Old | New | Differences | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | ||
2 | 2 | ||
3 | 3 | EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXIS TING LAW. | |
4 | 4 | [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law. | |
5 | 5 | Underlining indicates amendments to bill. | |
6 | 6 | Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by | |
7 | 7 | amendment. | |
8 | - | Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments. | |
9 | 8 | *sb0338* | |
10 | 9 | ||
11 | 10 | SENATE BILL 338 | |
12 | - | R5 (5lr1360) | |
13 | - | ENROLLED BILL | |
14 | - | — Judicial Proceedings/Environment and Transportation — | |
15 | - | Introduced by Senators West, Hettleman, Salling, Sydnor, and Brooks Baltimore | |
16 | - | County Senators | |
17 | - | ||
18 | - | Read and Examined by Proofreaders: | |
19 | - | ||
20 | - | _______________________________________________ | |
21 | - | Proofreader. | |
22 | - | _______________________________________________ | |
23 | - | Proofreader. | |
24 | - | ||
25 | - | Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this | |
26 | - | ||
27 | - | _______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M. | |
28 | - | ||
29 | - | ______________________________________________ | |
30 | - | President. | |
11 | + | R5 5lr1360 | |
12 | + | SB 1067/24 – JPR CF HB 978 | |
13 | + | By: Senators West, Hettleman, Salling, Sydnor, and Brooks Baltimore County | |
14 | + | Senators | |
15 | + | Introduced and read first time: January 16, 2025 | |
16 | + | Assigned to: Judicial Proceedings | |
17 | + | Committee Report: Favorable with amendments | |
18 | + | Senate action: Adopted with floor amendments | |
19 | + | Read second time: February 26, 2025 | |
31 | 20 | ||
32 | 21 | CHAPTER ______ | |
33 | 22 | ||
34 | 23 | AN ACT concerning 1 | |
35 | 24 | ||
36 | 25 | Baltimore County – Speed Monitoring Systems – Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 2 | |
37 | 26 | ||
38 | 27 | FOR the purpose of authorizing the State Highway Administration to place and use a 3 | |
39 | - | certain number of speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County 4 | |
40 | - | and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County subject to certain requirements; requiring 5 | |
41 | - | that fines collected in Baltimore County as a result of violations enforced by speed 6 | |
42 | - | monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in 7 | |
43 | - | Baltimore County be used to recover costs and assist in covering the cost of roadway 8 | |
44 | - | and safety improvements on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 9 | |
45 | - | in Baltimore County; requiring the Department of State Police to mail a warning 10 | |
46 | - | notice instead of a citation for a violation recorded by a speed monitoring system on 11 | |
47 | - | Interstate 695 or Interstate 83 in Baltimore County during a certain time period; 12 | |
48 | - | and generally relating to speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore 13 | |
49 | - | County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County. 14 2 SENATE BILL 338 | |
28 | + | certain number of speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 4 | |
29 | + | Baltimore County subject to certain requirements; requiring that fines collected in 5 | |
30 | + | Baltimore County as a result of violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on 6 | |
31 | + | Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 be used to recover costs and assist in covering the 7 | |
32 | + | cost of roadway and safety improvements on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 8 | |
33 | + | Baltimore County; requiring the Department of State Police to mail a warning notice 9 | |
34 | + | instead of a citation for a violation recorded by a speed monitoring system on 10 | |
35 | + | Interstate 695 or Interstate 83 in Baltimore County during a certain time period; 11 | |
36 | + | and generally relating to speed monitoring systems in Baltimore County. 12 | |
37 | + | ||
38 | + | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 13 | |
39 | + | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 14 | |
40 | + | Section 7–302(e)(3) and 10–311(b) 15 | |
41 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 16 | |
42 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 17 | |
43 | + | ||
44 | + | BY adding to 18 | |
45 | + | Article – Transportation 19 | |
46 | + | Section 21–811 20 | |
47 | + | Annotated Code of Maryland 21 | |
48 | + | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 22 2 SENATE BILL 338 | |
50 | 49 | ||
51 | 50 | ||
52 | 51 | ||
53 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 1 | |
54 | - | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 2 | |
55 | - | Section 7–302(e)(3) and 10–311(b) 3 | |
56 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 4 | |
57 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 5 | |
52 | + | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 1 | |
53 | + | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 2 | |
58 | 54 | ||
59 | - | BY adding to 6 | |
60 | - | Article – Transportation 7 | |
61 | - | Section 21–811 8 | |
62 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 9 | |
63 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 10 | |
55 | + | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 3 | |
64 | 56 | ||
65 | - | BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 11 | |
66 | - | Article – Transportation 12 | |
67 | - | Section 21–809 13 | |
68 | - | Annotated Code of Maryland 14 | |
69 | - | (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 15 | |
57 | + | 7–302. 4 | |
70 | 58 | ||
71 | - | ||
72 | - | ||
73 | - | ||
74 | - | ||
75 | - | ||
76 | - | ||
77 | - | ||
59 | + | (e) (3) (I) [Civil] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF 5 | |
60 | + | THIS PARAGRAPH , CIVIL penalties resulting from citations issued using a vehicle height 6 | |
61 | + | monitoring system, traffic control signal monitoring system, speed monitoring system, 7 | |
62 | + | work zone speed control system, stop sign monitoring system, school bus monitoring 8 | |
63 | + | camera, bus lane monitoring system, or a noise abatement monitoring system that are 9 | |
64 | + | collected by the District Court shall be collected in accordance with subsection (a) of this 10 | |
65 | + | section and distributed in accordance with § 12–118 of the Transportation Article. 11 | |
78 | 66 | ||
79 | - | SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 23 | |
80 | - | That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 24 | |
67 | + | (II) 1. THE SUBJECT TO SUBSUBPARA GRAPH 3 OF THIS 12 | |
68 | + | SUBPARAGRAPH , THE FINES COLLECTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT AS A RESULT OF 13 | |
69 | + | VIOLATIONS ENFORCED BY SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 14 | |
70 | + | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY SHALL BE REMIT TED TO THE 15 | |
71 | + | COMPTROLLER FOR DISTR IBUTION TO THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TO 16 | |
72 | + | BE USED SOLELY TO ASSIST: 17 | |
81 | 73 | ||
82 | - | Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 25 | |
74 | + | A. RECOVER THE COST OF I MPLEMENTING AND 18 | |
75 | + | ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 19 | |
76 | + | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 20 | |
83 | 77 | ||
84 | - | 7–302. 26 | |
78 | + | B. ASSIST IN COVERING THE COST OF ROADWAY AND 21 | |
79 | + | SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE 22 | |
80 | + | COUNTY. 23 | |
85 | 81 | ||
86 | - | (e) (3) (I) [Civil] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF 27 | |
87 | - | THIS PARAGRAPH , CIVIL penalties resulting from citations issued using a vehicle height 28 | |
88 | - | monitoring system, traffic control signal monitoring system, speed monitoring system, 29 | |
89 | - | work zone speed control system, stop sign monitoring system, school bus monitoring 30 | |
90 | - | camera, bus lane monitoring system, or a noise abatement monitoring system that are 31 | |
91 | - | collected by the District Court shall be collected in accordance with subsection (a) of this 32 | |
92 | - | section and distributed in accordance with § 12–118 of the Transportation Article. 33 | |
82 | + | 2. FINES REMITTED DISTRIBUTED TO THE STATE 24 | |
83 | + | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH 25 | |
84 | + | ARE SUPPLEMENTAL TO AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO TAKE THE PLACE OF FUNDING 26 | |
85 | + | THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPROPRIATED FOR USES DESCRIBED UNDER 27 | |
86 | + | SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH . 28 | |
93 | 87 | ||
94 | - | (II) 1. THE SUBJECT TO SUBSUBPARA GRAPH 3 OF THIS 34 | |
95 | - | SUBPARAGRAPH , THE FINES COLLECTED THE FINES COLLECTED B Y THE DISTRICT 35 | |
96 | - | COURT BY THE DISTRICT COURT AS A RESULT OF VIOLA TIONS ENFORCED BY SP EED 36 | |
97 | - | MONITORING SY STEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 37 SENATE BILL 338 3 | |
88 | + | 3. NOT MORE THAN 49% OF THE FINES DISTRIB UTED TO 29 | |
89 | + | THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAP H 1 OF THIS 30 | |
90 | + | SUBPARAGRAPH MAY BE USED TO RECOVER THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND 31 | |
91 | + | ADMINISTERING TH E SPEED MONITORING S YSTEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 32 | |
92 | + | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 33 | |
93 | + | ||
94 | + | 10–311. 34 | |
95 | + | SENATE BILL 338 3 | |
98 | 96 | ||
99 | 97 | ||
100 | - | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY SHALL BE REMIT TED TO THE 1 | |
101 | - | COMPTROLLER FOR DISTR IBUTION TO THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TO 2 | |
102 | - | BE USED SOLELY TO ASSIST: 3 | |
98 | + | (b) A recorded image of a motor vehicle produced by a speed monitoring system 1 | |
99 | + | in accordance with § 21–809 [or], § 21–810, OR § 21–811 of the Transportation Article is 2 | |
100 | + | admissible in a proceeding concerning a civil citation issued under that section for a 3 | |
101 | + | violation of Title 21, Subtitle 8 of the Transportation Article without authentication. 4 | |
103 | 102 | ||
104 | - | A. RECOVER THE COST OF I MPLEMENTING AND 4 | |
105 | - | ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN 5 | |
106 | - | BALTIMORE COUNTY AND INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 6 | |
103 | + | Article – Transportation 5 | |
107 | 104 | ||
108 | - | B. ASSIST IN COVERING THE COST OF ROADWAY AND 7 | |
109 | - | SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 8 | |
110 | - | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 9 | |
105 | + | 21–811. 6 | |
111 | 106 | ||
112 | - | 2. FINES REMITTED DISTRIBUTED TO THE STATE 10 | |
113 | - | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH 11 | |
114 | - | ARE SUPPLEMENTAL TO AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO TAKE THE PLACE OF FUNDING 12 | |
115 | - | THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPROPRIATED FOR USES DESCRIBED UNDER 13 | |
116 | - | SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH . 14 | |
107 | + | (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 7 | |
108 | + | INDICATED. 8 | |
117 | 109 | ||
118 | - | 3. NOT MORE THAN 49% OF THE FINES DISTRIB UTED TO 15 | |
119 | - | THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS 16 | |
120 | - | SUBPARAGRAPH MAY BE USED TO RECOVER THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND 17 | |
121 | - | ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 18 | |
122 | - | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 19 | |
110 | + | (2) (I) “OWNER” MEANS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF A MOTOR 9 | |
111 | + | VEHICLE OR A LESSEE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE U NDER A LEASE OF 6 MONTHS OR 10 | |
112 | + | LONGER. 11 | |
123 | 113 | ||
124 | - | ||
114 | + | (II) “OWNER” DOES NOT INCLUDE : 12 | |
125 | 115 | ||
126 | - | (b) A recorded image of a motor vehicle produced by a speed monitoring system 21 | |
127 | - | in accordance with § 21–809 [or], § 21–810, OR § 21–811 of the Transportation Article is 22 | |
128 | - | admissible in a proceeding concerning a civil citation issued under that section for a 23 | |
129 | - | violation of Title 21, Subtitle 8 of the Transportation Article without authentication. 24 | |
116 | + | 1. A MOTOR VEHICLE RENTAL OR LEASING CO MPANY; 13 | |
117 | + | OR 14 | |
130 | 118 | ||
131 | - | Article – Transportation 25 | |
119 | + | 2. A HOLDER OF A SPECIAL REGISTRATION PLATE 15 | |
120 | + | ISSUED UNDER TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 9, PART III OF THIS ARTICLE. 16 | |
132 | 121 | ||
133 | - | 21–811. 26 | |
122 | + | (3) “RECORDED IMAGE ” MEANS AN IMAGE RECOR DED BY A SPEED 17 | |
123 | + | MONITORING SYSTEM : 18 | |
134 | 124 | ||
135 | - | (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 27 | |
136 | - | INDICATED. 28 | |
125 | + | (I) ON: 19 | |
137 | 126 | ||
138 | - | (2) (I) “OWNER” MEANS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF A MOTOR 29 | |
139 | - | VEHICLE OR A LESSEE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE U NDER A LEASE OF 6 MONTHS OR 30 | |
140 | - | LONGER. 31 | |
127 | + | 1. A PHOTOGRAPH ; 20 | |
141 | 128 | ||
142 | - | (II) “OWNER” DOES NOT INCLUDE : 32 | |
129 | + | 2. A MICROPHOTOGRAPH ; 21 | |
130 | + | ||
131 | + | 3. AN ELECTRONIC IMAGE ; 22 | |
132 | + | ||
133 | + | 4. VIDEOTAPE; OR 23 | |
134 | + | ||
135 | + | 5. ANY OTHER MEDIUM ; AND 24 | |
136 | + | ||
137 | + | (II) SHOWING: 25 | |
138 | + | ||
139 | + | 1. THE REAR OF A MOTOR V EHICLE; 26 | |
143 | 140 | 4 SENATE BILL 338 | |
144 | 141 | ||
145 | 142 | ||
146 | - | 1. A MOTOR VEHICLE RENTAL OR LEASING CO MPANY; 1 | |
147 | - | OR 2 | |
143 | + | 2. AT LEAST TWO TIME –STAMPED IMAGES OF TH E 1 | |
144 | + | MOTOR VEHICLE THAT I NCLUDE THE SAME STAT IONARY OBJECT NEAR THE MOTO R 2 | |
145 | + | VEHICLE; AND 3 | |
148 | 146 | ||
149 | - | 2. A HOLDER OF A SPECIAL REGISTRATION PLATE 3 | |
150 | - | ISSUED UNDER TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 9, PART III OF THIS ARTICLE. 4 | |
147 | + | 3. ON AT LEAST ONE IMAGE OR PORTION OF TAPE , A 4 | |
148 | + | CLEAR AND LEGIBLE ID ENTIFICATION OF THE ENTIRE REGISTRATION PLATE 5 | |
149 | + | NUMBER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE. 6 | |
151 | 150 | ||
152 | - | (3) “RECORDED IMAGE ” MEANS AN IMAGE RECOR DED BY A SPEED 5 | |
153 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM : 6 | |
151 | + | (4) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM” MEANS A DEVICE HAVIN G ONE OR 7 | |
152 | + | MORE MOTOR V EHICLE SENSORS CONNE CTED TO A CAMERA SYS TEM CAPABLE OF 8 | |
153 | + | PRODUCING RECORDED I MAGES OF MOTOR VEHIC LES. 9 | |
154 | 154 | ||
155 | - | (I) ON: 7 | |
155 | + | (5) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM OPERATOR ” MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL 10 | |
156 | + | WHO HAS BEEN TRAINED AND CERTIFIED TO OPE RATE A SPEED MONITOR ING 11 | |
157 | + | SYSTEM AND WHO IS : 12 | |
156 | 158 | ||
157 | - | 1. A PHOTOGRAPH ; 8 | |
159 | + | (I) A POLICE OFFICER OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 13 | |
160 | + | POLICE; 14 | |
158 | 161 | ||
159 | - | 2. A MICROPHOTOGRAPH ; 9 | |
162 | + | (II) A REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 15 | |
163 | + | POLICE; OR 16 | |
160 | 164 | ||
161 | - | | |
165 | + | (III) A STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION CONTRA CTOR. 17 | |
162 | 166 | ||
163 | - | 4. VIDEOTAPE; OR 11 | |
167 | + | (B) (1) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 18 | |
168 | + | STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PLACE NOT MORE THAN THREE SPEED 19 | |
169 | + | MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 20 | |
170 | + | THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 21 | |
171 | + | INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 22 | |
164 | 172 | ||
165 | - | 5. ANY OTHER MEDIUM ; AND 12 | |
173 | + | (II) NOT MORE THAN FOUR TWO SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 23 | |
174 | + | IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME ON A 24 | |
175 | + | HIGHWAY SPECIFIED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT LOCATIONS 25 | |
176 | + | IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE MARYLAND STATE 26 | |
177 | + | POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS BEING AT HIGH 27 | |
178 | + | RISK FOR MOTOR VEHIC LE CRASHES THAT RESU LT IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR 28 | |
179 | + | DEATH. 29 | |
166 | 180 | ||
167 | - | (II) SHOWING: 13 | |
168 | - | ||
169 | - | 1. THE REAR OF A MOTOR V EHICLE; 14 | |
170 | - | ||
171 | - | 2. AT LEAST TWO TIME –STAMPED IMAGES OF TH E 15 | |
172 | - | MOTOR VEHICLE THAT I NCLUDE THE SAME STAT IONARY OBJECT NEAR THE MOTO R 16 | |
173 | - | VEHICLE; AND 17 | |
174 | - | ||
175 | - | 3. ON AT LEAST ONE IMAGE OR PORTION OF TAPE , A 18 | |
176 | - | CLEAR AND LEGIBLE ID ENTIFICATION OF THE ENTIRE REGISTRATION PLATE 19 | |
177 | - | NUMBER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE. 20 | |
178 | - | ||
179 | - | (4) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM” MEANS A DEVICE HAVIN G ONE OR 21 | |
180 | - | MORE MOTOR V EHICLE SENSORS CONNE CTED TO A CAMERA SYS TEM CAPABLE OF 22 | |
181 | - | PRODUCING RECORDED I MAGES OF MOTOR VEHIC LES. 23 | |
182 | - | ||
183 | - | (5) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM OPERATOR ” MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL 24 | |
184 | - | WHO HAS BEEN TRAINED AND CERTIFIED TO OPE RATE A SPEED MONITOR ING 25 | |
185 | - | SYSTEM AND WHO IS : 26 | |
186 | - | ||
187 | - | (I) A POLICE OFFICER OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 27 | |
188 | - | POLICE; 28 | |
181 | + | (2) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 30 | |
182 | + | STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN TWO SPEED 31 | |
183 | + | MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 32 | |
184 | + | THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 33 | |
185 | + | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 34 | |
189 | 186 | SENATE BILL 338 5 | |
190 | 187 | ||
191 | 188 | ||
192 | - | (II) A REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 1 | |
193 | - | POLICE; OR 2 | |
189 | + | (II) NOT MORE THAN THREE ONE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS 1 | |
190 | + | SYSTEM IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME 2 | |
191 | + | ON A HIGHWAY SPECIFI ED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT 3 | |
192 | + | LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE 4 | |
193 | + | MARYLAND STATE POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS 5 | |
194 | + | BEING AT HIGH RISK F OR MOTOR VEH ICLE CRASHES THAT RE SULT IN SERIOUS 6 | |
195 | + | BODILY INJURY OR DEA TH. 7 | |
194 | 196 | ||
195 | - | (III) A STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION CONTRA CTOR. 3 | |
197 | + | (3) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SPECIFIED IN PAR AGRAPH 8 | |
198 | + | (1) OR (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION M AY BE USED ONLY: 9 | |
196 | 199 | ||
197 | - | (B) (1) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 4 | |
198 | - | STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN THREE SPEED 5 | |
199 | - | MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 6 | |
200 | - | THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 7 | |
201 | - | INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 8 | |
200 | + | (I) WHEN BEING OPERATED B Y A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 10 | |
201 | + | OPERATOR; AND 11 | |
202 | 202 | ||
203 | - | (II) NOT MORE THAN FOUR TWO SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 9 | |
204 | - | IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME ON A 10 | |
205 | - | HIGHWAY SPECIFIED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT LOCATIONS 11 | |
206 | - | IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE MARYLAND STATE 12 | |
207 | - | POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS BEING A T HIGH 13 | |
208 | - | RISK FOR MOTOR VEHIC LE CRASHES THAT RESU LT IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR 14 | |
209 | - | DEATH. 15 | |
203 | + | (II) 1. IF ALL SPEED LIMIT SIGN S APPROACHING AND 12 | |
204 | + | WITHIN THE SEGMENT O F HIGHWAY ON WHICH T HE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS 13 | |
205 | + | LOCATED INCLUDE SIGN S THAT: 14 | |
210 | 206 | ||
211 | - | (2) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 16 | |
212 | - | STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN TWO SPEED 17 | |
213 | - | MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 18 | |
214 | - | THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 19 | |
215 | - | INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 20 | |
207 | + | A. ARE IN ACCORDANCE WIT H THE MARYLAND MANUAL 15 | |
208 | + | ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC C ONTROL DEVICES ; AND 16 | |
216 | 209 | ||
217 | - | (II) NOT MORE THAN THREE ONE SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 21 | |
218 | - | SYSTEM IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME 22 | |
219 | - | ON A HIGHWAY SPECIFI ED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT 23 | |
220 | - | LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE 24 | |
221 | - | MARYLAND STATE POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS 25 | |
222 | - | BEING AT HIGH RISK F OR MOTOR VEHICLE CRA SHES THAT RESULT IN SERIOUS 26 | |
223 | - | BODILY INJURY OR DEA TH. 27 | |
210 | + | B. INDICATE THAT A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN 17 | |
211 | + | USE; AND 18 | |
224 | 212 | ||
225 | - | (3) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SPECIFIED IN PAR AGRAPH 28 | |
226 | - | (1) OR (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION M AY BE USED ONLY : 29 | |
213 | + | 2. IF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ENSURE S 19 | |
214 | + | THAT EACH SIGN THAT INDICATES THAT A SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE IS 20 | |
215 | + | PROXIMATE TO A DEVIC E THAT DISPLAYS A RE AL–TIME POSTING OF THE SPEED AT 21 | |
216 | + | WHICH A DRIVER IS TR AVELING. ONLY IF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH T HE MARYLAND 22 | |
217 | + | MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, A CONSPICUOUS ROAD S IGN IS 23 | |
218 | + | PLACED AT A REASONAB LE DISTANCE CONSISTE NT WITH NATIONAL GUI DELINES 24 | |
219 | + | BEFORE THE SPEED MON ITORING SYSTEM ALERT ING DRIVERS THAT A S PEED 25 | |
220 | + | MONITORING SYSTEM MAY BE IN OPERATION. 26 | |
227 | 221 | ||
228 | - | (I) WHEN BEING OPERATED B Y A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 30 | |
229 | - | OPERATOR; AND 31 | |
222 | + | (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR NEED NO T BE 27 | |
223 | + | PRESENT IN PERSON OR REMOTELY AT THE HIGH WAY CORRIDOR WHERE A SPEED 28 | |
224 | + | MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE. 29 | |
230 | 225 | ||
231 | - | (II) 1. IF ALL SPEED LIMIT SI GNS APPROACHING AND 32 | |
232 | - | WITHIN THE SEGMENT O F HIGHWAY ON WHICH T HE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS 33 | |
233 | - | LOCATED INCLUDE SIGN S THAT: 34 | |
234 | - | 6 SENATE BILL 338 | |
226 | + | (4) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 30 | |
227 | + | 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 31 | |
228 | + | VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 16 12 MILES PER HOUR 32 | |
229 | + | ABOVE THE POSTED SPE ED LIMIT. 33 | |
230 | + | ||
231 | + | (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 34 | |
232 | + | 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 35 6 SENATE BILL 338 | |
235 | 233 | ||
236 | 234 | ||
237 | - | ||
238 | - | ||
235 | + | VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 12 MILES PER HOUR ABOVE 1 | |
236 | + | THE POSTED SPEED LIM IT. 2 | |
239 | 237 | ||
240 | - | B. INDICATE THAT A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN 3 | |
241 | - | USE; AND 4 | |
238 | + | (5) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL 3 | |
239 | + | COMPLETE TRAINING BY THE MANUFA CTURER OF THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 4 | |
240 | + | IN THE PROCEDURES FO R SETTING UP , TESTING, AND OPERATING THE SP EED 5 | |
241 | + | MONITORING SYSTEM . 6 | |
242 | 242 | ||
243 | - | 2. IF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ENSURE S 5 | |
244 | - | THAT EACH SIGN THAT INDICATES THAT A SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE IS 6 | |
245 | - | PROXIMATE TO A DEVIC E THAT DISPLAYS A RE AL–TIME POSTING OF THE SPEED AT 7 | |
246 | - | WHICH A DRIVER IS TR AVELING. ONLY IF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH T HE MARYLAND 8 | |
247 | - | MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, A CONSPICUOUS ROAD S IGN IS 9 | |
248 | - | PLACED AT A REASONAB LE DISTANCE CONSISTE NT WITH NATIONAL GUI DELINES 10 | |
249 | - | BEFORE THE SPEED MON ITORING SYSTEM ALER TING DRIVERS THAT A SPEED 11 | |
250 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM MA Y BE IN OPERATION . 12 | |
243 | + | (II) ON COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING, THE MANUFACTURER 7 | |
244 | + | SHALL ISSUE A SIGNED CERTIFICATE TO THE S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 8 | |
245 | + | OPERATOR. 9 | |
251 | 246 | ||
252 | - | (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR NEED NO T BE 13 | |
253 | - | PRESENT IN PERSON OR REMOTELY AT THE HIGH WAY CORRIDOR WHERE A SPEED 14 | |
254 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE. 15 | |
247 | + | (III) THE CERTIFICATE OF TR AINING SHALL BE ADMI TTED AS 10 | |
248 | + | EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T PROCEEDING FOR A V IOLATION OF THIS SEC TION. 11 | |
255 | 249 | ||
256 | - | (4) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 16 | |
257 | - | 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 17 | |
258 | - | VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 16 12 MILES PER HOUR 18 | |
259 | - | ABOVE THE POSTED SPE ED LIMIT. 19 | |
250 | + | (6) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL F ILL OUT AND 12 | |
251 | + | SIGN A DAILY SET–UP LOG FOR A SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM THA T: 13 | |
260 | 252 | ||
261 | - | (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 20 | |
262 | - | 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 21 | |
263 | - | VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 12 MILES PER HOUR ABOVE 22 | |
264 | - | THE POSTED SPEED LIM IT. 23 | |
253 | + | (I) STATES THE DATE AND TIM E WHEN AND THE LOCAT ION 14 | |
254 | + | WHERE THE SYSTEM WAS SET UP; 15 | |
265 | 255 | ||
266 | - | ( | |
267 | - | ||
268 | - | ||
269 | - | ||
256 | + | (II) STATES THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM OP ERATOR 16 | |
257 | + | SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM ED, AND THE DEVICE PASSE D, THE 17 | |
258 | + | MANUFACTURER –SPECIFIED SELF –TESTS OF THE SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM 18 | |
259 | + | BEFORE PRODUCING A RECORDED IMAGE; 19 | |
270 | 260 | ||
271 | - | (II) ON COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING, THE MANUFACTURER 28 | |
272 | - | SHALL ISSUE A SIGNED CERTIFICATE TO THE S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 29 | |
273 | - | OPERATOR. 30 | |
261 | + | (III) SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 20 | |
274 | 262 | ||
275 | - | ( | |
276 | - | ||
263 | + | (IV) SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T 21 | |
264 | + | PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 22 | |
277 | 265 | ||
278 | - | (6) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL F ILL OUT AND 33 | |
279 | - | SIGN A DAILY SET–UP LOG FOR A SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM THA T: 34 | |
266 | + | (7) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SHALL UNDERGO AN 23 | |
267 | + | ANNUAL CALIBRATION C HECK PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT CALIBRAT ION 24 | |
268 | + | LABORATORY . 25 | |
269 | + | ||
270 | + | (II) THE INDEPENDENT CALIB RATION LABORATORY SH ALL 26 | |
271 | + | ISSUE A SIGNED CERTI FICATE OF CALIBRATIO N AFTER THE ANNUAL C ALIBRATION 27 | |
272 | + | CHECK THAT: 28 | |
273 | + | ||
274 | + | 1. SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 29 | |
275 | + | ||
276 | + | 2. SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COU RT 30 | |
277 | + | PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 31 | |
280 | 278 | SENATE BILL 338 7 | |
281 | 279 | ||
282 | 280 | ||
283 | - | (I) STATES THE DATE AND T IME WHEN AND THE LOCAT ION 1 | |
284 | - | WHERE THE SYSTEM WAS SET UP; 2 | |
281 | + | (8) THE PROCUREMENT OF A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM UNDER 1 | |
282 | + | THIS SECTION SHALL B E CONDUCTED IN ACCOR DANCE WITH TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 1 2 | |
283 | + | OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE. 3 | |
285 | 284 | ||
286 | - | (II) STATES THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM OP ERATOR 3 | |
287 | - | SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM ED, AND THE DEVICE PASSE D, THE 4 | |
288 | - | MANUFACTURER –SPECIFIED SELF –TESTS OF THE SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM 5 | |
289 | - | BEFORE PRODUCING A R ECORDED IMAGE; 6 | |
285 | + | (C) (1) UNLESS THE DRIVER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE RECE IVED A 4 | |
286 | + | CITATION FROM A POLI CE OFFICER AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER 5 | |
287 | + | OR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S UBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, THE DRIVER OF A 6 | |
288 | + | MOTOR VEHICLE IS SUB JECT TO A CIVIL PENA LTY IF AN IMAGE OF T HE MOTOR 7 | |
289 | + | VEHICLE IS RECO RDED BY A SPEED MONI TORING SYSTEM IN ACC ORDANCE WITH 8 | |
290 | + | SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION WHIL E BEING OPERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS 9 | |
291 | + | SUBTITLE. 10 | |
290 | 292 | ||
291 | - | ( | |
293 | + | (2) A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT EXCEED $40. 11 | |
292 | 294 | ||
293 | - | (IV) SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T 8 | |
294 | - | PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 9 | |
295 | + | (3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL: 12 | |
295 | 296 | ||
296 | - | (7) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SHALL UNDERGO AN 10 | |
297 | - | ANNUAL CALIBRATION C HECK PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT CALIBRAT ION 11 | |
298 | - | LABORATORY . 12 | |
297 | + | (I) PRESCRIBE A UNIFORM C ITATION FORM CONSIST ENT WITH 13 | |
298 | + | SUBSECTION (D)(1) OF THIS SECTION AND § 7–302 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; AND 14 | |
299 | 299 | ||
300 | - | (II) THE | |
301 | - | ||
302 | - | ||
300 | + | (II) INDICATE ON THE CITAT ION THE AMOUNT OF TH E CIVIL 15 | |
301 | + | PENALTY TO BE PAID B Y PERSONS WHO CHOOSE TO PREPAY THE CIVI L PENALTY 16 | |
302 | + | WITHOUT APPEARING IN DISTRICT COURT. 17 | |
303 | 303 | ||
304 | - | 1. SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 16 | |
304 | + | (D) (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVIS IONS OF PARAGRAPHS (2) THROUGH (4) 18 | |
305 | + | OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF 19 | |
306 | + | THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL TO THE OWNER LIABLE UND ER 20 | |
307 | + | SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION A CI TATION THAT SHALL IN CLUDE: 21 | |
305 | 308 | ||
306 | - | | |
307 | - | ||
309 | + | (I) THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE REGISTERED OW NER OF 22 | |
310 | + | THE VEHICLE; 23 | |
308 | 311 | ||
309 | - | (8) THE PROCUREMENT OF A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM UNDER 19 | |
310 | - | THIS SECTION SHALL B E CONDUCTED IN ACCOR DANCE WITH TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 1 20 | |
311 | - | OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE. 21 | |
312 | + | (II) THE REGISTRATION NUMB ER OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE 24 | |
313 | + | INVOLVED IN THE VIOL ATION; 25 | |
312 | 314 | ||
313 | - | (C) (1) UNLESS THE DRIVER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE RECEIVED A 22 | |
314 | - | CITATION FROM A POLI CE OFFICER AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER 23 | |
315 | - | OR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S UBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, THE DRIVER OF A 24 | |
316 | - | MOTOR VEHICLE IS SUB JECT TO A CIVIL PENA LTY IF AN IMAGE OF T HE MOTOR 25 | |
317 | - | VEHICLE IS RECORDED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 26 | |
318 | - | SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION WHIL E BEING OPERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS 27 | |
319 | - | SUBTITLE. 28 | |
315 | + | (III) THE VIOLATION CHARGED ; 26 | |
320 | 316 | ||
321 | - | ( | |
317 | + | (IV) THE LOCATION WHERE THE V IOLATION OCCURRED ; 27 | |
322 | 318 | ||
323 | - | ( | |
319 | + | (V) THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATION; 28 | |
324 | 320 | ||
325 | - | (I) PRESCRIBE A UNIFORM C ITATION FORM CONSIST ENT WITH 31 | |
326 | - | SUBSECTION (D)(1) OF THIS SECTION AND § 7–302 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; AND 32 8 SENATE BILL 338 | |
321 | + | (VI) AT LEAST ONE RECORDED IMAGE OF THE VEHICLE WITH A 29 | |
322 | + | DATA BAR IMPRINTED O N EACH IMAGE THAT IN CLUDES THE SPEED OF THE VEHICLE 30 | |
323 | + | AND THE DATE AND TIM E THE IMAGE WAS RECO RDED; 31 | |
324 | + | 8 SENATE BILL 338 | |
325 | + | ||
326 | + | ||
327 | + | (VII) THE AMOUNT OF THE CIV IL PENALTY IMPOSED A ND THE 1 | |
328 | + | DATE BY WHICH THE CI VIL PENALTY SHOULD B E PAID; 2 | |
329 | + | ||
330 | + | (VIII) A SIGNED STATEMENT BY A POLICE OFFICER EMP LOYED BY 3 | |
331 | + | THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 4 | |
332 | + | STATE POLICE THAT, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES , THE MOTOR 5 | |
333 | + | VEHICLE WAS BEING OP ERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 6 | |
334 | + | ||
335 | + | (IX) A STATEMENT THAT RECOR DED IMAGES ARE EVIDE NCE OF 7 | |
336 | + | A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 8 | |
337 | + | ||
338 | + | (X) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 9 | |
339 | + | LIABLE UNDER THIS SECTI ON OF THE MANNER AND TIME IN WHICH LIABIL ITY AS 10 | |
340 | + | ALLEGED IN THE CITAT ION MAY BE CONTESTED IN THE DISTRICT COURT; AND 11 | |
341 | + | ||
342 | + | (XI) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 12 | |
343 | + | LIABLE UNDER THIS SE CTION THAT FAILURE T O PAY THE CIVIL PENA LTY OR TO 13 | |
344 | + | CONTEST LIABILITY IN A TIMELY MANNER : 14 | |
345 | + | ||
346 | + | 1. IS AN ADMISSION OF LI ABILITY; 15 | |
347 | + | ||
348 | + | 2. MAY RESULT IN THE REF USAL TO REGISTER THE 16 | |
349 | + | MOTOR VEHICLE ; AND 17 | |
350 | + | ||
351 | + | 3. MAY RESULT IN THE SUS PENSION OF THE MOTOR 18 | |
352 | + | VEHICLE REGISTRATION . 19 | |
353 | + | ||
354 | + | (2) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL A WAR NING 20 | |
355 | + | NOTICE INSTEAD OF A CITATION TO THE OWNE R LIABLE UNDER SUBSE CTION (C) OF 21 | |
356 | + | THIS SECTION DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 22 | |
357 | + | IS IN OPERATION. 23 | |
358 | + | ||
359 | + | (3) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION , 24 | |
360 | + | THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY NOT MAIL A CITATION TO A PERSON WHO 25 | |
361 | + | IS NOT AN OWNER . 26 | |
362 | + | ||
363 | + | (4) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, A 27 | |
364 | + | CITATION ISSUED UNDE R THIS SECTION SHALL BE MAILED NOT LATER THAN 2 28 | |
365 | + | WEEKS AFTER THE ALLE GED VIOLATION IF T HE VEHICLE IS REGIST ERED IN THE 29 | |
366 | + | STATE, AND NOT LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ALLEG ED VIOLATION IF THE 30 | |
367 | + | VEHICLE IS REGISTERE D IN ANOTHER STATE . 31 | |
368 | + | ||
369 | + | (5) A PERSON WHO RECEIVES A CITATION UNDER PAR AGRAPH (1) OF 32 | |
370 | + | THIS SUBSECTION MAY : 33 SENATE BILL 338 9 | |
327 | 371 | ||
328 | 372 | ||
329 | 373 | ||
330 | - | (II) INDICATE ON THE CITAT ION THE AMOUNT OF TH E CIVIL 1 | |
331 | - | PENALTY TO BE PAID B Y PERSONS WHO CHOOSE TO PREPAY THE CIVIL PENALTY 2 | |
332 | - | WITHOUT APPEARING IN DISTRICT COURT. 3 | |
374 | + | (I) PAY THE CIVIL PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1 | |
375 | + | INSTRUCTIONS ON THE CITATION; OR 2 | |
333 | 376 | ||
334 | - | (D) (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVIS IONS OF PARAGRAPHS (2) THROUGH (4) 4 | |
335 | - | OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF 5 | |
336 | - | THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL TO THE OWNER LIABLE UND ER 6 | |
337 | - | SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION A CITAT ION THAT SHALL INCLU DE: 7 | |
377 | + | (II) ELECT TO STAND TRIAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3 | |
378 | + | ALLEGED VIOLATION . 4 | |
338 | 379 | ||
339 | - | (I) THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE REGISTERED OW NER OF 8 | |
340 | - | THE VEHICLE; 9 | |
380 | + | (E) (1) A CERTIFICATE ALLEGING THAT THE VIOLATION O F THIS 5 | |
381 | + | SUBTITLE OCCURRED AN D THE REQUIREMENTS U NDER SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS 6 | |
382 | + | SECTION HAVE BEEN SA TISFIED, SWORN TO, OR AFFIRMED BY AN OF FICER OF THE 7 | |
383 | + | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES 8 | |
384 | + | PRODUCED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM , SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS 9 | |
385 | + | CONTAINED IN THE CER TIFICATE AND SHALL B E ADMISSIBLE IN A PROCEE DING 10 | |
386 | + | ALLEGING A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SECTION W ITHOUT THE PRESENCE OR 11 | |
387 | + | TESTIMONY OF THE SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM OPERATOR WHO PERFORM ED THE 12 | |
388 | + | REQUIREMENTS UNDER S UBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION. 13 | |
341 | 389 | ||
342 | - | (II) THE REGISTRATION NUMB ER OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE 10 | |
343 | - | INVOLVED IN THE VIOL ATION; 11 | |
390 | + | (2) IF A PERSON WHO RECEI VED A CITATION UNDER SUBSECTION (D) 14 | |
391 | + | OF THIS SECTION DESI RES A SPEED MONITORI NG SYSTEM OPERATOR T O BE 15 | |
392 | + | PRESENT AND TESTIFY AT TRIAL, THE PERSON SHALL NOT IFY THE COURT AND TH E 16 | |
393 | + | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE IN WRITING NOT LATER THAN 20 DAYS BEFORE 17 | |
394 | + | TRIAL. 18 | |
344 | 395 | ||
345 | - | (III) THE VIOLATION CHARGED ; 12 | |
396 | + | (3) ADJUDICATION OF LIABI LITY SHALL BE BASED ON A 19 | |
397 | + | PREPONDERANCE OF EVI DENCE. 20 | |
346 | 398 | ||
347 | - | (IV) THE LOCATION WHERE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D; 13 | |
399 | + | (F) (1) THE DISTRICT COURT MAY CONSIDER IN DEFENSE OF A 21 | |
400 | + | VIOLATION: 22 | |
348 | 401 | ||
349 | - | (V) THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATION; 14 | |
402 | + | (I) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THAT 23 | |
403 | + | THE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE REGISTRATION PLA TES OF THE MOTOR VEH ICLE WERE 24 | |
404 | + | STOLEN BEFORE THE VIOLATION OCCURRED AND WERE NO T UNDER THE CONTROL 25 | |
405 | + | OR POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE OWNER AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATIO N; 26 | |
350 | 406 | ||
351 | - | ( | |
352 | - | ||
353 | - | ||
407 | + | (II) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 27 | |
408 | + | EVIDENCE THAT THE PE RSON NAMED IN THE CI TATION WAS NOT OPERA TING THE 28 | |
409 | + | VEHICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 29 | |
354 | 410 | ||
355 | - | ( | |
356 | - | ||
411 | + | (III) ANY OTHER ISSUES AND EVIDENCE THAT THE DISTRICT 30 | |
412 | + | COURT DEEMS PERTINENT . 31 | |
357 | 413 | ||
358 | - | (VIII) A SIGNED STATEMENT BY A POLICE OFFICER EMP LOYED BY 20 | |
359 | - | THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 21 | |
360 | - | STATE POLICE THAT, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORD ED IMAGES, THE MOTOR 22 | |
361 | - | VEHICLE WAS BEING OP ERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 23 | |
362 | - | ||
363 | - | (IX) A STATEMENT THAT RECOR DED IMAGES ARE EVIDE NCE OF 24 | |
364 | - | A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 25 | |
365 | - | ||
366 | - | (X) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 26 | |
367 | - | LIABLE UNDER TH IS SECTION OF THE MA NNER AND TIME IN WHI CH LIABILITY AS 27 | |
368 | - | ALLEGED IN THE CITAT ION MAY BE CONTESTED IN THE DISTRICT COURT; AND 28 | |
369 | - | ||
370 | - | (XI) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 29 | |
371 | - | LIABLE UNDER THIS SE CTION THAT FAILURE T O PAY THE CIVIL PENA LTY OR TO 30 | |
372 | - | CONTEST LIABILITY IN A TIMEL Y MANNER: 31 SENATE BILL 338 9 | |
414 | + | (2) TO DEMONSTRATE THAT T HE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE 32 | |
415 | + | REGISTRATION PLATES WERE STOLEN BEFORE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D AND 33 | |
416 | + | WERE NOT UNDER THE C ONTROL OR POSSESSION OF THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF 34 10 SENATE BILL 338 | |
373 | 417 | ||
374 | 418 | ||
419 | + | THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER SHALL SUBM IT PROOF THAT A POLI CE REPORT 1 | |
420 | + | REGARDING THE STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE OR REG ISTRATION PLATES WAS FILED IN 2 | |
421 | + | A TIMELY MANNER . 3 | |
375 | 422 | ||
376 | - | 1. IS AN ADMISSION OF LI ABILITY; 1 | |
423 | + | (3) TO SATISFY THE EVIDEN TIARY BURDEN UNDER PARAGRAPH 4 | |
424 | + | (1)(II) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE PERSON NAMED IN THE CITATION SHALL P ROVIDE 5 | |
425 | + | TO THE DISTRICT COURT A LETTER , SWORN TO OR AFFIRMED BY THE PERSON AND 6 | |
426 | + | MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUE STED, THAT: 7 | |
377 | 427 | ||
378 | - | | |
379 | - | ||
428 | + | (I) STATES THAT THE PERSO N NAMED IN TH E CITATION WAS 8 | |
429 | + | NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 9 | |
380 | 430 | ||
381 | - | 3. MAY RESULT IN THE SUS PENSION OF THE MOTOR 4 | |
382 | - | VEHICLE REGISTRATION . 5 | |
431 | + | (II) INCLUDES ANY OTHER CO RROBORATING EVIDENCE . 10 | |
383 | 432 | ||
384 | - | (2) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL A WARNING 6 | |
385 | - | NOTICE INSTEAD OF A CITATION TO THE OWNE R LIABLE UNDER SUBSE CTION (C) OF 7 | |
386 | - | THIS SECTION DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 8 | |
387 | - | IS IN OPERATION. 9 | |
433 | + | (4) (I) IF THE DISTRICT COURT FINDS THAT THE PERSON NAMED 11 | |
434 | + | IN THE CITATION WAS NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE 12 | |
435 | + | VIOLATION OR RECEIVES E VIDENCE UNDER PARAGR APH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION 13 | |
436 | + | IDENTIFYING THE PERS ON DRIVING THE VEHIC LE AT THE TIME OF TH E VIOLATION, 14 | |
437 | + | THE CLERK OF THE COU RT MAY PROVIDE TO TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE 15 | |
438 | + | A COPY OF ANY EVIDEN CE SUBSTANTIATING WH O WAS OPERATING THE VEHICLE AT 16 | |
439 | + | THE TIME OF THE VIOL ATION. 17 | |
388 | 440 | ||
389 | - | (3) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION , 10 | |
390 | - | THE DEPARTMENT O F STATE POLICE MAY NOT MAIL A CITATION TO A PERSON WHO 11 | |
391 | - | IS NOT AN OWNER . 12 | |
441 | + | (II) ON RECEIPT OF SUBSTAN TIATING EVIDENCE FRO M THE 18 | |
442 | + | DISTRICT COURT UNDER SUBPARAGR APH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 19 | |
443 | + | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY ISSUE A CI TATION AS PROVIDED I N 20 | |
444 | + | SUBSECTION (D) OF THIS SECTION TO THE PERSON WHO THE EVIDENCE IND ICATES 21 | |
445 | + | WAS OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION. 22 | |
392 | 446 | ||
393 | - | (4) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, A 13 | |
394 | - | CITATION ISSUED UNDE R THIS SECTION SHALL BE MAILED NOT LATER THAN 2 14 | |
395 | - | WEEKS AFTER THE ALLE GED VIOLATION IF THE VEHICLE IS REGISTERED IN THE 15 | |
396 | - | STATE, AND NOT LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ALLEG ED VIOLATION IF THE 16 | |
397 | - | VEHICLE IS REGISTERE D IN ANOTHER STATE . 17 | |
447 | + | (III) ANY CITATION ISSUED U NDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 23 | |
448 | + | PARAGRAPH SHALL BE M AILED NOT LATER THAN 2 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE 24 | |
449 | + | EVIDENCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT. 25 | |
398 | 450 | ||
399 | - | ( | |
400 | - | ||
451 | + | (G) IF A PERSON LIABLE UN DER THIS SECTION DOE S NOT PAY THE CIVIL 26 | |
452 | + | PENALTY OR CONTEST T HE VIOLATION, THE ADMINISTRATION MAY : 27 | |
401 | 453 | ||
402 | - | ( | |
403 | - | ||
454 | + | (1) REFUSE TO REGISTER OR REREGISTER THE REGIS TRATION OF 28 | |
455 | + | THE MOTOR VEHICLE CI TED FOR THE VIOLATIO N; OR 29 | |
404 | 456 | ||
405 | - | ( | |
406 | - | ||
457 | + | (2) SUSPEND THE REGISTRATI ON OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE CITED FOR 30 | |
458 | + | THE VIOLATION. 31 | |
407 | 459 | ||
408 | - | (E) (1) A CERTIFICATE ALLEGING THAT THE VIOLATION O F THIS 24 | |
409 | - | SUBTITLE OCCURRED AN D THE REQUIREMENTS U NDER SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS 25 | |
410 | - | SECTION HAVE BEEN SATISFIED , SWORN TO, OR AFFIRMED BY AN OF FICER OF THE 26 | |
411 | - | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES 27 | |
412 | - | PRODUCED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM , SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS 28 | |
413 | - | CONTAINED IN THE CER TIFICATE AND SHALL B E ADMISSIBLE IN A PROCEEDING 29 | |
414 | - | ALLEGING A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SECTION W ITHOUT THE PRESENCE OR 30 | |
415 | - | TESTIMONY OF THE SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM OPERATOR WHO PERFORM ED THE 31 | |
416 | - | REQUIREMENTS UNDER S UBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION. 32 | |
417 | - | 10 SENATE BILL 338 | |
460 | + | (H) A VIOLATION FOR WHICH A CIVIL PENALTY IS I MPOSED UNDER THIS 32 | |
461 | + | SECTION: 33 | |
462 | + | SENATE BILL 338 11 | |
418 | 463 | ||
419 | 464 | ||
420 | - | (2) IF A PERSON WHO RECEI VED A CITATION UNDER SUBSECTION (D) 1 | |
421 | - | OF THIS SECTION DESI RES A SPEED MONITORI NG SYSTEM OPERATOR T O BE 2 | |
422 | - | PRESENT AND TESTIFY AT TRIAL, THE PERSON SHALL NOT IFY THE COURT AND TH E 3 | |
423 | - | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE IN WRITING NOT LATER THAN 20 DAYS BEFORE 4 | |
424 | - | TRIAL. 5 | |
465 | + | (1) IS NOT A MOVING VIOLA TION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING 1 | |
466 | + | POINTS UNDER § 16–402 OF THIS ARTICLE; 2 | |
425 | 467 | ||
426 | - | ( | |
427 | - | ||
468 | + | (2) MAY NOT BE RECORDED BY T HE ADMINISTRATION ON THE 3 | |
469 | + | DRIVING RECORD OF TH E OWNER OR DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE; 4 | |
428 | 470 | ||
429 | - | ( | |
430 | - | ||
471 | + | (3) MAY BE TREATED AS A P ARKING VIOLATION FOR PURPOSES OF § 5 | |
472 | + | 26–305 OF THIS ARTICLE; AND 6 | |
431 | 473 | ||
432 | - | (I) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THAT 10 | |
433 | - | THE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE REGISTRATION PLA TES OF THE MOTOR VEH ICLE WERE 11 | |
434 | - | STOLEN BEFORE THE VIOLATION OCCURRED A ND WERE NOT UNDER TH E CONTROL 12 | |
435 | - | OR POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE OWNER AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATIO N; 13 | |
474 | + | (4) MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE 7 | |
475 | + | INSURANCE COVERAGE . 8 | |
436 | 476 | ||
437 | - | (II) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 14 | |
438 | - | EVIDENCE THAT THE PE RSON NAMED IN THE CI TATION WAS NOT OPERA TING THE 15 | |
439 | - | VEHICLE AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION ; AND 16 | |
477 | + | (I) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, THE 9 | |
478 | + | CHIEF JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL ADOPT PRO CEDURES FOR THE 10 | |
479 | + | ISSUANCE OF CITATION S, THE TRIAL OF CIVIL V IOLATIONS, AND THE COLLECTION 11 | |
480 | + | OF CIVIL PENALTIES U NDER THIS SECTION . 12 | |
440 | 481 | ||
441 | - | (III) ANY OTHER ISSUES AND EVIDENCE THAT THE DISTRICT 17 | |
442 | - | COURT DEEMS PERTINENT . 18 | |
482 | + | (J) (1) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R 13 | |
483 | + | DESIGNATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL ADMINIST ER AND 14 | |
484 | + | PROCESS CIVIL CITATI ONS ISSUED UNDER THI S SECTION IN COORDIN ATION WITH 15 | |
485 | + | THE DISTRICT COURT. 16 | |
443 | 486 | ||
444 | - | (2) TO DEMONSTRATE THAT T HE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE 19 | |
445 | - | REGISTRATION PLATES WERE STOLEN BEFORE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D AND 20 | |
446 | - | WERE NOT UNDER THE C ONTROL OR PO SSESSION OF THE OWNE R AT THE TIME OF 21 | |
447 | - | THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER SHALL SUBM IT PROOF THAT A POLI CE REPORT 22 | |
448 | - | REGARDING THE STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE OR REG ISTRATION PLATES WAS FILED IN 23 | |
449 | - | A TIMELY MANNER . 24 | |
487 | + | (2) IF A CONTRACTOR PROVI DES, DEPLOYS, OR OPERATES A SPEED 17 | |
488 | + | MONITORING SYSTEM FO R THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR THE STATE 18 | |
489 | + | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE CONTRACTOR ’S FEE MAY NOT BE CON TINGENT ON 19 | |
490 | + | THE NUMBER OF CITATI ONS ISSUED OR PAID . 20 | |
450 | 491 | ||
451 | - | ( | |
452 | - | ||
453 | - | ||
454 | - | ||
492 | + | (K) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 21 | |
493 | + | ADMINISTRATION JOINTL Y SHALL ADOPT REGULA TIONS ESTABLISHING 22 | |
494 | + | STANDARDS AND PROCED URES FOR SPEED MONIT ORING SYSTEMS AUTHOR IZED 23 | |
495 | + | UNDER THIS SECTION . 24 | |
455 | 496 | ||
456 | - | (I) STATES THAT THE PERSO N NAMED IN THE CITAT ION WAS 29 | |
457 | - | NOT OPERATING THE VEHICL E AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 30 | |
497 | + | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 25 | |
458 | 498 | ||
459 | - | (II) INCLUDES ANY OTHER CO RROBORATING EVIDENCE . 31 | |
499 | + | (a) On or before June 1, 2030, the State Highway Administration shall submit a 26 | |
500 | + | report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, 27 | |
501 | + | the General Assembly, on the speed monitoring systems placed on Interstate 695 and 28 | |
502 | + | Interstate 83 in Baltimore County in accordance with § 21–811 of the Transportation 29 | |
503 | + | Article as enacted by Section 1 of this Act. 30 | |
460 | 504 | ||
461 | - | (4) (I) IF THE DISTRICT COURT FINDS THAT THE PERSON NAMED 32 | |
462 | - | IN THE CITATION WAS NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE 33 | |
463 | - | VIOLATION OR RECEIVE S EVIDENCE UNDER PARAG RAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION 34 SENATE BILL 338 11 | |
505 | + | (b) The report required under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 31 | |
464 | 506 | ||
465 | - | ||
466 | - | IDENTIFYING THE PERS ON DRIVING THE VEHIC LE AT THE TIME OF TH E VIOLATION, 1 | |
467 | - | THE CLERK OF THE COU RT MAY PROVIDE TO TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE 2 | |
468 | - | A COPY OF ANY EVIDEN CE SUBSTANTIATING WH O WAS OPERATING THE VEHICLE AT 3 | |
469 | - | THE TIME OF THE VIOL ATION. 4 | |
470 | - | ||
471 | - | (II) ON RECEIPT OF SUBSTAN TIATING EVIDENCE FRO M THE 5 | |
472 | - | DISTRICT COURT UNDER SUBPARAGR APH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 6 | |
473 | - | DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY ISSUE A CI TATION AS PROVIDED I N 7 | |
474 | - | SUBSECTION (D) OF THIS SECTION TO T HE PERSON WHO THE EVIDENCE IND ICATES 8 | |
475 | - | WAS OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION. 9 | |
476 | - | ||
477 | - | (III) ANY CITATION ISSUED U NDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 10 | |
478 | - | PARAGRAPH SHALL BE M AILED NOT LATER THAN 2 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE 11 | |
479 | - | EVIDENCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT. 12 | |
480 | - | ||
481 | - | (G) IF A PERSON LIABLE UN DER THIS SECTION DOE S NOT PAY THE CIVIL 13 | |
482 | - | PENALTY OR CONTEST T HE VIOLATION, THE ADMINISTRATION MAY : 14 | |
483 | - | ||
484 | - | (1) REFUSE TO REGISTER OR REREGISTER THE REGIS TRATION OF 15 | |
485 | - | THE MOTOR VEHICLE CI TED FOR THE VIOLATIO N; OR 16 | |
486 | - | ||
487 | - | (2) SUSPEND THE REGISTRAT ION OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE CITED FOR 17 | |
488 | - | THE VIOLATION. 18 | |
489 | - | ||
490 | - | (H) A VIOLATION FOR WHICH A CIVIL PENALTY IS I MPOSED UNDER THIS 19 | |
491 | - | SECTION: 20 | |
492 | - | ||
493 | - | (1) IS NOT A MOVING VIOLA TION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING 21 | |
494 | - | POINTS UNDER § 16–402 OF THIS ARTICLE; 22 | |
495 | - | ||
496 | - | (2) MAY NOT BE RECORDED B Y THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE 23 | |
497 | - | DRIVING RECORD OF TH E OWNER OR DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE; 24 | |
498 | - | ||
499 | - | (3) MAY BE TREATED AS A P ARKING VIOLATION FOR PURPOSES OF § 25 | |
500 | - | 26–305 OF THIS ARTICLE; AND 26 | |
501 | - | ||
502 | - | (4) MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE 27 | |
503 | - | INSURANCE COVERAGE . 28 | |
504 | - | ||
505 | - | (I) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, THE 29 | |
506 | - | CHIEF JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL ADOPT PRO CEDURES FOR THE 30 | |
507 | - | ISSUANCE OF CITATION S, THE TRIAL OF CIVIL V IOLATIONS, AND THE COLLECTION 31 | |
508 | - | OF CIVIL PENALTIES U NDER THIS SECTION . 32 | |
507 | + | (1) any changes since the implementation of speed monitoring systems 32 | |
508 | + | under Section 1 of this Act in: 33 | |
509 | 509 | 12 SENATE BILL 338 | |
510 | 510 | ||
511 | 511 | ||
512 | - | (J) (1) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R 1 | |
513 | - | DESIGNATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL ADMINIST ER AND 2 | |
514 | - | PROCESS CIVIL CITATI ONS ISSUED UNDER THI S SECTION IN COORDIN ATION WITH 3 | |
515 | - | THE DISTRICT COURT. 4 | |
512 | + | (i) accident and fatality rates on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 1 | |
513 | + | Baltimore County; and 2 | |
516 | 514 | ||
517 | - | (2) IF A CONTRACTOR PROVI DES, DEPLOYS, OR OPERATES A SPEED 5 | |
518 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR THE STATE 6 | |
519 | - | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE CONTRACTOR ’S FEE MAY NOT BE CON TINGENT ON 7 | |
520 | - | THE NUMBER OF CITATI ONS ISSUED OR PAID . 8 | |
515 | + | (ii) the number of repeat violations recorded by speed monitoring 3 | |
516 | + | systems; 4 | |
521 | 517 | ||
522 | - | (K) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 9 | |
523 | - | ADMINISTRATION JOINTL Y SHALL ADOPT REGULATI ONS ESTABLISHING 10 | |
524 | - | STANDARDS AND PROCED URES FOR SPEED MONIT ORING SYSTEMS AUTHOR IZED 11 | |
525 | - | UNDER THIS SECTION . 12 | |
518 | + | (2) any measurable improvements in driver awareness and compliance 5 | |
519 | + | with posted speed limits at areas on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County 6 | |
520 | + | where speed monitoring systems are operated; 7 | |
526 | 521 | ||
527 | - | 21–809. 13 | |
522 | + | (3) any unintended consequences including traffic congestion or an 8 | |
523 | + | increase in the use of alternative routes; 9 | |
528 | 524 | ||
529 | - | (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 14 | |
525 | + | (4) the gross revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the 10 | |
526 | + | speed monitoring systems; 11 | |
530 | 527 | ||
531 | - | ( | |
528 | + | (5) the percentage of the gross revenue collected that has been used: 12 | |
532 | 529 | ||
533 | - | (i) A law enforcement agency of a local political subdivision that is 16 | |
534 | - | authorized to issue a citation for a violation of the Maryland Vehicle Law or of local traffic 17 | |
535 | - | laws or regulations; [or] 18 | |
530 | + | (i) to recover the cost of implementing and administering the speed 13 | |
531 | + | monitoring systems; and 14 | |
536 | 532 | ||
537 | - | (ii) For a municipal corporation that does not maintain a police force, 19 | |
538 | - | an agency established or designated by the municipal corporation to implement this subtitle 20 | |
539 | - | using speed monitoring systems in accordance with this section; OR 21 | |
533 | + | (ii) for public safety purposes, including pedestrian or highway 15 | |
534 | + | safety programs; 16 | |
540 | 535 | ||
541 | - | ( | |
542 | - | ||
543 | - | ||
536 | + | (6) whether revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the speed 17 | |
537 | + | monitoring systems has been sufficient to cover the costs specified under paragraph (5)(i) 18 | |
538 | + | and (ii) of this subsection; 19 | |
544 | 539 | ||
545 | - | (3) (i) “Erroneous violation” means a potential violation submitted by a 25 | |
546 | - | speed monitoring system contractor for review by an agency that is apparently inaccurate 26 | |
547 | - | based on a technical variable that is under the control of the contractor. 27 | |
540 | + | (7) how funds have been used for public safety purposes on Interstate 695 20 | |
541 | + | and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 21 | |
548 | 542 | ||
549 | - | (ii) “Erroneous violation” includes a potential violation based on: 28 | |
543 | + | (8) whether revenue collected has been supplemental to, and has not 22 | |
544 | + | supplanted, existing State and local funds allocated for transportation; 23 | |
550 | 545 | ||
551 | - | 1. A recorded image of a registration plate that does not 29 | |
552 | - | match the registration plate issued for the motor vehicle in the recorded image; 30 | |
546 | + | (9) the percentage of issued citations that have been contested; 24 | |
553 | 547 | ||
554 | - | 2. A recorded image that shows a stopped vehicle or no 31 | |
555 | - | progression; 32 | |
548 | + | (10) the percentage of contested citations that were overturned or reduced; 25 | |
549 | + | ||
550 | + | (11) whether citations have consistently been issued within the time frames 26 | |
551 | + | required under § 21–811(d)(4) of the Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this 27 | |
552 | + | Act, and any required maintenance, calibration, and certification checks have been 28 | |
553 | + | documented and performed as scheduled; 29 | |
554 | + | ||
555 | + | (12) whether there has been any pattern of citation errors or disputes 30 | |
556 | + | regarding vehicle identification; 31 | |
556 | 557 | SENATE BILL 338 13 | |
557 | 558 | ||
558 | 559 | ||
559 | - | 3. An incorrectly measured speed for a motor vehicle; 1 | |
560 | + | (13) whether speed monitoring systems have been consistently maintained 1 | |
561 | + | and calibrated in accordance with § 21–811(b)(7) of the Transportation Article, as enacted 2 | |
562 | + | by Section 1 of this Act; 3 | |
560 | 563 | ||
561 | - | 4. A measured speed of a motor vehicle that is below the 2 | |
562 | - | threshold speed that would subject the owner to a civil citation under this section; 3 | |
564 | + | (14) whether the locations that have been identified as being at high risk for 4 | |
565 | + | motor vehicle crashes that result in serious bodily injury or death have changed since the 5 | |
566 | + | implementation of the speed monitoring systems; 6 | |
563 | 567 | ||
564 | - | | |
565 | - | ||
568 | + | (15) whether speed monitoring systems have been relocated as a result of 7 | |
569 | + | any changes under item (14) of this subsection, or any changes in traffic patterns; 8 | |
566 | 570 | ||
567 | - | 6. A recorded image that was taken by a speed monitoring 6 | |
568 | - | system with an expired calibration certificate. 7 | |
571 | + | (16) whether the speed limit thresholds under § 21–811(b)(4) of the 9 | |
572 | + | Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this Act have effectively influenced driver 10 | |
573 | + | behavior; 11 | |
569 | 574 | ||
570 | - | ( | |
571 | - | ||
575 | + | (17) any issues with speed monitoring system visibility, signage, or 12 | |
576 | + | technical malfunctions; 13 | |
572 | 577 | ||
573 | - | (ii) “Owner” does not include: 10 | |
578 | + | (18) whether there have been any formal complaints or legal challenges to 14 | |
579 | + | the implementation of speed monitoring systems under Section 1 of this Act; 15 | |
574 | 580 | ||
575 | - | 1. A motor vehicle rental or leasing company; or 11 | |
581 | + | (19) any privacy or data security concerns that have arisen from the 16 | |
582 | + | handling of recorded images or citation data; 17 | |
576 | 583 | ||
577 | - | 2. A holder of a special registration plate issued under Title 12 | |
578 | - | 13, Subtitle 9, Part III of this article. 13 | |
584 | + | (20) any significant delays in processing citations or appeals; 18 | |
579 | 585 | ||
580 | - | (5) “Program administrator” means an employee or a representative of the 14 | |
581 | - | local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION designated by the local 15 | |
582 | - | jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION to oversee a contract with a 16 | |
583 | - | speed monitoring system contractor. 17 | |
586 | + | (21) whether any public safety improvements intended to be funded as a 19 | |
587 | + | result of violations enforced by the speed monitoring systems have been completed on 20 | |
588 | + | schedule and within budget; and 21 | |
584 | 589 | ||
585 | - | (6) “Recorded image” means an image recorded by a speed monitoring 18 | |
586 | - | system: 19 | |
590 | + | (22) any disparities in the number of citations issued as a result of violations 22 | |
591 | + | enforced by the speed monitoring systems on different communities or demographic groups 23 | |
592 | + | in the State. 24 | |
587 | 593 | ||
588 | - | (i) On: 20 | |
594 | + | SECTION 2. 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 25 | |
595 | + | June 1, 2025. It shall remain effective for a period of 5 years and 1 month and, at the end 26 | |
596 | + | of June 30, 2030, this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall 27 | |
597 | + | be abrogated and of no further force and effect. 28 | |
589 | 598 | ||
590 | - | 1. A photograph; 21 | |
591 | - | ||
592 | - | 2. A microphotograph; 22 | |
593 | - | ||
594 | - | 3. An electronic image; 23 | |
595 | - | ||
596 | - | 4. Videotape; or 24 | |
597 | - | ||
598 | - | 5. Any other medium; and 25 | |
599 | - | ||
600 | - | (ii) Showing: 26 | |
601 | - | ||
602 | - | 1. The rear of a motor vehicle; 27 | |
603 | - | ||
604 | - | 2. At least two time–stamped images of the motor vehicle that 28 | |
605 | - | include the same stationary object near the motor vehicle; and 29 14 SENATE BILL 338 | |
606 | - | ||
607 | - | ||
608 | - | ||
609 | - | 3. On at least one image or portion of tape, a clear and legible 1 | |
610 | - | identification of the entire registration plate number of the motor vehicle. 2 | |
611 | - | ||
612 | - | (7) “School zone” means a designated roadway segment within up to a 3 | |
613 | - | half–mile radius of a school for any of grades kindergarten through grade 12 where 4 | |
614 | - | school–related activity occurs, including: 5 | |
615 | - | ||
616 | - | (i) Travel by students to or from school on foot or by bicycle; or 6 | |
617 | - | ||
618 | - | (ii) The dropping off or picking up of students by school buses or other 7 | |
619 | - | vehicles. 8 | |
620 | - | ||
621 | - | (8) “Speed monitoring system” means a device with one or more motor 9 | |
622 | - | vehicle sensors producing recorded images of motor vehicles traveling at speeds at least 12 10 | |
623 | - | miles per hour above the posted speed limit. 11 | |
624 | - | ||
625 | - | (9) “Speed monitoring system operator” means a representative of an agency 12 | |
626 | - | or contractor that operates a speed monitoring system. 13 | |
627 | - | ||
628 | - | (b) (1) (i) 1. A speed monitoring system may not be used [in] BY a local 14 | |
629 | - | jurisdiction under this section unless its use is authorized by the governing body of the local 15 | |
630 | - | jurisdiction by local law enacted after reasonable notice and a public hearing. 16 | |
631 | - | ||
632 | - | 2. THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY US E 17 | |
633 | - | SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 18 | |
634 | - | INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION . 19 | |
635 | - | ||
636 | - | (ii) Before a county may use a speed monitoring system on a State 20 | |
637 | - | highway at a location within a municipal corporation, the county shall: 21 | |
638 | - | ||
639 | - | 1. Obtain the approval of the State Highway Administration; 22 | |
640 | - | ||
641 | - | 2. Notify the municipal corporation of the State Highway 23 | |
642 | - | Administration’s approval of the use of a speed monitoring system at that location; and 24 | |
643 | - | ||
644 | - | 3. Grant the municipal corporation 60 days from the date of 25 | |
645 | - | the county’s notice to the municipal corporation to enact an ordinance authorizing the 26 | |
646 | - | municipal corporation instead of the county to use a speed monitoring system at that 27 | |
647 | - | location. 28 | |
648 | - | ||
649 | - | (iii) 1. This subparagraph applies only in Prince George’s County. 29 | |
650 | - | ||
651 | - | 2. In the county, a municipal corporation may implement and 30 | |
652 | - | use a speed monitoring system consistent with the requirements of this subsection on a 31 | |
653 | - | county highway at a location within its corporate limits if the municipal corporation: 32 SENATE BILL 338 15 | |
654 | - | ||
655 | - | ||
656 | - | ||
657 | - | A. Submits to the county a plan describing the boundary of 1 | |
658 | - | the applicable school zone and the proposed location of the speed monitoring system; and 2 | |
659 | - | ||
660 | - | B. Requests and receives permission from the county to use the 3 | |
661 | - | speed monitoring system at the proposed location. 4 | |
662 | - | ||
663 | - | 3. If the county fails to respond to the request within 60 days, 5 | |
664 | - | the municipal corporation may implement and use the speed monitoring system as described 6 | |
665 | - | in the plan submission. 7 | |
666 | - | ||
667 | - | 4. The county may not: 8 | |
668 | - | ||
669 | - | A. Unreasonably deny a request under this subparagraph; or 9 | |
670 | - | ||
671 | - | B. Place exactions, fees, or unreasonable restrictions on the 10 | |
672 | - | implementation and use of a speed monitoring system under this subparagraph. 11 | |
673 | - | ||
674 | - | 5. The county shall state in writing the reasons for any denial 12 | |
675 | - | of a request under this subparagraph. 13 | |
676 | - | ||
677 | - | 6. A municipal corporation may contest in the circuit court a 14 | |
678 | - | county denial of a request under this subparagraph. 15 | |
679 | - | ||
680 | - | (iv) In Prince George’s County, if a municipal corporation has 16 | |
681 | - | established a school zone that is within one–quarter mile of a school zone established in 17 | |
682 | - | another municipal corporation, the municipal corporation may not implement or use a speed 18 | |
683 | - | monitoring system in that school zone unless it has obtained the approval of the other 19 | |
684 | - | municipal corporation. 20 | |
685 | - | ||
686 | - | (v) An ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of a 21 | |
687 | - | local jurisdiction under this paragraph shall provide that, if the local jurisdiction moves or 22 | |
688 | - | places a mobile or stationary speed monitoring system to or at a location where a speed 23 | |
689 | - | monitoring system had not previously been moved or placed, the local jurisdiction may not 24 | |
690 | - | issue a citation for a violation recorded by that speed monitoring system: 25 | |
691 | - | ||
692 | - | 1. Until signage is installed in accordance with 26 | |
693 | - | subparagraph (viii) of this paragraph; and 27 | |
694 | - | ||
695 | - | 2. For at least the first 15 calendar days after the signage is 28 | |
696 | - | installed. 29 | |
697 | - | ||
698 | - | (vi) This section applies to a violation of this subtitle recorded by a 30 | |
699 | - | speed monitoring system that meets the requirements of this subsection and has been placed: 31 | |
700 | - | ||
701 | - | 1. In Anne Arundel County, Montgomery County, or Prince 32 | |
702 | - | George’s County, on a highway in a residential district, as defined in § 21–101 of this title, 33 16 SENATE BILL 338 | |
703 | - | ||
704 | - | ||
705 | - | with a maximum posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour, which speed limit was established 1 | |
706 | - | using generally accepted traffic engineering practices; 2 | |
707 | - | ||
708 | - | 2. In a school zone with a posted speed limit of at least 20 3 | |
709 | - | miles per hour; 4 | |
710 | - | ||
711 | - | 3. In Prince George’s County: 5 | |
712 | - | ||
713 | - | A. Subject to subparagraph (vii)1 of this paragraph, on 6 | |
714 | - | Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway); or 7 | |
715 | - | ||
716 | - | B. On that part of a highway located within the grounds of an 8 | |
717 | - | institution of higher education as defined in § 10–101(h) of the Education Article, or within 9 | |
718 | - | one–half mile of the grounds of a building or property used by the institution of higher 10 | |
719 | - | education where generally accepted traffic and engineering practices indicate that motor 11 | |
720 | - | vehicle, pedestrian, or bicycle traffic is substantially generated or influenced by the 12 | |
721 | - | institution of higher education; 13 | |
722 | - | ||
723 | - | 4. Subject to subparagraph (vii)2 of this paragraph, on 14 | |
724 | - | Interstate 83 in Baltimore City; 15 | |
725 | - | ||
726 | - | 5. In Anne Arundel County, on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup 16 | |
727 | - | Road) between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel 17 | |
728 | - | County–Howard County line; [or] 18 | |
729 | - | ||
730 | - | 6. Subject to subparagraph (vii)3 of this paragraph, at the 19 | |
731 | - | intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot County; 20 | |
732 | - | OR 21 | |
733 | - | ||
734 | - | 7. SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (VII)4 OF THIS 22 | |
735 | - | PARAGRAPH , BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ON INTERSTATE 83 IN 23 | |
736 | - | BALTIMORE COUNTY OR ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 24 | |
737 | - | ||
738 | - | (vii) 1. Not more than six mobile or stationary speed monitoring 25 | |
739 | - | systems may be placed on Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway). 26 | |
740 | - | ||
741 | - | 2. Not more than two speed monitoring systems may be placed 27 | |
742 | - | on Interstate 83 in Baltimore City. 28 | |
743 | - | ||
744 | - | 3. Not more than one speed monitoring system may be placed 29 | |
745 | - | at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot 30 | |
746 | - | County. 31 | |
747 | - | ||
748 | - | 4. THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION : 32 | |
749 | - | SENATE BILL 338 17 | |
750 | - | ||
751 | - | ||
752 | - | A. MAY PLACE AND USE A S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 1 | |
753 | - | ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE 2 | |
754 | - | COUNTY UNDER THIS SEC TION ONLY AT A LOCAT ION IT IDENTIFIES AS BEING AT 3 | |
755 | - | HIGH RISK FOR MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES THAT RESULT IN DEATH OR S ERIOUS 4 | |
756 | - | BODILY INJURY; 5 | |
757 | - | ||
758 | - | B. I. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE MORE THAN THREE 6 | |
759 | - | SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS IN EACH DIRECTI ON ON INTERSTATE 83 IN 7 | |
760 | - | BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 8 | |
761 | - | ||
762 | - | II. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE MORE TH AN FOUR SPEED 9 | |
763 | - | MONITORING SYSTEMS I N EACH DIRECTION ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE 10 | |
764 | - | COUNTY; AND 11 | |
765 | - | ||
766 | - | C. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE A SPEED MONITORING 12 | |
767 | - | SYSTEM AUTHORIZED UN DER THIS SECTION WIT HIN 5 MILES OF ANOTHER SPE ED 13 | |
768 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM AUTHORIZED UNDER THI S SECTION OPERATING IN THE SAME 14 | |
769 | - | DIRECTION. 15 | |
770 | - | ||
771 | - | (viii) Before activating a speed monitoring system, the local jurisdiction 16 | |
772 | - | OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , shall: 17 | |
773 | - | ||
774 | - | 1. Publish notice of the location of the speed monitoring 18 | |
775 | - | system on its website and in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction; 19 | |
776 | - | ||
777 | - | 2. Ensure that each sign that designates a school zone is 20 | |
778 | - | proximate to a sign that: 21 | |
779 | - | ||
780 | - | A. Indicates that speed monitoring systems are in use in the 22 | |
781 | - | school zone; and 23 | |
782 | - | ||
783 | - | B. Is in accordance with the manual for and the specifications 24 | |
784 | - | for a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration 25 | |
785 | - | under § 25–104 of this article; 26 | |
786 | - | ||
787 | - | 3. With regard to a speed monitoring system established on 27 | |
788 | - | Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) in Prince George’s County, based on proximity 28 | |
789 | - | to an institution of higher education under subparagraph (vi)3 of this paragraph, on 29 | |
790 | - | Interstate 83 in Baltimore City, in Anne Arundel County on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup 30 | |
791 | - | Road) between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel 31 | |
792 | - | County–Howard County line, [or] at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) 32 | |
793 | - | and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot County, OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY 33 | |
794 | - | OR INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY, ensure that all speed limit signs 34 | |
795 | - | approaching and within the segment of highway on which the speed monitoring system is 35 | |
796 | - | located include signs that: 36 18 SENATE BILL 338 | |
797 | - | ||
798 | - | ||
799 | - | ||
800 | - | A. Are in accordance with the manual and specifications for 1 | |
801 | - | a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration 2 | |
802 | - | under § 25–104 of this article; and 3 | |
803 | - | ||
804 | - | B. Indicate that a speed monitoring system is in use; and 4 | |
805 | - | ||
806 | - | 4. With regard to a speed monitoring system placed on 5 | |
807 | - | Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) in Prince George’s County, Interstate 83 in 6 | |
808 | - | Baltimore City, in Anne Arundel County on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) between the 7 | |
809 | - | Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard County line, 8 | |
810 | - | [or] at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot 9 | |
811 | - | County, OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN 10 | |
812 | - | BALTIMORE COUNTY, ensure that each sign that indicates that a speed monitoring system 11 | |
813 | - | is in use is proximate to a device that displays a real–time posting of the speed at which a 12 | |
814 | - | driver is traveling. 13 | |
815 | - | ||
816 | - | (ix) A speed monitoring system in a school zone may operate only 14 | |
817 | - | Monday through Friday between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. 15 | |
818 | - | ||
819 | - | (x) 1. A local jurisdiction that authorizes a program of speed 16 | |
820 | - | monitoring systems OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , 17 | |
821 | - | shall designate an official or employee to investigate and respond to questions or concerns 18 | |
822 | - | about the local jurisdiction’s OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ’S speed 19 | |
823 | - | monitoring system program. 20 | |
824 | - | ||
825 | - | 2. A. The [local] designee shall review a citation 21 | |
826 | - | generated by a speed monitoring system if the person who received the citation requests 22 | |
827 | - | review before the deadline for contesting liability under this section. 23 | |
828 | - | ||
829 | - | B. If the [local] designee determines that the citation is an 24 | |
830 | - | erroneous violation, the [local] designee shall void the citation. 25 | |
831 | - | ||
832 | - | C. If the [local] designee determines that a person did not 26 | |
833 | - | receive notice of a citation issued under this section due to an administrative error, the 27 | |
834 | - | [local] designee may resend the citation in accordance with subsection (d) of this section or 28 | |
835 | - | void the citation. 29 | |
836 | - | ||
837 | - | D. A [local] designee that takes any action described under 30 | |
838 | - | subsubsubparagraph C of this subsubparagraph shall notify the Administration of the 31 | |
839 | - | action for the purpose of rescinding any administrative penalties imposed under subsection 32 | |
840 | - | (g) of this section. 33 | |
841 | - | ||
842 | - | E. A [local] designee may not determine that a citation is an 34 | |
843 | - | erroneous violation based solely on the dismissal of the citation by a court. 35 | |
844 | - | SENATE BILL 338 19 | |
845 | - | ||
846 | - | ||
847 | - | 3. A [local] designee may not be employed by a speed 1 | |
848 | - | monitoring system contractor or have been involved in any review of a speed monitoring 2 | |
849 | - | system citation, other than review of a citation under this subparagraph. 3 | |
850 | - | ||
851 | - | 4. On receipt of a written question or concern from a person, 4 | |
852 | - | the [local] designee shall provide a written answer or response to the person within a 5 | |
853 | - | reasonable time. 6 | |
854 | - | ||
855 | - | 5. A local jurisdiction AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 7 | |
856 | - | ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , shall make any written questions or concerns 8 | |
857 | - | received under this subparagraph and any subsequent written answers or responses 9 | |
858 | - | available for public inspection. 10 | |
859 | - | ||
860 | - | (xi) A local jurisdiction may not use a speed monitoring system to 11 | |
861 | - | enforce speed limits on any portion of a highway for which the speed limit has been decreased 12 | |
862 | - | without performing an engineering and traffic investigation. 13 | |
863 | - | ||
864 | - | (2) (i) A speed monitoring system operator shall complete training by a 14 | |
865 | - | manufacturer of speed monitoring systems in the procedures for setting up and operating 15 | |
866 | - | the speed monitoring system. 16 | |
867 | - | ||
868 | - | (ii) The manufacturer shall issue a signed certificate to the speed 17 | |
869 | - | monitoring system operator on completion of the training. 18 | |
870 | - | ||
871 | - | (iii) The certificate of training shall be admitted as evidence in any 19 | |
872 | - | court proceeding for a violation of this section. 20 | |
873 | - | ||
874 | - | (3) A speed monitoring system operator shall fill out and sign a daily 21 | |
875 | - | set–up log for a speed monitoring system that: 22 | |
876 | - | ||
877 | - | (i) States that the speed monitoring system operator successfully 23 | |
878 | - | performed or reviewed and evaluated the manufacturer–specified daily self–test of the speed 24 | |
879 | - | monitoring system prior to producing a recorded image; 25 | |
880 | - | ||
881 | - | (ii) Shall be kept on file; and 26 | |
882 | - | ||
883 | - | (iii) Shall be admitted as evidence in any court proceeding for a 27 | |
884 | - | violation of this section. 28 | |
885 | - | ||
886 | - | (4) (i) A speed monitoring system shall undergo an annual calibration 29 | |
887 | - | check performed by an independent calibration laboratory that is: 30 | |
888 | - | ||
889 | - | 1. Selected by the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 31 | |
890 | - | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE ; and 32 | |
891 | - | 20 SENATE BILL 338 | |
892 | - | ||
893 | - | ||
894 | - | 2. Unaffiliated with the manufacturer of the speed 1 | |
895 | - | monitoring system. 2 | |
896 | - | ||
897 | - | (ii) The independent calibration laboratory shall issue a signed 3 | |
898 | - | certificate of calibration after the annual calibration check that: 4 | |
899 | - | ||
900 | - | 1. Shall be kept on file; and 5 | |
901 | - | ||
902 | - | 2. Shall be admitted as evidence in any court proceeding for 6 | |
903 | - | a violation of this section. 7 | |
904 | - | ||
905 | - | (5) If a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 8 | |
906 | - | authorizes a program of speed monitoring systems under this section: 9 | |
907 | - | ||
908 | - | (i) The local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 10 | |
909 | - | ADMINISTRATION shall designate a program administrator who may not be an employee 11 | |
910 | - | or representative of the speed monitoring system contractor; and 12 | |
911 | - | ||
912 | - | (ii) The contract with the speed monitoring system contractor shall 13 | |
913 | - | include the following provisions: 14 | |
914 | - | ||
915 | - | 1. For potential violations submitted by a contractor for 15 | |
916 | - | review by an agency, if more than 5% of the violations in a calendar year are erroneous 16 | |
917 | - | violations, then the contractor shall be subject to liquidated damages for each erroneous 17 | |
918 | - | violation equal to at least 50% of the fine amount for the erroneous violation, plus any 18 | |
919 | - | reimbursements paid by the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 19 | |
920 | - | ADMINISTRATION ; and 20 | |
921 | - | ||
922 | - | 2. The local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 21 | |
923 | - | ADMINISTRATION may cancel a contract with a contractor if the contractor violates the 22 | |
924 | - | contract by submitting erroneous violations to the agency that exceed a threshold specified 23 | |
925 | - | in the contract or violates the law in implementing the contract. 24 | |
926 | - | ||
927 | - | (6) (i) The Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission, in 25 | |
928 | - | consultation with the State Highway Administration and other interested stakeholders, 26 | |
929 | - | shall develop a training program concerning the oversight and administration of a speed 27 | |
930 | - | monitoring program by a local jurisdiction AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 28 | |
931 | - | ADMINISTRATION, including a curriculum of best practices in the State. 29 | |
932 | - | ||
933 | - | (ii) 1. A program administrator shall participate in the training 30 | |
934 | - | program established under this paragraph before a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 31 | |
935 | - | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION initially implements a new speed monitoring program and 32 | |
936 | - | subsequently at least once every 2 years. 33 | |
937 | - | SENATE BILL 338 21 | |
938 | - | ||
939 | - | ||
940 | - | 2. A program administrator for a program in existence on 1 | |
941 | - | June 1, 2014, shall initially participate in the training program on or before December 31, 2 | |
942 | - | 2014, and subsequently at least once every 2 years. 3 | |
943 | - | ||
944 | - | 3. If a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 4 | |
945 | - | ADMINISTRATION designates a new program administrator, the new program 5 | |
946 | - | administrator shall participate in the next available training program. 6 | |
947 | - | ||
948 | - | (c) (1) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle received a citation from a police 7 | |
949 | - | officer at the time of the violation, the owner or, in accordance with subsection (f)(4) of this 8 | |
950 | - | section, the driver of a motor vehicle is subject to a civil penalty if the motor vehicle is 9 | |
951 | - | recorded by a speed monitoring system while being operated in violation of this subtitle. 10 | |
952 | - | ||
953 | - | (2) A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed $40. 11 | |
954 | - | ||
955 | - | (3) For purposes of this section, the District Court shall prescribe: 12 | |
956 | - | ||
957 | - | (i) A uniform citation form consistent with subsection (d)(1) of this 13 | |
958 | - | section and § 7–302 of the Courts Article; and 14 | |
959 | - | ||
960 | - | (ii) A civil penalty, which shall be indicated on the citation, to be paid 15 | |
961 | - | by persons who choose to prepay the civil penalty without appearing in District Court. 16 | |
962 | - | ||
963 | - | (d) (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) of this subsection, 17 | |
964 | - | an agency shall mail to an owner liable under subsection (c) of this section a citation that 18 | |
965 | - | shall include: 19 | |
966 | - | ||
967 | - | (i) The name and address of the registered owner of the vehicle; 20 | |
968 | - | ||
969 | - | (ii) The registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the 21 | |
970 | - | violation; 22 | |
971 | - | ||
972 | - | (iii) The violation charged; 23 | |
973 | - | ||
974 | - | (iv) The location where the violation occurred; 24 | |
975 | - | ||
976 | - | (v) The date and time of the violation; 25 | |
977 | - | ||
978 | - | (vi) A copy of the recorded image; 26 | |
979 | - | ||
980 | - | (vii) The amount of the civil penalty imposed and the date by which 27 | |
981 | - | the civil penalty should be paid; 28 | |
982 | - | ||
983 | - | (viii) A signed statement by a duly authorized law enforcement officer 29 | |
984 | - | employed by or under contract with an agency that, based on inspection of recorded images, 30 | |
985 | - | the motor vehicle was being operated in violation of this subtitle; 31 | |
986 | - | 22 SENATE BILL 338 | |
987 | - | ||
988 | - | ||
989 | - | (ix) A statement that recorded images are evidence of a violation of 1 | |
990 | - | this subtitle; 2 | |
991 | - | ||
992 | - | (x) Information advising the person alleged to be liable under this 3 | |
993 | - | section of the manner and time in which liability as alleged in the citation may be contested 4 | |
994 | - | in the District Court; and 5 | |
995 | - | ||
996 | - | (xi) Information advising the person alleged to be liable under this 6 | |
997 | - | section that failure to pay the civil penalty or to contest liability in a timely manner: 7 | |
998 | - | ||
999 | - | 1. Is an admission of liability; 8 | |
1000 | - | ||
1001 | - | 2. May result in the refusal by the Administration to register 9 | |
1002 | - | the motor vehicle; and 10 | |
1003 | - | ||
1004 | - | 3. May result in the suspension of the motor vehicle 11 | |
1005 | - | registration. 12 | |
1006 | - | ||
1007 | - | (2) (i) Except as provided in [subparagraph] SUBPARAGRAPHS (ii) 13 | |
1008 | - | AND (III) of this paragraph, an agency may mail a warning notice instead of a citation to 14 | |
1009 | - | the owner liable under subsection (c) of this section. 15 | |
1010 | - | ||
1011 | - | (ii) With regard to a speed monitoring system established on 16 | |
1012 | - | Interstate 83 in Baltimore City, an agency shall mail a warning notice instead of a citation 17 | |
1013 | - | for a violation recorded by the speed monitoring system during the first 90 days that the 18 | |
1014 | - | speed monitoring system is in operation. 19 | |
1015 | - | ||
1016 | - | (III) WITH REGARD TO A SPEE D MONITORING SYSTE M 20 | |
1017 | - | ESTABLISHED ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN 21 | |
1018 | - | BALTIMORE COUNTY, THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SHALL MAIL A 22 | |
1019 | - | WARNING NOTICE INSTE AD OF A CITATION FOR A VIOLATION RECORDED BY THE 23 | |
1020 | - | SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM DURING THE FIRST 30 DAYS THAT THE SPEED 24 | |
1021 | - | MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN OPERATION. 25 | |
1022 | - | ||
1023 | - | (3) Except as provided in subsection (f)(4) of this section, an agency may not 26 | |
1024 | - | mail a citation to a person who is not an owner. 27 | |
1025 | - | ||
1026 | - | (4) Except as provided in subsections (b)(1)(x) and (f)(4) of this section, a 28 | |
1027 | - | citation issued under this section shall be mailed no later than 2 weeks after the alleged 29 | |
1028 | - | violation if the vehicle is registered in this State, and 30 days after the alleged violation if 30 | |
1029 | - | the vehicle is registered in another state. 31 | |
1030 | - | ||
1031 | - | (5) A person who receives a citation under paragraph (1) of this subsection 32 | |
1032 | - | may: 33 | |
1033 | - | SENATE BILL 338 23 | |
1034 | - | ||
1035 | - | ||
1036 | - | (i) Pay the civil penalty, in accordance with instructions on the 1 | |
1037 | - | citation, directly to the political subdivision OR THE DISTRICT COURT, AS APPROPRIATE ; 2 | |
1038 | - | or 3 | |
1039 | - | ||
1040 | - | (ii) Elect to stand trial in the District Court for the alleged violation. 4 | |
1041 | - | ||
1042 | - | (6) To mail the citation or warning notice, an agency shall use: 5 | |
1043 | - | ||
1044 | - | (i) The current mailing address on file with the Administration; or 6 | |
1045 | - | ||
1046 | - | (ii) If a mailing address is unavailable, the current residential 7 | |
1047 | - | address on file with the Administration. 8 | |
1048 | - | ||
1049 | - | (e) (1) A certificate alleging that the violation of this subtitle occurred and the 9 | |
1050 | - | requirements under subsection (b) of this section have been satisfied, sworn to, or affirmed 10 | |
1051 | - | by a duly authorized law enforcement officer employed by or under contract with an agency, 11 | |
1052 | - | based on inspection of recorded images produced by a speed monitoring system, shall be 12 | |
1053 | - | evidence of the facts contained in the certificate and shall be admissible in a proceeding 13 | |
1054 | - | alleging a violation under this section without the presence or testimony of the speed 14 | |
1055 | - | monitoring system operator who performed the requirements under subsection (b) of this 15 | |
1056 | - | section. 16 | |
1057 | - | ||
1058 | - | (2) If a person who received a citation under subsection (d) of this section 17 | |
1059 | - | desires the speed monitoring system operator to be present and testify at trial, the person 18 | |
1060 | - | shall notify the court and the State in writing no later than 20 days before trial. 19 | |
1061 | - | ||
1062 | - | (3) Adjudication of liability shall be based on a preponderance of evidence. 20 | |
1063 | - | ||
1064 | - | (f) (1) The District Court may consider in defense of a violation: 21 | |
1065 | - | ||
1066 | - | (i) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, that the motor vehicle 22 | |
1067 | - | or the registration plates of the motor vehicle were stolen before the violation occurred and 23 | |
1068 | - | were not under the control or possession of the owner at the time of the violation; 24 | |
1069 | - | ||
1070 | - | (ii) Subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection, evidence that the 25 | |
1071 | - | person named in the citation was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation; and 26 | |
1072 | - | ||
1073 | - | (iii) Any other issues and evidence that the District Court deems 27 | |
1074 | - | pertinent. 28 | |
1075 | - | ||
1076 | - | (2) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle or the registration plates were 29 | |
1077 | - | stolen before the violation occurred and were not under the control or possession of the owner 30 | |
1078 | - | at the time of the violation, the owner shall submit proof that a police report regarding the 31 | |
1079 | - | stolen motor vehicle or registration plates was filed in a timely manner. 32 | |
1080 | - | 24 SENATE BILL 338 | |
1081 | - | ||
1082 | - | ||
1083 | - | (3) To satisfy the evidentiary burden under paragraph (1)(ii) of this 1 | |
1084 | - | subsection, the person named in the citation shall provide to the District Court a letter, sworn 2 | |
1085 | - | to or affirmed by the person and mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, that: 3 | |
1086 | - | ||
1087 | - | (i) States that the person named in the citation was not operating the 4 | |
1088 | - | vehicle at the time of the violation; and 5 | |
1089 | - | ||
1090 | - | (ii) Includes any other corroborating evidence. 6 | |
1091 | - | ||
1092 | - | (4) (i) If the District Court finds that the person named in the citation 7 | |
1093 | - | was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation or receives evidence under 8 | |
1094 | - | paragraph (3) of this subsection identifying the person driving the vehicle at the time of the 9 | |
1095 | - | violation, the clerk of the court shall provide to the agency issuing the citation a copy of any 10 | |
1096 | - | evidence substantiating who was operating the vehicle at the time of the violation. 11 | |
1097 | - | ||
1098 | - | (ii) On receipt of substantiating evidence from the District Court 12 | |
1099 | - | under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, an agency may issue a citation as provided in 13 | |
1100 | - | subsection (d) of this section to the person who the evidence indicates was operating the 14 | |
1101 | - | vehicle at the time of the violation. 15 | |
1102 | - | ||
1103 | - | (iii) A citation issued under subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph shall 16 | |
1104 | - | be mailed no later than 2 weeks after receipt of the evidence from the District Court. 17 | |
1105 | - | ||
1106 | - | (g) If a person liable under this section does not pay the civil penalty or contest the 18 | |
1107 | - | violation, the Administration may refuse to register or reregister the motor vehicle cited for 19 | |
1108 | - | the violation. 20 | |
1109 | - | ||
1110 | - | (h) A violation for which a civil penalty is imposed under this section: 21 | |
1111 | - | ||
1112 | - | (1) Is not a moving violation for the purpose of assessing points under § 22 | |
1113 | - | 16–402 of this article; 23 | |
1114 | - | ||
1115 | - | (2) May not be recorded by the Administration on the driving record of the 24 | |
1116 | - | owner or driver of the vehicle; 25 | |
1117 | - | ||
1118 | - | (3) May be treated as a parking violation for purposes of § 26–305 of this 26 | |
1119 | - | article; and 27 | |
1120 | - | ||
1121 | - | (4) May not be considered in the provision of motor vehicle insurance 28 | |
1122 | - | coverage. 29 | |
1123 | - | ||
1124 | - | (i) In consultation with the appropriate local government agencies AND THE 30 | |
1125 | - | STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , the Chief Judge of the District Court shall adopt 31 | |
1126 | - | procedures for the issuance of citations, the trial of civil violations, and the collection of civil 32 | |
1127 | - | penalties under this section. 33 | |
1128 | - | SENATE BILL 338 25 | |
1129 | - | ||
1130 | - | ||
1131 | - | (j) (1) An agency or an agent or contractor designated by the agency shall 1 | |
1132 | - | administer and process civil citations issued under this section in coordination with the 2 | |
1133 | - | District Court. 3 | |
1134 | - | ||
1135 | - | (2) If a contractor in any manner operates a speed monitoring system or 4 | |
1136 | - | administers or processes citations generated by a speed monitoring system on behalf of a 5 | |
1137 | - | local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , the contractor’s fee may 6 | |
1138 | - | not be contingent on a per–ticket basis on the number of citations issued or paid. 7 | |
1139 | - | ||
1140 | - | (k) (1) On or before December 31 of each year, the Maryland Police Training 8 | |
1141 | - | and Standards Commission shall: 9 | |
1142 | - | ||
1143 | - | (i) Compile and make publicly available a report for the previous 10 | |
1144 | - | fiscal year on each speed monitoring system program operated by a local jurisdiction AND 11 | |
1145 | - | THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION under this section; and 12 | |
1146 | - | ||
1147 | - | (ii) Submit the report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 13 | |
1148 | - | 2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly. 14 | |
1149 | - | ||
1150 | - | (2) The report shall include: 15 | |
1151 | - | ||
1152 | - | (i) The total number of citations issued; 16 | |
1153 | - | ||
1154 | - | (ii) The number of citations issued and the number voided as 17 | |
1155 | - | erroneous violations for each camera; 18 | |
1156 | - | ||
1157 | - | (iii) The gross revenue generated by the program; 19 | |
1158 | - | ||
1159 | - | (iv) The expenditures incurred by the program; 20 | |
1160 | - | ||
1161 | - | (v) The net revenue generated by the program; 21 | |
1162 | - | ||
1163 | - | (vi) The total amount of any payments made to a contractor under the 22 | |
1164 | - | program; 23 | |
1165 | - | ||
1166 | - | (vii) A description of how the net revenue generated by the program 24 | |
1167 | - | was used; 25 | |
1168 | - | ||
1169 | - | (viii) The number of employees of the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 26 | |
1170 | - | HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , involved in the program; 27 | |
1171 | - | ||
1172 | - | (ix) The type of speed monitoring system used by the local jurisdiction 28 | |
1173 | - | OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ; 29 | |
1174 | - | 26 SENATE BILL 338 | |
1175 | - | ||
1176 | - | ||
1177 | - | (x) The locations at which each speed monitoring system was used in 1 | |
1178 | - | the local jurisdiction OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 2 | |
1179 | - | 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; 3 | |
1180 | - | ||
1181 | - | (xi) The activation start and stop dates of each speed monitoring 4 | |
1182 | - | system for each location at which it was used; and 5 | |
1183 | - | ||
1184 | - | (xii) The number of citations issued by each speed monitoring system 6 | |
1185 | - | at each location. 7 | |
1186 | - | ||
1187 | - | (3) Each local jurisdiction with a speed monitoring system program AND 8 | |
1188 | - | THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION shall submit the information required under 9 | |
1189 | - | paragraph (2) of this subsection to the Commission by October 31 of each year and assist the 10 | |
1190 | - | Commission in the preparation of the annual report. 11 | |
1191 | - | ||
1192 | - | SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the Laws o f Maryland read 12 | |
1193 | - | as follows: 13 | |
1194 | - | ||
1195 | - | Article – Transportation 14 | |
1196 | - | ||
1197 | - | 21–809. 15 | |
1198 | - | ||
1199 | - | (c) (2) (I) [A] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 16 | |
1200 | - | PARAGRAPH , A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed: 17 | |
1201 | - | ||
1202 | - | [(i)] 1. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 18 | |
1203 | - | exceeded the speed limit by between 12 and 15, inclusive, miles per hour, $40; 19 | |
1204 | - | ||
1205 | - | [(ii)] 2. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 20 | |
1206 | - | exceeded the speed limit by between 16 and 19, inclusive, miles per hour, $70; 21 | |
1207 | - | ||
1208 | - | [(iii)] 3. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 22 | |
1209 | - | exceeded the speed limit by between 20 and 29, inclusive, miles per hour, $120; 23 | |
1210 | - | ||
1211 | - | [(iv)] 4. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 24 | |
1212 | - | exceeded the speed limit by between 30 and 39, inclusive, miles per hour, $230; and 25 | |
1213 | - | ||
1214 | - | [(v)] 5. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 26 | |
1215 | - | exceeded the speed limit by 40 miles per hour or more, $425. 27 | |
1216 | - | ||
1217 | - | (II) A CIVIL PENAL TY UNDER THIS SUBSEC TION FOR A 28 | |
1218 | - | VIOLATION RECORDED O N INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 29 | |
1219 | - | 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY NOT EXCEED $40. 30 | |
1220 | - | ||
1221 | - | SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That Section 2 of this Act shall take 31 | |
1222 | - | effect October 1, 2025, contingent on the taking effect of Chapter ____ or ____ (S.B. 118 or 32 SENATE BILL 338 27 | |
1223 | - | ||
1224 | - | ||
1225 | - | H.B. 182) of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2025, and if Chapter ____ or _____ (S.B. 1 | |
1226 | - | 118 or H.B. 182) does not take effect, Section 2 of this Act, with no further action required 2 | |
1227 | - | by the General Assembly, shall be null and void. 3 | |
1228 | - | ||
1229 | - | SECTION 2. 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 4 | |
1230 | - | ||
1231 | - | (a) On or before June 1, 2030 2029, the State Highway Administration shall 5 | |
1232 | - | submit a report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government 6 | |
1233 | - | Article, the General Assembly, on the speed monitoring systems placed on Interstate 695 7 | |
1234 | - | in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County in accordance with § 21–811 8 | |
1235 | - | 21–809 of the Transportation Article as, as enacted by Section 1 of this Act. 9 | |
1236 | - | ||
1237 | - | (b) The report required under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 10 | |
1238 | - | ||
1239 | - | (1) any changes since the implementation of speed monitoring systems 11 | |
1240 | - | under Section 1 of this Act in: 12 | |
1241 | - | ||
1242 | - | (i) accident crash and fatality rates on Interstate 695 and Interstate 13 | |
1243 | - | 83 in Baltimore County; and 14 | |
1244 | - | ||
1245 | - | (ii) the number of repeat violations recorded by these speed 15 | |
1246 | - | monitoring systems; 16 | |
1247 | - | ||
1248 | - | (2) any measurable improvements in driver awareness and compliance 17 | |
1249 | - | with posted speed limits at areas on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 18 | |
1250 | - | in Baltimore County where speed monitoring systems are operated; 19 | |
1251 | - | ||
1252 | - | (3) any unintended consequences including traffic congestion or an 20 | |
1253 | - | increase in the use of alternative routes; 21 | |
1254 | - | ||
1255 | - | (4) the gross revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the 22 | |
1256 | - | speed monitoring systems; 23 | |
1257 | - | ||
1258 | - | (5) the percentage of the gross revenue collected that has been used to: 24 | |
1259 | - | ||
1260 | - | (i) to recover the cost of implementing and administering the speed 25 | |
1261 | - | monitoring systems; and 26 | |
1262 | - | ||
1263 | - | (ii) for public safety purposes, including pedestrian or highway 27 | |
1264 | - | safety programs assist in covering the cost of roadway and safety improvements on Interstate 28 | |
1265 | - | 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 29 | |
1266 | - | ||
1267 | - | (6) whether revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the speed 30 | |
1268 | - | monitoring systems has been sufficient to cover the costs specified under paragraph (5)(i) 31 | |
1269 | - | and (ii) of this subsection; 32 | |
1270 | - | 28 SENATE BILL 338 | |
1271 | - | ||
1272 | - | ||
1273 | - | (7) how funds have been used for public safety purposes on Interstate 695 1 | |
1274 | - | in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 2 | |
1275 | - | ||
1276 | - | (8) whether revenue collected has been supplemental to, and has not 3 | |
1277 | - | supplanted, existing State and local funds allocated for transportation; 4 | |
1278 | - | ||
1279 | - | (9) the percentage of issued citations that have been contested; 5 | |
1280 | - | ||
1281 | - | (10) the percentage of contested citations that were overturned or reduced; 6 | |
1282 | - | ||
1283 | - | (11) whether citations have consistently been issued within the time frames 7 | |
1284 | - | required under § 21–811(d)(4) 21–809(d)(4) of the Transportation Article, as enacted by 8 | |
1285 | - | Section 1 of this Act, and any required maintenance, calibration, and certification checks 9 | |
1286 | - | have been documented and performed as scheduled; 10 | |
1287 | - | ||
1288 | - | (12) whether there has been any pattern of citation errors or disputes 11 | |
1289 | - | regarding vehicle identification; 12 | |
1290 | - | ||
1291 | - | (13) whether speed monitoring systems have been consistently maintained 13 | |
1292 | - | and calibrated in accordance with § 21–811(b)(7) 21–809(b)(4) of the Transportation Article, 14 | |
1293 | - | as enacted by Section 1 of this Act; 15 | |
1294 | - | ||
1295 | - | (14) whether the locations that have been identified as being at high risk for 16 | |
1296 | - | motor vehicle crashes that result in serious bodily injury or death have changed since the 17 | |
1297 | - | implementation of the speed monitoring systems; 18 | |
1298 | - | ||
1299 | - | (15) whether speed monitoring systems have been relocated as a result of 19 | |
1300 | - | any changes under item (14) of this subsection, or any changes in traffic patterns; 20 | |
1301 | - | ||
1302 | - | (16) whether the speed limit thresholds under § 21–811(b)(4) tolerance of 12 21 | |
1303 | - | miles per hour under § 21–809 of the Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this 22 | |
1304 | - | Act have has effectively influenced driver behavior on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County 23 | |
1305 | - | and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 24 | |
1306 | - | ||
1307 | - | (17) any issues with speed monitoring system visibility, signage, or 25 | |
1308 | - | technical malfunctions; 26 | |
1309 | - | ||
1310 | - | (18) whether there have been any formal complaints or legal challenges to 27 | |
1311 | - | the implementation of speed monitoring systems under Section 1 of this Act; 28 | |
1312 | - | ||
1313 | - | (19) any privacy or data security concerns that have arisen from the 29 | |
1314 | - | handling of recorded images or citation data; 30 | |
1315 | - | ||
1316 | - | (20) any significant delays in processing citations or appeals; and 31 | |
1317 | - | SENATE BILL 338 29 | |
1318 | - | ||
1319 | - | ||
1320 | - | (21) whether any public safety improvements intended to be funded by 1 | |
1321 | - | revenue derived as a result of violations enforced by the speed monitoring systems have 2 | |
1322 | - | been completed on schedule and within budget; and 3 | |
1323 | - | ||
1324 | - | (22) any disparities in the number of citations issued as a result of violations 4 | |
1325 | - | enforced by the speed monitoring systems on different communities or demographic groups 5 | |
1326 | - | in the State. 6 | |
1327 | - | ||
1328 | - | SECTION 2. 3. 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That , except as provided in 7 | |
1329 | - | Section 3 of this Act, this Act shall take effect June October 1, 2025. It shall remain effective 8 | |
1330 | - | for a period of 5 years and 1 month 4 years and 9 months and, at the end of June 30, 2030, 9 | |
1331 | - | this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and 10 | |
1332 | - | of no further force and effect. 11 | |
1333 | - | ||
1334 | - | ||
1335 | - | ||
1336 | - | ||
1337 | - | Approved: | |
1338 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
1339 | - | Governor. | |
1340 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
1341 | - | President of the Senate. | |
1342 | - | ________________________________________________________________________________ | |
1343 | - | Speaker of the House of Delegates. |