Maryland House Bill HB881

Maryland 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 1/30/25
• Report Pass: 3/14/25
• Engrossed: 3/14/25
• Refer: 3/17/25
• Report Pass: 4/5/25
• Enrolled: 4/7/25
• Chaptered: 5/6/25
• Passed: 5/6/25

Caption

Family Investment Program - Child Support

Impact

If enacted, HB 881 will amend existing Maryland laws governing child support and assistance programs. Starting in fiscal year 2028, at least $100 of child support collected per month for one child, or $200 for two or more children, will need to pass through to the family without affecting their calculated assistance. By fiscal year 2031, the bill stipulates that all child support collected must be disregarded when determining assistance amounts. This amendment could significantly increase the financial resources available to families, improving their access to essential support services.

Summary

House Bill 881 seeks to reform the way child support payments are considered in the determination of benefits for families seeking assistance under the Family Investment Program (FIP) and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill mandates that a portion of child support received by families pass through directly to them without being counted against the assistance they can receive. This change aims to provide families with greater financial support and align benefits with the needs of children in these households.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 881 appears to be positive, as it is viewed as a step toward better supporting low-income families in Maryland. Supporters argue that the bill addresses the challenges many families face in meeting basic needs while ensuring that child support payments are not penalized in the context of receiving essential aid. However, concerns have been raised about the implications for state budgets and the structuring of assistance programs based on available funding.

Contention

Notably, there may be contention regarding the fiscal impact of HB 881, particularly in relation to funding for the FIP and SNAP. Critics may express concerns that increasing the amount of child support disregarded could strain state resources or complicate the calculation processes within social services. Advocates for the bill, however, argue that this approach will ultimately lead to better outcomes for children and families by allowing them to retain more of their income, thus leading to enhanced well-being overall.