Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB392 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 01/16/2025

                             
 
EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. 
        [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. 
          *hb0392*  
  
HOUSE BILL 392 
D1, C9   	5lr1873 
HB 392/24 – JUD   	CF SB 107 
By: Delegates Bartlett, Hill, Simmons, Stewart, and Young 
Introduced and read first time: January 16, 2025 
Assigned to: Judiciary 
 
A BILL ENTITLED 
 
AN ACT concerning 1 
 
Evidence – Interception of Oral Communications – Fair Housing Testing 2 
 
FOR the purpose of providing that it is lawful for a person to intercept an oral 3 
communication if the person is working as a fair housing tester for a certain fair 4 
housing testing program under certain circumstances; and generally relating to 5 
electronic surveillance. 6 
 
BY adding to 7 
 Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 8 
Section 10–401(13) and 10–402(c)(12) 9 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 10 
 (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 11 
 
BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 12 
 Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 13 
Section 10–401(13) through (18) 14 
 Annotated Code of Maryland 15 
 (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 16 
 
 SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 17 
That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 18 
 
Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 19 
 
10–401. 20 
 
 As used in this subtitle the following terms have the meanings indicated: 21 
 
 (13) “NONPROFIT CIVIL RIGHT S ORGANIZATION ” MEANS: 22 
  2 	HOUSE BILL 392  
 
 
 (I) A QUALIFIED FAIR HOUSI	NG ENFORCEMENT 1 
ORGANIZATION OR A FA IR HOUSING ORGANIZAT ION AS DEFINED UNDER 24 C.F.R. § 2 
125.103; OR 3 
 
 (II) AN ORGANIZATION INCOR PORATED UNDER MARYLAND 4 
LAW AS A PRIVATE , TAX–EXEMPT CIVIL RIGHTS ORGANIZATION THAT HA S AT LEAST 5 
2 YEARS’ EXPERIENCE IN: 6 
 
 1. COMPLAINT INTAKE ; 7 
 
 2. COMPLAINT INVESTIGATI ON; AND 8 
 
 3. TESTING FOR FAIR HOUS ING VIOLATIONS OR 9 
ENFORCEMENT OF MERIT ORIOUS CLAIMS . 10 
 
 [(13)] (14) (i) “Oral communication” means any conversation or words 11 
spoken to or by any person in private conversation. 12 
 
 (ii) “Oral communication” does not include any electronic 13 
communication. 14 
 
 [(14)] (15) “Person” means any employee or agent of this State or a political 15 
subdivision thereof, and any individual, partnership, association, joint stock company, 16 
trust, or corporation. 17 
 
 [(15)] (16) “Readily accessible to the general public” means, with respect to 18 
a radio communication, that the communication is not: 19 
 
 (i) Scrambled or encrypted; 20 
 
 (ii) Transmitted using modulation techniques the essential 21 
parameters of which have been withheld from the public with the intention of preserving 22 
the privacy of the communication; or 23 
 
 (iii) Except for tone–only paging device communications, transmitted 24 
over frequencies reserved for private use and licensed for private use under federal or State 25 
law. 26 
 
 [(16)] (17) “Telephone solicitation theft” means conduct of a person that: 27 
 
 (i) Constitutes the offense of theft or attempted theft; and 28 
 
 (ii) Involves the use of a telephone to solicit the payment of money. 29 
 
 [(17)] (18) “User” means any person or entity that: 30 
   	HOUSE BILL 392 	3 
 
 
 (i) Uses an electronic communication service; and 1 
 
 (ii) Is duly authorized by the provider of the service to engage in that 2 
use. 3 
 
 [(18)] (19) “Wire communication” means any aural transfer made in whole 4 
or in part through the use of facilities for the transmission of communications by the aid of 5 
wire, cable, or other like connection between the point of origin and the point of reception 6 
(including the use of a connection in a switching station) furnished or operated by any 7 
person licensed to engage in providing or operating such facilities for the transmission of 8 
communications. 9 
 
10–402. 10 
 
 (c) (12) (I) IT IS LAWFUL UNDER THIS SUB TITLE FOR A PERSON T O 11 
INTERCEPT AN ORAL COMMUNICATION I F: 12 
 
 1. THE PERSON IS WORKING AS A FAIR HOUSING TE STER 13 
FOR A FAIR HOUSING T ESTING PROGRAM OPERA TED BY: 14 
 
 A. THE FEDERAL GOVERNMEN T; 15 
 
 B. THE STATE;  16 
 
 C. A LOCAL GOVERNM ENT; OR 17 
 
 D. A NONPROFIT CIVIL RIGH TS ORGANIZATION ; 18 
 
 2. THE PERSON IS A PARTY TO THE COMMUNICATION ; 19 
AND 20 
 
 3. THE INTERCEPTION IS B EING MADE FOR THE 21 
PURPOSE OF OBTAINING EVIDENCE OF A FAIR H OUSING VIOLATION UND ER 22 
FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL LAW . 23 
 
 (II) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (III) OF THIS 24 
PARAGRAPH , NO PART OF THE CONTE NTS OF THE INTERCEPT ED COMMUNICATION 25 
AND NO EVIDENCE DERI VED THEREFROM MAY BE RECEIVED IN EVIDENCE IN ANY 26 
TRIAL, HEARING, OR OTHER PROCEEDING IN OR BEFORE ANY COU RT, GRAND JURY, 27 
DEPARTMENT , OFFICER, AGENCY, REGULATORY BODY , LEGISLATIVE COMMITTE E, 28 
OR OTHER AUTHORITY O F THE STATE OR A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE.  29 
 
 (III) THE CONTENTS OF AN IN	TERCEPTED ORAL 30 
COMMUNICATION MADE I N ACCORDANCE WITH SU BPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS 31  4 	HOUSE BILL 392  
 
 
PARAGRAPH MAY BE USE D ONLY FOR THE PURPO SE OF ENFORCING FEDE RAL, 1 
STATE, OR LOCAL FAIR HOUSIN G LAWS.  2 
 
 SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act sh all take effect 3 
October 1, 2025. 4