Maine House Bill LD1616

Maine 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/11/23
• Refer: 4/11/23
• Refer: 4/12/23
• Failed: 6/6/23

Caption

An Act to Make the Description of the State Seal Gender-neutral and to Depict One of the Human Images on the State Flag as Female

Impact

The proposed changes encapsulated within LD1616 could have a lasting impact on state laws relating to gender representation in official state symbols. By ensuring that the language describing the state seal is gender-neutral and that one human figure on the state flag is female, the bill seeks to promote gender equality within the state's visual and legislative identity. This change could resonate positively within the community, promoting progressive values and creating a symbol of inclusivity within the state of Maine. However, the actual visibility and impact of such alterations in the mindset of the public remain to be fully assessed.

Summary

LD1616 is a legislative act aimed at making the descriptions of the figures present on the Maine state seal gender-neutral. Specifically, the bill proposes changing the terms 'husbandman' to 'farmer' and 'seaman' to 'sailor,' thereby reflecting modern language and inclusivity in the official state symbols. In addition, the bill directs the Secretary of State to commission a redesign of the state flag that would showcase one of the human images on the coat of arms as female. The intended submission for the recommended flag design is set for December 6, 2023, to the Joint Standing Committee on State and Local Government, potentially paving the way for subsequent legislation in the Second Regular Session of the 131st Legislature.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be largely supportive, particularly from advocates for gender equality and inclusiveness. Many view this legislative move as a positive step towards modernization and representation of women in state iconography. However, there may be segments of the population who could perceive these changes as unnecessary or as a departure from traditional state values. Overall, the discussion is framed within the broader context of ongoing conversations about inclusivity and representation in government affairs.

Contention

While the bill has garnered substantial support, there may still be points of contention, particularly around the implications of changing traditional state symbols. Critics may argue about the relevance of current terminology while proponents are likely to emphasize the importance of aligning state symbols with contemporary societal values. The process of redesigning the flag and the potential debates over the chosen design could also evoke discussion surrounding representation and historical preservation versus progressive updates.