Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB230

Introduced
1/10/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
1/29/24  
Engrossed
2/1/24  
Refer
2/7/24  
Report Pass
3/28/24  
Enrolled
4/5/24  
Chaptered
5/16/24  

Caption

Insurance - Hearing Representation

Impact

The implementation of SB230 is set to influence state laws by expanding the definitions and eligibility of representatives allowed to advocate for small business entities in official hearings. This means that corporate officers or authorized employees of small employers can represent their interests, making it less burdensome on small businesses that may find it financially challenging to secure legal representation. The bill effectively seeks to streamline the process and make the insurance hearing process more inclusive for those who might not otherwise participate due to legal costs.

Summary

Senate Bill 230 focuses on modifying the representation rules during hearings concerning insurance matters in Maryland. The bill mandates that small employers can be represented by individuals other than attorneys in hearings held by the Insurance Commissioner. This change aims to facilitate access to hearings for smaller entities that may not have the resources to hire legal counsel, thereby promoting fairness and accessibility within the insurance regulatory framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB230 appears to be favorable among proponents, particularly small business owners and advocacy groups that support less stringent legal representation requirements. They believe that the bill is a significant step towards leveling the playing field for small employers in the often complex insurance environment. Conversely, there might be concerns raised regarding the potential for less formal representation to complicate legal processes or dilute the integrity of hearings, but these concerns were not highlighted prominently in available discussions.

Contention

Despite the general support, some points of contention could arise regarding the adequacy of representation by non-attorneys. Critics might argue that allowing non-legal representatives could lead to misunderstandings of legal processes and implications, thus potentially disadvantaging small employers rather than helping them. Additionally, the measure of who qualifies as a 'small employer,' as determined by state regulations, could also lead to disputes about eligibility and representation rights. Nevertheless, the overall expectation is that the bill will enhance participation in hearings without significantly undermining regulatory standards.

Companion Bills

MD HB90

Crossfiled Insurance - Hearing Representation

Similar Bills

CT SJ00007

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CT HJ00041

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims.

CT HJ00023

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner Extensions Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State.

CT HJ00038

Resolution Concerning The Disposition Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.

CA AB2009

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB1920

California Travel and Tourism Commission.

CA AB2323

Insurance: covered communications.

CT HJ00029

Resolution Granting The Claims Commissioner An Extension Of Time To Dispose Of Certain Claims Against The State Pursuant To Chapter 53 Of The General Statutes.