Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB989

Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/5/24  
Report Pass
3/15/24  
Engrossed
3/18/24  
Refer
3/18/24  
Report Pass
4/4/24  
Enrolled
4/6/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

Montgomery County – Subdivision Plats – Conditions PG/MC 111–24

Impact

The bill seeks to modernize and expedite the subdivision approval process in Montgomery County by allowing conditional tentatively approved plats, streamlining regulatory procedures and potentially fostering economic growth through quicker development timelines. This legislative adjustment is expected to simplify interactions between the Planning Board and developers, thereby enhancing the efficiency of land use and planning operations within the region.

Summary

House Bill 989, concerning subdivision plats in Montgomery County, allows the Montgomery County Planning Board to grant tentative approval for subdivision plats subject to specified conditions. This means that the Planning Board can move forward with approvals even when certain requirements have yet to be met. However, this tentative approval does not permit the entry of this status on the subdivision plat nor does it allow for the plat's submission to county records until all conditions are fulfilled. The intent behind this change is to streamline the development process and facilitate planning operations within the county.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 989 appears to be positive among legislators supporting it, highlighting the necessity for an efficient planning process in light of ongoing issues in urban development. Proponents argue that the bill's provisions could lead to substantial improvements in local development projects and positively impact both the economy and local communities. However, some concerns may exist regarding the implications of allowing provisional approvals, particularly questioning whether it may compromise thorough assessments during the planning phase.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between expedited development and ensuring that all necessary conditions for a subdivision approval are rigorously met. Critics may argue that such a provision could lead to insufficient oversight or diminished accountability for developers, potentially impacting community standards and quality of living. The effectiveness of conditional approvals hinges on the proper execution of oversight practices to avoid any adverse consequences.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

MD HB778

Montgomery County - Bicounty Agencies - Commissioner Discipline, Disclosures, Training, and Ethics MC/PG 105-23

MD HB344

Montgomery County – Voting Methods MC 03–23

MD HB819

Montgomery County - Off-Street Parking Requirements Near Mass Transit Stations MC/PG 106-23

MD HB277

Montgomery County – Alcoholic Beverages – Holders of Class B–BWL (Clubhouse/Lodge) License and Class 7 Micro–Brewery License MC 16–23

MD HB345

Montgomery County - Alcohol Beverage Services - Advisory Board MC 04-23

MD HB820

Montgomery County - Maryland Route 200 (Intercounty Connector) - Speed Limit Enforcement MC 8-23

MD HB796

Montgomery County - Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Restructuring Task Force - Establishment MC/PG 104-23

MD HB763

Montgomery County - Collective Bargaining for Sheriff's Office Employees - Binding Arbitration Procedures MC 13-23

MD HB764

Montgomery County Housing Opportunities Commission - Collective Bargaining Agreement Implementation - Impasse Arbitration MC 10-23

MD HB783

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission – Minority Business Enterprise Utilization Program – Revisions and Extension MC/PG 101–23

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.