Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB366

Introduced
1/17/25  

Caption

Campaign Finance - Civil Penalties - Process

Summary

Senate Bill 366 aims to enhance the regulation of campaign finance violations by establishing a clearer process for the issuance of civil penalties. The bill requires the State Board of Elections to inform individuals or political committees that may be in violation of campaign finance laws, including details of the alleged violation, penalty amount, and options for appeal. This proactive notification process is intended to provide greater transparency and clarity for those involved in campaign financing, thereby fostering compliance with existing laws. A significant feature of SB366 is the mandate for the State Board to develop comprehensive regulations that define the appeal process for any notices of pending civil penalties. This includes criteria for initiating appeals, timelines for the process, and guidance on how decisions regarding appeals are to be communicated. The passage of this bill could significantly streamline the process by which campaign finance violations are addressed, potentially increasing accountability and ensuring that violators are treated fairly under established guidelines. The proposed bill delineates various violations that could incur civil penalties, which can be up to $1,000 per violation, with stiffer penalties applicable in certain cases. Additionally, if contributions are improperly accepted due to a violation, the entity must refund those contributions and incur the penalty. This provision underscores a commitment to maintaining ethical standards in political financing and protecting the integrity of the electoral process. Despite its potential benefits, SB366 may face contention from different stakeholders concerned about the additional responsibilities it places on the State Board and the implications for campaign committees. Critics might argue that the existing framework can be burdensome for candidates and organizations, particularly smaller ones with fewer resources to navigate complex compliance requirements. Nonetheless, advocates for good governance contend that an enhanced regulatory environment is essential to ensure fair electoral practices and public trust in the campaign financing system.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

OK HB2109

Campaign finance and financial disclosure; municipal; county; technology center district; independent school district; Ethics Commission; effective date; emergency.

NJ A2533

Prohibits contributions by administrator of Type II school district to candidates for member of district's school board; restricts employment by Type II school district of contributors to election campaign of member of district's school board.

NJ A924

Prohibits contributions by administrator of Type II school district to candidates for member of district's school board; restricts employment by Type II school district of contributors to election campaign of member of district's school board.

OK SB890

Local Government Campaign Finance and Financial Disclosure Act; transferring certain duties to the Ethics Commission. Effective date.

OK HB2204

Campaign finance and financial disclosure; modifying definitions; authorizing Ethics Commission to develop certain online reporting processes; effective date.

OK HB2204

Campaign finance and financial disclosure; modifying definitions; authorizing Ethics Commission to develop certain online reporting processes; effective date.

OK HB3147

Campaign finance and financial disclosure; modifying definitions; authorizing Ethics Commission to develop certain online reporting processes; effective date.

TX HB2225

Relating to the filing with the Texas Ethics Commission of campaign treasurer appointments and reports of political contributions and political expenditures.