Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MAT TER ADDED TO EXISTIN G LAW. | |
4 | 4 | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | - | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | - | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | - | amendment. | |
8 | 5 | *hb0084* | |
9 | 6 | ||
10 | 7 | HOUSE BILL 84 | |
11 | 8 | R1, M3 5lr1602 | |
12 | - | (PRE–FILED) | |
9 | + | (PRE–FILED) | |
13 | 10 | By: Delegate Edelson | |
14 | 11 | Requested: November 1, 2024 | |
15 | 12 | Introduced and read first time: January 8, 2025 | |
16 | 13 | Assigned to: Appropriations and Environment and Transportation | |
17 | - | Committee Report: Favorable with amendments | |
18 | - | House action: Adopted | |
19 | - | Read second time: March 4, 2025 | |
20 | 14 | ||
21 | - | ||
15 | + | A BILL ENTITLED | |
22 | 16 | ||
23 | 17 | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
24 | 18 | ||
25 | 19 | Transportation – Major Highway Capacity Expansion Projects and Impact 2 | |
26 | 20 | Assessments 3 | |
27 | 21 | (Transportation and Climate Alignment Act of 2025) 4 | |
28 | 22 | ||
29 | 23 | FOR the purpose of requiring the Department of Transportation, as part of the planning 5 | |
30 | - | and implementation of certain major highway expansion projects to, to perform an 6 | |
31 | - | impact assessment of the project and develop and implement a corresponding 7 | |
32 | - | multimodal transportation program; requiring the Department, beginning with the 8 | |
33 | - | a certain Consolidated Transportation Program, to evaluate certain major capital 9 | |
34 | - | projects for their impact on greenhouse gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled; 10 | |
35 | - | requiring, under certain circumstances, the Department to fund offsetting activities 11 | |
36 | - | to reduce certain project or program impacts on greenhouse gas emissions and 12 | |
37 | - | vehicle miles traveled; requiring the Secretary of Transportation to perform certain 13 | |
38 | - | capacity expansion impact assessments establish certain processes and post certain 14 | |
39 | - | information on the Department’s website; requiring the Department and the State 15 | |
40 | - | Highway Administration to issue a certain report before proceeding to the final 16 | |
41 | - | project planning phase for certain projects; and generally relating to the planning 17 | |
42 | - | and development of certain transportation projects. 18 | |
24 | + | and implementation of certain major highway expansion projects to develop and 6 | |
25 | + | implement a corresponding multimodal transportation program; requiring the 7 | |
26 | + | Department beginning with the Consolidated Transportation Program to evaluate 8 | |
27 | + | certain major capital projects for their impact on greenhouse gas emissions and 9 | |
28 | + | vehicle miles traveled; requiring, under certain circumstances, the Department to 10 | |
29 | + | fund offsetting activities to reduce certain project or program impacts on greenhouse 11 | |
30 | + | gas emissions and vehicle miles traveled; requiring the Secretary of Transportation 12 | |
31 | + | to perform certain capacity expansion impact assessments; requiring the 13 | |
32 | + | Department and the State Highway Administration to issue a certain report before 14 | |
33 | + | proceeding to the final project planning phase for certain projects; and generally 15 | |
34 | + | relating to the planning and development of certain transportation projects. 16 | |
43 | 35 | ||
44 | - | BY adding to 19 | |
45 | - | Article – Transportation 20 | |
46 | - | Section 2–901 through 2–905 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 9. Major 21 | |
47 | - | Highway Capacity Expansion Projects” 22 | |
48 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 23 2 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
36 | + | BY adding to 17 | |
37 | + | Article – Transportation 18 | |
38 | + | Section 2–901 through 2–905 to be under the new subtitle “Subtitle 9. Major 19 | |
39 | + | Highway Capacity Expansion Projects” 20 | |
40 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 21 | |
41 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 22 | |
42 | + | ||
43 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 23 | |
44 | + | Article – Transportation 24 | |
45 | + | Section 8–102 25 | |
46 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 26 | |
47 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 27 | |
48 | + | 2 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
49 | 49 | ||
50 | 50 | ||
51 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 1 | |
51 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 1 | |
52 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 2 | |
52 | 53 | ||
53 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 2 | |
54 | 54 | Article – Transportation 3 | |
55 | - | Section 8–102 4 | |
56 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 5 | |
57 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 6 | |
58 | 55 | ||
59 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 7 | |
60 | - | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 8 | |
56 | + | SUBTITLE 9. MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECTS. 4 | |
61 | 57 | ||
62 | - | ||
58 | + | 2–901. 5 | |
63 | 59 | ||
64 | - | SUBTITLE 9. MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECTS. 10 | |
60 | + | (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 6 | |
61 | + | INDICATED. 7 | |
65 | 62 | ||
66 | - | 2–901. 11 | |
63 | + | (B) “CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVA LENT” MEANS THE MEASUREMEN T OF A 8 | |
64 | + | GIVEN WEIGHT OF A GR EENHOUSE GAS THAT HA S THE SAME GLOBAL WA RMING 9 | |
65 | + | POTENTIAL, MEASURED OVER A S PECIFIED PERIOD OF T IME, AS 1 METRIC TON OF 10 | |
66 | + | CARBON DIOXIDE . 11 | |
67 | 67 | ||
68 | - | (A) IN THIS SUBTITLE THE FOLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 12 | |
69 | - | INDICATED. 13 | |
68 | + | (C) “GREENHOUSE GAS ” INCLUDES CARBON DIOX IDE, METHANE, NITROUS 12 | |
69 | + | OXIDE, HYDROFLUOROCARBONS , PERFLUOROCARBONS , AND SULFUR 13 | |
70 | + | HEXAFLUORIDE . 14 | |
70 | 71 | ||
71 | - | (B) “CARBON DIOXIDE EQUIVA LENT” MEANS THE MEASUREMEN T OF A 14 | |
72 | - | GIVEN WEIGHT OF A GR EENHOUSE GAS THAT HA S THE SAME GLOBAL WA RMING 15 | |
73 | - | POTENTIAL, MEASURED OVER A SPEC IFIED PERIOD OF TIME , AS 1 METRIC TON OF 16 | |
74 | - | CARBON DIOXIDE . 17 | |
72 | + | (D) “GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS” MEANS EMISSIONS OF G REENHOUSE 15 | |
73 | + | GASES IN THE STATE, MEASURED IN METRIC T ONS OF CARBON DIOXID E 16 | |
74 | + | EQUIVALENTS . 17 | |
75 | 75 | ||
76 | - | ( | |
77 | - | ||
78 | - | ||
76 | + | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS AN ASSESSMENT OF A PROJECT’S OR 18 | |
77 | + | PROGRAM’S IMPACT ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS IONS AND VEHICLE MI LES 19 | |
78 | + | TRAVELED. 20 | |
79 | 79 | ||
80 | - | ( | |
81 | - | ||
82 | - | ||
80 | + | (F) “INDUCED DEMAND ” MEANS THE VOLUME OF TRAFFIC TH AT IS DRAWN 21 | |
81 | + | TO A NEW OR EXPANDED ROAD BY PROVIDING ADDITIONAL CAPACITY, INCLUDING 22 | |
82 | + | FROM: 23 | |
83 | 83 | ||
84 | - | (E) “IMPACT ASSESSMENT ” MEANS AN ASSESSMENT OF A PROJECT’S OR 24 | |
85 | - | PROGRAM’S OPERATIONAL IMPACT ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND VE HICLE 25 | |
86 | - | MILES TRAVELED . 26 | |
84 | + | (1) TRIPS DIVERTED FROM OTHER ROUTES; 24 | |
87 | 85 | ||
88 | - | (F) “INDUCED DEMAND ” MEANS THE VOLUME OF TRAFFI C THAT IS DRAWN 27 | |
89 | - | TO A NEW OR EXPANDED ROAD BY PROVIDING AD DITIONAL CAPACITY , INCLUDING 28 | |
90 | - | FROM: 29 | |
86 | + | (2) DISCRETIONARY TRIPS THAT MAY NOT H AVE BEEN MADE 25 | |
87 | + | WITHOUT IMPROVEMENT ; AND 26 | |
91 | 88 | ||
92 | - | (1) TRIPS DIVERTED FROM O THER ROUTES ; 30 | |
89 | + | (3) IMPROVED ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT AND OTHER ACTIVITY 27 | |
90 | + | LOCATION CHOICES . 28 | |
93 | 91 | ||
94 | - | (2) DISCRETIONARY TRIPS T HAT MAY NOT HAVE BEE N MADE 31 | |
95 | - | WITHOUT IMPROVEMENT ; AND 32 HOUSE BILL 84 3 | |
92 | + | (G) “MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT ” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 2–103.1 OF 29 | |
93 | + | THIS TITLE. 30 | |
94 | + | HOUSE BILL 84 3 | |
95 | + | ||
96 | + | ||
97 | + | (H) “MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACIT Y EXPANSION PROJECT ” MEANS A MAJOR 1 | |
98 | + | CAPITAL PRO JECT THAT: 2 | |
99 | + | ||
100 | + | (1) THROUGH ALL PHASES INCREASES HIGHWAY CAPACITY 3 | |
101 | + | THROUGH NEW HIGHWAY LANES OR EXTENDED HI GHWAY LANES ; AND 4 | |
102 | + | ||
103 | + | (2) HAS A TOTAL COST FOR ALL PHASES THAT EXCEEDS $5,000,000. 5 | |
104 | + | ||
105 | + | (I) “OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT Y” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 1–701 6 | |
106 | + | OF THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE. 7 | |
107 | + | ||
108 | + | (J) “UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY ” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 1–701 OF 8 | |
109 | + | THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE. 9 | |
110 | + | ||
111 | + | (K) “VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D PER CAPITA” MEANS THE TOTAL NUMB ER 10 | |
112 | + | OF ON–ROAD MILES TRAVELED BY VEHICLES IN A GEO GRAPHIC REGION OVER A 11 | |
113 | + | 1–YEAR PERIOD DIVIDED BY THE POPUL ATION IN THAT REGION . 12 | |
114 | + | ||
115 | + | 2–902. 13 | |
116 | + | ||
117 | + | THIS SUBTITLE DOES NO T APPLY TO A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPA CITY EXPANSION 14 | |
118 | + | PROJECT THAT ON OR BEFORE JUNE 30, 2025, WAS: 15 | |
119 | + | ||
120 | + | (1) A PART OF THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT 16 | |
121 | + | PROGRAM; OR 17 | |
122 | + | ||
123 | + | (2) FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTI ON IN THE CONSOLIDATED 18 | |
124 | + | TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM. 19 | |
125 | + | ||
126 | + | 2–903. 20 | |
127 | + | ||
128 | + | (A) AS PART OF THE PLANNI NG AND IMPLEMENTATIO N OF A MAJOR 21 | |
129 | + | HIGHWAY EXPANSION PR OJECT, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL DEVE LOP AND 22 | |
130 | + | IMPLEMENT A CORRESPO NDING MULTIMODAL TRA NSPORTATION PROGRAM FOR 23 | |
131 | + | THE PROPOSED HIGHWAY CORRIDOR EXPANSION. 24 | |
132 | + | ||
133 | + | (B) (1) DURING DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY 25 | |
134 | + | EXPANSION PROJECT , THE MULTIMODAL TRANS PORTATION PROGRAM REQUIRED 26 | |
135 | + | UNDER SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION SHALL IDENTIFY INVES TMENTS IN 27 | |
136 | + | TRANSIT, TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT , TRANSPORTATION DEMAN D 28 | |
137 | + | MANAGEMENT , PEDESTRIAN AND BICYC LE FACILITIES, LAND USE CHANGES , AND 29 | |
138 | + | OTHER MEASURES TO OF FSET THE INCREASE IN VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED 30 | |
139 | + | ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. 31 4 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
96 | 140 | ||
97 | 141 | ||
98 | 142 | ||
99 | - | (3) IMPROVED ACCESS TO EM PLOYMENT AND OTHER A CTIVITY 1 | |
100 | - | LOCATION CHOICES AN INCREASE IN THE D EMAND FOR MOTOR VEHI CLE TRAVEL 2 | |
101 | - | THAT IS DEMONSTRATED BY A N INCREASE IN VEHICL E MILES TRAVELED DUE TO AN 3 | |
102 | - | INCREASE IN ROADWAY SUPPLY, SUCH AS NEW OR EXPAN DED ROADS, ADDITIONAL 4 | |
103 | - | CAPACITY, OR ADDITIONAL LANE M ILES. 5 | |
143 | + | (2) THE PROGRAM SHALL FOCUS ON AREAS IN THE FOLLOWING 1 | |
144 | + | ORDER OF PRIORITY : 2 | |
104 | 145 | ||
105 | - | ( | |
106 | - | ||
146 | + | (I) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES AND UNDERSERVED 3 | |
147 | + | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT; 4 | |
107 | 148 | ||
108 | - | ( | |
109 | - | ||
149 | + | (II) AREAS WITHIN OR ASSOCIATED WITH A T LEAST ONE OF THE 5 | |
150 | + | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT; 6 | |
110 | 151 | ||
111 | - | (1) THROUGH ALL PHASES IN CREASES HIGHWAY CAPA CITY 10 | |
112 | - | THROUGH NEW HIGHWAY LANES, GRADE SEPARATIONS IN CLUDING INTERCHANGES , 11 | |
113 | - | OR EXTENDED HIGHWAY LANES; AND 12 | |
152 | + | (III) OVERBURDENED COMMUNITIES AND UNDERSERVED 7 | |
153 | + | COMMUNITIES ACROSS T HE STATE; 8 | |
114 | 154 | ||
115 | - | (2) HAS A TOTAL COST FOR ALL PHASES THAT EXCEEDS $5,000,000 13 | |
116 | - | $100,000,000. 14 | |
155 | + | (IV) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES AND UNDERSERVED 9 | |
156 | + | COMMUNITIES I N THE REGION IN WHIC H THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY 10 | |
157 | + | EXPANSION PROJECT IS LOCATED; AND 11 | |
117 | 158 | ||
118 | - | (I) “OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT Y” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 1–701 15 | |
119 | - | OF THE ENVIRONMENT ARTICLE. 16 | |
159 | + | (V) BENEFITS TO THE ENTIR E STATE. 12 | |
120 | 160 | ||
121 | - | (J) “SYSTEM PRESERVATION A CTIVITY” MEANS AN ACTIVITY FO CUSED ON 17 | |
122 | - | MAINTAINING AND REHA BILITATING EXISTING TRANSPORTATION 18 | |
123 | - | INFRASTRUCTURE TO EN SURE THE INFRASTRUCT URE REMAINS SAFE , RELIABLE, 19 | |
124 | - | AND FUNCTIONAL . 20 | |
161 | + | (C) (1) THE MULTIMODAL TRANSP ORTATION PROGRAM SHA LL OFFSET 13 | |
162 | + | THE VEHICLE MILES TR AVELED ASSOCIATED WI TH THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY 14 | |
163 | + | EXPANSION PROJECT . 15 | |
125 | 164 | ||
126 | - | (J) (K) “UNDERSERVED COMMUNITY ” HAS THE MEANING STAT ED IN § 21 | |
127 | - | 1–701 OF THE ENVIRONMEN T ARTICLE. 22 | |
165 | + | (2) THE NET VEHICLE MILES TR AVELED FROM THE PROJ ECT AND ITS 16 | |
166 | + | ASSOCIATED MULTIMODA L TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM SHALL EQUAL ZERO OR A 17 | |
167 | + | NUMBER LESS THAN ZERO. 18 | |
128 | 168 | ||
129 | - | (K) (L) “VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D PER CAPITA ” MEANS THE TOTAL 23 | |
130 | - | NUMBER OF ON –ROAD MILES TRAVELED BY VEHICLES IN A GEO GRAPHIC REGION 24 | |
131 | - | OVER A 1–YEAR PERIOD DIVIDED BY THE POPULATION IN THAT REGION. 25 | |
169 | + | (D) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CONSIDER BOTH THE MAJOR HIGHWAY 19 | |
170 | + | CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT AND THE MULTI MODAL TRANSPORTATION OFFSE T 20 | |
171 | + | PROGRAM AS PART OF ITS EVALU ATION OF THE PROJECT UNDER § 2–103.7 OF THIS 21 | |
172 | + | TITLE. 22 | |
132 | 173 | ||
133 | - | 2–902. 26 | |
174 | + | (E) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL FUND ELEMENTS OF THE MULT IMODAL 23 | |
175 | + | TRANSPORTA TION PROGRAM CONCURRENTLY WITH FUNDING FOR THE 24 | |
176 | + | CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT . 25 | |
134 | 177 | ||
135 | - | THIS SUBTITLE DOES NO T APPLY TO A MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION 27 | |
136 | - | PROJECT THAT ON OR B EFORE JUNE 30, 2025, WAS: 28 | |
178 | + | 2–904. 26 | |
137 | 179 | ||
138 | - | (1) A WAS A PART OF THE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION 29 | |
139 | - | IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM THAT RECEIVED FUNDIN G FOR CONSTRUCTION ; OR 30 | |
140 | - | 4 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
141 | - | ||
142 | - | ||
143 | - | (2) FUNDED WAS FUNDED FOR CONSTRUCTION IN THE 1 | |
144 | - | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM; OR 2 | |
145 | - | ||
146 | - | (3) COMPLETED THE ENVIRON MENTAL REVIEW PROCES S UNDER THE 3 | |
147 | - | NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT. 4 | |
148 | - | ||
149 | - | 2–903. 5 | |
150 | - | ||
151 | - | (A) AS PART OF THE PLANNI NG AND IMPLEMENTATIO N OF A MAJOR 6 | |
152 | - | HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT , THE DEPARTMENT SHALL PERFORM AN 7 | |
153 | - | IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE PROJECT AND DEVELOP AND IMPLEMEN T A 8 | |
154 | - | CORRESPONDING MULTIM ODAL TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM FOR THE PROPOSED 9 | |
155 | - | HIGHWAY CORRIDOR EXP ANSION. 10 | |
156 | - | ||
157 | - | (B) (1) DURING PROJECT DEVELOPMENT OF THE MAJOR HIGHWAY 11 | |
158 | - | CAPACITY EXPANSION PROJECT , THE MULTIMODA L TRANSPORTATION PRO GRAM 12 | |
159 | - | REQUIRED UNDER SUBSE CTION (A) OF THIS SECTION SHAL L IDENTIFY 13 | |
160 | - | INVESTMENTS IN TRANS IT, TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT , TRANSPORTATION 14 | |
161 | - | DEMAND MANAGEMENT , PEDESTRIAN AND BICYC LE FACILITIES, LAND USE 15 | |
162 | - | CHANGES, AND OTHER MEASURES ACTIVITIES SPECIFIED IN § 2–904(C) OF THIS 16 | |
163 | - | SUBTITLE TO OFFSET THE INCREA SE IN VEHICLE MILES TRAVEL ED GREENHOUSE 17 | |
164 | - | GAS EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT. 18 | |
165 | - | ||
166 | - | (2) THE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORT ATION PROGRAM SHALL FOCUS ON 19 | |
167 | - | AREAS IN THE FOLLOWI NG ORDER OF PRIORITY : 20 | |
168 | - | ||
169 | - | (I) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES AND UNDERSERVED 21 | |
170 | - | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT; 22 | |
171 | - | ||
172 | - | (II) AREAS WITHIN OR ASSOC IATED WITH AT LEAST ONE OF THE 23 | |
173 | - | COMMUNITIES IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT ; 24 | |
174 | - | ||
175 | - | (III) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES AND UNDERSER VED 25 | |
176 | - | COMMUNITIES ACROSS T HE STATE; 26 | |
177 | - | ||
178 | - | (IV) OVERBURDENED COMMUNIT IES AND UNDERSERVED 27 | |
179 | - | COMMUNITIES IN THE THE REGION IN WHICH THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY 28 | |
180 | - | EXPANSION PROJECT IS LOCATED; AND 29 | |
181 | - | ||
182 | - | (V) BENEFITS TO THE ENTIR E STATE THE STATE AT LARGE. 30 | |
183 | - | ||
184 | - | (C) (1) THE MULTIMODAL TRANSP ORTATION PROGRAM SHA LL OFFSET 31 | |
185 | - | THE VEHICLE MILES TRAVEL ED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS IONS ASSOCIATED WITH 32 | |
186 | - | THE MAJOR HIGHWAY CA PACITY EXPANSION PRO JECT. 33 HOUSE BILL 84 5 | |
180 | + | (A) (1) BEGINNING WITH THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 27 | |
181 | + | PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2032 AND IN EACH 28 | |
182 | + | ANNUAL RELEASE THEREAFTER , THE DEPARTMENT SHALL EVAL UATE MAJOR 29 | |
183 | + | CAPITAL PROJECTS INC LUDED IN THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 30 | |
184 | + | PROGRAM FOR THEIR IMPACT ON: 31 HOUSE BILL 84 5 | |
187 | 185 | ||
188 | 186 | ||
189 | 187 | ||
190 | - | (2) THE NET VEHICLE MILES TRAVEL ED GREENHOUSE GAS 1 | |
191 | - | EMISSIONS FROM THE PROJECT AND ITS ASSOCIATED MULTIMODAL 2 | |
192 | - | TRANSPORTATION PROGR AM SHALL EQUAL ZERO OR A NUMBER LESS THAN ZER O BE 3 | |
193 | - | ZERO OR A NEGATIVE N UMBER. 4 | |
188 | + | (I) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION S; AND 1 | |
194 | 189 | ||
195 | - | (D) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL CONS IDER BOTH THE MAJOR HIGHWAY 5 | |
196 | - | CAPACITY EXPANSION P ROJECT AND THE MULTI MODAL TRANSPORTATION OFFSET 6 | |
197 | - | PROGRAM AS PART OF ITS EVALUATI ON OF THE PROJECT UN DER § 2–103.7 OF THIS 7 | |
198 | - | TITLE. 8 | |
190 | + | (II) VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PER C APITA. 2 | |
199 | 191 | ||
200 | - | (E) THE DEPARTMENT SHALL FUND: 9 | |
192 | + | (2) IF THE NET IMPACT OF A MAJOR CAPITAL PROJECT IS AN 3 | |
193 | + | INCREASE IN GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS IONS, THE STATE SHALL FUND OFFS ETTING 4 | |
194 | + | ACTIVITIES TO REDUCE THE NET GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS TO ZERO OR A 5 | |
195 | + | NUMBER LESS THAN ZER O. 6 | |
201 | 196 | ||
202 | - | (1) FUND ELEMENTS OF THE MULT IMODAL TRANSPORTATIO N 10 | |
203 | - | PROGRAM CONCURRENTLY WITH FUNDING FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAJOR 11 | |
204 | - | HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION PROJECT; OR 12 | |
197 | + | (3) THE EVALUATION REQUIRED UNDER PARAG RAPH (1) OF THIS 7 | |
198 | + | SUBSECTION SHALL BE PUBLISHED FOR THE DRAFT CONSOLIDATED 8 | |
199 | + | TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM BY OCTOBER 1 EACH YEAR, AND WITH THE FINAL 9 | |
200 | + | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM EACH YEAR. 10 | |
205 | 201 | ||
206 | - | (2) DEFER THE MAJOR HIGHW AY EXPANSION CAPACIT Y PROJECT 13 | |
207 | - | UNTIL THE PROJECT ME ETS THE OFFSETTING R EQUIREMENTS FOR A MU LTIMODAL 14 | |
208 | - | TRANSPORTATION PROGR AM UNDER THIS SUBTIT LE. 15 | |
202 | + | (B) (1) BEGINNING WITH THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 11 | |
203 | + | PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2032 AND IN EACH 12 | |
204 | + | ANNUAL RELEASE THERE AFTER, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ACHI EVE, TO THE 13 | |
205 | + | MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACT ICABLE AND SUBJECT T O THE STATE BUDGET, A PROGRAM 14 | |
206 | + | WHOSE IMPACT ON GREE NHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS IS CONSISTENT WITH , AND MAKES 15 | |
207 | + | PROGRESS TOWARD ACHI EVING GREENHOUSE GAS REDUC TION TARGETS 16 | |
208 | + | CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE’S CARBON POLLUTION R EDUCTION PLAN OVER T HE 17 | |
209 | + | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PERIOD . 18 | |
209 | 210 | ||
210 | - | 2–904. 16 | |
211 | + | (2) THE DEPARTMENT MAY FUND O FFSETTING ACTIVITIES TO MAKE 19 | |
212 | + | THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MORE CONSISTENT WITH THE 20 | |
213 | + | GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS ION REDUCTION GOALS UNDER THE STATE’S CARBON 21 | |
214 | + | POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN OR TO INCREASE PROGRESS TOWARD THOS E GOALS. 22 | |
211 | 215 | ||
212 | - | (A) (1) BEGINNING WITH THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 17 | |
213 | - | PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2027 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2032 AND IN EACH 18 | |
214 | - | ANNUAL RELEASE THERE AFTER, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL EVAL UATE MAJOR 19 | |
215 | - | CAPITAL PROJECTS INC LUDED IN THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 20 | |
216 | - | PROGRAM FOR THEIR IMP ACT ON: 21 | |
216 | + | (C) THE OFFSETTING ACTIVI TIES REQUIRED UNDER SUBSE CTIONS (A) AND 23 | |
217 | + | (B) OF THIS SECTION ARE ACTIVITIES THAT: 24 | |
217 | 218 | ||
218 | - | (I) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS; AND 22 | |
219 | + | (1) DEMONSTRABLY CREATE C ONSISTENT, LONG–TERM REDUCTIONS 25 | |
220 | + | IN GREENHOUSE GAS EM ISSIONS OR VEHICLE M ILES TRAVELED ; 26 | |
219 | 221 | ||
220 | - | (II) VEHICLE MILES TRAVELE D PER CAPITA. 23 | |
222 | + | (2) PRIORITIZE OVERBURDEN ED AND UNDERSERVED C OMMUNITIES; 27 | |
223 | + | AND 28 | |
221 | 224 | ||
222 | - | (2) IF THE NET IMPACT OF A MAJOR CAPITAL PROJ ECT IS AN 24 | |
223 | - | INCREASE IN GREENHOU SE GAS EMISSIONS , THE STATE SHALL FUND OFFS ETTING 25 | |
224 | - | ACTIVITIES TO REDUCE THE NET GREENHOUSE G AS EMISSIONS TO ZERO OR A 26 | |
225 | - | NUMBER LESS THAN ZER O. 27 | |
225 | + | (3) INCLUDE: 29 | |
226 | 226 | ||
227 | - | (3) THE EVALUATION REQUIR ED UNDER PARAGRAPH (1) OF THIS 28 | |
228 | - | SUBSECTION SHALL BE PUBLISHED FOR THE DR AFT CONSOLIDATED 29 | |
229 | - | TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM BY OCTOBER 1 EACH YEAR, AND WITH THE FINAL 30 | |
230 | - | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM EACH YEAR . 31 | |
231 | - | 6 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
227 | + | (I) PARKING REDUCTION INI TIATIVES; 30 | |
228 | + | ||
229 | + | (II) ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION ; 31 6 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
232 | 230 | ||
233 | 231 | ||
234 | - | (B) (1) BEGINNING WITH THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 1 | |
235 | - | PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YE AR 2027 THROUGH FISCAL YEAR 2032 AND IN EACH 2 | |
236 | - | ANNUAL RELEASE THERE AFTER, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ACHI EVE, TO THE 3 | |
237 | - | MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACT ICABLE AND SUBJECT T O THE STATE BUDGET 4 | |
238 | - | APPROPRIATIONS , A PROGRAM WHOSE IMP ACT ON GREENHOUSE GA S EMISSIONS IS 5 | |
239 | - | CONSISTENT WITH , AND MAKES AND PROGRESS TOWARD ACHI EVING GREENHOUSE 6 | |
240 | - | GAS REDUCTION TARGET S ARE, OVER THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 7 | |
241 | - | PROGRAM PERIOD , CONSISTENT WITH THE STATE’S CARBON POLLUTION 8 | |
242 | - | REDUCTION PLAN OVER THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PERIOD 9 | |
243 | - | THE PROJECTED GREENH OUSE GAS EMISSION RE DUCTIONS MODELED FOR ROADS 10 | |
244 | - | IN MARYLAND’S CLIMATE POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN: MODELING APPENDIX. 11 | |
245 | 232 | ||
246 | - | (2) THE DEPARTMENT MAY SHALL FUND OFFSETTING ACTI VITIES TO 12 | |
247 | - | MAKE THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM MORE CONSISTE NT WITH 13 | |
248 | - | THE GREENHOUSE GAS E MISSION REDUCTION GO ALS UNDER THE STATE’S CARBON 14 | |
249 | - | POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN OR TO INCREASE PROGRESS TOWARD THOS E GOALS 15 | |
250 | - | DEPARTMENT ’S 2023 CLIMATE POLLUTION REDUCTION PLAN AND THE TARGETS 16 | |
251 | - | ESTABLISHED IN SUBSECTI ON (D) OF THIS SECTION. 17 | |
233 | + | (III) TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT STRATEGIE S; 1 | |
252 | 234 | ||
253 | - | ( | |
254 | - | ||
235 | + | (IV) LOW–TRAVEL–DEMAND COMMERCIAL AN D RESIDENTIAL 2 | |
236 | + | DEVELOPMENT AND OTHE R LAND USE CHANGES ; 3 | |
255 | 237 | ||
256 | - | (1) DEMONSTRABLY CREATE C ONSISTENT, LONG–TERM REDUCTIONS 20 | |
257 | - | IN GREENHOUSE GAS EM ISSIONS OR VEHICLE M ILES TRAVELED; 21 | |
238 | + | (V) ROADWAY PRICING ; 4 | |
258 | 239 | ||
259 | - | ( | |
240 | + | (VI) TELECOMMUTING ; 5 | |
260 | 241 | ||
261 | - | ( | |
262 | - | ||
242 | + | (VII) PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS AND 6 | |
243 | + | EXPANSION; 7 | |
263 | 244 | ||
264 | - | ( | |
245 | + | (VIII) MICRO–MOBILITY; 8 | |
265 | 246 | ||
266 | - | (I) PARKING REDUCTION INI TIATIVES; 26 | |
247 | + | (IX) ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTA TION IMPROVEMENTS TH AT 9 | |
248 | + | COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT; 10 | |
267 | 249 | ||
268 | - | ( | |
250 | + | (X) ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GE NERATION; AND 11 | |
269 | 251 | ||
270 | - | (III) TRANSPORTATION TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT 28 | |
271 | - | AND TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT ST RATEGIES; 29 | |
252 | + | (XI) OTHER ACTIVITIES IDEN TIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OR 12 | |
253 | + | THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO RED UCE TRANSPORTATION 13 | |
254 | + | EMISSIONS. 14 | |
272 | 255 | ||
273 | - | (IV) LOW–TRAVEL–DEMAND COMMERCIAL AN D RESIDENTIAL 30 | |
274 | - | DEVELOPMENT AND OTHE R LAND USE CHANGES ; 31 | |
256 | + | (D) TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIR EMENTS UNDER THIS SE CTION, THE 15 | |
257 | + | DEPARTMENT SHALL SET ANNUAL DECLINING GRE ENHOUSE GAS EMISSION 16 | |
258 | + | REDUCTION TARGETS TH AT INCORPORATE ASSUM PTIONS ABOUT THE USE OF 17 | |
259 | + | ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE STATE. 18 | |
275 | 260 | ||
276 | - | (V) ROADWAY PRICING ; 32 | |
261 | + | (E) IN EVALUATING THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM’S 19 | |
262 | + | IMPACT ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND VEHICLE MILES TR AVELED, THE 20 | |
263 | + | DEPARTMENT SHALL : 21 | |
264 | + | ||
265 | + | (1) ESTABLISH THE BASELIN E TOTAL GREENHOUSE G AS EMISSIONS 22 | |
266 | + | ATTRIBUTABLE TO SURF ACE TRANSPORTATION I N THE STATE FOR THE 23 | |
267 | + | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM PERIO D; 24 | |
268 | + | ||
269 | + | (2) CONSIDER THE DIRECT A ND INDUCED DEMAND IM PACTS OF 25 | |
270 | + | HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION PROJECTS AND TRANSIT CAPITAL PROJ ECTS ON 26 | |
271 | + | VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PER CAPITA AND GREENHOUSE GAS E MISSIONS; 27 | |
272 | + | ||
273 | + | (3) CONSIDER THE DIRECT B ENEFITS OF INVESTMEN TS IN: 28 | |
277 | 274 | HOUSE BILL 84 7 | |
278 | 275 | ||
279 | 276 | ||
280 | - | (VI) TELECOMMUTING ; 1 | |
277 | + | (I) TRANSIT OPERATIONS , INCLUDING LOCALLY OP ERATED 1 | |
278 | + | TRANSIT SYSTEMS ; 2 | |
281 | 279 | ||
282 | - | (VII) PUBLIC TRANSIT SERVICE IMPR OVEMENTS AND 2 | |
283 | - | EXPANSION; 3 | |
280 | + | (II) TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND 3 | |
281 | + | TRANSPORTATION DEMAN D MANAGEMENT , INCLUDING LAND DEVEL OPMENT 4 | |
282 | + | DESIGNED TO REDUCED TRAVEL DEMAND; 5 | |
284 | 283 | ||
285 | - | (VIII) MICRO–MOBILITY, INCLUDING THROUGH TH E USE OF 4 | |
286 | - | ADAPTIVE AND INCLUSI VE LOW–SPEED VEHICLES FOR P EOPLE WITH DISABILIT IES; 5 | |
284 | + | (III) PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCL E INFRASTRUCTURE ; 6 | |
287 | 285 | ||
288 | - | (IX) ACCESSIBLE TRANSPORTA TION IMPROVEMENTS THAT 6 | |
289 | - | COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT AND PEDESTRIAN 7 | |
290 | - | IMPROVEMENTS FOR PEO PLE WITH DISABILITIE S; 8 | |
286 | + | (IV) ELECTRIFICATION OF STATE VEHICLES; 7 | |
291 | 287 | ||
292 | - | (X) ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GE NERATION SOLAR ENERGY 9 | |
293 | - | GENERATION ON PROPER TY CONTROLLED BY THE DEPARTMENT ; AND 10 | |
288 | + | (V) VEHICLE CHARGING INFR ASTRUCTURE ; AND 8 | |
294 | 289 | ||
295 | - | (XI) OTHER ACTIVITIES IDEN TIFIED BY THE DEPARTMENT OR 11 | |
296 | - | THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO RED UCE TRANSPORTATION 12 | |
297 | - | EMISSIONS TO REDUCE VEHICLE MI LES TRAVELED . 13 | |
290 | + | (VI) ALTERNATIVE ENERGY GENERATION ; AND 9 | |
298 | 291 | ||
299 | - | (D) TO ACHIEVE THE REQUIR EMENTS UNDER THIS SE CTION, THE 14 | |
300 | - | DEPARTMENT SHALL SET ANNUAL: 15 | |
292 | + | (4) COMPARE THE PROJECTED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS IONS TO THE 10 | |
293 | + | TARGET EMISSIONS EST ABLISHED IN SUBSECTI ON (C) OF THIS SECTION TO 11 | |
294 | + | DETERMINE WHETHER TH E CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 12 | |
295 | + | ACHIEVES THE EMISSIO NS TARGETS. 13 | |
301 | 296 | ||
302 | - | (1) ANNUAL STATEWIDE DECLINING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION 16 | |
303 | - | REDUCTION TARGETS THAT INCORPO RATE ASSUMPTIONS ABO UT THE USE OF 17 | |
304 | - | ELECTRIC VEHICLES IN THE STATE; AND 18 | |
297 | + | (F) IN EVALUATING WHETHER THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION 14 | |
298 | + | PROGRAM MEETS GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS ION GOALS, THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT 15 | |
299 | + | CONSIDER STATE OF GO OD REPAIR ACTIVITIES AND ACTIVITIES THAT ARE SOLELY 16 | |
300 | + | FOR SYSTEM PRESERVATION . 17 | |
305 | 301 | ||
306 | - | (2) ANNUAL REGIONAL DECLI NING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION 19 | |
307 | - | REDUCTION TARGETS TH AT: 20 | |
302 | + | 2–905. 18 | |
308 | 303 | ||
309 | - | (I) ARE SET AT AN AMOUNT THAT WHEN MET AND TA KEN 21 | |
310 | - | COLLECTIVELY FOR ALL REGIONS WOU LD ACHIEVE THE REQUI REMENTS SPECIFIED 22 | |
311 | - | IN § 2–903(C)(2) OF THIS SUBTITLE AND THE STATEWIDE TARGET S SET UNDER ITEM 23 | |
312 | - | (1) OF THIS ITEM; AND 24 | |
304 | + | (A) THE SECRETARY SHALL: 19 | |
313 | 305 | ||
314 | - | ( | |
315 | - | ||
306 | + | (1) ESTABLISH A PROCESS TO PERFORM CAPACITY EXPANSION 20 | |
307 | + | IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ; 21 | |
316 | 308 | ||
317 | - | (E) IN EVALUATING THE CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM’S 27 | |
318 | - | IMPACT ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS AND VE HICLE MILES TRAVELED , THE 28 | |
319 | - | DEPARTMENT SHALL : 29 | |
309 | + | (2) REQUIRE THE USE OF AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE 22 | |
310 | + | DETERMINATION S REQUIRED UNDER §§ 2–903 AND 2–904 OF THIS SUBTITLE; AND 23 | |
320 | 311 | ||
321 | - | (1) ESTABLISH THE BASELIN E TOTAL GREENHOUSE G AS EMISSIONS 30 | |
322 | - | ATTRIBUTABLE TO SURF ACE TRANSPORTATION I N THE STATE FOR THE 31 | |
323 | - | CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATI ON PROGRAM PERIOD ; 32 8 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
312 | + | (3) IMPLEMENT THE REQUIREMENTS UNDER THIS SECTION , 24 | |
313 | + | INCLUDING BY ESTABLISHING : 25 | |
314 | + | ||
315 | + | (I) ANY NECESSARY POLICIES , PROCEDURES , MANUALS, AND 26 | |
316 | + | TECHNICAL SPECIFICAT IONS; 27 | |
317 | + | 8 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
324 | 318 | ||
325 | 319 | ||
320 | + | (II) PROCEDURES TO PERFORM AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT THAT 1 | |
321 | + | PROVIDES FOR THE DETERMINATIO NS REQUIRED UNDER §§ 2–902 AND 2–903 OF 2 | |
322 | + | THIS SUBTITLE; 3 | |
326 | 323 | ||
327 | - | (2) CONSIDER THE DIRECT A ND INDUCED DEMAND IM PACTS OF 1 | |
328 | - | HIGHWAY CAPACITY EXP ANSION PROJECTS AND TRANSIT MAJOR CAPITAL 2 | |
329 | - | PROJECTS ON VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED PER C APITA AND GREENHOUSE GAS 3 | |
330 | - | EMISSIONS; 4 | |
324 | + | (III) CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFICATION O F A CAPACITY EXPANSI ON 4 | |
325 | + | PROJECT; AND 5 | |
331 | 326 | ||
332 | - | (3) CONSIDER THE DIRECT CLIMATE BENEFITS OF INVESTMENTS IN : 5 | |
327 | + | (IV) RELATED DATA REPORTING FROM LOCAL UNITS OF 6 | |
328 | + | GOVERNMENT ON LOCAL MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOCAL 7 | |
329 | + | PROJECT IMPACTS ON G REENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS AND VEHICLE MILE S 8 | |
330 | + | TRAVELED. 9 | |
333 | 331 | ||
334 | - | (I) TRANSIT OPERATIONS , INCLUDING LOCALLY OP ERATED 6 | |
335 | - | TRANSIT SYSTEMS ; 7 | |
332 | + | (B) AN ANALYSIS UNDER A CAPACITY EXPANSION I MPACT ASSESSMENT 10 | |
333 | + | SHALL INCLUDE ESTIMATES RESULTING FROM A PROJECT OR PO RTFOLIO OF 11 | |
334 | + | PROJECTS FOR THE FOLLOWING : 12 | |
336 | 335 | ||
337 | - | (II) TRANSIT–ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT AND 8 | |
338 | - | TRANSPORTATION DEMAN D MANAGEMENT , INCLUDING LAND DEVEL OPMENT 9 | |
339 | - | DESIGNED TO REDUCED TRAVEL DEMAND ; 10 | |
336 | + | (1) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS OVER A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS; 13 | |
340 | 337 | ||
341 | - | (III) PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE INFRASTRUCTU RE; 11 | |
338 | + | (2) A NET CHANGE IN VEHICL E MILES TRAVELED FOR THE AFFECTED 14 | |
339 | + | NETWORK; AND 15 | |
342 | 340 | ||
343 | - | (IV) ELECTRIFICATION OF STATE VEHICLES ; 12 | |
341 | + | (3) IMPACTS TO STATE HIGHWAYS AND RELATED IMPACTS TO LOCAL 16 | |
342 | + | ROAD SYSTEMS , ON A LOCAL, REGIONAL, OR STATEWIDE BASIS AS APPROPRI ATE. 17 | |
344 | 343 | ||
345 | - | (V) VEHICLE CHARGING INFR ASTRUCTURE ; AND 13 | |
344 | + | (C) THE ANALYSIS AND ESTI MATES SPECIFIED UNDE R SUBSECTION (B) OF 18 | |
345 | + | THIS SECTION SHALL B E DETERMINED USING T HE BEST AVAILABLE DA TA AND 19 | |
346 | + | MODELING TOOLS , SUCH AS: 20 | |
346 | 347 | ||
347 | - | ( | |
348 | - | ||
348 | + | (1) THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION ’S 21 | |
349 | + | INDUCED TRAVEL CALCU LATOR; 22 | |
349 | 350 | ||
350 | - | (4) COMPARE THE PROJECTED GREENHOUSE GAS EMISS IONS TO THE 16 | |
351 | - | TARGET EMISSIONS EST ABLISHED IN SUBSECTI ON (C) (D) OF THIS SECTION TO 17 | |
352 | - | DETERMINE WHETHER TH E CONSOLIDATED TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM 18 | |
353 | - | ACHIEVES THE EMISSIO NS TARGETS. 19 | |
351 | + | (2) THE STATE HIGHWAY INDUCED FREQUENCY OF TRAVEL 23 | |
352 | + | CALCULATOR; 24 | |
354 | 353 | ||
355 | - | (F) IN EVALUATING WHETHER THE CONSOLIDAT ED TRANSPORTATION 20 | |
356 | - | PROGRAM MEETS GREENHO USE GAS EMISSION GOA LS, THE DEPARTMENT MAY NOT 21 | |
357 | - | CONSIDER STATE OF GO OD REPAIR ACTIVITIES AND ACTIVITIES THAT ARE SOLELY 22 | |
358 | - | FOR SYSTEM PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES. 23 | |
354 | + | (3) THE CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY 25 | |
355 | + | AND CARBON REDUCTION TOOL; OR 26 | |
359 | 356 | ||
360 | - | 2–905. 24 | |
357 | + | (4) ANY OTHER IMPACT ASSESSM ENT TOOL USED FOR ME ASURING 27 | |
358 | + | INDUCED DEMAND FOR GRADE SEPARATION PROJECTS. 28 | |
361 | 359 | ||
362 | - | (A) THE SECRETARY SHALL : 25 | |
363 | - | ||
364 | - | (1) ESTABLISH A PROCESS TO PERFORM CAPACITY EXPANSION 26 | |
365 | - | IMPACT ASSESSMENTS ; 27 | |
366 | - | ||
367 | - | (2) ESTABLISH A PROCESS F OR CONSIDERING PROGR ESS MADE 28 | |
368 | - | TOWARD MEETING THE T ARGETS SPECIFIED IN § 2–904(D) OF THIS SUBTITLE; 29 | |
369 | - | HOUSE BILL 84 9 | |
360 | + | (D) IN FISCAL YEAR 2025, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLO CATE FUNDING 29 | |
361 | + | FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF STATEWIDE AND REGIONAL 30 | |
362 | + | TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SECTION, 31 HOUSE BILL 84 9 | |
370 | 363 | ||
371 | 364 | ||
372 | - | (3) ESTABLISH A PROCESS F OR DEVELOPING A MULT IMODAL 1 | |
373 | - | TRANSPORTATION PROGR AM UNDER § 2–903 OF THIS SUBTITLE , INCLUDING A 2 | |
374 | - | METHOD FOR CONSIDERI NG THE DIRECT AND IN DUCED DEMAND IMPACTS OF A 3 | |
375 | - | MAJOR HIGHWAY CAPACI TY EXPANSION PROJECT ; AND 4 | |
365 | + | INCLUDING INDUCED DEMAND AND L AND USE EFFECTS FROM TRANSPORTATION 1 | |
366 | + | INVESTMENTS . 2 | |
376 | 367 | ||
377 | - | ||
368 | + | 8–102. 3 | |
378 | 369 | ||
379 | - | ( | |
380 | - | ||
370 | + | (a) It is the policy of this title to promote an efficient and economical 4 | |
371 | + | transportation system. 5 | |
381 | 372 | ||
382 | - | (II) ANY MULTIMODAL TRANSP ORTATION PROGRAM 8 | |
383 | - | DEVELOPED UNDER § 2–903 OF THIS SUBTITLE . 9 | |
373 | + | (b) The Department [of Transportation] and the [State Highway] Administration 6 | |
374 | + | may not proceed to the final project planning phase unless it has been determined that the 7 | |
375 | + | objective of the proposed project cannot be reasonably achieved through: 8 | |
384 | 376 | ||
385 | - | (2) REQUIRE THE USE OF AN IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN THE 10 | |
386 | - | DETERMINATIONS REQUI RED UNDER §§ 2–903 AND 2–904 OF THIS SUBTITLE; AND 11 | |
377 | + | (1) Improvements in highway maintenance and safety; 9 | |
387 | 378 | ||
388 | - | ( | |
389 | - | ||
379 | + | (2) Projects that modify existing highways but provide for minimal 10 | |
380 | + | relocation or new highway construction; and 11 | |
390 | 381 | ||
391 | - | ( | |
392 | - | ||
382 | + | (3) Improvements in, or adoption of, transit alternatives, including mass 12 | |
383 | + | transit alternatives. 13 | |
393 | 384 | ||
394 | - | ( | |
395 | - | ||
396 | - | ||
385 | + | (C) THE DEPARTME NT AND THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL ISSUE A REPORT 14 | |
386 | + | PRIOR TO PROCEEDING TO THE FINAL PROJECT PL ANNING PHASE THAT 15 | |
387 | + | DOCUMENTS : 16 | |
397 | 388 | ||
398 | - | ( | |
399 | - | ||
389 | + | (1) THE EVALUATION OF THE ALTERNATIVES IDENTIF IED IN 17 | |
390 | + | SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION; OR 18 | |
400 | 391 | ||
401 | - | (IV) RELATED DATA REPORTIN G FROM LOCAL UNITS O F 21 | |
402 | - | GOVERNMENT ON LOCAL MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTE MS AND LOCAL 22 | |
403 | - | PROJECT IMPACTS ON G REENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS AND VEHICLE MILE S 23 | |
404 | - | TRAVELED. 24 | |
392 | + | (2) A DETERMINATION THROUG H OTHER REQUIRED PLA NNING 19 | |
393 | + | DOCUMENTS . 20 | |
405 | 394 | ||
406 | - | (B) AN ANALYSIS UNDER A C APACITY EXPANSION IM PACT ASSESSMENT 25 | |
407 | - | SHALL INCLUDE ESTIMA TES RESULTING FROM A PROJECT OR PORTFOLIO OF 26 | |
408 | - | PROJECTS FOR THE FOL LOWING: 27 | |
409 | - | ||
410 | - | (1) GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSI ONS OVER A PERIOD OF 20 YEARS; 28 | |
411 | - | ||
412 | - | (2) A NET CHANGE IN VEHICL E MILES TRAVELED FOR THE AFFECTED 29 | |
413 | - | NETWORK; AND 30 | |
414 | - | 10 HOUSE BILL 84 | |
415 | - | ||
416 | - | ||
417 | - | (3) IMPACTS TO STATE HIGHWAYS AND RE LATED IMPACTS TO LOC AL 1 | |
418 | - | ROAD SYSTEMS , ON A LOCAL, REGIONAL, OR STATEWIDE BAS IS AS APPROPRIATE . 2 | |
419 | - | ||
420 | - | (C) THE ANALYSIS AND ESTI MATES SPECIFIED UNDE R SUBSECTION (B) OF 3 | |
421 | - | THIS SECTION SHALL B E DETERMINED USING T HE BEST AVAILABLE DA TA AND 4 | |
422 | - | MODELING TOOLS , SUCH AS: 5 | |
423 | - | ||
424 | - | (1) THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION ’S 6 | |
425 | - | INDUCED TRAVEL CALCULATOR ; 7 | |
426 | - | ||
427 | - | (2) THE STATE HIGHWAY INDUCED FREQUENCY OF TRAVEL 8 | |
428 | - | CALCULATOR; 9 | |
429 | - | ||
430 | - | (3) THE CAMBRIDGE SYSTEMATICS TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY 10 | |
431 | - | AND CARBON REDUCTION TOOL; OR 11 | |
432 | - | ||
433 | - | (4) ANY OTHER IMPACT ASSE SSMENT TOOL USED FOR MEASURING 12 | |
434 | - | INDUCED DEMAND FOR G RADE SEPAR ATION PROJECTS . 13 | |
435 | - | ||
436 | - | (D) (B) IN FISCAL YEAR 2025 2026, THE DEPARTMENT SHALL ALLO CATE 14 | |
437 | - | FUNDING FOR THE IMPL EMENTATION AND DEVEL OPMENT OF STATEWIDE AND 15 | |
438 | - | REGIONAL TRAVEL DEMA ND MODELING RELATED TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS 16 | |
439 | - | SECTION, INCLUDING INDUCED DE MAND AND LAND USE EFFECTS FROM 17 | |
440 | - | TRANSPORTATION INVES TMENTS. 18 | |
441 | - | ||
442 | - | 8–102. 19 | |
443 | - | ||
444 | - | (a) It is the policy of this title to promote an efficient and economical 20 | |
445 | - | transportation system. 21 | |
446 | - | ||
447 | - | (b) The Department [of Transportation] and the [State Highway] Administration 22 | |
448 | - | may not proceed to the final project planning phase unless it has been determined that the 23 | |
449 | - | objective of the proposed project cannot be reasonably achieved through: 24 | |
450 | - | ||
451 | - | (1) Improvements in highway maintenance and safety; 25 | |
452 | - | ||
453 | - | (2) Projects that modify existing highways but provide for minimal 26 | |
454 | - | relocation or new highway construction; and 27 | |
455 | - | ||
456 | - | (3) Improvements in, or adoption of, transit alternatives, including mass 28 | |
457 | - | transit alternatives. 29 | |
458 | - | ||
459 | - | (C) THE DEPARTMENT AND THE ADMINISTRATION SHALL ISSUE A REPORT 30 | |
460 | - | PRIOR TO PROCEEDING TO THE FINAL PROJECT PLANNING PHASE THAT 31 | |
461 | - | DOCUMENTS : 32 HOUSE BILL 84 11 | |
462 | - | ||
463 | - | ||
464 | - | ||
465 | - | (1) THE EVALUATION OF THE ALTERNATIVES IDENTIF IED IN 1 | |
466 | - | SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION; OR 2 | |
467 | - | ||
468 | - | (2) A DETERMINATION THROUG H OTHER REQUIRED PLA NNING 3 | |
469 | - | DOCUMENTS . 4 | |
470 | - | ||
471 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 5 | |
472 | - | 1, 2025. 6 | |
473 | - | ||
474 | - | ||
475 | - | ||
476 | - | ||
477 | - | Approved: | |
478 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
479 | - | Governor. | |
480 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
481 | - | Speaker of the House of Delegates. | |
482 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
483 | - | President of the Senate. | |
395 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect July 21 | |
396 | + | 1, 2025. 22 |