Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB413

Introduced
1/20/25  
Refer
1/20/25  
Report Pass
2/17/25  
Engrossed
2/20/25  

Caption

Consumer Protection - Consumer Contracts - Limitations Periods

Impact

Legislatively, SB413 aims to modify existing state laws to better accommodate telemedicine and telehealth services. This includes provisions that would regulate the delivery of medical services via digital platforms and ensure that such services meet established medical standards. The proposed changes reflect a growing recognition of the role of technology in healthcare and the increasing demand for flexible delivery options. Additionally, by enhancing the regulatory framework, the bill is expected to protect patients' rights while accessing telehealth services, thereby addressing concerns related to security and confidentiality.

Summary

SB413 addresses crucial aspects of healthcare delivery, specifically focusing on the expansion of telemedicine services across the state. The bill seeks to enhance access to healthcare for residents, particularly in underserved areas, by instituting guidelines and regulations for telehealth practices. Proponents argue that the bill will significantly improve patient care and convenience by allowing patients to receive medical consultations remotely, thus removing barriers related to transportation and time, which can often hinder access to needed services. The intent is to create a framework that encourages healthcare providers to adopt telemedicine practices more broadly while ensuring quality care for patients.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB413 appears generally positive, with a majority of stakeholders, including healthcare professionals, telehealth advocates, and patient rights groups, expressing support for the bill. They view it as a progressive move that aligns state healthcare policies with contemporary practices in the medical field. However, there are some concerns, particularly from entities worried about the regulatory burden placed on healthcare providers and the potential for disparities in access to technology impacting patient care across different demographics.

Contention

Despite the overall support for SB413, notable points of contention have arisen, particularly regarding how the bill will be implemented and monitored. Critics question whether the regulations will be sufficiently robust to ensure quality healthcare standards are maintained in telehealth services. Some healthcare providers fear that while the bill promotes telemedicine, it may inadvertently lead to a decrease in the quality of care if not carefully managed. The dialog surrounding the bill emphasizes the need for balance between expanding access through technology and maintaining stringent standards of medical care.

Companion Bills

MD HB431

Crossfiled Consumer Protection - Consumer Contracts - Limitation Periods

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.