Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB397

Introduced
1/20/25  

Caption

Motorcycles - Protective Headgear Requirement - Exception (In Remembrance of Gary "Pappy" Boward)

Impact

If enacted, SB397 would amend Article 21, Section 1306 of the Maryland Transportation code, which regulates motorcycle riding practices. The implications of this change raise questions about safety standards and the potential for higher injury rates among those who choose not to wear helmets. Supporters may argue that experienced riders should have the right to make their own choices, while critics might contend that this exemption could undermine public safety efforts and lead to increased healthcare costs associated with motorcycle accidents.

Summary

Senate Bill 397 proposes a change to the current motorcycle helmet laws in Maryland, introducing exceptions to the requirement that operators and passengers wear protective headgear while riding. Specifically, the bill allows individuals who are at least 21 years old, have been licensed to operate a motorcycle for at least two years, or have completed a state-approved motorcycle safety course to ride without a helmet. This change is situated within a broader discussion on motorcycle safety and rider autonomy, reflecting varying opinions on the necessity and effectiveness of helmet laws.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB397 include the balance between personal freedom and public safety. Advocates of the bill emphasize that it recognizes the competence of experienced motorcyclists and promotes individual liberties. However, its detractors express concerns that repealing helmet requirements for certain riders may create risks not only for those individuals but also for society due to potential increases in accident-related injuries. The bill’s enactment would likely elicit discussions about the state’s role in regulating personal safety versus individual rights.

Notable_features

The bill specifically honors Gary 'Pappy' Boward in its title, indicating a personal connection to the legislative change and possibly implying a broader context of community sentiment around motorcycle riding culture in Maryland. The requirement for a motorcycle safety course adds a conditional layer that may mitigate some concerns raised by safety advocates, as it ensures that only those who have demonstrated a level of competence can opt-out of the helmet requirement.

Companion Bills

MD SB503

Carry Over Vehicle Laws - Protective Headgear Requirement - Exception (In Remembrance of Gary "Pappy" Boward)

Similar Bills

AL SB302

Motorcycles; certain aged individuals with certain insurance authorized to operate without helmets

MA H3622

Relative to standards for protective headgear for operators or passengers on motorcycles

TX HB1571

Relating to the operation and movement of motorcycles during periods of traffic congestion.

TX HB813

Relating to the operation and movement of motorcycles during periods of traffic congestion.

UT SB0212

Motor Assisted Transportation Devices Amendments

PA HB646

In rules of the road in general, further providing for prohibiting use of hearing impairment devices.

TX SB1115

Relating to the titling, registration, and operation of an autocycle.

TX HB3701

Relating to the titling, registration, and operation of an autocycle.