Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland House Bill HB871

Introduced
1/30/25  
Refer
1/30/25  
Report Pass
3/13/25  
Engrossed
3/14/25  
Refer
3/17/25  
Report Pass
4/3/25  

Caption

Health Services Cost Review Commission - Community Benefits - Community Health Worker Workforce Program

Impact

If enacted, HB 871 will alter the landscape of community health services in Maryland, potentially increasing the number of community health workers who can provide essential services directly to patients. The partnerships formed under the bill are expected to provide not only healthcare services but also promote community resilience and education. By mandating that health insurance be provided to community health workers when they lack coverage, the bill underscores a commitment to supporting those who serve vulnerable populations, improving workforce stability in community health sectors.

Summary

House Bill 871 focuses on enhancing community health initiatives through the establishment of Community Health Worker Workforce Programs. The bill aims to redefine 'community benefit' to include these programs, allowing partnerships between nonprofit hospitals and community-based organizations to facilitate improved health outcomes. This initiative is designed to address social determinants of health and enhance access to services, particularly in underserved communities as defined by the established criteria. The intent reflects an understanding that effective community health efforts require trusted local intermediaries who can bridge gaps between services and residents.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around HB 871 appears positive, particularly among healthcare advocates and community organizations who believe it will enhance public health responses. Supporters argue that this bill provides a structured framework for hospitals and local organizations to collaborate effectively and respond to pressing health needs. Conversely, some concerns may arise regarding the sustainability of funding and the administrative resources required to implement these programs, indicating a level of cautious optimism in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notably, one point of contention involves the requirement for memorandums of understanding between nonprofit hospitals and community organizations. Critics question whether this will create administrative burdens that could undermine the effectiveness of the partnerships. Furthermore, there might be debates on how to evaluate the impact of such programs adequately and ensure they align with the community's actual health needs, raising questions about accountability and performance measurement in the long term.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3203

Relating to the sunset review of local workforce development boards in this state.

MS SB2286

Workforce Enhancement Training Fund contributions; provide for suspensions under certain circumstances.

CA AB37

Workforce development: mental health service providers: homelessness.

CA SB275

Eligible training provider list.

CA AB338

Workforce development: the Counties of Los Angeles and Ventura: 2025 wildfires.

CA SB714

Zero-emission vehicles: workforce development: Clean Energy Workforce Training Council.

OR HB3029

Relating to workforce development.

MS HB1414

Workforce Enhancement Training Fund; revise administration of and make technical changes to.