Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB338 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
11
22
33 EXPLANATION: CAPITALS INDICATE MATTER ADDED TO EXIS TING LAW.
44 [Brackets] indicate matter deleted from existing law.
55 Underlining indicates amendments to bill.
66 Strike out indicates matter stricken from the bill by amendment or deleted from the law by
77 amendment.
8- Italics indicate opposite chamber/conference committee amendments.
98 *sb0338*
109
1110 SENATE BILL 338
12-R5 (5lr1360)
13-ENROLLED BILL
14-— Judicial Proceedings/Environment and Transportation —
15-Introduced by Senators West, Hettleman, Salling, Sydnor, and Brooks Baltimore
16-County Senators
17-
18-Read and Examined by Proofreaders:
19-
20-_______________________________________________
21-Proofreader.
22-_______________________________________________
23-Proofreader.
24-
25-Sealed with the Great Seal and presented to the Governor, for his approval this
26-
27-_______ day of _______________ at ________________________ o’clock, ________M.
28-
29-______________________________________________
30-President.
11+R5 5lr1360
12+SB 1067/24 – JPR CF HB 978
13+By: Senators West, Hettleman, Salling, Sydnor, and Brooks Baltimore County
14+Senators
15+Introduced and read first time: January 16, 2025
16+Assigned to: Judicial Proceedings
17+Committee Report: Favorable with amendments
18+Senate action: Adopted with floor amendments
19+Read second time: February 26, 2025
3120
3221 CHAPTER ______
3322
3423 AN ACT concerning 1
3524
3625 Baltimore County – Speed Monitoring Systems – Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 2
3726
3827 FOR the purpose of authorizing the State Highway Administration to place and use a 3
39-certain number of speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County 4
40-and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County subject to certain requirements; requiring 5
41-that fines collected in Baltimore County as a result of violations enforced by speed 6
42-monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in 7
43-Baltimore County be used to recover costs and assist in covering the cost of roadway 8
44-and safety improvements on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 9
45-in Baltimore County; requiring the Department of State Police to mail a warning 10
46-notice instead of a citation for a violation recorded by a speed monitoring system on 11
47-Interstate 695 or Interstate 83 in Baltimore County during a certain time period; 12
48-and generally relating to speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 in Baltimore 13
49-County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County. 14 2 SENATE BILL 338
28+certain number of speed monitoring systems on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 4
29+Baltimore County subject to certain requirements; requiring that fines collected in 5
30+Baltimore County as a result of violations enforced by speed monitoring systems on 6
31+Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 be used to recover costs and assist in covering the 7
32+cost of roadway and safety improvements on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 8
33+Baltimore County; requiring the Department of State Police to mail a warning notice 9
34+instead of a citation for a violation recorded by a speed monitoring system on 10
35+Interstate 695 or Interstate 83 in Baltimore County during a certain time period; 11
36+and generally relating to speed monitoring systems in Baltimore County. 12
37+
38+BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 13
39+ Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 14
40+Section 7–302(e)(3) and 10–311(b) 15
41+ Annotated Code of Maryland 16
42+ (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 17
43+
44+BY adding to 18
45+ Article – Transportation 19
46+ Section 21–811 20
47+ Annotated Code of Maryland 21
48+ (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 22 2 SENATE BILL 338
5049
5150
5251
53-BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 1
54- Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 2
55-Section 7–302(e)(3) and 10–311(b) 3
56- Annotated Code of Maryland 4
57- (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 5
52+ SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 1
53+That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 2
5854
59-BY adding to 6
60- Article – Transportation 7
61- Section 21–811 8
62- Annotated Code of Maryland 9
63- (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 10
55+Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 3
6456
65-BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 11
66- Article – Transportation 12
67- Section 21–809 13
68- Annotated Code of Maryland 14
69- (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 15
57+7–302. 4
7058
71-BY repealing and reenacting, with amendments, 16
72- Article – Transportation 17
73- Section 21–809(c)(2) 18
74- Annotated Code of Maryland 19
75- (2020 Replacement Volume and 2024 Supplement) 20
76-(As enacted by Chapter ___or ___ (S.B. 118 or H.B. 182) of the Acts of the General 21
77-Assembly of 2025) 22
59+ (e) (3) (I) [Civil] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF 5
60+THIS PARAGRAPH , CIVIL penalties resulting from citations issued using a vehicle height 6
61+monitoring system, traffic control signal monitoring system, speed monitoring system, 7
62+work zone speed control system, stop sign monitoring system, school bus monitoring 8
63+camera, bus lane monitoring system, or a noise abatement monitoring system that are 9
64+collected by the District Court shall be collected in accordance with subsection (a) of this 10
65+section and distributed in accordance with § 12–118 of the Transportation Article. 11
7866
79- SECTION 1. BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF MARYLAND, 23
80-That the Laws of Maryland read as follows: 24
67+ (II) 1. THE SUBJECT TO SUBSUBPARA GRAPH 3 OF THIS 12
68+SUBPARAGRAPH , THE FINES COLLECTED BY THE DISTRICT COURT AS A RESULT OF 13
69+VIOLATIONS ENFORCED BY SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 14
70+INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY SHALL BE REMIT TED TO THE 15
71+COMPTROLLER FOR DISTR IBUTION TO THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TO 16
72+BE USED SOLELY TO ASSIST: 17
8173
82-Article – Courts and Judicial Proceedings 25
74+ A. RECOVER THE COST OF I MPLEMENTING AND 18
75+ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 19
76+INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 20
8377
84-7–302. 26
78+ B. ASSIST IN COVERING THE COST OF ROADWAY AND 21
79+SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE 22
80+COUNTY. 23
8581
86- (e) (3) (I) [Civil] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF 27
87-THIS PARAGRAPH , CIVIL penalties resulting from citations issued using a vehicle height 28
88-monitoring system, traffic control signal monitoring system, speed monitoring system, 29
89-work zone speed control system, stop sign monitoring system, school bus monitoring 30
90-camera, bus lane monitoring system, or a noise abatement monitoring system that are 31
91-collected by the District Court shall be collected in accordance with subsection (a) of this 32
92-section and distributed in accordance with § 12–118 of the Transportation Article. 33
82+ 2. FINES REMITTED DISTRIBUTED TO THE STATE 24
83+HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH 25
84+ARE SUPPLEMENTAL TO AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO TAKE THE PLACE OF FUNDING 26
85+THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPROPRIATED FOR USES DESCRIBED UNDER 27
86+SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH . 28
9387
94- (II) 1. THE SUBJECT TO SUBSUBPARA GRAPH 3 OF THIS 34
95-SUBPARAGRAPH , THE FINES COLLECTED THE FINES COLLECTED B Y THE DISTRICT 35
96-COURT BY THE DISTRICT COURT AS A RESULT OF VIOLA TIONS ENFORCED BY SP EED 36
97-MONITORING SY STEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 37 SENATE BILL 338 3
88+ 3. NOT MORE THAN 49% OF THE FINES DISTRIB UTED TO 29
89+THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAP H 1 OF THIS 30
90+SUBPARAGRAPH MAY BE USED TO RECOVER THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND 31
91+ADMINISTERING TH E SPEED MONITORING S YSTEMS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 32
92+INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 33
93+
94+10–311. 34
95+ SENATE BILL 338 3
9896
9997
100-INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY SHALL BE REMIT TED TO THE 1
101-COMPTROLLER FOR DISTR IBUTION TO THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION TO 2
102-BE USED SOLELY TO ASSIST: 3
98+ (b) A recorded image of a motor vehicle produced by a speed monitoring system 1
99+in accordance with § 21–809 [or], § 21–810, OR § 21–811 of the Transportation Article is 2
100+admissible in a proceeding concerning a civil citation issued under that section for a 3
101+violation of Title 21, Subtitle 8 of the Transportation Article without authentication. 4
103102
104- A. RECOVER THE COST OF I MPLEMENTING AND 4
105-ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN 5
106-BALTIMORE COUNTY AND INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 6
103+Article – Transportation 5
107104
108- B. ASSIST IN COVERING THE COST OF ROADWAY AND 7
109-SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 8
110-INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 9
105+21–811. 6
111106
112- 2. FINES REMITTED DISTRIBUTED TO THE STATE 10
113-HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH 11
114-ARE SUPPLEMENTAL TO AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO TAKE THE PLACE OF FUNDING 12
115-THAT WOULD OTHERWISE BE APPROPRIATED FOR USES DESCRIBED UNDER 13
116-SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS SUBPARAGRAPH . 14
107+ (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 7
108+INDICATED. 8
117109
118- 3. NOT MORE THAN 49% OF THE FINES DISTRIB UTED TO 15
119-THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION UNDER SUBSUBPARAGRAPH 1 OF THIS 16
120-SUBPARAGRAPH MAY BE USED TO RECOVER THE COST OF IMPLEMENTING AND 17
121-ADMINISTERING THE SP EED MONITORING SYSTE MS ON INTERSTATE 695 AND 18
122-INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 19
110+ (2) (I) “OWNER” MEANS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF A MOTOR 9
111+VEHICLE OR A LESSEE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE U NDER A LEASE OF 6 MONTHS OR 10
112+LONGER. 11
123113
124-10–311. 20
114+ (II) “OWNER” DOES NOT INCLUDE : 12
125115
126- (b) A recorded image of a motor vehicle produced by a speed monitoring system 21
127-in accordance with § 21–809 [or], § 21–810, OR § 21–811 of the Transportation Article is 22
128-admissible in a proceeding concerning a civil citation issued under that section for a 23
129-violation of Title 21, Subtitle 8 of the Transportation Article without authentication. 24
116+ 1. A MOTOR VEHICLE RENTAL OR LEASING CO MPANY; 13
117+OR 14
130118
131-Article – Transportation 25
119+ 2. A HOLDER OF A SPECIAL REGISTRATION PLATE 15
120+ISSUED UNDER TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 9, PART III OF THIS ARTICLE. 16
132121
133-21–811. 26
122+ (3) “RECORDED IMAGE ” MEANS AN IMAGE RECOR DED BY A SPEED 17
123+MONITORING SYSTEM : 18
134124
135- (A) (1) IN THIS SECTION THE F OLLOWING WORDS HAVE THE MEANINGS 27
136-INDICATED. 28
125+ (I) ON: 19
137126
138- (2) (I) “OWNER” MEANS THE REGISTERED OWNER OF A MOTOR 29
139-VEHICLE OR A LESSEE OF A MOTOR VEHICLE U NDER A LEASE OF 6 MONTHS OR 30
140-LONGER. 31
127+ 1. A PHOTOGRAPH ; 20
141128
142- (II) “OWNER” DOES NOT INCLUDE : 32
129+ 2. A MICROPHOTOGRAPH ; 21
130+
131+ 3. AN ELECTRONIC IMAGE ; 22
132+
133+ 4. VIDEOTAPE; OR 23
134+
135+ 5. ANY OTHER MEDIUM ; AND 24
136+
137+ (II) SHOWING: 25
138+
139+ 1. THE REAR OF A MOTOR V EHICLE; 26
143140 4 SENATE BILL 338
144141
145142
146- 1. A MOTOR VEHICLE RENTAL OR LEASING CO MPANY; 1
147-OR 2
143+ 2. AT LEAST TWO TIME –STAMPED IMAGES OF TH E 1
144+MOTOR VEHICLE THAT I NCLUDE THE SAME STAT IONARY OBJECT NEAR THE MOTO R 2
145+VEHICLE; AND 3
148146
149- 2. A HOLDER OF A SPECIAL REGISTRATION PLATE 3
150-ISSUED UNDER TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 9, PART III OF THIS ARTICLE. 4
147+ 3. ON AT LEAST ONE IMAGE OR PORTION OF TAPE , A 4
148+CLEAR AND LEGIBLE ID ENTIFICATION OF THE ENTIRE REGISTRATION PLATE 5
149+NUMBER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE. 6
151150
152- (3) “RECORDED IMAGE ” MEANS AN IMAGE RECOR DED BY A SPEED 5
153-MONITORING SYSTEM : 6
151+ (4) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM” MEANS A DEVICE HAVIN G ONE OR 7
152+MORE MOTOR V EHICLE SENSORS CONNE CTED TO A CAMERA SYS TEM CAPABLE OF 8
153+PRODUCING RECORDED I MAGES OF MOTOR VEHIC LES. 9
154154
155- (I) ON: 7
155+ (5) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM OPERATOR ” MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL 10
156+WHO HAS BEEN TRAINED AND CERTIFIED TO OPE RATE A SPEED MONITOR ING 11
157+SYSTEM AND WHO IS : 12
156158
157- 1. A PHOTOGRAPH ; 8
159+ (I) A POLICE OFFICER OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 13
160+POLICE; 14
158161
159- 2. A MICROPHOTOGRAPH ; 9
162+ (II) A REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 15
163+POLICE; OR 16
160164
161- 3. AN ELECTRONIC IMAGE ; 10
165+ (III) A STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION CONTRA CTOR. 17
162166
163- 4. VIDEOTAPE; OR 11
167+ (B) (1) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 18
168+STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PLACE NOT MORE THAN THREE SPEED 19
169+MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 20
170+THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 21
171+INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 22
164172
165- 5. ANY OTHER MEDIUM ; AND 12
173+ (II) NOT MORE THAN FOUR TWO SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 23
174+IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME ON A 24
175+HIGHWAY SPECIFIED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT LOCATIONS 25
176+IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE MARYLAND STATE 26
177+POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS BEING AT HIGH 27
178+RISK FOR MOTOR VEHIC LE CRASHES THAT RESU LT IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR 28
179+DEATH. 29
166180
167- (II) SHOWING: 13
168-
169- 1. THE REAR OF A MOTOR V EHICLE; 14
170-
171- 2. AT LEAST TWO TIME –STAMPED IMAGES OF TH E 15
172-MOTOR VEHICLE THAT I NCLUDE THE SAME STAT IONARY OBJECT NEAR THE MOTO R 16
173-VEHICLE; AND 17
174-
175- 3. ON AT LEAST ONE IMAGE OR PORTION OF TAPE , A 18
176-CLEAR AND LEGIBLE ID ENTIFICATION OF THE ENTIRE REGISTRATION PLATE 19
177-NUMBER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE. 20
178-
179- (4) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM” MEANS A DEVICE HAVIN G ONE OR 21
180-MORE MOTOR V EHICLE SENSORS CONNE CTED TO A CAMERA SYS TEM CAPABLE OF 22
181-PRODUCING RECORDED I MAGES OF MOTOR VEHIC LES. 23
182-
183- (5) “SPEED MONITORING SYST EM OPERATOR ” MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL 24
184-WHO HAS BEEN TRAINED AND CERTIFIED TO OPE RATE A SPEED MONITOR ING 25
185-SYSTEM AND WHO IS : 26
186-
187- (I) A POLICE OFFICER OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 27
188-POLICE; 28
181+ (2) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 30
182+STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN TWO SPEED 31
183+MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 32
184+THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 33
185+INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 34
189186 SENATE BILL 338 5
190187
191188
192- (II) A REPRESENTATIVE OF TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE 1
193-POLICE; OR 2
189+ (II) NOT MORE THAN THREE ONE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS 1
190+SYSTEM IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME 2
191+ON A HIGHWAY SPECIFI ED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT 3
192+LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE 4
193+MARYLAND STATE POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS 5
194+BEING AT HIGH RISK F OR MOTOR VEH ICLE CRASHES THAT RE SULT IN SERIOUS 6
195+BODILY INJURY OR DEA TH. 7
194196
195- (III) A STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION CONTRA CTOR. 3
197+ (3) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SPECIFIED IN PAR AGRAPH 8
198+(1) OR (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION M AY BE USED ONLY: 9
196199
197- (B) (1) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 4
198-STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN THREE SPEED 5
199-MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 6
200-THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 7
201-INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 8
200+ (I) WHEN BEING OPERATED B Y A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 10
201+OPERATOR; AND 11
202202
203- (II) NOT MORE THAN FOUR TWO SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 9
204-IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME ON A 10
205-HIGHWAY SPECIFIED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT LOCATIONS 11
206-IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE MARYLAND STATE 12
207-POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS BEING A T HIGH 13
208-RISK FOR MOTOR VEHIC LE CRASHES THAT RESU LT IN SERIOUS BODILY INJURY OR 14
209-DEATH. 15
203+ (II) 1. IF ALL SPEED LIMIT SIGN S APPROACHING AND 12
204+WITHIN THE SEGMENT O F HIGHWAY ON WHICH T HE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS 13
205+LOCATED INCLUDE SIGN S THAT: 14
210206
211- (2) (I) SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRA PH (II) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 16
212-STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY PL ACE NOT MORE THAN TWO SPEED 17
213-MONITORING SYSTEMS IN EACH DIRECTION THAT MEET THE REQUIR EMENTS OF 18
214-THIS SECTION TO RECO RD THE IMAGES OF MOT OR VEHICLES TRAVELIN G ON 19
215-INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 20
207+ A. ARE IN ACCORDANCE WIT H THE MARYLAND MANUAL 15
208+ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC C ONTROL DEVICES ; AND 16
216209
217- (II) NOT MORE THAN THREE ONE SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS 21
218-SYSTEM IN EACH DIRECTION MA Y BE OPERATED IN OPERATION AT THE SAME TIME 22
219-ON A HIGHWAY SPECIFI ED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH AT 23
220-LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE 24
221-MARYLAND STATE POLICE, OR THE BALTIMORE COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT AS 25
222-BEING AT HIGH RISK F OR MOTOR VEHICLE CRA SHES THAT RESULT IN SERIOUS 26
223-BODILY INJURY OR DEA TH. 27
210+ B. INDICATE THAT A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN 17
211+USE; AND 18
224212
225- (3) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SPECIFIED IN PAR AGRAPH 28
226-(1) OR (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION M AY BE USED ONLY : 29
213+ 2. IF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ENSURE S 19
214+THAT EACH SIGN THAT INDICATES THAT A SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE IS 20
215+PROXIMATE TO A DEVIC E THAT DISPLAYS A RE AL–TIME POSTING OF THE SPEED AT 21
216+WHICH A DRIVER IS TR AVELING. ONLY IF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH T HE MARYLAND 22
217+MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, A CONSPICUOUS ROAD S IGN IS 23
218+PLACED AT A REASONAB LE DISTANCE CONSISTE NT WITH NATIONAL GUI DELINES 24
219+BEFORE THE SPEED MON ITORING SYSTEM ALERT ING DRIVERS THAT A S PEED 25
220+MONITORING SYSTEM MAY BE IN OPERATION. 26
227221
228- (I) WHEN BEING OPERATED B Y A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 30
229-OPERATOR; AND 31
222+ (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR NEED NO T BE 27
223+PRESENT IN PERSON OR REMOTELY AT THE HIGH WAY CORRIDOR WHERE A SPEED 28
224+MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE. 29
230225
231- (II) 1. IF ALL SPEED LIMIT SI GNS APPROACHING AND 32
232-WITHIN THE SEGMENT O F HIGHWAY ON WHICH T HE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS 33
233-LOCATED INCLUDE SIGN S THAT: 34
234- 6 SENATE BILL 338
226+ (4) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 30
227+695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 31
228+VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 16 12 MILES PER HOUR 32
229+ABOVE THE POSTED SPE ED LIMIT. 33
230+
231+ (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 34
232+83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 35 6 SENATE BILL 338
235233
236234
237- A. ARE IN ACCORDANCE WIT H THE MARYLAND MANUAL 1
238-ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC C ONTROL DEVICES ; AND 2
235+VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 12 MILES PER HOUR ABOVE 1
236+THE POSTED SPEED LIM IT. 2
239237
240- B. INDICATE THAT A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN 3
241-USE; AND 4
238+ (5) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL 3
239+COMPLETE TRAINING BY THE MANUFA CTURER OF THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 4
240+IN THE PROCEDURES FO R SETTING UP , TESTING, AND OPERATING THE SP EED 5
241+MONITORING SYSTEM . 6
242242
243- 2. IF THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ENSURE S 5
244-THAT EACH SIGN THAT INDICATES THAT A SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE IS 6
245-PROXIMATE TO A DEVIC E THAT DISPLAYS A RE AL–TIME POSTING OF THE SPEED AT 7
246-WHICH A DRIVER IS TR AVELING. ONLY IF, IN ACCORDANCE WITH T HE MARYLAND 8
247-MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, A CONSPICUOUS ROAD S IGN IS 9
248-PLACED AT A REASONAB LE DISTANCE CONSISTE NT WITH NATIONAL GUI DELINES 10
249-BEFORE THE SPEED MON ITORING SYSTEM ALER TING DRIVERS THAT A SPEED 11
250-MONITORING SYSTEM MA Y BE IN OPERATION . 12
243+ (II) ON COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING, THE MANUFACTURER 7
244+SHALL ISSUE A SIGNED CERTIFICATE TO THE S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 8
245+OPERATOR. 9
251246
252- (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR NEED NO T BE 13
253-PRESENT IN PERSON OR REMOTELY AT THE HIGH WAY CORRIDOR WHERE A SPEED 14
254-MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN USE. 15
247+ (III) THE CERTIFICATE OF TR AINING SHALL BE ADMI TTED AS 10
248+EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T PROCEEDING FOR A V IOLATION OF THIS SEC TION. 11
255249
256- (4) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 16
257-695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 17
258-VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 16 12 MILES PER HOUR 18
259-ABOVE THE POSTED SPE ED LIMIT. 19
250+ (6) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL F ILL OUT AND 12
251+SIGN A DAILY SET–UP LOG FOR A SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM THA T: 13
260252
261- (II) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATED ON INTERSTATE 20
262-83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY BE USED ON LY TO RECORD THE IMA GES OF 21
263-VEHICLES THAT ARE TR AVELING AT SPEEDS AT LEAST 12 MILES PER HOUR ABOVE 22
264-THE POSTED SPEED LIM IT. 23
253+ (I) STATES THE DATE AND TIM E WHEN AND THE LOCAT ION 14
254+WHERE THE SYSTEM WAS SET UP; 15
265255
266- (5) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL 24
267-COMPLETE TRAINING BY THE MANUFACTURER OF THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 25
268-IN THE PROCEDURES FO R SETTING UP , TESTING, AND OPERATING THE SP EED 26
269-MONITORING SYSTEM . 27
256+ (II) STATES THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM OP ERATOR 16
257+SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM ED, AND THE DEVICE PASSE D, THE 17
258+MANUFACTURER –SPECIFIED SELF –TESTS OF THE SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM 18
259+BEFORE PRODUCING A RECORDED IMAGE; 19
270260
271- (II) ON COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING, THE MANUFACTURER 28
272-SHALL ISSUE A SIGNED CERTIFICATE TO THE S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 29
273-OPERATOR. 30
261+ (III) SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 20
274262
275- (III) THE CERTIFICATE OF TRAINING SHA LL BE ADMITTED AS 31
276-EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T PROCEEDING FOR A V IOLATION OF THIS SEC TION. 32
263+ (IV) SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T 21
264+PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 22
277265
278- (6) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM OPERATOR SHALL F ILL OUT AND 33
279-SIGN A DAILY SET–UP LOG FOR A SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM THA T: 34
266+ (7) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SHALL UNDERGO AN 23
267+ANNUAL CALIBRATION C HECK PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT CALIBRAT ION 24
268+LABORATORY . 25
269+
270+ (II) THE INDEPENDENT CALIB RATION LABORATORY SH ALL 26
271+ISSUE A SIGNED CERTI FICATE OF CALIBRATIO N AFTER THE ANNUAL C ALIBRATION 27
272+CHECK THAT: 28
273+
274+ 1. SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 29
275+
276+ 2. SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COU RT 30
277+PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 31
280278 SENATE BILL 338 7
281279
282280
283- (I) STATES THE DATE AND T IME WHEN AND THE LOCAT ION 1
284-WHERE THE SYSTEM WAS SET UP; 2
281+ (8) THE PROCUREMENT OF A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM UNDER 1
282+THIS SECTION SHALL B E CONDUCTED IN ACCOR DANCE WITH TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 1 2
283+OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE. 3
285284
286- (II) STATES THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM OP ERATOR 3
287-SUCCESSFULLY PERFORM ED, AND THE DEVICE PASSE D, THE 4
288-MANUFACTURER –SPECIFIED SELF –TESTS OF THE SPEED M ONITORING SYSTEM 5
289-BEFORE PRODUCING A R ECORDED IMAGE; 6
285+ (C) (1) UNLESS THE DRIVER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE RECE IVED A 4
286+CITATION FROM A POLI CE OFFICER AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER 5
287+OR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S UBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, THE DRIVER OF A 6
288+MOTOR VEHICLE IS SUB JECT TO A CIVIL PENA LTY IF AN IMAGE OF T HE MOTOR 7
289+VEHICLE IS RECO RDED BY A SPEED MONI TORING SYSTEM IN ACC ORDANCE WITH 8
290+SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION WHIL E BEING OPERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS 9
291+SUBTITLE. 10
290292
291- (III) SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 7
293+ (2) A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT EXCEED $40. 11
292294
293- (IV) SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T 8
294-PROCEEDING FOR A VIO LATION OF THIS SECTI ON. 9
295+ (3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL: 12
295296
296- (7) (I) A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM SHALL UNDERGO AN 10
297-ANNUAL CALIBRATION C HECK PERFORMED BY AN INDEPENDENT CALIBRAT ION 11
298-LABORATORY . 12
297+ (I) PRESCRIBE A UNIFORM C ITATION FORM CONSIST ENT WITH 13
298+SUBSECTION (D)(1) OF THIS SECTION AND § 7–302 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; AND 14
299299
300- (II) THE INDEPENDENT CALIB RATION LABORATORY SH ALL 13
301-ISSUE A SIGNED CERTI FICATE OF CALIBRATIO N AFTER THE ANNUAL C ALIBRATION 14
302-CHECK THAT: 15
300+ (II) INDICATE ON THE CITAT ION THE AMOUNT OF TH E CIVIL 15
301+PENALTY TO BE PAID B Y PERSONS WHO CHOOSE TO PREPAY THE CIVI L PENALTY 16
302+WITHOUT APPEARING IN DISTRICT COURT. 17
303303
304- 1. SHALL BE KEPT ON FILE ; AND 16
304+ (D) (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVIS IONS OF PARAGRAPHS (2) THROUGH (4) 18
305+OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF 19
306+THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL TO THE OWNER LIABLE UND ER 20
307+SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION A CI TATION THAT SHALL IN CLUDE: 21
305308
306- 2. SHALL BE ADMITTED AS EVIDENCE IN ANY COUR T 17
307-PROCEEDING FOR A V IOLATION OF THIS SEC TION. 18
309+ (I) THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE REGISTERED OW NER OF 22
310+THE VEHICLE; 23
308311
309- (8) THE PROCUREMENT OF A SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM UNDER 19
310-THIS SECTION SHALL B E CONDUCTED IN ACCOR DANCE WITH TITLE 13, SUBTITLE 1 20
311-OF THE STATE FINANCE AND PROCUREMENT ARTICLE. 21
312+ (II) THE REGISTRATION NUMB ER OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE 24
313+INVOLVED IN THE VIOL ATION; 25
312314
313- (C) (1) UNLESS THE DRIVER OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE RECEIVED A 22
314-CITATION FROM A POLI CE OFFICER AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER 23
315-OR, IN ACCORDANCE WITH S UBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, THE DRIVER OF A 24
316-MOTOR VEHICLE IS SUB JECT TO A CIVIL PENA LTY IF AN IMAGE OF T HE MOTOR 25
317-VEHICLE IS RECORDED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 26
318-SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION WHIL E BEING OPERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS 27
319-SUBTITLE. 28
315+ (III) THE VIOLATION CHARGED ; 26
320316
321- (2) A CIVIL PENALTY UNDER THIS SUBSECTION MAY NOT EXCEED $40. 29
317+ (IV) THE LOCATION WHERE THE V IOLATION OCCURRED ; 27
322318
323- (3) FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL: 30
319+ (V) THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATION; 28
324320
325- (I) PRESCRIBE A UNIFORM C ITATION FORM CONSIST ENT WITH 31
326-SUBSECTION (D)(1) OF THIS SECTION AND § 7–302 OF THE COURTS ARTICLE; AND 32 8 SENATE BILL 338
321+ (VI) AT LEAST ONE RECORDED IMAGE OF THE VEHICLE WITH A 29
322+DATA BAR IMPRINTED O N EACH IMAGE THAT IN CLUDES THE SPEED OF THE VEHICLE 30
323+AND THE DATE AND TIM E THE IMAGE WAS RECO RDED; 31
324+ 8 SENATE BILL 338
325+
326+
327+ (VII) THE AMOUNT OF THE CIV IL PENALTY IMPOSED A ND THE 1
328+DATE BY WHICH THE CI VIL PENALTY SHOULD B E PAID; 2
329+
330+ (VIII) A SIGNED STATEMENT BY A POLICE OFFICER EMP LOYED BY 3
331+THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 4
332+STATE POLICE THAT, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES , THE MOTOR 5
333+VEHICLE WAS BEING OP ERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 6
334+
335+ (IX) A STATEMENT THAT RECOR DED IMAGES ARE EVIDE NCE OF 7
336+A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 8
337+
338+ (X) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 9
339+LIABLE UNDER THIS SECTI ON OF THE MANNER AND TIME IN WHICH LIABIL ITY AS 10
340+ALLEGED IN THE CITAT ION MAY BE CONTESTED IN THE DISTRICT COURT; AND 11
341+
342+ (XI) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 12
343+LIABLE UNDER THIS SE CTION THAT FAILURE T O PAY THE CIVIL PENA LTY OR TO 13
344+CONTEST LIABILITY IN A TIMELY MANNER : 14
345+
346+ 1. IS AN ADMISSION OF LI ABILITY; 15
347+
348+ 2. MAY RESULT IN THE REF USAL TO REGISTER THE 16
349+MOTOR VEHICLE ; AND 17
350+
351+ 3. MAY RESULT IN THE SUS PENSION OF THE MOTOR 18
352+VEHICLE REGISTRATION . 19
353+
354+ (2) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL A WAR NING 20
355+NOTICE INSTEAD OF A CITATION TO THE OWNE R LIABLE UNDER SUBSE CTION (C) OF 21
356+THIS SECTION DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 22
357+IS IN OPERATION. 23
358+
359+ (3) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION , 24
360+THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY NOT MAIL A CITATION TO A PERSON WHO 25
361+IS NOT AN OWNER . 26
362+
363+ (4) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, A 27
364+CITATION ISSUED UNDE R THIS SECTION SHALL BE MAILED NOT LATER THAN 2 28
365+WEEKS AFTER THE ALLE GED VIOLATION IF T HE VEHICLE IS REGIST ERED IN THE 29
366+STATE, AND NOT LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ALLEG ED VIOLATION IF THE 30
367+VEHICLE IS REGISTERE D IN ANOTHER STATE . 31
368+
369+ (5) A PERSON WHO RECEIVES A CITATION UNDER PAR AGRAPH (1) OF 32
370+THIS SUBSECTION MAY : 33 SENATE BILL 338 9
327371
328372
329373
330- (II) INDICATE ON THE CITAT ION THE AMOUNT OF TH E CIVIL 1
331-PENALTY TO BE PAID B Y PERSONS WHO CHOOSE TO PREPAY THE CIVIL PENALTY 2
332-WITHOUT APPEARING IN DISTRICT COURT. 3
374+ (I) PAY THE CIVIL PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH 1
375+INSTRUCTIONS ON THE CITATION; OR 2
333376
334- (D) (1) SUBJECT TO THE PROVIS IONS OF PARAGRAPHS (2) THROUGH (4) 4
335-OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF 5
336-THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL TO THE OWNER LIABLE UND ER 6
337-SUBSECTION (C) OF THIS SECTION A CITAT ION THAT SHALL INCLU DE: 7
377+ (II) ELECT TO STAND TRIAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 3
378+ALLEGED VIOLATION . 4
338379
339- (I) THE NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE REGISTERED OW NER OF 8
340-THE VEHICLE; 9
380+ (E) (1) A CERTIFICATE ALLEGING THAT THE VIOLATION O F THIS 5
381+SUBTITLE OCCURRED AN D THE REQUIREMENTS U NDER SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS 6
382+SECTION HAVE BEEN SA TISFIED, SWORN TO, OR AFFIRMED BY AN OF FICER OF THE 7
383+DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES 8
384+PRODUCED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM , SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS 9
385+CONTAINED IN THE CER TIFICATE AND SHALL B E ADMISSIBLE IN A PROCEE DING 10
386+ALLEGING A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SECTION W ITHOUT THE PRESENCE OR 11
387+TESTIMONY OF THE SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM OPERATOR WHO PERFORM ED THE 12
388+REQUIREMENTS UNDER S UBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION. 13
341389
342- (II) THE REGISTRATION NUMB ER OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE 10
343-INVOLVED IN THE VIOL ATION; 11
390+ (2) IF A PERSON WHO RECEI VED A CITATION UNDER SUBSECTION (D) 14
391+OF THIS SECTION DESI RES A SPEED MONITORI NG SYSTEM OPERATOR T O BE 15
392+PRESENT AND TESTIFY AT TRIAL, THE PERSON SHALL NOT IFY THE COURT AND TH E 16
393+DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE IN WRITING NOT LATER THAN 20 DAYS BEFORE 17
394+TRIAL. 18
344395
345- (III) THE VIOLATION CHARGED ; 12
396+ (3) ADJUDICATION OF LIABI LITY SHALL BE BASED ON A 19
397+PREPONDERANCE OF EVI DENCE. 20
346398
347- (IV) THE LOCATION WHERE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D; 13
399+ (F) (1) THE DISTRICT COURT MAY CONSIDER IN DEFENSE OF A 21
400+VIOLATION: 22
348401
349- (V) THE DATE AND TIME OF THE VIOLATION; 14
402+ (I) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THAT 23
403+THE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE REGISTRATION PLA TES OF THE MOTOR VEH ICLE WERE 24
404+STOLEN BEFORE THE VIOLATION OCCURRED AND WERE NO T UNDER THE CONTROL 25
405+OR POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE OWNER AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATIO N; 26
350406
351- (VI) AT LEAST ONE RECORDED IMAGE OF THE VEHICLE WITH A 15
352-DATA BAR IMPRINTED O N EACH IMAGE THAT IN CLUDES THE SPEED OF THE VEHICLE 16
353-AND THE DATE AND TIM E THE IMAGE WAS RECO RDED; 17
407+ (II) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 27
408+EVIDENCE THAT THE PE RSON NAMED IN THE CI TATION WAS NOT OPERA TING THE 28
409+VEHICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 29
354410
355- (VII) THE AMOUNT OF THE CIVI L PENALTY IMPOSED AN D THE 18
356-DATE BY WHICH THE CI VIL PENALTY SHOULD B E PAID; 19
411+ (III) ANY OTHER ISSUES AND EVIDENCE THAT THE DISTRICT 30
412+COURT DEEMS PERTINENT . 31
357413
358- (VIII) A SIGNED STATEMENT BY A POLICE OFFICER EMP LOYED BY 20
359-THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R OF THE DEPARTMENT OF 21
360-STATE POLICE THAT, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORD ED IMAGES, THE MOTOR 22
361-VEHICLE WAS BEING OP ERATED IN VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 23
362-
363- (IX) A STATEMENT THAT RECOR DED IMAGES ARE EVIDE NCE OF 24
364-A VIOLATION OF THIS SUBTITLE; 25
365-
366- (X) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 26
367-LIABLE UNDER TH IS SECTION OF THE MA NNER AND TIME IN WHI CH LIABILITY AS 27
368-ALLEGED IN THE CITAT ION MAY BE CONTESTED IN THE DISTRICT COURT; AND 28
369-
370- (XI) INFORMATION ADVISING THE PERSON ALLEGED T O BE 29
371-LIABLE UNDER THIS SE CTION THAT FAILURE T O PAY THE CIVIL PENA LTY OR TO 30
372-CONTEST LIABILITY IN A TIMEL Y MANNER: 31 SENATE BILL 338 9
414+ (2) TO DEMONSTRATE THAT T HE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE 32
415+REGISTRATION PLATES WERE STOLEN BEFORE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D AND 33
416+WERE NOT UNDER THE C ONTROL OR POSSESSION OF THE OWNER AT THE TIME OF 34 10 SENATE BILL 338
373417
374418
419+THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER SHALL SUBM IT PROOF THAT A POLI CE REPORT 1
420+REGARDING THE STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE OR REG ISTRATION PLATES WAS FILED IN 2
421+A TIMELY MANNER . 3
375422
376- 1. IS AN ADMISSION OF LI ABILITY; 1
423+ (3) TO SATISFY THE EVIDEN TIARY BURDEN UNDER PARAGRAPH 4
424+(1)(II) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE PERSON NAMED IN THE CITATION SHALL P ROVIDE 5
425+TO THE DISTRICT COURT A LETTER , SWORN TO OR AFFIRMED BY THE PERSON AND 6
426+MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUE STED, THAT: 7
377427
378- 2. MAY RESULT IN THE REF USAL TO REGISTER THE 2
379-MOTOR VEHICLE ; AND 3
428+ (I) STATES THAT THE PERSO N NAMED IN TH E CITATION WAS 8
429+NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 9
380430
381- 3. MAY RESULT IN THE SUS PENSION OF THE MOTOR 4
382-VEHICLE REGISTRATION . 5
431+ (II) INCLUDES ANY OTHER CO RROBORATING EVIDENCE . 10
383432
384- (2) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL MAIL A WARNING 6
385-NOTICE INSTEAD OF A CITATION TO THE OWNE R LIABLE UNDER SUBSE CTION (C) OF 7
386-THIS SECTION DURING THE FIRST 90 DAYS THAT THE SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM 8
387-IS IN OPERATION. 9
433+ (4) (I) IF THE DISTRICT COURT FINDS THAT THE PERSON NAMED 11
434+IN THE CITATION WAS NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE 12
435+VIOLATION OR RECEIVES E VIDENCE UNDER PARAGR APH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION 13
436+IDENTIFYING THE PERS ON DRIVING THE VEHIC LE AT THE TIME OF TH E VIOLATION, 14
437+THE CLERK OF THE COU RT MAY PROVIDE TO TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE 15
438+A COPY OF ANY EVIDEN CE SUBSTANTIATING WH O WAS OPERATING THE VEHICLE AT 16
439+THE TIME OF THE VIOL ATION. 17
388440
389- (3) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION , 10
390-THE DEPARTMENT O F STATE POLICE MAY NOT MAIL A CITATION TO A PERSON WHO 11
391-IS NOT AN OWNER . 12
441+ (II) ON RECEIPT OF SUBSTAN TIATING EVIDENCE FRO M THE 18
442+DISTRICT COURT UNDER SUBPARAGR APH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 19
443+DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY ISSUE A CI TATION AS PROVIDED I N 20
444+SUBSECTION (D) OF THIS SECTION TO THE PERSON WHO THE EVIDENCE IND ICATES 21
445+WAS OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION. 22
392446
393- (4) EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBSECTION (F)(4) OF THIS SECTION, A 13
394-CITATION ISSUED UNDE R THIS SECTION SHALL BE MAILED NOT LATER THAN 2 14
395-WEEKS AFTER THE ALLE GED VIOLATION IF THE VEHICLE IS REGISTERED IN THE 15
396-STATE, AND NOT LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER THE ALLEG ED VIOLATION IF THE 16
397-VEHICLE IS REGISTERE D IN ANOTHER STATE . 17
447+ (III) ANY CITATION ISSUED U NDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 23
448+PARAGRAPH SHALL BE M AILED NOT LATER THAN 2 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE 24
449+EVIDENCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT. 25
398450
399- (5) A PERSON WHO RECEIVES A CITATION UNDER PAR AGRAPH (1) OF 18
400-THIS SUBSECTION MAY : 19
451+ (G) IF A PERSON LIABLE UN DER THIS SECTION DOE S NOT PAY THE CIVIL 26
452+PENALTY OR CONTEST T HE VIOLATION, THE ADMINISTRATION MAY : 27
401453
402- (I) PAY THE CIVIL PENALTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH 20
403-INSTRUCTIONS ON THE CITATION; OR 21
454+ (1) REFUSE TO REGISTER OR REREGISTER THE REGIS TRATION OF 28
455+THE MOTOR VEHICLE CI TED FOR THE VIOLATIO N; OR 29
404456
405- (II) ELECT TO STAND TRIAL IN THE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 22
406-ALLEGED VIOLATION . 23
457+ (2) SUSPEND THE REGISTRATI ON OF THE MOTOR VEHI CLE CITED FOR 30
458+THE VIOLATION. 31
407459
408- (E) (1) A CERTIFICATE ALLEGING THAT THE VIOLATION O F THIS 24
409-SUBTITLE OCCURRED AN D THE REQUIREMENTS U NDER SUBSECTION (B) OF THIS 25
410-SECTION HAVE BEEN SATISFIED , SWORN TO, OR AFFIRMED BY AN OF FICER OF THE 26
411-DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, BASED ON INSPECTION OF RECORDED IMAGES 27
412-PRODUCED BY A SPEED MONITORING SYSTEM , SHALL BE EVIDENCE OF THE FACTS 28
413-CONTAINED IN THE CER TIFICATE AND SHALL B E ADMISSIBLE IN A PROCEEDING 29
414-ALLEGING A VIOLATION UNDER THIS SECTION W ITHOUT THE PRESENCE OR 30
415-TESTIMONY OF THE SPE ED MONITORING SYSTEM OPERATOR WHO PERFORM ED THE 31
416-REQUIREMENTS UNDER S UBSECTION (B) OF THIS SECTION. 32
417- 10 SENATE BILL 338
460+ (H) A VIOLATION FOR WHICH A CIVIL PENALTY IS I MPOSED UNDER THIS 32
461+SECTION: 33
462+ SENATE BILL 338 11
418463
419464
420- (2) IF A PERSON WHO RECEI VED A CITATION UNDER SUBSECTION (D) 1
421-OF THIS SECTION DESI RES A SPEED MONITORI NG SYSTEM OPERATOR T O BE 2
422-PRESENT AND TESTIFY AT TRIAL, THE PERSON SHALL NOT IFY THE COURT AND TH E 3
423-DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE IN WRITING NOT LATER THAN 20 DAYS BEFORE 4
424-TRIAL. 5
465+ (1) IS NOT A MOVING VIOLA TION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING 1
466+POINTS UNDER § 16–402 OF THIS ARTICLE; 2
425467
426- (3) ADJUDICATION OF LIABI LITY SHALL BE BASED ON A 6
427-PREPONDERANCE OF EVI DENCE. 7
468+ (2) MAY NOT BE RECORDED BY T HE ADMINISTRATION ON THE 3
469+DRIVING RECORD OF TH E OWNER OR DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE; 4
428470
429- (F) (1) THE DISTRICT COURT MAY CONSIDER IN DEFENSE OF A 8
430-VIOLATION: 9
471+ (3) MAY BE TREATED AS A P ARKING VIOLATION FOR PURPOSES OF § 5
472+26–305 OF THIS ARTICLE; AND 6
431473
432- (I) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THAT 10
433-THE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE REGISTRATION PLA TES OF THE MOTOR VEH ICLE WERE 11
434-STOLEN BEFORE THE VIOLATION OCCURRED A ND WERE NOT UNDER TH E CONTROL 12
435-OR POSSESSION OF THE VEHICLE OWNER AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATIO N; 13
474+ (4) MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE 7
475+INSURANCE COVERAGE . 8
436476
437- (II) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION , 14
438-EVIDENCE THAT THE PE RSON NAMED IN THE CI TATION WAS NOT OPERA TING THE 15
439-VEHICLE AT THE TI ME OF THE VIOLATION ; AND 16
477+ (I) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, THE 9
478+CHIEF JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL ADOPT PRO CEDURES FOR THE 10
479+ISSUANCE OF CITATION S, THE TRIAL OF CIVIL V IOLATIONS, AND THE COLLECTION 11
480+OF CIVIL PENALTIES U NDER THIS SECTION . 12
440481
441- (III) ANY OTHER ISSUES AND EVIDENCE THAT THE DISTRICT 17
442-COURT DEEMS PERTINENT . 18
482+ (J) (1) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R 13
483+DESIGNATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL ADMINIST ER AND 14
484+PROCESS CIVIL CITATI ONS ISSUED UNDER THI S SECTION IN COORDIN ATION WITH 15
485+THE DISTRICT COURT. 16
443486
444- (2) TO DEMONSTRATE THAT T HE MOTOR VEHICLE OR THE 19
445-REGISTRATION PLATES WERE STOLEN BEFORE T HE VIOLATION OCCURRE D AND 20
446-WERE NOT UNDER THE C ONTROL OR PO SSESSION OF THE OWNE R AT THE TIME OF 21
447-THE VIOLATION , THE OWNER SHALL SUBM IT PROOF THAT A POLI CE REPORT 22
448-REGARDING THE STOLEN MOTOR VEHICLE OR REG ISTRATION PLATES WAS FILED IN 23
449-A TIMELY MANNER . 24
487+ (2) IF A CONTRACTOR PROVI DES, DEPLOYS, OR OPERATES A SPEED 17
488+MONITORING SYSTEM FO R THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR THE STATE 18
489+HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE CONTRACTOR ’S FEE MAY NOT BE CON TINGENT ON 19
490+THE NUMBER OF CITATI ONS ISSUED OR PAID . 20
450491
451- (3) TO SATISFY THE EVIDEN TIARY BURDEN UNDER P ARAGRAPH 25
452-(1)(II) OF THIS SUBSECTION , THE PERSON NAMED IN THE CITATION SHALL P ROVIDE 26
453-TO THE DISTRICT COURT A LETTER , SWORN TO OR AFFIRMED BY THE PERSON AND 27
454-MAILED BY CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUE STED, THAT: 28
492+ (K) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 21
493+ADMINISTRATION JOINTL Y SHALL ADOPT REGULA TIONS ESTABLISHING 22
494+STANDARDS AND PROCED URES FOR SPEED MONIT ORING SYSTEMS AUTHOR IZED 23
495+UNDER THIS SECTION . 24
455496
456- (I) STATES THAT THE PERSO N NAMED IN THE CITAT ION WAS 29
457-NOT OPERATING THE VEHICL E AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION; AND 30
497+ SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 25
458498
459- (II) INCLUDES ANY OTHER CO RROBORATING EVIDENCE . 31
499+ (a) On or before June 1, 2030, the State Highway Administration shall submit a 26
500+report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government Article, 27
501+the General Assembly, on the speed monitoring systems placed on Interstate 695 and 28
502+Interstate 83 in Baltimore County in accordance with § 21–811 of the Transportation 29
503+Article as enacted by Section 1 of this Act. 30
460504
461- (4) (I) IF THE DISTRICT COURT FINDS THAT THE PERSON NAMED 32
462-IN THE CITATION WAS NOT OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE 33
463-VIOLATION OR RECEIVE S EVIDENCE UNDER PARAG RAPH (3) OF THIS SUBSECTION 34 SENATE BILL 338 11
505+ (b) The report required under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 31
464506
465-
466-IDENTIFYING THE PERS ON DRIVING THE VEHIC LE AT THE TIME OF TH E VIOLATION, 1
467-THE CLERK OF THE COU RT MAY PROVIDE TO TH E DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE 2
468-A COPY OF ANY EVIDEN CE SUBSTANTIATING WH O WAS OPERATING THE VEHICLE AT 3
469-THE TIME OF THE VIOL ATION. 4
470-
471- (II) ON RECEIPT OF SUBSTAN TIATING EVIDENCE FRO M THE 5
472-DISTRICT COURT UNDER SUBPARAGR APH (I) OF THIS PARAGRAPH , THE 6
473-DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE MAY ISSUE A CI TATION AS PROVIDED I N 7
474-SUBSECTION (D) OF THIS SECTION TO T HE PERSON WHO THE EVIDENCE IND ICATES 8
475-WAS OPERATING THE VE HICLE AT THE TIME OF THE VIOLATION. 9
476-
477- (III) ANY CITATION ISSUED U NDER SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 10
478-PARAGRAPH SHALL BE M AILED NOT LATER THAN 2 WEEKS AFTER RECEIPT OF THE 11
479-EVIDENCE FROM THE DISTRICT COURT. 12
480-
481- (G) IF A PERSON LIABLE UN DER THIS SECTION DOE S NOT PAY THE CIVIL 13
482-PENALTY OR CONTEST T HE VIOLATION, THE ADMINISTRATION MAY : 14
483-
484- (1) REFUSE TO REGISTER OR REREGISTER THE REGIS TRATION OF 15
485-THE MOTOR VEHICLE CI TED FOR THE VIOLATIO N; OR 16
486-
487- (2) SUSPEND THE REGISTRAT ION OF THE MOTOR VEHICLE CITED FOR 17
488-THE VIOLATION. 18
489-
490- (H) A VIOLATION FOR WHICH A CIVIL PENALTY IS I MPOSED UNDER THIS 19
491-SECTION: 20
492-
493- (1) IS NOT A MOVING VIOLA TION FOR THE PURPOSE OF ASSESSING 21
494-POINTS UNDER § 16–402 OF THIS ARTICLE; 22
495-
496- (2) MAY NOT BE RECORDED B Y THE ADMINISTRATION ON THE 23
497-DRIVING RECORD OF TH E OWNER OR DRIVER OF THE VEHICLE; 24
498-
499- (3) MAY BE TREATED AS A P ARKING VIOLATION FOR PURPOSES OF § 25
500-26–305 OF THIS ARTICLE; AND 26
501-
502- (4) MAY NOT BE CONSIDERED IN THE PROVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLE 27
503-INSURANCE COVERAGE . 28
504-
505- (I) IN CONSULTATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE, THE 29
506-CHIEF JUDGE OF THE DISTRICT COURT SHALL ADOPT PRO CEDURES FOR THE 30
507-ISSUANCE OF CITATION S, THE TRIAL OF CIVIL V IOLATIONS, AND THE COLLECTION 31
508-OF CIVIL PENALTIES U NDER THIS SECTION . 32
507+ (1) any changes since the implementation of speed monitoring systems 32
508+under Section 1 of this Act in: 33
509509 12 SENATE BILL 338
510510
511511
512- (J) (1) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR A CONTRACTO R 1
513-DESIGNATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE SHALL ADMINIST ER AND 2
514-PROCESS CIVIL CITATI ONS ISSUED UNDER THI S SECTION IN COORDIN ATION WITH 3
515-THE DISTRICT COURT. 4
512+ (i) accident and fatality rates on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in 1
513+Baltimore County; and 2
516514
517- (2) IF A CONTRACTOR PROVI DES, DEPLOYS, OR OPERATES A SPEED 5
518-MONITORING SYSTEM FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE OR THE STATE 6
519-HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , THE CONTRACTOR ’S FEE MAY NOT BE CON TINGENT ON 7
520-THE NUMBER OF CITATI ONS ISSUED OR PAID . 8
515+ (ii) the number of repeat violations recorded by speed monitoring 3
516+systems; 4
521517
522- (K) THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE POLICE AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 9
523-ADMINISTRATION JOINTL Y SHALL ADOPT REGULATI ONS ESTABLISHING 10
524-STANDARDS AND PROCED URES FOR SPEED MONIT ORING SYSTEMS AUTHOR IZED 11
525-UNDER THIS SECTION . 12
518+ (2) any measurable improvements in driver awareness and compliance 5
519+with posted speed limits at areas on Interstate 695 and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County 6
520+where speed monitoring systems are operated; 7
526521
527-21–809. 13
522+ (3) any unintended consequences including traffic congestion or an 8
523+increase in the use of alternative routes; 9
528524
529- (a) (1) In this section the following words have the meanings indicated. 14
525+ (4) the gross revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the 10
526+speed monitoring systems; 11
530527
531- (2) “Agency” means: 15
528+ (5) the percentage of the gross revenue collected that has been used: 12
532529
533- (i) A law enforcement agency of a local political subdivision that is 16
534-authorized to issue a citation for a violation of the Maryland Vehicle Law or of local traffic 17
535-laws or regulations; [or] 18
530+ (i) to recover the cost of implementing and administering the speed 13
531+monitoring systems; and 14
536532
537- (ii) For a municipal corporation that does not maintain a police force, 19
538-an agency established or designated by the municipal corporation to implement this subtitle 20
539-using speed monitoring systems in accordance with this section; OR 21
533+ (ii) for public safety purposes, including pedestrian or highway 15
534+safety programs; 16
540535
541- (III) FOR SPEED MONITORING SYSTEMS PLACED AND U SED ON 22
542-INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE 23
543-COUNTY, THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION . 24
536+ (6) whether revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the speed 17
537+monitoring systems has been sufficient to cover the costs specified under paragraph (5)(i) 18
538+and (ii) of this subsection; 19
544539
545- (3) (i) “Erroneous violation” means a potential violation submitted by a 25
546-speed monitoring system contractor for review by an agency that is apparently inaccurate 26
547-based on a technical variable that is under the control of the contractor. 27
540+ (7) how funds have been used for public safety purposes on Interstate 695 20
541+and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 21
548542
549- (ii) “Erroneous violation” includes a potential violation based on: 28
543+ (8) whether revenue collected has been supplemental to, and has not 22
544+supplanted, existing State and local funds allocated for transportation; 23
550545
551- 1. A recorded image of a registration plate that does not 29
552-match the registration plate issued for the motor vehicle in the recorded image; 30
546+ (9) the percentage of issued citations that have been contested; 24
553547
554- 2. A recorded image that shows a stopped vehicle or no 31
555-progression; 32
548+ (10) the percentage of contested citations that were overturned or reduced; 25
549+
550+ (11) whether citations have consistently been issued within the time frames 26
551+required under § 21–811(d)(4) of the Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this 27
552+Act, and any required maintenance, calibration, and certification checks have been 28
553+documented and performed as scheduled; 29
554+
555+ (12) whether there has been any pattern of citation errors or disputes 30
556+regarding vehicle identification; 31
556557 SENATE BILL 338 13
557558
558559
559- 3. An incorrectly measured speed for a motor vehicle; 1
560+ (13) whether speed monitoring systems have been consistently maintained 1
561+and calibrated in accordance with § 21–811(b)(7) of the Transportation Article, as enacted 2
562+by Section 1 of this Act; 3
560563
561- 4. A measured speed of a motor vehicle that is below the 2
562-threshold speed that would subject the owner to a civil citation under this section; 3
564+ (14) whether the locations that have been identified as being at high risk for 4
565+motor vehicle crashes that result in serious bodily injury or death have changed since the 5
566+implementation of the speed monitoring systems; 6
563567
564- 5. A recorded image that was taken outside of the hours and 4
565-days that speed monitoring systems are authorized for use in school zones; and 5
568+ (15) whether speed monitoring systems have been relocated as a result of 7
569+any changes under item (14) of this subsection, or any changes in traffic patterns; 8
566570
567- 6. A recorded image that was taken by a speed monitoring 6
568-system with an expired calibration certificate. 7
571+ (16) whether the speed limit thresholds under § 21–811(b)(4) of the 9
572+Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this Act have effectively influenced driver 10
573+behavior; 11
569574
570- (4) (i) “Owner” means the registered owner of a motor vehicle or a lessee 8
571-of a motor vehicle under a lease of 6 months or more. 9
575+ (17) any issues with speed monitoring system visibility, signage, or 12
576+technical malfunctions; 13
572577
573- (ii) “Owner” does not include: 10
578+ (18) whether there have been any formal complaints or legal challenges to 14
579+the implementation of speed monitoring systems under Section 1 of this Act; 15
574580
575- 1. A motor vehicle rental or leasing company; or 11
581+ (19) any privacy or data security concerns that have arisen from the 16
582+handling of recorded images or citation data; 17
576583
577- 2. A holder of a special registration plate issued under Title 12
578-13, Subtitle 9, Part III of this article. 13
584+ (20) any significant delays in processing citations or appeals; 18
579585
580- (5) “Program administrator” means an employee or a representative of the 14
581-local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION designated by the local 15
582-jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION to oversee a contract with a 16
583-speed monitoring system contractor. 17
586+ (21) whether any public safety improvements intended to be funded as a 19
587+result of violations enforced by the speed monitoring systems have been completed on 20
588+schedule and within budget; and 21
584589
585- (6) “Recorded image” means an image recorded by a speed monitoring 18
586-system: 19
590+ (22) any disparities in the number of citations issued as a result of violations 22
591+enforced by the speed monitoring systems on different communities or demographic groups 23
592+in the State. 24
587593
588- (i) On: 20
594+ SECTION 2. 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That this Act shall take effect 25
595+June 1, 2025. It shall remain effective for a period of 5 years and 1 month and, at the end 26
596+of June 30, 2030, this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall 27
597+be abrogated and of no further force and effect. 28
589598
590- 1. A photograph; 21
591-
592- 2. A microphotograph; 22
593-
594- 3. An electronic image; 23
595-
596- 4. Videotape; or 24
597-
598- 5. Any other medium; and 25
599-
600- (ii) Showing: 26
601-
602- 1. The rear of a motor vehicle; 27
603-
604- 2. At least two time–stamped images of the motor vehicle that 28
605-include the same stationary object near the motor vehicle; and 29 14 SENATE BILL 338
606-
607-
608-
609- 3. On at least one image or portion of tape, a clear and legible 1
610-identification of the entire registration plate number of the motor vehicle. 2
611-
612- (7) “School zone” means a designated roadway segment within up to a 3
613-half–mile radius of a school for any of grades kindergarten through grade 12 where 4
614-school–related activity occurs, including: 5
615-
616- (i) Travel by students to or from school on foot or by bicycle; or 6
617-
618- (ii) The dropping off or picking up of students by school buses or other 7
619-vehicles. 8
620-
621- (8) “Speed monitoring system” means a device with one or more motor 9
622-vehicle sensors producing recorded images of motor vehicles traveling at speeds at least 12 10
623-miles per hour above the posted speed limit. 11
624-
625- (9) “Speed monitoring system operator” means a representative of an agency 12
626-or contractor that operates a speed monitoring system. 13
627-
628- (b) (1) (i) 1. A speed monitoring system may not be used [in] BY a local 14
629-jurisdiction under this section unless its use is authorized by the governing body of the local 15
630-jurisdiction by local law enacted after reasonable notice and a public hearing. 16
631-
632- 2. THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION MAY US E 17
633-SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY AND 18
634-INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS SECTION . 19
635-
636- (ii) Before a county may use a speed monitoring system on a State 20
637-highway at a location within a municipal corporation, the county shall: 21
638-
639- 1. Obtain the approval of the State Highway Administration; 22
640-
641- 2. Notify the municipal corporation of the State Highway 23
642-Administration’s approval of the use of a speed monitoring system at that location; and 24
643-
644- 3. Grant the municipal corporation 60 days from the date of 25
645-the county’s notice to the municipal corporation to enact an ordinance authorizing the 26
646-municipal corporation instead of the county to use a speed monitoring system at that 27
647-location. 28
648-
649- (iii) 1. This subparagraph applies only in Prince George’s County. 29
650-
651- 2. In the county, a municipal corporation may implement and 30
652-use a speed monitoring system consistent with the requirements of this subsection on a 31
653-county highway at a location within its corporate limits if the municipal corporation: 32 SENATE BILL 338 15
654-
655-
656-
657- A. Submits to the county a plan describing the boundary of 1
658-the applicable school zone and the proposed location of the speed monitoring system; and 2
659-
660- B. Requests and receives permission from the county to use the 3
661-speed monitoring system at the proposed location. 4
662-
663- 3. If the county fails to respond to the request within 60 days, 5
664-the municipal corporation may implement and use the speed monitoring system as described 6
665-in the plan submission. 7
666-
667- 4. The county may not: 8
668-
669- A. Unreasonably deny a request under this subparagraph; or 9
670-
671- B. Place exactions, fees, or unreasonable restrictions on the 10
672-implementation and use of a speed monitoring system under this subparagraph. 11
673-
674- 5. The county shall state in writing the reasons for any denial 12
675-of a request under this subparagraph. 13
676-
677- 6. A municipal corporation may contest in the circuit court a 14
678-county denial of a request under this subparagraph. 15
679-
680- (iv) In Prince George’s County, if a municipal corporation has 16
681-established a school zone that is within one–quarter mile of a school zone established in 17
682-another municipal corporation, the municipal corporation may not implement or use a speed 18
683-monitoring system in that school zone unless it has obtained the approval of the other 19
684-municipal corporation. 20
685-
686- (v) An ordinance or resolution adopted by the governing body of a 21
687-local jurisdiction under this paragraph shall provide that, if the local jurisdiction moves or 22
688-places a mobile or stationary speed monitoring system to or at a location where a speed 23
689-monitoring system had not previously been moved or placed, the local jurisdiction may not 24
690-issue a citation for a violation recorded by that speed monitoring system: 25
691-
692- 1. Until signage is installed in accordance with 26
693-subparagraph (viii) of this paragraph; and 27
694-
695- 2. For at least the first 15 calendar days after the signage is 28
696-installed. 29
697-
698- (vi) This section applies to a violation of this subtitle recorded by a 30
699-speed monitoring system that meets the requirements of this subsection and has been placed: 31
700-
701- 1. In Anne Arundel County, Montgomery County, or Prince 32
702-George’s County, on a highway in a residential district, as defined in § 21–101 of this title, 33 16 SENATE BILL 338
703-
704-
705-with a maximum posted speed limit of 35 miles per hour, which speed limit was established 1
706-using generally accepted traffic engineering practices; 2
707-
708- 2. In a school zone with a posted speed limit of at least 20 3
709-miles per hour; 4
710-
711- 3. In Prince George’s County: 5
712-
713- A. Subject to subparagraph (vii)1 of this paragraph, on 6
714-Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway); or 7
715-
716- B. On that part of a highway located within the grounds of an 8
717-institution of higher education as defined in § 10–101(h) of the Education Article, or within 9
718-one–half mile of the grounds of a building or property used by the institution of higher 10
719-education where generally accepted traffic and engineering practices indicate that motor 11
720-vehicle, pedestrian, or bicycle traffic is substantially generated or influenced by the 12
721-institution of higher education; 13
722-
723- 4. Subject to subparagraph (vii)2 of this paragraph, on 14
724-Interstate 83 in Baltimore City; 15
725-
726- 5. In Anne Arundel County, on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup 16
727-Road) between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel 17
728-County–Howard County line; [or] 18
729-
730- 6. Subject to subparagraph (vii)3 of this paragraph, at the 19
731-intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot County; 20
732-OR 21
733-
734- 7. SUBJECT TO SUBPARAGRAPH (VII)4 OF THIS 22
735-PARAGRAPH , BY THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ON INTERSTATE 83 IN 23
736-BALTIMORE COUNTY OR ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY. 24
737-
738- (vii) 1. Not more than six mobile or stationary speed monitoring 25
739-systems may be placed on Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway). 26
740-
741- 2. Not more than two speed monitoring systems may be placed 27
742-on Interstate 83 in Baltimore City. 28
743-
744- 3. Not more than one speed monitoring system may be placed 29
745-at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot 30
746-County. 31
747-
748- 4. THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION : 32
749- SENATE BILL 338 17
750-
751-
752- A. MAY PLACE AND USE A S PEED MONITORING SYST EM 1
753-ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE 2
754-COUNTY UNDER THIS SEC TION ONLY AT A LOCAT ION IT IDENTIFIES AS BEING AT 3
755-HIGH RISK FOR MOTOR VEHICLE CRASHES THAT RESULT IN DEATH OR S ERIOUS 4
756-BODILY INJURY; 5
757-
758- B. I. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE MORE THAN THREE 6
759-SPEED MONITORING SYS TEMS IN EACH DIRECTI ON ON INTERSTATE 83 IN 7
760-BALTIMORE COUNTY; AND 8
761-
762- II. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE MORE TH AN FOUR SPEED 9
763-MONITORING SYSTEMS I N EACH DIRECTION ON INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE 10
764-COUNTY; AND 11
765-
766- C. MAY NOT PLACE OR USE A SPEED MONITORING 12
767-SYSTEM AUTHORIZED UN DER THIS SECTION WIT HIN 5 MILES OF ANOTHER SPE ED 13
768-MONITORING SYSTEM AUTHORIZED UNDER THI S SECTION OPERATING IN THE SAME 14
769-DIRECTION. 15
770-
771- (viii) Before activating a speed monitoring system, the local jurisdiction 16
772-OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , shall: 17
773-
774- 1. Publish notice of the location of the speed monitoring 18
775-system on its website and in a newspaper of general circulation in the jurisdiction; 19
776-
777- 2. Ensure that each sign that designates a school zone is 20
778-proximate to a sign that: 21
779-
780- A. Indicates that speed monitoring systems are in use in the 22
781-school zone; and 23
782-
783- B. Is in accordance with the manual for and the specifications 24
784-for a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration 25
785-under § 25–104 of this article; 26
786-
787- 3. With regard to a speed monitoring system established on 27
788-Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) in Prince George’s County, based on proximity 28
789-to an institution of higher education under subparagraph (vi)3 of this paragraph, on 29
790-Interstate 83 in Baltimore City, in Anne Arundel County on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup 30
791-Road) between the Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel 31
792-County–Howard County line, [or] at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) 32
793-and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot County, OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY 33
794-OR INTERSTATE 695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY, ensure that all speed limit signs 34
795-approaching and within the segment of highway on which the speed monitoring system is 35
796-located include signs that: 36 18 SENATE BILL 338
797-
798-
799-
800- A. Are in accordance with the manual and specifications for 1
801-a uniform system of traffic control devices adopted by the State Highway Administration 2
802-under § 25–104 of this article; and 3
803-
804- B. Indicate that a speed monitoring system is in use; and 4
805-
806- 4. With regard to a speed monitoring system placed on 5
807-Maryland Route 210 (Indian Head Highway) in Prince George’s County, Interstate 83 in 6
808-Baltimore City, in Anne Arundel County on Maryland Route 175 (Jessup Road) between the 7
809-Maryland Route 175/295 interchange and the Anne Arundel County–Howard County line, 8
810-[or] at the intersection of Maryland Route 333 (Oxford Road) and Bonfield Avenue in Talbot 9
811-County, OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN 10
812-BALTIMORE COUNTY, ensure that each sign that indicates that a speed monitoring system 11
813-is in use is proximate to a device that displays a real–time posting of the speed at which a 12
814-driver is traveling. 13
815-
816- (ix) A speed monitoring system in a school zone may operate only 14
817-Monday through Friday between 6:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. 15
818-
819- (x) 1. A local jurisdiction that authorizes a program of speed 16
820-monitoring systems OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , 17
821-shall designate an official or employee to investigate and respond to questions or concerns 18
822-about the local jurisdiction’s OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ’S speed 19
823-monitoring system program. 20
824-
825- 2. A. The [local] designee shall review a citation 21
826-generated by a speed monitoring system if the person who received the citation requests 22
827-review before the deadline for contesting liability under this section. 23
828-
829- B. If the [local] designee determines that the citation is an 24
830-erroneous violation, the [local] designee shall void the citation. 25
831-
832- C. If the [local] designee determines that a person did not 26
833-receive notice of a citation issued under this section due to an administrative error, the 27
834-[local] designee may resend the citation in accordance with subsection (d) of this section or 28
835-void the citation. 29
836-
837- D. A [local] designee that takes any action described under 30
838-subsubsubparagraph C of this subsubparagraph shall notify the Administration of the 31
839-action for the purpose of rescinding any administrative penalties imposed under subsection 32
840-(g) of this section. 33
841-
842- E. A [local] designee may not determine that a citation is an 34
843-erroneous violation based solely on the dismissal of the citation by a court. 35
844- SENATE BILL 338 19
845-
846-
847- 3. A [local] designee may not be employed by a speed 1
848-monitoring system contractor or have been involved in any review of a speed monitoring 2
849-system citation, other than review of a citation under this subparagraph. 3
850-
851- 4. On receipt of a written question or concern from a person, 4
852-the [local] designee shall provide a written answer or response to the person within a 5
853-reasonable time. 6
854-
855- 5. A local jurisdiction AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 7
856-ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , shall make any written questions or concerns 8
857-received under this subparagraph and any subsequent written answers or responses 9
858-available for public inspection. 10
859-
860- (xi) A local jurisdiction may not use a speed monitoring system to 11
861-enforce speed limits on any portion of a highway for which the speed limit has been decreased 12
862-without performing an engineering and traffic investigation. 13
863-
864- (2) (i) A speed monitoring system operator shall complete training by a 14
865-manufacturer of speed monitoring systems in the procedures for setting up and operating 15
866-the speed monitoring system. 16
867-
868- (ii) The manufacturer shall issue a signed certificate to the speed 17
869-monitoring system operator on completion of the training. 18
870-
871- (iii) The certificate of training shall be admitted as evidence in any 19
872-court proceeding for a violation of this section. 20
873-
874- (3) A speed monitoring system operator shall fill out and sign a daily 21
875-set–up log for a speed monitoring system that: 22
876-
877- (i) States that the speed monitoring system operator successfully 23
878-performed or reviewed and evaluated the manufacturer–specified daily self–test of the speed 24
879-monitoring system prior to producing a recorded image; 25
880-
881- (ii) Shall be kept on file; and 26
882-
883- (iii) Shall be admitted as evidence in any court proceeding for a 27
884-violation of this section. 28
885-
886- (4) (i) A speed monitoring system shall undergo an annual calibration 29
887-check performed by an independent calibration laboratory that is: 30
888-
889- 1. Selected by the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 31
890-HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE ; and 32
891- 20 SENATE BILL 338
892-
893-
894- 2. Unaffiliated with the manufacturer of the speed 1
895-monitoring system. 2
896-
897- (ii) The independent calibration laboratory shall issue a signed 3
898-certificate of calibration after the annual calibration check that: 4
899-
900- 1. Shall be kept on file; and 5
901-
902- 2. Shall be admitted as evidence in any court proceeding for 6
903-a violation of this section. 7
904-
905- (5) If a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION 8
906-authorizes a program of speed monitoring systems under this section: 9
907-
908- (i) The local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 10
909-ADMINISTRATION shall designate a program administrator who may not be an employee 11
910-or representative of the speed monitoring system contractor; and 12
911-
912- (ii) The contract with the speed monitoring system contractor shall 13
913-include the following provisions: 14
914-
915- 1. For potential violations submitted by a contractor for 15
916-review by an agency, if more than 5% of the violations in a calendar year are erroneous 16
917-violations, then the contractor shall be subject to liquidated damages for each erroneous 17
918-violation equal to at least 50% of the fine amount for the erroneous violation, plus any 18
919-reimbursements paid by the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 19
920-ADMINISTRATION ; and 20
921-
922- 2. The local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 21
923-ADMINISTRATION may cancel a contract with a contractor if the contractor violates the 22
924-contract by submitting erroneous violations to the agency that exceed a threshold specified 23
925-in the contract or violates the law in implementing the contract. 24
926-
927- (6) (i) The Maryland Police Training and Standards Commission, in 25
928-consultation with the State Highway Administration and other interested stakeholders, 26
929-shall develop a training program concerning the oversight and administration of a speed 27
930-monitoring program by a local jurisdiction AND THE STATE HIGHWAY 28
931-ADMINISTRATION, including a curriculum of best practices in the State. 29
932-
933- (ii) 1. A program administrator shall participate in the training 30
934-program established under this paragraph before a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 31
935-HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION initially implements a new speed monitoring program and 32
936-subsequently at least once every 2 years. 33
937- SENATE BILL 338 21
938-
939-
940- 2. A program administrator for a program in existence on 1
941-June 1, 2014, shall initially participate in the training program on or before December 31, 2
942-2014, and subsequently at least once every 2 years. 3
943-
944- 3. If a local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY 4
945-ADMINISTRATION designates a new program administrator, the new program 5
946-administrator shall participate in the next available training program. 6
947-
948- (c) (1) Unless the driver of the motor vehicle received a citation from a police 7
949-officer at the time of the violation, the owner or, in accordance with subsection (f)(4) of this 8
950-section, the driver of a motor vehicle is subject to a civil penalty if the motor vehicle is 9
951-recorded by a speed monitoring system while being operated in violation of this subtitle. 10
952-
953- (2) A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed $40. 11
954-
955- (3) For purposes of this section, the District Court shall prescribe: 12
956-
957- (i) A uniform citation form consistent with subsection (d)(1) of this 13
958-section and § 7–302 of the Courts Article; and 14
959-
960- (ii) A civil penalty, which shall be indicated on the citation, to be paid 15
961-by persons who choose to prepay the civil penalty without appearing in District Court. 16
962-
963- (d) (1) Subject to the provisions of paragraphs (2) through (4) of this subsection, 17
964-an agency shall mail to an owner liable under subsection (c) of this section a citation that 18
965-shall include: 19
966-
967- (i) The name and address of the registered owner of the vehicle; 20
968-
969- (ii) The registration number of the motor vehicle involved in the 21
970-violation; 22
971-
972- (iii) The violation charged; 23
973-
974- (iv) The location where the violation occurred; 24
975-
976- (v) The date and time of the violation; 25
977-
978- (vi) A copy of the recorded image; 26
979-
980- (vii) The amount of the civil penalty imposed and the date by which 27
981-the civil penalty should be paid; 28
982-
983- (viii) A signed statement by a duly authorized law enforcement officer 29
984-employed by or under contract with an agency that, based on inspection of recorded images, 30
985-the motor vehicle was being operated in violation of this subtitle; 31
986- 22 SENATE BILL 338
987-
988-
989- (ix) A statement that recorded images are evidence of a violation of 1
990-this subtitle; 2
991-
992- (x) Information advising the person alleged to be liable under this 3
993-section of the manner and time in which liability as alleged in the citation may be contested 4
994-in the District Court; and 5
995-
996- (xi) Information advising the person alleged to be liable under this 6
997-section that failure to pay the civil penalty or to contest liability in a timely manner: 7
998-
999- 1. Is an admission of liability; 8
1000-
1001- 2. May result in the refusal by the Administration to register 9
1002-the motor vehicle; and 10
1003-
1004- 3. May result in the suspension of the motor vehicle 11
1005-registration. 12
1006-
1007- (2) (i) Except as provided in [subparagraph] SUBPARAGRAPHS (ii) 13
1008-AND (III) of this paragraph, an agency may mail a warning notice instead of a citation to 14
1009-the owner liable under subsection (c) of this section. 15
1010-
1011- (ii) With regard to a speed monitoring system established on 16
1012-Interstate 83 in Baltimore City, an agency shall mail a warning notice instead of a citation 17
1013-for a violation recorded by the speed monitoring system during the first 90 days that the 18
1014-speed monitoring system is in operation. 19
1015-
1016- (III) WITH REGARD TO A SPEE D MONITORING SYSTE M 20
1017-ESTABLISHED ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 695 IN 21
1018-BALTIMORE COUNTY, THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION SHALL MAIL A 22
1019-WARNING NOTICE INSTE AD OF A CITATION FOR A VIOLATION RECORDED BY THE 23
1020-SPEED MONITORING SYS TEM DURING THE FIRST 30 DAYS THAT THE SPEED 24
1021-MONITORING SYSTEM IS IN OPERATION. 25
1022-
1023- (3) Except as provided in subsection (f)(4) of this section, an agency may not 26
1024-mail a citation to a person who is not an owner. 27
1025-
1026- (4) Except as provided in subsections (b)(1)(x) and (f)(4) of this section, a 28
1027-citation issued under this section shall be mailed no later than 2 weeks after the alleged 29
1028-violation if the vehicle is registered in this State, and 30 days after the alleged violation if 30
1029-the vehicle is registered in another state. 31
1030-
1031- (5) A person who receives a citation under paragraph (1) of this subsection 32
1032-may: 33
1033- SENATE BILL 338 23
1034-
1035-
1036- (i) Pay the civil penalty, in accordance with instructions on the 1
1037-citation, directly to the political subdivision OR THE DISTRICT COURT, AS APPROPRIATE ; 2
1038-or 3
1039-
1040- (ii) Elect to stand trial in the District Court for the alleged violation. 4
1041-
1042- (6) To mail the citation or warning notice, an agency shall use: 5
1043-
1044- (i) The current mailing address on file with the Administration; or 6
1045-
1046- (ii) If a mailing address is unavailable, the current residential 7
1047-address on file with the Administration. 8
1048-
1049- (e) (1) A certificate alleging that the violation of this subtitle occurred and the 9
1050-requirements under subsection (b) of this section have been satisfied, sworn to, or affirmed 10
1051-by a duly authorized law enforcement officer employed by or under contract with an agency, 11
1052-based on inspection of recorded images produced by a speed monitoring system, shall be 12
1053-evidence of the facts contained in the certificate and shall be admissible in a proceeding 13
1054-alleging a violation under this section without the presence or testimony of the speed 14
1055-monitoring system operator who performed the requirements under subsection (b) of this 15
1056-section. 16
1057-
1058- (2) If a person who received a citation under subsection (d) of this section 17
1059-desires the speed monitoring system operator to be present and testify at trial, the person 18
1060-shall notify the court and the State in writing no later than 20 days before trial. 19
1061-
1062- (3) Adjudication of liability shall be based on a preponderance of evidence. 20
1063-
1064- (f) (1) The District Court may consider in defense of a violation: 21
1065-
1066- (i) Subject to paragraph (2) of this subsection, that the motor vehicle 22
1067-or the registration plates of the motor vehicle were stolen before the violation occurred and 23
1068-were not under the control or possession of the owner at the time of the violation; 24
1069-
1070- (ii) Subject to paragraph (3) of this subsection, evidence that the 25
1071-person named in the citation was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation; and 26
1072-
1073- (iii) Any other issues and evidence that the District Court deems 27
1074-pertinent. 28
1075-
1076- (2) To demonstrate that the motor vehicle or the registration plates were 29
1077-stolen before the violation occurred and were not under the control or possession of the owner 30
1078-at the time of the violation, the owner shall submit proof that a police report regarding the 31
1079-stolen motor vehicle or registration plates was filed in a timely manner. 32
1080- 24 SENATE BILL 338
1081-
1082-
1083- (3) To satisfy the evidentiary burden under paragraph (1)(ii) of this 1
1084-subsection, the person named in the citation shall provide to the District Court a letter, sworn 2
1085-to or affirmed by the person and mailed by certified mail, return receipt requested, that: 3
1086-
1087- (i) States that the person named in the citation was not operating the 4
1088-vehicle at the time of the violation; and 5
1089-
1090- (ii) Includes any other corroborating evidence. 6
1091-
1092- (4) (i) If the District Court finds that the person named in the citation 7
1093-was not operating the vehicle at the time of the violation or receives evidence under 8
1094-paragraph (3) of this subsection identifying the person driving the vehicle at the time of the 9
1095-violation, the clerk of the court shall provide to the agency issuing the citation a copy of any 10
1096-evidence substantiating who was operating the vehicle at the time of the violation. 11
1097-
1098- (ii) On receipt of substantiating evidence from the District Court 12
1099-under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, an agency may issue a citation as provided in 13
1100-subsection (d) of this section to the person who the evidence indicates was operating the 14
1101-vehicle at the time of the violation. 15
1102-
1103- (iii) A citation issued under subparagraph (ii) of this paragraph shall 16
1104-be mailed no later than 2 weeks after receipt of the evidence from the District Court. 17
1105-
1106- (g) If a person liable under this section does not pay the civil penalty or contest the 18
1107-violation, the Administration may refuse to register or reregister the motor vehicle cited for 19
1108-the violation. 20
1109-
1110- (h) A violation for which a civil penalty is imposed under this section: 21
1111-
1112- (1) Is not a moving violation for the purpose of assessing points under § 22
1113-16–402 of this article; 23
1114-
1115- (2) May not be recorded by the Administration on the driving record of the 24
1116-owner or driver of the vehicle; 25
1117-
1118- (3) May be treated as a parking violation for purposes of § 26–305 of this 26
1119-article; and 27
1120-
1121- (4) May not be considered in the provision of motor vehicle insurance 28
1122-coverage. 29
1123-
1124- (i) In consultation with the appropriate local government agencies AND THE 30
1125-STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , the Chief Judge of the District Court shall adopt 31
1126-procedures for the issuance of citations, the trial of civil violations, and the collection of civil 32
1127-penalties under this section. 33
1128- SENATE BILL 338 25
1129-
1130-
1131- (j) (1) An agency or an agent or contractor designated by the agency shall 1
1132-administer and process civil citations issued under this section in coordination with the 2
1133-District Court. 3
1134-
1135- (2) If a contractor in any manner operates a speed monitoring system or 4
1136-administers or processes citations generated by a speed monitoring system on behalf of a 5
1137-local jurisdiction OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , the contractor’s fee may 6
1138-not be contingent on a per–ticket basis on the number of citations issued or paid. 7
1139-
1140- (k) (1) On or before December 31 of each year, the Maryland Police Training 8
1141-and Standards Commission shall: 9
1142-
1143- (i) Compile and make publicly available a report for the previous 10
1144-fiscal year on each speed monitoring system program operated by a local jurisdiction AND 11
1145-THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION under this section; and 12
1146-
1147- (ii) Submit the report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 13
1148-2–1257 of the State Government Article, the General Assembly. 14
1149-
1150- (2) The report shall include: 15
1151-
1152- (i) The total number of citations issued; 16
1153-
1154- (ii) The number of citations issued and the number voided as 17
1155-erroneous violations for each camera; 18
1156-
1157- (iii) The gross revenue generated by the program; 19
1158-
1159- (iv) The expenditures incurred by the program; 20
1160-
1161- (v) The net revenue generated by the program; 21
1162-
1163- (vi) The total amount of any payments made to a contractor under the 22
1164-program; 23
1165-
1166- (vii) A description of how the net revenue generated by the program 24
1167-was used; 25
1168-
1169- (viii) The number of employees of the local jurisdiction OR THE STATE 26
1170-HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION , AS APPROPRIATE , involved in the program; 27
1171-
1172- (ix) The type of speed monitoring system used by the local jurisdiction 28
1173-OR THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ; 29
1174- 26 SENATE BILL 338
1175-
1176-
1177- (x) The locations at which each speed monitoring system was used in 1
1178-the local jurisdiction OR ON INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 2
1179-695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY; 3
1180-
1181- (xi) The activation start and stop dates of each speed monitoring 4
1182-system for each location at which it was used; and 5
1183-
1184- (xii) The number of citations issued by each speed monitoring system 6
1185-at each location. 7
1186-
1187- (3) Each local jurisdiction with a speed monitoring system program AND 8
1188-THE STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION shall submit the information required under 9
1189-paragraph (2) of this subsection to the Commission by October 31 of each year and assist the 10
1190-Commission in the preparation of the annual report. 11
1191-
1192- SECTION 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That the Laws o f Maryland read 12
1193-as follows: 13
1194-
1195-Article – Transportation 14
1196-
1197-21–809. 15
1198-
1199- (c) (2) (I) [A] EXCEPT AS PROVIDED IN SUBPARAGRAPH (II) OF THIS 16
1200-PARAGRAPH , A civil penalty under this subsection may not exceed: 17
1201-
1202- [(i)] 1. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 18
1203-exceeded the speed limit by between 12 and 15, inclusive, miles per hour, $40; 19
1204-
1205- [(ii)] 2. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 20
1206-exceeded the speed limit by between 16 and 19, inclusive, miles per hour, $70; 21
1207-
1208- [(iii)] 3. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 22
1209-exceeded the speed limit by between 20 and 29, inclusive, miles per hour, $120; 23
1210-
1211- [(iv)] 4. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 24
1212-exceeded the speed limit by between 30 and 39, inclusive, miles per hour, $230; and 25
1213-
1214- [(v)] 5. If the citation alleges that the driver of the motor vehicle 26
1215-exceeded the speed limit by 40 miles per hour or more, $425. 27
1216-
1217- (II) A CIVIL PENAL TY UNDER THIS SUBSEC TION FOR A 28
1218-VIOLATION RECORDED O N INTERSTATE 83 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY OR INTERSTATE 29
1219-695 IN BALTIMORE COUNTY MAY NOT EXCEED $40. 30
1220-
1221- SECTION 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That Section 2 of this Act shall take 31
1222-effect October 1, 2025, contingent on the taking effect of Chapter ____ or ____ (S.B. 118 or 32 SENATE BILL 338 27
1223-
1224-
1225-H.B. 182) of the Acts of the General Assembly of 2025, and if Chapter ____ or _____ (S.B. 1
1226-118 or H.B. 182) does not take effect, Section 2 of this Act, with no further action required 2
1227-by the General Assembly, shall be null and void. 3
1228-
1229- SECTION 2. 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That: 4
1230-
1231- (a) On or before June 1, 2030 2029, the State Highway Administration shall 5
1232-submit a report to the Governor and, in accordance with § 2–1257 of the State Government 6
1233-Article, the General Assembly, on the speed monitoring systems placed on Interstate 695 7
1234-in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County in accordance with § 21–811 8
1235-21–809 of the Transportation Article as, as enacted by Section 1 of this Act. 9
1236-
1237- (b) The report required under subsection (a) of this section shall include: 10
1238-
1239- (1) any changes since the implementation of speed monitoring systems 11
1240-under Section 1 of this Act in: 12
1241-
1242- (i) accident crash and fatality rates on Interstate 695 and Interstate 13
1243-83 in Baltimore County; and 14
1244-
1245- (ii) the number of repeat violations recorded by these speed 15
1246-monitoring systems; 16
1247-
1248- (2) any measurable improvements in driver awareness and compliance 17
1249-with posted speed limits at areas on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 18
1250-in Baltimore County where speed monitoring systems are operated; 19
1251-
1252- (3) any unintended consequences including traffic congestion or an 20
1253-increase in the use of alternative routes; 21
1254-
1255- (4) the gross revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the 22
1256-speed monitoring systems; 23
1257-
1258- (5) the percentage of the gross revenue collected that has been used to: 24
1259-
1260- (i) to recover the cost of implementing and administering the speed 25
1261-monitoring systems; and 26
1262-
1263- (ii) for public safety purposes, including pedestrian or highway 27
1264-safety programs assist in covering the cost of roadway and safety improvements on Interstate 28
1265-695 in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 29
1266-
1267- (6) whether revenue collected as a result of violations enforced by the speed 30
1268-monitoring systems has been sufficient to cover the costs specified under paragraph (5)(i) 31
1269-and (ii) of this subsection; 32
1270- 28 SENATE BILL 338
1271-
1272-
1273- (7) how funds have been used for public safety purposes on Interstate 695 1
1274-in Baltimore County and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 2
1275-
1276- (8) whether revenue collected has been supplemental to, and has not 3
1277-supplanted, existing State and local funds allocated for transportation; 4
1278-
1279- (9) the percentage of issued citations that have been contested; 5
1280-
1281- (10) the percentage of contested citations that were overturned or reduced; 6
1282-
1283- (11) whether citations have consistently been issued within the time frames 7
1284-required under § 21–811(d)(4) 21–809(d)(4) of the Transportation Article, as enacted by 8
1285-Section 1 of this Act, and any required maintenance, calibration, and certification checks 9
1286-have been documented and performed as scheduled; 10
1287-
1288- (12) whether there has been any pattern of citation errors or disputes 11
1289-regarding vehicle identification; 12
1290-
1291- (13) whether speed monitoring systems have been consistently maintained 13
1292-and calibrated in accordance with § 21–811(b)(7) 21–809(b)(4) of the Transportation Article, 14
1293-as enacted by Section 1 of this Act; 15
1294-
1295- (14) whether the locations that have been identified as being at high risk for 16
1296-motor vehicle crashes that result in serious bodily injury or death have changed since the 17
1297-implementation of the speed monitoring systems; 18
1298-
1299- (15) whether speed monitoring systems have been relocated as a result of 19
1300-any changes under item (14) of this subsection, or any changes in traffic patterns; 20
1301-
1302- (16) whether the speed limit thresholds under § 21–811(b)(4) tolerance of 12 21
1303-miles per hour under § 21–809 of the Transportation Article, as enacted by Section 1 of this 22
1304-Act have has effectively influenced driver behavior on Interstate 695 in Baltimore County 23
1305-and Interstate 83 in Baltimore County; 24
1306-
1307- (17) any issues with speed monitoring system visibility, signage, or 25
1308-technical malfunctions; 26
1309-
1310- (18) whether there have been any formal complaints or legal challenges to 27
1311-the implementation of speed monitoring systems under Section 1 of this Act; 28
1312-
1313- (19) any privacy or data security concerns that have arisen from the 29
1314-handling of recorded images or citation data; 30
1315-
1316- (20) any significant delays in processing citations or appeals; and 31
1317- SENATE BILL 338 29
1318-
1319-
1320- (21) whether any public safety improvements intended to be funded by 1
1321-revenue derived as a result of violations enforced by the speed monitoring systems have 2
1322-been completed on schedule and within budget; and 3
1323-
1324- (22) any disparities in the number of citations issued as a result of violations 4
1325-enforced by the speed monitoring systems on different communities or demographic groups 5
1326-in the State. 6
1327-
1328- SECTION 2. 3. 5. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED, That , except as provided in 7
1329-Section 3 of this Act, this Act shall take effect June October 1, 2025. It shall remain effective 8
1330-for a period of 5 years and 1 month 4 years and 9 months and, at the end of June 30, 2030, 9
1331-this Act, with no further action required by the General Assembly, shall be abrogated and 10
1332-of no further force and effect. 11
1333-
1334-
1335-
1336-
1337-Approved:
1338-________________________________________________________________________________
1339- Governor.
1340-________________________________________________________________________________
1341- President of the Senate.
1342-________________________________________________________________________________
1343- Speaker of the House of Delegates.