1 | 1 | | |
---|
2 | 2 | | |
---|
3 | 3 | | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTING LAW . |
---|
4 | 4 | | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. |
---|
5 | 5 | | *sb0681* |
---|
6 | 6 | | |
---|
7 | 7 | | SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
8 | 8 | | R1, M3 4lr2622 |
---|
9 | 9 | | CF 4lr1143 |
---|
10 | 10 | | By: Senators Lam and Gile |
---|
11 | 11 | | Introduced and read first time: January 29, 2024 |
---|
12 | 12 | | Assigned to: Finance and Budget and Taxation |
---|
13 | 13 | | |
---|
14 | 14 | | A BILL ENTITLED |
---|
15 | 15 | | |
---|
16 | 16 | | AN ACT concerning 1 |
---|
17 | 17 | | |
---|
18 | 18 | | Major Highway Capacity Expansion Projects – Impact Assessments and 2 |
---|
19 | 19 | | Mitigation Plans 3 |
---|
20 | 20 | | (Transportation and Climate Alignment Act of 2024) 4 |
---|
21 | 21 | | |
---|
22 | 22 | | FOR the purpose of requiring the Department of Transportation to establish a process for 5 |
---|
23 | 23 | | performing major highway capacity expansion project impact assessments; requiring 6 |
---|
24 | 24 | | the Department of Transportation and a metropolitan planning organization to 7 |
---|
25 | 25 | | perform an impact assessment under certain circumstances; requiring the 8 |
---|
26 | 26 | | Department of Transportation to use the impact assessment to make a certain 9 |
---|
27 | 27 | | determination; requiring the Department of Transportation and a metropolitan 10 |
---|
28 | 28 | | planning organization to develop a certain mitigation plan under certain 11 |
---|
29 | 29 | | circumstances; requiring the Department of Transportation to review for approval a 12 |
---|
30 | 30 | | mitigation plan developed by a metropolitan planning organization; requiring the 13 |
---|
31 | 31 | | Department of the Environment to develop a methodology for making a certain 14 |
---|
32 | 32 | | determination; authorizing the Department of Transportation to restrict or redirect 15 |
---|
33 | 33 | | certain funding that would have been allocated to the metropolitan planning 16 |
---|
34 | 34 | | organization under certain circumstances; requiring the Department of 17 |
---|
35 | 35 | | Transportation or a metropolitan planning organization to post certain information 18 |
---|
36 | 36 | | to its website; and generally relating to major highway capacity projects. 19 |
---|
37 | 37 | | |
---|
38 | 38 | | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 20 |
---|
39 | 39 | | Article – Environment 21 |
---|
40 | 40 | | Section 1–701(a)(1), (7), and (8) 22 |
---|
41 | 41 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 23 |
---|
42 | 42 | | (2013 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 24 |
---|
43 | 43 | | |
---|
44 | 44 | | BY repealing and reenacting, without amendments, 25 |
---|
45 | 45 | | Article – Transportation 26 |
---|
46 | 46 | | Section 2–103.1(a)(1), (2), and (4) 27 |
---|
47 | 47 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 28 |
---|
48 | 48 | | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 29 2 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
49 | 49 | | |
---|
50 | 50 | | |
---|
51 | 51 | | |
---|
52 | 52 | | BY adding to 1 |
---|
53 | 53 | | Article – Transportation 2 |
---|
54 | 54 | | Section 2–901 through 2–907 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 9. Major 3 |
---|
55 | 55 | | Highway Capacity Expansion Projects” 4 |
---|
56 | 56 | | Annotated Code of Maryland 5 |
---|
57 | 57 | | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 6 |
---|
58 | 58 | | |
---|
59 | 59 | | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 7 |
---|
60 | 60 | | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 8 |
---|
61 | 61 | | |
---|
62 | 62 | | Article – Environment 9 |
---|
63 | 63 | | |
---|
64 | 64 | | 1–701. 10 |
---|
65 | 65 | | |
---|
66 | 66 | | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 11 |
---|
67 | 67 | | |
---|
68 | 68 | | (7) “Overburdened community” means any census tract for which three or 12 |
---|
69 | 69 | | more of the following environmental health indicators are above the 75th percentile 13 |
---|
70 | 70 | | statewide: 14 |
---|
71 | 71 | | |
---|
72 | 72 | | (i) Particulate matter (PM) 2.5; 15 |
---|
73 | 73 | | |
---|
74 | 74 | | (ii) Ozone; 16 |
---|
75 | 75 | | |
---|
76 | 76 | | (iii) National Air Toxics Assessment (NATA) diesel PM; 17 |
---|
77 | 77 | | |
---|
78 | 78 | | (iv) NATA cancer risk; 18 |
---|
79 | 79 | | |
---|
80 | 80 | | (v) NATA respiratory hazard index; 19 |
---|
81 | 81 | | |
---|
82 | 82 | | (vi) Traffic proximity; 20 |
---|
83 | 83 | | |
---|
84 | 84 | | (vii) Lead paint indicator; 21 |
---|
85 | 85 | | |
---|
86 | 86 | | (viii) National Priorities List Superfund site proximity; 22 |
---|
87 | 87 | | |
---|
88 | 88 | | (ix) Risk Management Plan facility proximity; 23 |
---|
89 | 89 | | |
---|
90 | 90 | | (x) Hazardous waste proximity; 24 |
---|
91 | 91 | | |
---|
92 | 92 | | (xi) Wastewater discharge indicator; 25 |
---|
93 | 93 | | |
---|
94 | 94 | | (xii) Proximity to a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO); 26 |
---|
95 | 95 | | |
---|
96 | 96 | | (xiii) Percent of the population lacking broadband coverage; 27 |
---|
97 | 97 | | SENATE BILL 681 3 |
---|
98 | 98 | | |
---|
99 | 99 | | |
---|
100 | 100 | | (xiv) Asthma emergency room discharges; 1 |
---|
101 | 101 | | |
---|
102 | 102 | | (xv) Myocardial infarction discharges; 2 |
---|
103 | 103 | | |
---|
104 | 104 | | (xvi) Low–birth–weight infants; 3 |
---|
105 | 105 | | |
---|
106 | 106 | | (xvii) Proximity to emitting power plants; 4 |
---|
107 | 107 | | |
---|
108 | 108 | | (xviii) Proximity to a Toxic Release Inventory (TRI) facility; 5 |
---|
109 | 109 | | |
---|
110 | 110 | | (xix) Proximity to a brownfields site; 6 |
---|
111 | 111 | | |
---|
112 | 112 | | (xx) Proximity to mining operations; and 7 |
---|
113 | 113 | | |
---|
114 | 114 | | (xxi) Proximity to a hazardous waste landfill. 8 |
---|
115 | 115 | | |
---|
116 | 116 | | (8) “Underserved community” means any census tract in which, according 9 |
---|
117 | 117 | | to the most recent U.S. Census Bureau Survey: 10 |
---|
118 | 118 | | |
---|
119 | 119 | | (i) At least 25% of the residents qualify as low–income; 11 |
---|
120 | 120 | | |
---|
121 | 121 | | (ii) At least 50% of the residents identify as nonwhite; or 12 |
---|
122 | 122 | | |
---|
123 | 123 | | (iii) At least 15% of the residents have limited English proficiency. 13 |
---|
124 | 124 | | |
---|
125 | 125 | | Article – Transportation 14 |
---|
126 | 126 | | |
---|
127 | 127 | | 2–103.1. 15 |
---|
128 | 128 | | |
---|
129 | 129 | | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 16 |
---|
130 | 130 | | |
---|
131 | 131 | | (2) “Capital project” means: 17 |
---|
132 | 132 | | |
---|
133 | 133 | | (i) Any project for which funds are expended for construction, 18 |
---|
134 | 134 | | reconstruction, or rehabilitation of a transportation facility by the Department or of a 19 |
---|
135 | 135 | | transportation facilities project by the Maryland Transportation Authority; or 20 |
---|
136 | 136 | | |
---|
137 | 137 | | (ii) Capital equipment, as defined by the Secretary. 21 |
---|
138 | 138 | | |
---|
139 | 139 | | (4) “Major capital project” means any new, expanded, or significantly 22 |
---|
140 | 140 | | improved facility or service that involves planning, environmental studies, design, 23 |
---|
141 | 141 | | right–of–way, construction, or purchase of essential equipment related to the facility or 24 |
---|
142 | 142 | | service. 25 |
---|
143 | 143 | | |
---|
144 | 144 | | SUBTITLE 9. MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECTS. 26 |
---|
145 | 145 | | |
---|
146 | 146 | | 2–901. 27 4 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
147 | 147 | | |
---|
148 | 148 | | |
---|
149 | 149 | | |
---|
150 | 150 | | (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 1 |
---|
151 | 151 | | INDICATED. 2 |
---|
152 | 152 | | |
---|
153 | 153 | | (B) “CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVA LENT” MEANS THE MEASUREMEN T OF A 3 |
---|
154 | 154 | | GIVEN WEIGHT OF A GR EENHOUSE GAS THAT HA S THE SAME GLOBAL WA RMING 4 |
---|
155 | 155 | | POTENTIAL, MEASURED OVER A SPEC IFIED PERIOD OF TIME , AS 1 METRIC TON OF 5 |
---|
156 | 156 | | CARBON DIOXIDE . 6 |
---|
157 | 157 | | |
---|
158 | 158 | | (C) “GREENHOUSE GAS ” INCLUDES CARBON DIOX IDE, METHANE, NITROUS 7 |
---|
159 | 159 | | OXIDE, HYDROFLUOROCARBONS , PERFLUOROCARBONS , AND SULFUR 8 |
---|
160 | 160 | | HEXAFLUORIDE . 9 |
---|
161 | 161 | | |
---|
162 | 162 | | (D) “GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS” MEANS EMISSIONS OF G REENHOUSE 10 |
---|
163 | 163 | | GASES IN THE STATE, MEASURED IN METRIC T ONS OF CARBON DIOXID E 11 |
---|
164 | 164 | | EQUIVALENTS . 12 |
---|
165 | 165 | | |
---|
166 | 166 | | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS A MAJOR HIGHWA Y CAPACITY 13 |
---|
167 | 167 | | EXPANSION PROJECT IM PACT ASSESSMENT . 14 |
---|
168 | 168 | | |
---|
169 | 169 | | (F) “INDUCED DEMAND ” MEANS THE SITUATION THAT ARISES WHEN AN 15 |
---|
170 | 170 | | EXPANDED ROAD BECOME S CONGESTED DUE TO A DDITIONAL DRIVERS US ING THE 16 |
---|
171 | 171 | | ROAD BECAUSE IT WAS EXPANDED. 17 |
---|
172 | 172 | | |
---|
173 | 173 | | (G) “MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT ” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 2–103.1 OF 18 |
---|
174 | 174 | | THIS TITLE. 19 |
---|
175 | 175 | | |
---|
176 | 176 | | (H) (1) “MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACIT Y EXPANSION PROJECT ” MEANS A 20 |
---|
177 | 177 | | MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT : 21 |
---|
178 | 178 | | |
---|
179 | 179 | | (I) WHOSE TOTAL COST FOR ALL PHASES EXCEEDS 22 |
---|
180 | 180 | | $10,000,000; AND 23 |
---|
181 | 181 | | |
---|
182 | 182 | | (II) THAT: 24 |
---|
183 | 183 | | |
---|
184 | 184 | | 1. INCREASES HIGHWAY CAP ACITY; 25 |
---|
185 | 185 | | |
---|
186 | 186 | | 2. IMPROVES HIGHWAY CAPA CITY THROUGH THE USE 26 |
---|
187 | 187 | | OF INTELLIGENT TRANS PORTATION SYSTEMS OR CONGESTION MANAGEMEN T 27 |
---|
188 | 188 | | SYSTEMS; OR 28 |
---|
189 | 189 | | |
---|
190 | 190 | | 3. INCLUDES GRADE SEPARA TION AT AN INTERSECT ION. 29 |
---|
191 | 191 | | SENATE BILL 681 5 |
---|
192 | 192 | | |
---|
193 | 193 | | |
---|
194 | 194 | | (2) “MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACIT Y EXPANSION PROJECT ” DOES NOT 1 |
---|
195 | 195 | | INCLUDE: 2 |
---|
196 | 196 | | |
---|
197 | 197 | | (I) PROJECTS IN THE MARYLAND AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 3 |
---|
198 | 198 | | OR THE MARYLAND PORT ADMINISTRATION ; 4 |
---|
199 | 199 | | |
---|
200 | 200 | | (II) MAINTENANCE AND STORA GE FACILITIES PROJECTS; 5 |
---|
201 | 201 | | |
---|
202 | 202 | | (III) WATER QUALITY IMPROVE MENT PROJECTS ; 6 |
---|
203 | 203 | | |
---|
204 | 204 | | (IV) PROJECTS RELATED TO MARYLAND’S PRIORITIES FOR 7 |
---|
205 | 205 | | TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD DEVELOPMENT ; 8 |
---|
206 | 206 | | |
---|
207 | 207 | | (V) PROJECTS THAT ARE SOL ELY FOR SYSTEM PRESE RVATION; 9 |
---|
208 | 208 | | OR 10 |
---|
209 | 209 | | |
---|
210 | 210 | | (VI) THE CONSTRUCTION OR RECONSTRUCTION OF : 11 |
---|
211 | 211 | | |
---|
212 | 212 | | 1. A HIGHWAY EXIT RAMP TH AT IS LESS THAN 2,500 12 |
---|
213 | 213 | | FEET IN LENGTH ; 13 |
---|
214 | 214 | | |
---|
215 | 215 | | 2. A BIKE LANE; OR 14 |
---|
216 | 216 | | |
---|
217 | 217 | | 3. A DEDICATED BUS LANE . 15 |
---|
218 | 218 | | |
---|
219 | 219 | | (I) “OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT Y” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 1–701 16 |
---|
220 | 220 | | OF THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE. 17 |
---|
221 | 221 | | |
---|
222 | 222 | | (J) “UNDERSERVED COM MUNITY” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 1–701 OF 18 |
---|
223 | 223 | | THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE. 19 |
---|
224 | 224 | | |
---|
225 | 225 | | (K) “VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D” MEANS THE TOTAL NUMB ER OF ON–ROAD 20 |
---|
226 | 226 | | MILES TRAVELED BY VE HICLES IN A GEOGRAPH IC REGION OVER A 1–YEAR PERIOD. 21 |
---|
227 | 227 | | |
---|
228 | 228 | | 2–902. 22 |
---|
229 | 229 | | |
---|
230 | 230 | | (A) THE REQUIREMENTS OF T HIS SUBTITLE A RE IN ADDITION TO AN D MAY 23 |
---|
231 | 231 | | NOT SUPPLANT ANY HEA LTH AND SAFETY GOALS ESTABLISHED UNDER STATE OR 24 |
---|
232 | 232 | | LOCAL LAWS OR REGULA TIONS. 25 |
---|
233 | 233 | | |
---|
234 | 234 | | (B) THIS SUBTITLE DOES NO T APPLY TO: 26 |
---|
235 | 235 | | |
---|
236 | 236 | | (1) A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT THAT WAS, 27 6 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
237 | 237 | | |
---|
238 | 238 | | |
---|
239 | 239 | | BEFORE JULY 1, 2024, SUBMITTED FOR A PPROVAL FOR INCLUSIO N IN, OR FUNDED 1 |
---|
240 | 240 | | FOR CONSTRUCTION UND ER: 2 |
---|
241 | 241 | | |
---|
242 | 242 | | (I) THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT 3 |
---|
243 | 243 | | PROGRAM; 4 |
---|
244 | 244 | | |
---|
245 | 245 | | (II) A METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 5 |
---|
246 | 246 | | TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; OR 6 |
---|
247 | 247 | | |
---|
248 | 248 | | (III) THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM; OR 7 |
---|
249 | 249 | | |
---|
250 | 250 | | (2) A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT FOR WHICH 8 |
---|
251 | 251 | | AN ASSESSMENT COMPAR ABLE TO THE IMPACT A SSESSMENT REQUIRED U NDER THIS 9 |
---|
252 | 252 | | SUBTITLE WAS PERFORM ED. 10 |
---|
253 | 253 | | |
---|
254 | 254 | | 2–903. 11 |
---|
255 | 255 | | |
---|
256 | 256 | | (A) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ESTA BLISH A PROCESS FOR PERFORMING 12 |
---|
257 | 257 | | MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT IMPACT ASS ESSMENTS. 13 |
---|
258 | 258 | | |
---|
259 | 259 | | (B) (1) AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT SHALL INCLUDE AN ANA LYSIS AND 14 |
---|
260 | 260 | | ESTIMATES OF A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION PROJECT ’S: 15 |
---|
261 | 261 | | |
---|
262 | 262 | | (I) QUANTITATIVE NET CHAN GE IN: 16 |
---|
263 | 263 | | |
---|
264 | 264 | | 1. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS FOR THE SIXTH YE AR 17 |
---|
265 | 265 | | AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE; AND 18 |
---|
266 | 266 | | |
---|
267 | 267 | | 2. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D IN THE PROJECT ARE A 19 |
---|
268 | 268 | | FOR THE SIXTH YEAR A FTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE; AND 20 |
---|
269 | 269 | | |
---|
270 | 270 | | (II) IMPACT ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND VE HICLE 21 |
---|
271 | 271 | | MILES TRAVELED CAUSE D BY ANY INDUCED DEM AND CREATED BY THE P ROJECT. 22 |
---|
272 | 272 | | |
---|
273 | 273 | | (2) THE ANALYSIS AND ESTIMAT ES SPECIFIED UNDER P ARAGRAPH 23 |
---|
274 | 274 | | (1)(II) OF THIS SUBSECTION S HALL BE DETERMINED U SING THE BEST AVAILA BLE 24 |
---|
275 | 275 | | DATA AND MODELING TO OLS, SUCH AS: 25 |
---|
276 | 276 | | |
---|
277 | 277 | | (I) THE STATE HIGHWAY INDUCED FREQUENCY OF TRAVEL 26 |
---|
278 | 278 | | CALCULATOR; 27 |
---|
279 | 279 | | |
---|
280 | 280 | | (II) THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE 28 |
---|
281 | 281 | | TRANSPORTATION ’S INDUCED TRAVEL CALCULATOR; OR 29 SENATE BILL 681 7 |
---|
282 | 282 | | |
---|
283 | 283 | | |
---|
284 | 284 | | |
---|
285 | 285 | | (III) ANY OTHER IMPACT ASSE SSMENT TOOL USED FOR 1 |
---|
286 | 286 | | MEASURING INDUCED DE MAND FOR GRADE SEPAR ATION PROJECTS . 2 |
---|
287 | 287 | | |
---|
288 | 288 | | 2–904. 3 |
---|
289 | 289 | | |
---|
290 | 290 | | (A) (1) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PERF ORM AN IMPACT ASSESS MENT 4 |
---|
291 | 291 | | FOR A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT BEFORE THE PR OJECT MAY 5 |
---|
292 | 292 | | BE CONSIDERED FOR IN CLUSION IN THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 6 |
---|
293 | 293 | | IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM OR THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. 7 |
---|
294 | 294 | | |
---|
295 | 295 | | (2) A METROPOLITAN PLANNIN G ORGANIZATION SHALL : 8 |
---|
296 | 296 | | |
---|
297 | 297 | | (I) PERFORM AN IMPACT ASS ESSMENT FOR A MAJOR HI GHWAY 9 |
---|
298 | 298 | | CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT BEFORE THE PR OJECT MAY BE CONSIDE RED FOR 10 |
---|
299 | 299 | | INCLUSION IN A METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION 11 |
---|
300 | 300 | | IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AND 12 |
---|
301 | 301 | | |
---|
302 | 302 | | (II) SUBMIT AN IMPACT ASSE SSMENT PERFORMED UND ER THIS 13 |
---|
303 | 303 | | SECTION TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL . 14 |
---|
304 | 304 | | |
---|
305 | 305 | | (B) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL USE THE INFORMATION COLL ECTED IN THE 15 |
---|
306 | 306 | | IMPACT ASSESSMENT RE QUIRED IN SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION TO 16 |
---|
307 | 307 | | DETERMINE WHETHER A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT MEETS 17 |
---|
308 | 308 | | THE FOLLOWING REQUIR EMENTS: 18 |
---|
309 | 309 | | |
---|
310 | 310 | | (1) THE PROJECT WILL NOT INCREASE GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; 19 |
---|
311 | 311 | | |
---|
312 | 312 | | (2) THE PROJECT WILL NOT INCREASE VEHICLE MIL ES TRAVELED; 20 |
---|
313 | 313 | | |
---|
314 | 314 | | (3) THE PROJECT CONFORMS WITH THE GREENHOUSE GAS 21 |
---|
315 | 315 | | EMISSIONS REDUCTION TARGETS SPECIFIED IN § 2–1205 OF THE ENVIRONMENT 22 |
---|
316 | 316 | | ARTICLE; AND 23 |
---|
317 | 317 | | |
---|
318 | 318 | | (4) THE PROJECT CONFORMS WITH THE VEHICLE MIL ES TRAVELED 24 |
---|
319 | 319 | | REDUCTION TARGETS SP ECIFIED IN THE 2024 ANNUAL ATTAINMENT REPORT ON 25 |
---|
320 | 320 | | TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PERFORMANCE . 26 |
---|
321 | 321 | | |
---|
322 | 322 | | (C) (1) IF THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT A MAJOR HIGHWAY 27 |
---|
323 | 323 | | CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT DOES NOT SATISFY EAC H REQUIREMENT SPECIF IED 28 |
---|
324 | 324 | | IN SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION , THE DEPARTMENT OR , FOR AN IMPACT 29 |
---|
325 | 325 | | ASSESSMENT PERFORMED BY A METROPOLITAN PL ANNING ORGANIZATION , THE 30 |
---|
326 | 326 | | METROPOLITAN PLANNIN G ORGANIZATION SHALL : 31 8 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
327 | 327 | | |
---|
328 | 328 | | |
---|
329 | 329 | | |
---|
330 | 330 | | (I) ALTER THE SCOPE OR DE SIGN OF THE PROJECT; 1 |
---|
331 | 331 | | |
---|
332 | 332 | | (II) DEVELOP A MITIGATION PLAN IN ACCORDANCE W ITH § 2 |
---|
333 | 333 | | 2–905 OF THIS SUBTITLE ; OR 3 |
---|
334 | 334 | | |
---|
335 | 335 | | (III) HALT PROJECT DEVELOPM ENT AND OMIT THE PRO JECT 4 |
---|
336 | 336 | | FROM THE RELEVANT TR ANSPORTATION IMPROVE MENT PROGRAM OR THE 5 |
---|
337 | 337 | | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. 6 |
---|
338 | 338 | | |
---|
339 | 339 | | (2) THE DEPARTMENT OR A METRO POLITAN PLANNING 7 |
---|
340 | 340 | | ORGANIZATION SHALL P ERFORM SUBSEQUENT IM PACT ASSESSMENTS ON A MAJOR 8 |
---|
341 | 341 | | HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION PROJECT ALTER ED IN ACCORDANCE WIT H 9 |
---|
342 | 342 | | PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS SUBSECTION U NTIL THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT 10 |
---|
343 | 343 | | THE PROJEC T SATISFIES EACH REQ UIREMENT SPECIFIED I N SUBSECTION (B) OF 11 |
---|
344 | 344 | | THIS SECTION. 12 |
---|
345 | 345 | | |
---|
346 | 346 | | 2–905. 13 |
---|
347 | 347 | | |
---|
348 | 348 | | (A) IF THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THROUGH AN IMPACT AS SESSMENT 14 |
---|
349 | 349 | | THAT A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT WILL RESULT I N A NET 15 |
---|
350 | 350 | | INCREASE IN GREENHOU SE GAS EMISSIONS OR VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D AND THE 16 |
---|
351 | 351 | | PROJECT IS NOT GOING TO BE ALTERED OR HAL TED UNDER § 2–904(C) OF THIS 17 |
---|
352 | 352 | | SUBTITLE, THE DEPARTMENT OR A METRO POLITAN PLANNING ORG ANIZATION 18 |
---|
353 | 353 | | SHALL DEVELOP AND IM PLEMENT A MITIGATION PLAN TO ELIMINATE TH E NET 19 |
---|
354 | 354 | | INCREASE IN GREENHOU SE GAS EMISSIONS OR VEHI CLE MILES TRAVELED . 20 |
---|
355 | 355 | | |
---|
356 | 356 | | (B) (1) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , A MITIGATION 21 |
---|
357 | 357 | | PLAN DEVELOPED UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL I NCLUDE ONE OR MORE O F THE 22 |
---|
358 | 358 | | FOLLOWING MITIGATION ACTIONS: 23 |
---|
359 | 359 | | |
---|
360 | 360 | | (I) TRANSIT EXPANSION , INCLUDING: 24 |
---|
361 | 361 | | |
---|
362 | 362 | | 1. REGULAR FIXED BUS ROUTES ; 25 |
---|
363 | 363 | | |
---|
364 | 364 | | 2. ARTERIAL BUS RAPID TR ANSIT; 26 |
---|
365 | 365 | | |
---|
366 | 366 | | 3. HIGHWAY BUS RAPID TRA NSIT; 27 |
---|
367 | 367 | | |
---|
368 | 368 | | 4. RAIL TRANSIT; AND 28 |
---|
369 | 369 | | |
---|
370 | 370 | | 5. INTERCITY PASSENGER R AIL; 29 |
---|
371 | 371 | | SENATE BILL 681 9 |
---|
372 | 372 | | |
---|
373 | 373 | | |
---|
374 | 374 | | (II) TRANSIT SERVICE IMPRO VEMENTS, INCLUDING: 1 |
---|
375 | 375 | | |
---|
376 | 376 | | 1. INCREASED SERVICE LEV ELS; 2 |
---|
377 | 377 | | |
---|
378 | 378 | | 2. TRANSIT FARE REDUCTIONS OR INCENT IVES; AND 3 |
---|
379 | 379 | | |
---|
380 | 380 | | 3. TRANSIT PRIORITY TREA TMENTS; 4 |
---|
381 | 381 | | |
---|
382 | 382 | | (III) ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE 5 |
---|
383 | 383 | | IMPROVEMENTS , INCLUDING PROTECTED BICYCLE LANES OR PAT HWAYS; 6 |
---|
384 | 384 | | |
---|
385 | 385 | | (IV) SHARED SERVICES FOR M ANUAL OR ELECTRIC LO W SPEED 7 |
---|
386 | 386 | | VEHICLES, INCLUDING ELECTRIC BICYCLES AN D SCOOTERS; 8 |
---|
387 | 387 | | |
---|
388 | 388 | | (V) TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT , INCLUDING: 9 |
---|
389 | 389 | | |
---|
390 | 390 | | 1. VANPOOL AND SHARED VE HICLE PROGRAMS ; 10 |
---|
391 | 391 | | |
---|
392 | 392 | | 2. TELEWORKING PROGRAMS ; AND 11 |
---|
393 | 393 | | |
---|
394 | 394 | | 3. EXPANSION OF BROADBAN D ACCESS; 12 |
---|
395 | 395 | | |
---|
396 | 396 | | (VI) PARKING MANAGEMENT , INCLUDING: 13 |
---|
397 | 397 | | |
---|
398 | 398 | | 1. REDUCTION OR ELIMINATION OF PARKING 14 |
---|
399 | 399 | | REQUIREMENTS ; 15 |
---|
400 | 400 | | |
---|
401 | 401 | | 2. PARKING COST ADJUSTME NTS; AND 16 |
---|
402 | 402 | | |
---|
403 | 403 | | 3. ELIMINATION OF PARKIN G SUBSIDIES; 17 |
---|
404 | 404 | | |
---|
405 | 405 | | (VII) LAND USE IMPROVEMENTS , INCLUDING: 18 |
---|
406 | 406 | | |
---|
407 | 407 | | 1. RESIDENTIAL AND OTHER DENSITY INCREASES ; 19 |
---|
408 | 408 | | |
---|
409 | 409 | | 2. INFILL DEVELOPMENT ; AND 20 |
---|
410 | 410 | | |
---|
411 | 411 | | 3. TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ; AND 21 |
---|
412 | 412 | | |
---|
413 | 413 | | (VIII) INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROV EMENTS RELATED TO 22 |
---|
414 | 414 | | PEDESTRIANS OR TRAFF IC OPERATIONS, INCLUDING: 23 |
---|
415 | 415 | | |
---|
416 | 416 | | 1. COMPLETE STREETS ; 24 10 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
417 | 417 | | |
---|
418 | 418 | | |
---|
419 | 419 | | |
---|
420 | 420 | | 2. REDUCED CONFLICT INTE RSECTIONS; 1 |
---|
421 | 421 | | |
---|
422 | 422 | | 3. CROSSWALKS; 2 |
---|
423 | 423 | | |
---|
424 | 424 | | 4. MIXED–USE PATHS; 3 |
---|
425 | 425 | | |
---|
426 | 426 | | 5. ROADWAY GEOMETRY WITH RE DUCED DESIGN 4 |
---|
427 | 427 | | SPEEDS; AND 5 |
---|
428 | 428 | | |
---|
429 | 429 | | 6. BUFFERED AND SHELTERE D SIDEWALKS. 6 |
---|
430 | 430 | | |
---|
431 | 431 | | (2) A MITIGATION ACTION MA Y BE INCORPORATED IN THE 7 |
---|
432 | 432 | | MITIGATION PLAN FOR A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPA CITY EXPANSION PROJE CT IF: 8 |
---|
433 | 433 | | |
---|
434 | 434 | | (I) THE NECESSARY FUNDING SOURCES ARE IDENTI FIED AND 9 |
---|
435 | 435 | | SUFFICIENT AMOUNTS A RE COMMITTED ; 10 |
---|
436 | 436 | | |
---|
437 | 437 | | (II) THE MITIGATION ACTION IS FOCUSED ON AREAS IN 11 |
---|
438 | 438 | | ACCORDANCE WITH SUBS ECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION; AND 12 |
---|
439 | 439 | | |
---|
440 | 440 | | (III) PROCEDURES ARE ESTABL ISHED TO ENSURE THAT THE 13 |
---|
441 | 441 | | MITIGATION ACTION CO NFORMS WITH THE REQU IREMENTS UN DER § 2–904(B) OF 14 |
---|
442 | 442 | | THIS SUBTITLE. 15 |
---|
443 | 443 | | |
---|
444 | 444 | | (C) (1) THE BENEFITS PROVIDED BY A MITIGATION ACTI ON SHALL FOCUS 16 |
---|
445 | 445 | | ON AREAS IN THE FOLL OWING ORDER OF PRIOR ITY: 17 |
---|
446 | 446 | | |
---|
447 | 447 | | (I) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES OR UNDERSERVED 18 |
---|
448 | 448 | | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT; 19 |
---|
449 | 449 | | |
---|
450 | 450 | | (II) AREAS WITHIN OR ASSOC IATED WITH AT LEAST ONE OF THE 20 |
---|
451 | 451 | | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT ; 21 |
---|
452 | 452 | | |
---|
453 | 453 | | (III) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES OR UNDERSERVED 22 |
---|
454 | 454 | | COMMUNITIES ; 23 |
---|
455 | 455 | | |
---|
456 | 456 | | (IV) THE REGION IN WHICH T HE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAP ACITY 24 |
---|
457 | 457 | | EXPANSION PROJECT IS LOCATED; OR 25 |
---|
458 | 458 | | |
---|
459 | 459 | | (V) BENEFITS TO THE ENTIR E STATE. 26 |
---|
460 | 460 | | |
---|
461 | 461 | | (2) THE DEPARTMENT OR A METRO POLITAN PLANNING 27 SENATE BILL 681 11 |
---|
462 | 462 | | |
---|
463 | 463 | | |
---|
464 | 464 | | ORGANIZATION SHALL I NCLUDE IN A MITIGATI ON PLAN AN EXPLANATI ON ON THE 1 |
---|
465 | 465 | | FEASIBILITY OF AND R ATIONALE FOR SELECTI NG A MITIGATION ACTI ON LOCATED 2 |
---|
466 | 466 | | IN AN AREA SPECIFIED IN PARAGRAPH (1)(III) THROUGH (V) OF THIS SUBSECTION . 3 |
---|
467 | 467 | | |
---|
468 | 468 | | (D) (1) A METROPOLITAN PLANNIN G ORGANIZATION SHALL SUBMIT A 4 |
---|
469 | 469 | | MITIGATION PLAN DEVE LOPED UNDER THIS SEC TION TO THE DEPARTMENT FOR 5 |
---|
470 | 470 | | REVIEW AND APPROVAL . 6 |
---|
471 | 471 | | |
---|
472 | 472 | | (2) (I) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL APPR OVE A MITIGATION PL AN IF 7 |
---|
473 | 473 | | THE DEPARTMENT DETERMINES THAT THE MITIGATION PLAN COMPLIES WITH T HIS 8 |
---|
474 | 474 | | SECTION AND THE REQU IREMENTS UNDER § 2–904(B) OF THIS SUBTITLE. 9 |
---|
475 | 475 | | |
---|
476 | 476 | | (II) THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT SHALL DEV ELOP 10 |
---|
477 | 477 | | A METHODOLOGY FOR TH E DEPARTMENT TO DETERMI NE IF A MITIGATI ON PLAN 11 |
---|
478 | 478 | | FOR A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT IS SUFFICIENT FOR 12 |
---|
479 | 479 | | REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. 13 |
---|
480 | 480 | | |
---|
481 | 481 | | (3) (I) IF THE DEPARTMENT DOES NOT A PPROVE A 14 |
---|
482 | 482 | | METROPOLITAN PLANNIN G ORGANIZATION ’S MITIGATION PLAN SU BMITTED UNDER 15 |
---|
483 | 483 | | THIS SECTION, THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATIO N SHALL ADDRESS ANY 16 |
---|
484 | 484 | | ISSUES RAISED BY THE DEPARTMENT AND RESUBM IT THE PLAN TO THE 17 |
---|
485 | 485 | | DEPARTMENT FOR APPROV AL. 18 |
---|
486 | 486 | | |
---|
487 | 487 | | (II) IF A METROPOLITAN PLA NNING ORGANIZATION ’S 19 |
---|
488 | 488 | | RESUBMITTED MITIGATI ON PLAN STILL DOES N OT CONFORM WITH THE 20 |
---|
489 | 489 | | REQUIREMENTS OF THI S SECTION AND § 2–904(B) OF THIS SUBTITLE , THE 21 |
---|
490 | 490 | | DEPARTMENT MAY RESTRI CT AND REDIRECT ANY FUNDING THAT WOULD H AVE 22 |
---|
491 | 491 | | BEEN ALLOCATED BY TH E DEPARTMENT TO THE MET ROPOLITAN PLANNING 23 |
---|
492 | 492 | | ORGANIZATION , INCLUDING FUNDING FR OM: 24 |
---|
493 | 493 | | |
---|
494 | 494 | | 1. THE CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY 25 |
---|
495 | 495 | | PROGRAM; AND 26 |
---|
496 | 496 | | |
---|
497 | 497 | | 2. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BLOCK GRANTS. 27 |
---|
498 | 498 | | |
---|
499 | 499 | | 2–906. 28 |
---|
500 | 500 | | |
---|
501 | 501 | | THE DEPARTMENT OR A METRO POLITAN PLANNING ORG ANIZATION SHALL 29 |
---|
502 | 502 | | PUBLISH ON ITS WEBSI TE THE FOLLOWING INF ORMATION FOR EACH IM PACT 30 |
---|
503 | 503 | | ASSESSMENT THE DEPARTMENT OR METROPO LITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION 31 |
---|
504 | 504 | | PERFORMS: 32 |
---|
505 | 505 | | |
---|
506 | 506 | | (1) A SUMMARY OF THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION 33 12 SENATE BILL 681 |
---|
507 | 507 | | |
---|
508 | 508 | | |
---|
509 | 509 | | PROJECT AND AN OVERV IEW OF THE IMPACT AS SESSMENT, INCLUDING: 1 |
---|
510 | 510 | | |
---|
511 | 511 | | (I) THE ESTIMATED QUANTIT ATIVE NET CHANGE IN : 2 |
---|
512 | 512 | | |
---|
513 | 513 | | 1. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS FOR THE SIXTH YE AR 3 |
---|
514 | 514 | | AFTER THE PRO JECT IS COMPLETE ; AND 4 |
---|
515 | 515 | | |
---|
516 | 516 | | 2. VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D IN THE PROJECT ARE A 5 |
---|
517 | 517 | | FOR THE SIXTH YEAR A FTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE; 6 |
---|
518 | 518 | | |
---|
519 | 519 | | (II) THE STATUS OF THE PRO JECT; AND 7 |
---|
520 | 520 | | |
---|
521 | 521 | | (III) THE AMOUNT OF FUNDING ALLOCATED TO ANY MIT IGATION 8 |
---|
522 | 522 | | ACTIONS RELATED TO T HE PROJECT; AND 9 |
---|
523 | 523 | | |
---|
524 | 524 | | (2) THE INDUCED DEMAND TR AFFIC MODEL AND METH ODOLOGY THE 10 |
---|
525 | 525 | | DEPARTMENT OR METROPO LITAN PLANNING ORGAN IZATION USED TO ASSE SS A 11 |
---|
526 | 526 | | MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT ’S IMPACT ON GREENHOU SE GAS 12 |
---|
527 | 527 | | EMISSIONS AND VEHICL E MILES TRAVELED . 13 |
---|
528 | 528 | | |
---|
529 | 529 | | 2–907. 14 |
---|
530 | 530 | | |
---|
531 | 531 | | THE DEPARTMENT MAY ADOPT REGUL ATIONS TO CARRY OUT THIS SUBTITLE. 15 |
---|
532 | 532 | | |
---|
533 | 533 | | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 16 |
---|
534 | 534 | | 1, 2024. 17 |
---|
535 | 535 | | |
---|