Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB246

Introduced
1/8/24  
Introduced
1/8/25  
Refer
1/8/24  
Refer
1/8/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Engrossed
3/14/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
3/27/25  
Enrolled
4/2/25  
Chaptered
4/8/25  

Caption

Human Services - Adult Protective Services

Impact

The implementation of HB 246 is expected to impact state laws significantly, particularly those governing the confidentiality of information reported concerning vulnerable adults. By allowing disclosures related to adult protective services without violating confidentiality provisions, the bill enhances the ability of various practitioners to report suspicions of abuse and improves the overall responsiveness of the system designed to protect vulnerable adults. The ability for health practitioners to report directly by calling a statewide hotline will streamline communication and expedite intervention efforts.

Summary

House Bill 246 aims to enhance protections for vulnerable adults by updating adult protective services regulations in Maryland. The bill seeks to clarify that certain confidentiality laws do not prevent the disclosure of information pertinent to adult protective services, particularly in cases where there may be allegations of abuse or neglect. Additionally, the bill expands the definition of 'health practitioner' to include emergency medical services providers, thus acknowledging their role in identifying and reporting potential abuse or neglect of vulnerable adults.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 246 appears to be favorable among supporters who view it as a necessary adjustment to protect vulnerable populations more effectively. Advocates emphasize the importance of ensuring that those who encounter situations involving potential abuse or neglect of vulnerable adults feel empowered to report such incidents. However, there are underlying concerns regarding the balance between maintaining confidentiality and ensuring safety, leading to a nuanced discussion of the ethical implications of the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential implications for confidentiality and the rights of individuals involved in the reporting process. Critics may raise concerns about the possibility of unwanted disclosures that could emerge from broader reporting obligations adopted in the bill. Additionally, there may be discussions surrounding the adequacy of training for health practitioners in recognizing signs of abuse and understanding their responsibilities under the new legislation. Overall, while the bill enjoys support, its rollout and the response to its provisions may reveal deeper discussions regarding adult protective services.

Companion Bills

MD SB205

Crossfiled Human Services - Adult Protective Services

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.