Maryland 2025 Regular Session

Maryland Senate Bill SB722

Introduced
1/31/25  
Refer
1/31/25  
Report Pass
3/3/25  
Engrossed
3/6/25  
Refer
3/7/25  
Report Pass
3/31/25  
Enrolled
4/1/25  
Chaptered
5/6/25  

Caption

Department of the Environment - Definition of Ecological Restoration

Impact

If enacted, SB722 would empower the Department of the Environment to update existing regulations to reflect this new definition of ecological restoration. This could lead to an expansion in programs and practices aimed at restoration efforts across the state, thereby potentially enhancing funding opportunities and strategic partnerships aimed at ecosystem restoration. The introduction of a formal definition is intended to clarify and standardize best practices, which advocates argue is essential for effective environmental management.

Summary

Senate Bill 722 introduces a formal definition of 'ecological restoration' within the Maryland environment code. The bill aims to establish clear guidelines for activities aimed at recovering, re-establishing, or enhancing degraded ecosystems. The defined processes include improving physical, chemical, or biological characteristics, restoring natural functions, and enhancing ecosystem resiliency. By doing so, the bill seeks to promote greater consistency in how ecological restoration is regulated and to guide future environmental policies in Maryland.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB722 appears to be generally positive among environmental advocates and conservation groups, who view the bill as a crucial step towards improving the health and sustainability of Maryland's ecosystems. However, potential concerns arise regarding the administrative capacity of the Department of the Environment to manage the anticipated increases in regulatory responsibilities and programs. Some stakeholders may also view the implementation of broader ecological restoration definitions as a potential for regulatory burdens on certain land uses or sectors.

Contention

Notably, while there is broad support for the idea of ecological restoration, there may be contention regarding the specific methods and approaches that will be deemed acceptable under the new regulations. Stakeholders with interests in land development, agriculture, and resource extraction might express concerns about how strict adherence to ecological restoration definitions could impact their operations. The tension between economic development and environmental conservation is expected to be a significant point of discussion as SB722 moves through the legislative process.

Companion Bills

MD HB1155

Crossfiled Department of the Environment - Definition of Ecological Restoration

Previously Filed As

MD SB969

Watershed, Stream, and Floodplain Restoration - Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Restoration and Stream and Floodplain Restoration Funding (Whole Watershed Act)

MD HB24

Department of the Environment - Environmental Justice Evaluation of Environmental Permit Applications

MD HB1165

Watershed, Stream, and Floodplain Restoration - Chesapeake and Atlantic Coastal Bays Restoration and Stream and Floodplain Restoration Funding (Whole Watershed Act)

MD SB417

Environment – State Wetlands – Shoreline Restoration

MD HB602

Environment - State Wetlands - Shoreline Restoration

MD HB245

Department of the Environment - Fees, Penalties, Funding, and Regulation

MD SB932

Maryland Agricultural BMP Priority Environmental Stewardship Program - Established

MD SB96

Environment - Impact of Environmental Permits and State Agency Actions

MD HB516

Climate Crisis and Environmental Justice Act of 2024

MD SB798

Stream Restoration Contractors Licensing Board, Stream Restoration Contractors, and Stream Restoration Project Requirements

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.