involving road, highway, 2 |
---|
431 | 431 | | or bridge assets may not include a noncompete clause that would inhibit the planning, 3 |
---|
432 | 432 | | construction, or implementation of [State–funded] transit OR ROAD MAINTENANCE 4 |
---|
433 | 433 | | projects. 5 |
---|
434 | 434 | | |
---|
435 | 435 | | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 6 |
---|
436 | 436 | | 1, 2024. 7 |
---|