Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB300

Introduced
1/10/24  
Refer
1/10/24  
Report Pass
3/13/24  
Engrossed
3/14/24  
Refer
3/15/24  
Report Pass
4/3/24  
Enrolled
4/4/24  
Chaptered
4/9/24  

Caption

Natural Resources - Wildland Areas - Belt Woods Wildland

Impact

If enacted, SB 300 would amend existing laws concerning the state's wildland preservation, providing more flexibility for the Department of Natural Resources to conduct necessary maintenance and archaeological work that has the potential to enhance the ecological integrity of the Belt Woods Wildland. Moreover, it explicitly acknowledges the need for careful management of both existing structures and ecological features, allowing for continued agricultural use until such time as forestation occurs.

Summary

Senate Bill 300 concerns the Belt Woods Wildland in Prince George's County, Maryland, and aims to enable certain archaeological and restoration activities within this designated area. The bill allows the Department of Natural Resources to undertake archaeological inventories and stabilization of historic structures, while also permitting actions to remove nonnative species and enhance ecological features within the wildland. This act is part of a broader effort to preserve unique natural resources and ensure that the wildland remains unimpaired for future generations.

Sentiment

The sentiment towards SB 300 appears to be predominantly positive, especially among environmental advocates and stakeholders who support efforts to maintain and enhance the state's natural landscapes. The bill has been favorably voted upon in the legislative process, indicating a general consensus on its utility. However, there may be some contention surrounding the balance between development and ecological preservation, particularly concerning the methods employed for land management.

Contention

Notable points of contention involve the extent to which the Department of Natural Resources can exert control over the wildland, particularly regarding the removal of nonnative species and the use of mechanical equipment for stabilization and restoration. Detractors may express concern over potential disruptions to local ecosystems and the historical significance of existing structures. As such, while the bill facilitates important conservation efforts, it also raises discussions about the balance of ecological preservation and historic integrity.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB774

Research program: firefighting: wildland and wildland-urban interface.

CA AB1141

Wildfires: Wildland Urban Interface Fire Research Center.

US HB4584

National Wildland Fire Risk Reduction Program Act

CA AB1067

Public lands: Department of Parks and Recreation: wildfire management plan: fire hazard severity zones.

OK SB1071

Wildland fires; establishing provisions relating to wildland fire liability and wildland fire mitigation. Effective date.

CA AB1943

Housing: the Tiny Homes of California Act.

OK HB1106

Public utilities; creating the Electric Utility Wildland Fire Prevention and Response Act of 2025; effective date.

OK SB517

Electric utilities; creating the Wildland Fire Protection Act. Effective date.