Maine 2023-2024 Regular Session

Maine Senate Bill LD1070

Introduced
3/9/23  
Refer
3/16/23  

Caption

An Act to Increase Ballot Transparency with Blockchain Technology

Impact

The implementation of LD1070 could significantly alter the landscape of how voting is conducted in Maine. By establishing blockchain transactions as public records, the bill promises to provide transparency that could potentially deter electoral fraud and manipulation. Moreover, this shift may serve as a model for other states looking to modernize their voting systems. However, it also raises questions about technology access and the capacity of all electoral stakeholders to engage with new systems effectively.

Summary

LD1070, titled 'An Act to Increase Ballot Transparency with Blockchain Technology', seeks to enhance the integrity and transparency of election processes in Maine by integrating blockchain technology into the voting system. The bill mandates that all electronic tabulating devices must be capable of creating blockchain transactions for every ballot cast, ensuring that these transactions are publicly accessible. By doing so, the bill aims to improve public trust in electoral outcomes by allowing voters to verify their votes through an incorruptible ledger system. This approach reflects a growing interest in using innovative technologies to bolster democratic processes.

Sentiment

Discussions around LD1070 exhibit a generally positive sentiment among proponents who believe that the bill offers a necessary modernization of the voting process. They emphasize the importance of transparency and security, arguing that blockchain technology can help achieve these goals. Critics, however, express concerns about the feasibility of such technologies and the potential for technology-related complications during elections. This sentiment reflects a tension between embracing innovation and ensuring practical, accessible solutions for all voters.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding LD1070 include concerns about the technological gap between communities that may be ready to implement blockchain solutions effectively and those that may struggle with the transition. Additionally, there are discussions about the cost implications for the state’s election administration and whether the benefits of increased transparency will outweigh the hurdles in establishing such a system. Opponents may also question whether the focus on technology could lead to neglect in other important areas of the electoral process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

ME SB838

Corporate records: articles of incorporation: blockchain technology.

ME AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

ME HB2071

Relating to blockchains.

ME S1756

"Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act."

ME A2371

"Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act."

ME S1304

"Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act."

ME A2249

"Digital Asset and Blockchain Technology Act."

ME HB1590

"Blockchain Basics Act"; create.

ME HB8275

Border Security and Blockchain Technology Act

ME HB1322

Blockchain technology.

Similar Bills

IL SB1887

DIGITAL PROPERTY PROTECT ACT

HI SR26

Requesting The Department Of Commerce And Consumer Affairs To Create A Task Force To Study The Approval Of Blockchain Technology And Cryptocurrency In The State.

HI SCR31

Requesting The Department Of Commerce And Consumer Affairs To Create A Task Force To Study The Approval Of Blockchain Technology And Cryptocurrency In The State.

CA AB2658

Secretary of the Government Operations Agency: working group: blockchain technology.

UT SB0160

Blockchain Liability Amendments

AZ SB1156

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

AZ SB1236

Blockchain technology; tax; fee; prohibition

WY HB0308

Cryptographic Frontiers Act.