Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTING LA W. | |
4 | 4 | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | 5 | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | 6 | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | 7 | amendment. | |
8 | - | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | 8 | *hb1475* | |
10 | 9 | ||
11 | 10 | HOUSE BILL 1475 | |
12 | - | F5 (5lr3279) | |
13 | - | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | - | — Ways and Means/Education, Energy, and the Environment — | |
15 | - | Introduced by Delegate Feldmark Delegates Feldmark, Atterbeary, Buckel, | |
16 | - | Ebersole, Fair, Griffith, Hartman, Hornberger, Miller, Mireku –North, | |
17 | - | Palakovich Carr, Patterson, Roberson, Roberts, Vogel, Wells, Wims, and Wu | |
11 | + | F5 5lr3279 | |
18 | 12 | ||
19 | - | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
20 | - | ||
21 | - | _______________________________________________ | |
22 | - | Proofreader. | |
23 | - | _______________________________________________ | |
24 | - | Proofreader. | |
25 | - | ||
26 | - | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
27 | - | ||
28 | - | _______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M. | |
29 | - | ||
30 | - | ______________________________________________ | |
31 | - | Speaker. | |
13 | + | By: Delegate Feldmark Delegates Feldmark, Atterbeary, Buckel, Ebersole, Fair, | |
14 | + | Griffith, Hartman, Hornberger, Miller, Mireku –North, Palakovich Carr, | |
15 | + | Patterson, Roberson, Roberts, Vogel, Wells, Wims, and Wu | |
16 | + | Introduced and read first time: February 7, 2025 | |
17 | + | Assigned to: Ways and Means | |
18 | + | Committee Report: Favorable with amendments | |
19 | + | House action: Adopted | |
20 | + | Read second time: March 6, 2025 | |
32 | 21 | ||
33 | 22 | CHAPTER ______ | |
34 | 23 | ||
35 | 24 | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
36 | 25 | ||
37 | - | Office of Child Care Advisory Council | |
38 | - | ||
26 | + | Office of Child Care Advisory Council – Publicly Funded Prekindergarten – 2 | |
27 | + | Analysis and Report 3 | |
39 | 28 | (Mixed Delivery Model Viability Act) 4 | |
40 | 29 | ||
41 | 30 | FOR the purpose of requiring the Office of Child Care Advisory Council within the State 5 | |
42 | - | Department of Education | |
43 | - | ||
44 | - | ||
45 | - | ||
31 | + | Department of Education to conduct an analysis of the mixed delivery, publicly 6 | |
32 | + | funded prekindergarten system established under the Blueprint for Maryland’s 7 | |
33 | + | Future; and generally relating to an analysis of the mixed delivery, publicly funded 8 | |
34 | + | prekindergarten program. 9 | |
46 | 35 | ||
47 | 36 | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 10 | |
48 | 37 | That: 11 | |
49 | - | 2 HOUSE BILL 1475 | |
38 | + | ||
39 | + | (a) The Office of Child Care Advisory Council within the State Department of 12 | |
40 | + | Education shall conduct an analysis of the mixed delivery, publicly funded prekindergarten 13 | |
41 | + | system established under Title 7, Subtitle 1A of the Education Article. 14 | |
42 | + | ||
43 | + | (b) In conducting the analysis required under subsection (a) of this section, the 15 | |
44 | + | Council shall review: 16 | |
45 | + | ||
46 | + | (1) any discrepancies between State policies that regulate private and 17 | |
47 | + | public prekindergarten providers, including differences in policies for rests or nap time, 18 2 HOUSE BILL 1475 | |
50 | 48 | ||
51 | 49 | ||
52 | - | (a) The Office of Child Care Advisory Council within the State Department of 1 | |
53 | - | Education shall convene a workgroup to conduct an analysis of the mixed delivery, publicly 2 | |
54 | - | funded prekindergarten system established under Title 7, Subtitle 1A of the Education 3 | |
55 | - | Article. 4 | |
50 | + | substitute teachers, and the day–to–day governance of prekindergarten providers 1 | |
51 | + | identified by the Council; 2 | |
56 | 52 | ||
57 | - | (b) The workgroup shall consist of the following members: 5 | |
53 | + | (2) the implementation of the requirements for publicly funded 3 | |
54 | + | prekindergarten programs under Chapter 165 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2024; 4 | |
58 | 55 | ||
59 | - | ( | |
60 | - | ||
56 | + | (3) the method by which private prekindergarten providers are reimbursed 5 | |
57 | + | and whether a method of payment through forward funding would be a feasible alternative; 6 | |
61 | 58 | ||
62 | - | ( | |
63 | - | ||
59 | + | (4) inefficiencies in the invoicing process for private prekindergarten 7 | |
60 | + | providers and delays in private provider payments; 8 | |
64 | 61 | ||
65 | - | (3) at least one representative from each of the following entities, designated 10 | |
66 | - | by the State Superintendent of Schools: 11 | |
62 | + | (5) whether the timeline for the operation of a prekindergarten educational 9 | |
63 | + | program required by the Prekindergarten Expansion Grant Program under § 10 | |
64 | + | 7–101.2(c)(1)(iii) of the Education Article matches the typical needs of prekindergarten 11 | |
65 | + | students and parents; 12 | |
67 | 66 | ||
68 | - | (i) the State Department of Education; 12 | |
67 | + | (6) the feasibility of changing the Prekindergarten Expansion Grant 13 | |
68 | + | Program guidelines after grant agreements have been executed and whether there are 14 | |
69 | + | appropriate changes that should be made to the guidelines; 15 | |
69 | 70 | ||
70 | - | (ii) the Maryland Department of Health; 13 | |
71 | + | (7) the process through which quality rating levels in the Maryland 16 | |
72 | + | EXCELS Program are changed, including: 17 | |
71 | 73 | ||
72 | - | (iii) the Head Start Program; 14 | |
74 | + | (i) disciplining a prekindergarten provider for an infraction by 18 | |
75 | + | lowering the quality rating level; 19 | |
73 | 76 | ||
74 | - | (iv) the Office of the State Fire Marshal; 15 | |
77 | + | (ii) whether, when using a reduction of a prekindergarten provider’s 20 | |
78 | + | quality rating as a disciplinary measure, the reduction is commensurate with the severity 21 | |
79 | + | of the infraction; 22 | |
75 | 80 | ||
76 | - | (v) a child care advocacy organization; and 16 | |
81 | + | (iii) the process for appealing a change in a prekindergarten 23 | |
82 | + | provider’s quality rating; 24 | |
77 | 83 | ||
78 | - | (vi) a community college with an early childhood education program; 17 | |
84 | + | (iv) the feasibility of making standardized changes in the quality 25 | |
85 | + | rating level; and 26 | |
79 | 86 | ||
80 | - | ( | |
81 | - | ||
87 | + | (v) whether there are alternative methods available to address 27 | |
88 | + | infractions, including methods to deal with infractions caused by a single employee; 28 | |
82 | 89 | ||
83 | - | (5) at least two child care providers from child care centers, designated by 20 | |
84 | - | the State Superintendent. 21 | |
90 | + | (8) the administrative processes that a private prekindergarten provider 29 | |
91 | + | must undertake in order to participate in publicly funded prekindergarten and whether the 30 | |
92 | + | processes could be streamlined or reduced; 31 | |
85 | 93 | ||
86 | - | (b) (c) In conducting the analysis required under subsection (a) of this section, the 22 | |
87 | - | Council workgroup shall review: 23 | |
88 | - | ||
89 | - | (1) any discrepancies between State policies that regulate private and 24 | |
90 | - | public prekindergarten providers, including differences in policies for rests or nap time, 25 | |
91 | - | substitute teachers, and the day–to–day governance of prekindergarten providers 26 | |
92 | - | identified by the Council workgroup; 27 | |
93 | - | ||
94 | - | (2) the implementation of the requirements for publicly funded 28 | |
95 | - | prekindergarten programs under Chapter 165 of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2024; 29 | |
96 | - | ||
97 | - | (3) the method by which private prekindergarten providers are reimbursed 30 | |
98 | - | and whether a method of payment through forward funding would be a feasible alternative; 31 HOUSE BILL 1475 3 | |
94 | + | (9) the feasibility of streamlining or reducing the administrative processes 32 | |
95 | + | for enrolling a child in publicly funded prekindergarten; 33 | |
96 | + | HOUSE BILL 1475 3 | |
99 | 97 | ||
100 | 98 | ||
99 | + | (10) the languages in which grant applications, agreements, guidelines, 1 | |
100 | + | technical support, training, and professional development are offered and whether the 2 | |
101 | + | languages offered align with those spoken by potential private prekindergarten providers; 3 | |
101 | 102 | ||
102 | - | (4) inefficiencies in the invoicing process for private prekindergarten 1 | |
103 | - | providers and delays in private provider payments; 2 | |
103 | + | (11) the languages in which materials provided to parents of children 4 | |
104 | + | enrolled with a private prekindergarten provider are offered and whether the languages 5 | |
105 | + | offered align with those spoken by the parents; and 6 | |
104 | 106 | ||
105 | - | (5) whether the timeline for the operation of a prekindergarten educational 3 | |
106 | - | program required by the Prekindergarten Expansion Grant Program under § 4 | |
107 | - | 7–101.2(c)(1)(iii) of the Education Article matches the typical needs of prekindergarten 5 | |
108 | - | students and parents; 6 | |
107 | + | (12) opportunities to pool resources among private prekindergarten 7 | |
108 | + | providers, including employee benefits, creating a centralized substitute teacher pool, and 8 | |
109 | + | other benefits that might come from economies of scale; 9 | |
109 | 110 | ||
110 | - | (6) the feasibility of changing the Prekindergarten Expansion Grant 7 | |
111 | - | Program guidelines after grant agreements have been executed and whether there are 8 | |
112 | - | appropriate changes that should be made to the guidelines; 9 | |
111 | + | (13) challenges for public prekindergarten providers in building or adapting 10 | |
112 | + | facilities to accommodate prekindergarten students; and 11 | |
113 | 113 | ||
114 | - | (7) the process through which quality rating levels in the Maryland 10 | |
115 | - | EXCELS Program are changed, including: 11 | |
114 | + | (14) how best to use publicly funded prekindergarten to provide a quality 12 | |
115 | + | early childhood education for students with and without disabilities together in the same 13 | |
116 | + | classrooms, including by developing methods to best: 14 | |
116 | 117 | ||
117 | - | (i) | |
118 | - | ||
118 | + | (i) combine federal, State, and local funding sources available for 15 | |
119 | + | children in a publicly funded prekindergarten context to maximize support for all children; 16 | |
119 | 120 | ||
120 | - | (ii) whether, when using a reduction of a prekindergarten provider’s 14 | |
121 | - | quality rating as a disciplinary measure, the reduction is commensurate with the severity 15 | |
122 | - | of the infraction; 16 | |
121 | + | (ii) improve teacher and staff training and recruitment to address 17 | |
122 | + | the needs of students with and without disabilities; and 18 | |
123 | 123 | ||
124 | - | (iii) the process for appealing a change in a prekindergarten 17 | |
125 | - | provider’s quality rating; 18 | |
124 | + | (iii) foster collaboration between public and private prekindergarten 19 | |
125 | + | providers in delivering specialized transportation and services for students with 20 | |
126 | + | disabilities. 21 | |
126 | 127 | ||
127 | - | (iv) the feasibility of making standardized changes in the quality 19 | |
128 | - | rating level; and 20 | |
128 | + | (c) In conducting the analysis required under subsection (a) of this section, the 22 | |
129 | + | Council shall solicit feedback from public prekindergarten providers, private 23 | |
130 | + | prekindergarten providers, and child care providers who have elected not to participate in 24 | |
131 | + | the publicly funded prekindergarten program. 25 | |
129 | 132 | ||
130 | - | ( | |
131 | - | ||
133 | + | (d) (1) The Council may consult additional subject matter and policy experts 26 | |
134 | + | that the Council determines are beneficial in conducting the analysis. 27 | |
132 | 135 | ||
133 | - | (8) the administrative processes that a private prekindergarten provider 23 | |
134 | - | must undertake in order to participate in publicly funded prekindergarten and whether the 24 | |
135 | - | processes could be streamlined or reduced; 25 | |
136 | + | (2) The Council may establish subcommittees to carry out the analysis 28 | |
137 | + | required under this section. 29 | |
136 | 138 | ||
137 | - | (9) the feasibility of streamlining or reducing the administrative processes 26 | |
138 | - | for enrolling a child in publicly funded prekindergarten; 27 | |
139 | - | ||
140 | - | (10) the languages in which grant applications, agreements, guidelines, 28 | |
141 | - | technical support, training, and professional development are offered and whether the 29 | |
142 | - | languages offered align with those spoken by potential private prekindergarten providers; 30 | |
143 | - | ||
144 | - | (11) the languages in which materials provided to parents of children 31 | |
145 | - | enrolled with a private prekindergarten provider are offered and whether the languages 32 | |
146 | - | offered align with those spoken by the parents; and 33 | |
139 | + | (e) (1) On or before June 1, 2026, the Council shall submit to the State Board 30 | |
140 | + | of Education and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General 31 | |
141 | + | Assembly, an interim report on the results of its analysis, including recommendations for 32 | |
142 | + | changes to regulations, policies, and procedures to increase the efficacy of the publicly 33 | |
143 | + | funded prekindergarten program and to make the program more equitable for providers 34 | |
144 | + | and families. 35 | |
147 | 145 | 4 HOUSE BILL 1475 | |
148 | 146 | ||
149 | 147 | ||
150 | - | (12) opportunities to pool resources among private prekindergarten 1 | |
151 | - | providers, including employee benefits, creating a centralized substitute teacher pool, and 2 | |
152 | - | other benefits that might come from economies of scale; 3 | |
148 | + | (2) On or before December 31, 2027, the Council shall submit a final report 1 | |
149 | + | to the General Assembly, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, on 2 | |
150 | + | the results of the analysis conducted under subsection (a) of this section, any changes made 3 | |
151 | + | by the State Department of Education in response to the recommendations in the interim 4 | |
152 | + | report, and any additional recommendations from the Council for changes to regulation, 5 | |
153 | + | policies, procedures, or statute regarding the mixed delivery, publicly funded 6 | |
154 | + | prekindergarten system. 7 | |
153 | 155 | ||
154 | - | (13) challenges for public prekindergarten providers in building or adapting 4 | |
155 | - | facilities to accommodate prekindergarten students; and 5 | |
156 | - | ||
157 | - | (14) how best to use publicly funded prekindergarten to provide a quality 6 | |
158 | - | early childhood education for students with and without disabilities together in the same 7 | |
159 | - | classrooms, including by developing methods to best: 8 | |
160 | - | ||
161 | - | (i) combine federal, State, and local funding sources available for 9 | |
162 | - | children in a publicly funded prekindergarten context to maximize support for all children; 10 | |
163 | - | ||
164 | - | (ii) improve teacher and staff training and recruitment to address 11 | |
165 | - | the needs of students with and without disabilities; and 12 | |
166 | - | ||
167 | - | (iii) foster collaboration between public and private prekindergarten 13 | |
168 | - | providers in delivering specialized transportation and services for students with 14 | |
169 | - | disabilities. 15 | |
170 | - | ||
171 | - | (c) (d) In conducting the analysis required under subsection (a) of this section, the 16 | |
172 | - | Council workgroup shall solicit feedback from public prekindergarten providers, private 17 | |
173 | - | prekindergarten providers, and child care providers who have elected not to participate in 18 | |
174 | - | the publicly funded prekindergarten program. 19 | |
175 | - | ||
176 | - | (d) (e) (1) The Council workgroup may consult additional subject matter and 20 | |
177 | - | policy experts that the Council determines are beneficial in conducting the analysis. 21 | |
178 | - | ||
179 | - | (2) The Council workgroup may establish subcommittees to carry out the 22 | |
180 | - | analysis required under this section. 23 | |
181 | - | ||
182 | - | (e) (f) (1) On or before June 1, 2026, the Council workgroup shall submit to the 24 | |
183 | - | State Board of Education and the Accountability and Implementation Board and, in 25 | |
184 | - | accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly, an 26 | |
185 | - | interim report on the results of its analysis, including recommendations for changes to 27 | |
186 | - | regulations, policies, and procedures to increase the efficacy of the publicly funded 28 | |
187 | - | prekindergarten program and to make the program more equitable for providers and 29 | |
188 | - | families. 30 | |
189 | - | ||
190 | - | (2) On or before December 31, 2027, the Council workgroup shall submit a 31 | |
191 | - | final report to the Accountability and Implementation Board and the General Assembly, in 32 | |
192 | - | accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, on the results of the analysis 33 | |
193 | - | conducted under subsection (a) of this section, any changes made by the State Department 34 | |
194 | - | of Education in response to the recommendations in the interim report, and any additional 35 | |
195 | - | recommendations from the Council workgroup for changes to regulation, policies, 36 HOUSE BILL 1475 5 | |
196 | - | ||
197 | - | ||
198 | - | procedures, or statute regarding the mixed delivery, publicly funded prekindergarten 1 | |
199 | - | system. 2 | |
200 | - | ||
201 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 3 | |
202 | - | 1, 2025. It shall remain effective for a period of 3 years and, at the end of June 30, 2028, 4 | |
203 | - | this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and 5 | |
204 | - | of no further force and effect. 6 | |
156 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 8 | |
157 | + | 1, 2025. It shall remain effective for a period of 3 years and, at the end of June 30, 2028, 9 | |
158 | + | this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and 10 | |
159 | + | of no further force and effect. 11 | |
205 | 160 | ||
206 | 161 | ||
207 | 162 | ||
208 | 163 | ||
209 | 164 | Approved: | |
210 | 165 | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
211 | 166 | Governor. | |
212 | 167 | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
213 | 168 | Speaker of the House of Delegates. | |
214 | 169 | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
215 | 170 | President of the Senate. |