Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | - | WES MOORE, Governor Ch. 549 | |
2 | 1 | ||
3 | - | – 1 – | |
4 | - | Chapter 549 | |
5 | - | (Senate Bill 7) | |
6 | 2 | ||
7 | - | AN ACT concerning | |
3 | + | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | + | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | + | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | + | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | + | amendment. | |
8 | + | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | + | *sb0007* | |
8 | 10 | ||
9 | - | Public Safety – Law Enforcement Agencies – Positive Community Feedback | |
11 | + | SENATE BILL 7 | |
12 | + | P3 (4lr1428) | |
13 | + | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | + | — Judicial Proceedings/Judiciary — | |
15 | + | Introduced by Senator Bailey | |
10 | 16 | ||
11 | - | FOR the purpose of adding certain positive community feedback to the list of records that | |
12 | - | are not considered personnel records for certain purposes; requiring the Maryland | |
13 | - | Police Training and Standards Commission to develop a process for citizens to | |
14 | - | submit certain feedback; requiring each law enforcement agency to adopt the | |
15 | - | uniform citizen positive community feedback process; requiring a law enforcement | |
16 | - | agency to maintain a certain record that is subject to public inspection; and generally | |
17 | - | relating to law enforcement agencies. | |
17 | + | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
18 | 18 | ||
19 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, | |
20 | - | Article – General Provisions | |
21 | - | Section 4–311(c) and 4–351(a) | |
22 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland | |
23 | - | (2019 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) | |
19 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
20 | + | Proofreader. | |
21 | + | _______________________________________________ | |
22 | + | Proofreader. | |
24 | 23 | ||
25 | - | BY adding to | |
26 | - | Article – Public Safety | |
27 | - | Section 3–207(m) and 3–519.1 | |
28 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland | |
29 | - | (2022 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) | |
24 | + | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
30 | 25 | ||
31 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, | |
32 | - | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: | |
26 | + | _______ day of _______________ at _________________ _______ o’clock, ________M. | |
33 | 27 | ||
34 | - | Article – General Provisions | |
28 | + | ______________________________________________ | |
29 | + | President. | |
35 | 30 | ||
36 | - | ||
31 | + | CHAPTER ______ | |
37 | 32 | ||
38 | - | (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, THE | |
39 | - | FOLLOWING RECORDS AR E NOT PERSONNEL RECO RDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS | |
40 | - | SECTION: | |
33 | + | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
41 | 34 | ||
42 | - | (I) a record relating to an administrative or criminal investigation | |
43 | - | of misconduct by a police officer, including an internal affairs investigatory record[,]; | |
35 | + | Public Safety – Law Enforcement Agencies – Positive Community Feedback 2 | |
44 | 36 | ||
45 | - | (II) a hearing record[,]; | |
46 | - | Ch. 549 2024 LAWS OF MARYLAND | |
37 | + | FOR the purpose of adding certain positive community feedback to the list of records that 3 | |
38 | + | are not considered personnel records for certain purposes; requiring the Maryland 4 | |
39 | + | Police Training and Standards Commission to develop a process for citizens to 5 | |
40 | + | submit certain feedback; requiring each law enforcement agency to adopt the 6 | |
41 | + | uniform citizen positive community feedback process; requiring a law enforcement 7 | |
42 | + | agency to maintain a certain record that is subject to public inspection; and generally 8 | |
43 | + | relating to law enforcement agencies. 9 | |
47 | 44 | ||
48 | - | – 2 – | |
49 | - | (III) A RECORD OF POSITIVE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK THAT WAS | |
50 | - | NOT SOLICITED BY THE POLICE OFFICER WHO I S THE SUBJECT OF THE FEEDBACK; | |
51 | - | and | |
45 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 10 | |
46 | + | Article – General Provisions 11 | |
47 | + | Section 4–311(c) and 4–351(a) 12 | |
48 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 13 | |
49 | + | (2019 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 14 2 SENATE BILL 7 | |
52 | 50 | ||
53 | - | (IV) records relating to a disciplinary decision[, is not a personnel | |
54 | - | record for purposes of this section]. | |
55 | 51 | ||
56 | - | (2) A record of a technical infraction is a personnel record for the purposes | |
57 | - | of this section. | |
58 | 52 | ||
59 | - | 4–351. | |
53 | + | BY adding to 1 | |
54 | + | Article – Public Safety 2 | |
55 | + | Section 3–207(m) and 3–519.1 3 | |
56 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 4 | |
57 | + | (2022 Replacement Volume and 2023 Supplement) 5 | |
60 | 58 | ||
61 | - | | |
62 | - | ||
59 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 6 | |
60 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 7 | |
63 | 61 | ||
64 | - | (1) records of investigations conducted by the Attorney General, a State’s | |
65 | - | Attorney, a municipal or county attorney, a police department, or a sheriff; | |
62 | + | Article – General Provisions 8 | |
66 | 63 | ||
67 | - | (2) an investigatory file compiled for any other law enforcement, judicial, | |
68 | - | correctional, or prosecution purpose; | |
64 | + | 4–311. 9 | |
69 | 65 | ||
70 | - | ( | |
71 | - | the | |
72 | - | ||
66 | + | (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, THE 10 | |
67 | + | FOLLOWING RECORDS AR E NOT PERSONNEL RECO RDS FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS 11 | |
68 | + | SECTION: 12 | |
73 | 69 | ||
74 | - | (4) records, other than a record of a technical infraction, relating to an | |
75 | - | administrative or criminal investigation of misconduct by a police officer, including an | |
76 | - | internal affairs investigatory record, a hearing record, A RECORD OF POSITIVE | |
77 | - | COMMUNITY FEEDBACK , and records relating to a disciplinary decision. | |
70 | + | (I) a record relating to an administrative or criminal investigation 13 | |
71 | + | of misconduct by a police officer, including an internal affairs investigatory record[,]; 14 | |
78 | 72 | ||
79 | - | ||
73 | + | (II) a hearing record[,]; 15 | |
80 | 74 | ||
81 | - | 3–207. | |
75 | + | (III) A RECORD OF POSITIVE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK THAT WAS 16 | |
76 | + | NOT SOLICITED BY THE POLICE OFFICER WHO I S THE SUBJECT OF THE FEEDBACK; 17 | |
77 | + | and 18 | |
82 | 78 | ||
83 | - | (M) (1) THE COMMISSION SHALL DEVE LOP A UNIFORM CITIZE N POSITIVE | |
84 | - | COMMUNITY FEEDBACK P ROCESS TO BE FOLLOWE D BY EACH LAW ENFORC EMENT | |
85 | - | AGENCY. | |
79 | + | (IV) records relating to a disciplinary decision[, is not a personnel 19 | |
80 | + | record for purposes of this section]. 20 | |
86 | 81 | ||
87 | - | (2) THE | |
88 | - | ||
82 | + | (2) A record of a technical infraction is a personnel record for the purposes 21 | |
83 | + | of this section. 22 | |
89 | 84 | ||
90 | - | ||
85 | + | 4–351. 23 | |
91 | 86 | ||
92 | - | ( | |
93 | - | ||
87 | + | (a) Subject to subsections (b), (c), and (d) of this section, a custodian may deny 24 | |
88 | + | inspection of: 25 | |
94 | 89 | ||
95 | - | – 3 – | |
90 | + | (1) records of investigations conducted by the Attorney General, a State’s 26 | |
91 | + | Attorney, a municipal or county attorney, a police department, or a sheriff; 27 | |
96 | 92 | ||
97 | - | 3–519.1. | |
93 | + | (2) an investigatory file compiled for any other law enforcement, judicial, 28 | |
94 | + | correctional, or prosecution purpose; 29 | |
95 | + | SENATE BILL 7 3 | |
98 | 96 | ||
99 | - | (A) EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL ADOPT T HE UNIFORM | |
100 | - | CITIZEN POSITIVE COM MUNITY FEEDBACK PROC ESS DEVELOPED BY THE | |
101 | - | MARYLAND POLICE TRAINING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION UNDER § 3–207 OF | |
102 | - | THIS TITLE. | |
103 | 97 | ||
104 | - | (B) A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN CY SHALL: | |
98 | + | (3) records that contain intelligence information or security procedures of 1 | |
99 | + | the Attorney General, a State’s Attorney, a municipal or county attorney, a police 2 | |
100 | + | department, a State or local correctional facility, or a sheriff; or 3 | |
105 | 101 | ||
106 | - | (1) POST THE AGENCY ’S POSITIVE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK PROCESS | |
107 | - | ON THE AGENCY ’S WEBSITE IF THE AGE NCY MAINTAINS A WEBS ITE; AND | |
102 | + | (4) records, other than a record of a technical infraction, relating to an 4 | |
103 | + | administrative or criminal investigation of misconduct by a police officer, including an 5 | |
104 | + | internal affairs investigatory record, a hearing record, A RECORD OF POSITIVE 6 | |
105 | + | COMMUNITY FEEDBACK , and records relating to a disciplinary decision. 7 | |
108 | 106 | ||
109 | - | (2) MAINTAIN A RECORD OF POSITIVE COMMUNITY F EEDBACK FOR | |
110 | - | ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WITHIN THE AGENCY. | |
107 | + | Article – Public Safety 8 | |
111 | 108 | ||
112 | - | (C) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY O THER PROVISION OF LA W, RECORDS | |
113 | - | MAINTAINED UNDER SUB SECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC | |
114 | - | INSPECTION IN ACCO RDANCE WITH THE MARYLAND PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT. | |
109 | + | 3–207. 9 | |
115 | 110 | ||
116 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect | |
117 | - | October 1, 2024. | |
111 | + | (M) (1) THE COMMISSION SHALL DEVE LOP A UNIFORM CITIZE N POSITIVE 10 | |
112 | + | COMMUNITY FEEDBACK P ROCESS TO BE FOLLOWE D BY EACH LAW ENFORC EMENT 11 | |
113 | + | AGENCY. 12 | |
118 | 114 | ||
119 | - | Approved by the Governor, May 9, 2024. | |
115 | + | (2) THE UNIFORM CITIZEN POSI TIVE COMMUNITY FEEDB ACK 13 | |
116 | + | PROCESS SHALL : 14 | |
117 | + | ||
118 | + | (I) BE SIMPLE; AND 15 | |
119 | + | ||
120 | + | (II) BE POSTED ON THE WEB SITE OF THE COMMISSION AND 16 | |
121 | + | EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY. 17 | |
122 | + | ||
123 | + | 3–519.1. 18 | |
124 | + | ||
125 | + | (A) EACH LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY SHALL ADOPT T HE UNIFORM 19 | |
126 | + | CITIZEN POSITIVE COM MUNITY FEEDBACK PROCE SS DEVELOPED BY THE 20 | |
127 | + | MARYLAND POLICE TRAINING AND STANDARDS COMMISSION UNDER § 3–207 OF 21 | |
128 | + | THIS TITLE. 22 | |
129 | + | ||
130 | + | (B) A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGEN CY SHALL: 23 | |
131 | + | ||
132 | + | (1) POST THE AGENCY ’S POSITIVE COMMUNITY FEEDBACK PROCESS 24 | |
133 | + | ON THE AGENCY ’S WEBSITE IF THE AGE NCY MAINTAINS A WEBSITE ; AND 25 | |
134 | + | ||
135 | + | (2) MAINTAIN A RECORD OF POSITIVE COMMUNITY F EEDBACK FOR 26 | |
136 | + | ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS WITHIN THE AGENCY. 27 | |
137 | + | ||
138 | + | (C) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY O THER PROVISION OF LA W, RECORDS 28 | |
139 | + | MAINTAINED UNDER SUB SECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION ARE SUBJECT TO PUBLIC 29 | |
140 | + | INSPECTION IN ACCORD ANCE WITH THE MARYLAND PUBLIC INFORMATION ACT. 30 | |
141 | + | 4 SENATE BILL 7 | |
142 | + | ||
143 | + | ||
144 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 1 | |
145 | + | October 1, 2024. 2 | |
146 | + | ||
147 | + | ||
148 | + | ||
149 | + | Approved: | |
150 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
151 | + | Governor. | |
152 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
153 | + | President of the Senate. | |
154 | + | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
155 | + | Speaker of the House of Delegates. |