Maine 2025-2026 Regular Session

Maine House Bill LD407

Introduced
2/4/25  
Refer
2/4/25  

Caption

An Act to Prohibit the Use of Aqueous Film-forming Foam at the Former Brunswick Naval Air Station

Impact

The enactment of LD407 will significantly impact state laws concerning fire safety protocols and environmental regulations. By limiting the use of AFFF, the bill aims to mitigate potential contamination of water and land resources, addressing concerns about the environmental impact of chemical substances used in firefighting. The enforcement of this law will increase the regulatory obligations of authorities overseeing fire safety in Maine, prompting a shift towards alternative firefighting methods that do not involve fluorinated chemicals.

Summary

LD407 is a legislative act aimed at prohibiting the use of aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) on properties leased or owned by the Midcoast Regional Redevelopment Authority, which includes the site of the former Brunswick Naval Air Station. The bill mandates that this prohibition comes into effect on January 1, 2026, and assigns enforcement authority to the Department of Environmental Protection. Aqueous film-forming foam is typically used as a fire suppressant for flammable liquid fires and is known to contain fluorinated surfactants that pose environmental health risks.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding LD407 is generally supportive among environmental advocates and public health officials, who view it as a necessary step towards reducing harmful chemical exposures. However, there are also concerns from fire safety professionals about potentially less effective alternatives to AFFF. This divide reflects a broader debate between environmental protection and operational effectiveness in firefighting, particularly in scenarios involving flammable liquid hazards.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential challenges in transitioning away from AFFF for firefighting purposes and the need for effective substitutes that do not compromise safety. Some stakeholders argue that while the prohibition is warranted from an environmental perspective, it could inadvertently hinder emergency response efforts if suitable alternatives are not readily available. Therefore, LD407 raises fundamental questions about balancing public safety with environmental responsibility.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.