An Act to Fund Collective Bargaining Agreements with Executive Branch Employees
Impact
The legislation specifically adjusts salary schedules for various executive branch employees represented by unions such as the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) and law enforcement associations. Additionally, it provides equitable treatment to temporary, seasonal, and confidential employees who are otherwise excluded from collective bargaining agreements. The funding necessary for these adjustments is to be sourced from transfers of existing appropriations within the General Fund and Highway Fund, not exceeding $99 million for the fiscal years 2023-24 and 2024-25.
Summary
LD2017, titled 'An Act to Fund Collective Bargaining Agreements with Executive Branch Employees', addresses the timely funding of collective bargaining agreements negotiated by the executive branch for state employees. The bill is an emergency act due to the immediate financial obligations arising from these agreements that require legislative action. By providing the necessary funding, LD2017 aims to ensure that the terms of the collective bargaining agreements can be implemented without delay, thereby maintaining the stability and operations of state services.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding LD2017 is largely supportive, particularly among stakeholders involved in collective bargaining. Proponents argue that the bill is essential in recognizing the needs and rights of state employees, ensuring proper funding and supportive measures are in place. However, some may view the bill skeptically due to concerns about budgetary constraints and the potential for increased expenses in state funding. The necessity for swift enactment reflects a consensus on prioritizing employee rights and operational integrity within state services.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding LD2017 may arise from the implications of transferring funds between programs and departments to accommodate the financial requirements of new salary adjustments and collective bargaining agreements. Questions surrounding fiscal responsibility and the long-term economic impact on the state budget and services are likely to be part of the ongoing discussions. However, the urgency conveyed in the emergency preamble indicates a broad agreement on the critical need for the actions proposed in the bill.