Maryland 2024 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB547

Introduced
1/25/24  
Refer
1/25/24  
Report Pass
2/26/24  
Engrossed
3/1/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
4/1/24  
Enrolled
4/5/24  
Chaptered
5/9/24  

Caption

Wildlife - Traveling Animal Acts - Prohibition

Impact

The bill would have a considerable impact on animal welfare laws in the state, reinforcing existing wildlife protections by eliminating a category of performance that is often criticized for compromising the ethical treatment of animals. By imposing fines for violations of the prohibition, it also adds a layer of enforcement to ensure compliance among traveling shows that may attempt to include these animals. The intended effect is to foster a more humane approach to animal entertainment and align with contemporary views on wildlife conservation and ethics.

Summary

Senate Bill 547, titled 'Wildlife - Traveling Animal Acts - Prohibition', aims to prohibit the use of certain animals in traveling animal acts within the state. Specifically, the bill targets performances that involve species such as bears, cougars, elephants, and nonhuman primates, effectively banning their participation in traveling shows. The bill establishes parameters for what constitutes a traveling animal act and makes it unlawful for individuals or entities to allow such performances to occur with covered animals, thereby promoting wildlife protection and welfare.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 547 appears predominantly positive among animal rights advocates and conservationists, who view the bill as a necessary step toward safeguarding vulnerable species from exploitation in performance contexts. However, some individuals from sectors associated with entertainment may express concern, arguing that such prohibitions limit cultural displays and undermine traditional forms of entertainment that have utilized these animals.

Contention

While there is strong support for the ethical implications of the bill, contention arises around the broader implications for animal entertainment. Some critics have pointed out that the bill may affect not only circuses but also educational programs and exhibitions that aim to raise awareness about conservation. Thus, discussions around SB 547 have highlighted the delicate balance between animal welfare and traditional entertainment, sparking a dialogue about the role of animals in public shows and how best to educate the public while ensuring the humane treatment of animals.

Companion Bills

MD HB379

Crossfiled Wildlife - Traveling Animal Acts - Prohibition

Previously Filed As

MD SB690

Agriculture - Confinement of Egg-Laying Hens in Commercial Egg Production - Prohibitions

MD SB667

Annual Corrective Bill

MD HB626

Animal Testing and Research - Human-Relevant Research Funding and Animal Testing and Research Contributions

MD SB560

Animal Testing and Research - Human-Relevant Research Funding and Animal Testing and Research Contributions

MD SB579

Residential Property - Service Agreements - Prohibitions

MD SB327

Hunting, Wildlife Conservation, and Outdoor Recreation - Funding, Promotion, Management, Licenses, Permits, and Stamps

MD HB983

Hunting, Wildlife Conservation, and Outdoor Recreation - Funding, Promotion, Management, Licenses, Permits, and Stamps

MD HB728

Residential Property - Service Agreements - Prohibitions

MD HB580

Election Law – Polling Sites – Firearms Prohibitions

MD HB192

Currency - Campaign Finance Prohibitions - Disclosures by Financial Institutions

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.