An Act to Increase School Security Through Design and Protocol
The bill impacts state laws by creating a new legal framework concerning school security protocols. It states that teachers or staff members who fail to secure entry points (e.g., keeping doors unlocked or allowing unauthorized entry) could face civil liability should an incident occur resulting in injury or death. Notably, the bill stipulates that damages in such cases would not have legal caps, thereby increasing the legal responsibilities of school personnel regarding school security.
LD1326, titled 'An Act to Increase School Security Through Design and Protocol', aims to enhance the safety of schools by mandating specific security measures and protocols for teachers and staff. The bill introduces requirements for new school designs to include security features aimed at preventing unauthorized access, thereby reducing the risk posed by active shooters. Additionally, it establishes training requirements for school personnel regarding these safety features and the legal implications of their actions during security incidents.
The sentiment surrounding LD1326 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the legislation is a necessary response to the increasing concerns about school shootings and that it lays down essential protections for students and staff alike. Opponents, however, raise concerns regarding the potential for criminal charges against teachers, viewing the bill as creating an additional layer of stress in an already challenging environment. The conversation reflects apprehension about balancing safety with the practical realities of school operations.
A notable point of contention among lawmakers and educators is the criminalization aspect of the bill. Critics argue that labeling the failure to comply with security protocols as a Class E crime could discourage teachers from allowing flexible access to school facilities, ultimately impacting the learning environment. Additionally, the provision for civil liabilities poses concerns about how it might unfairly burden school staff, detracting from their ability to focus on education rather than legal risks associated with security breaches.