Maine Senate Bill LD587

Maine 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/25
• Refer: 2/19/25
• Engrossed: 6/5/25
• Enrolled: 6/9/25

Caption

An Act to Require School Boards to Adopt a Policy on Automated External Defibrillator Access at School-sponsored Athletic Events

Impact

The bill significantly impacts school policies by establishing a legal requirement for each school to have a cardiac emergency response plan that aligns with guidelines from recognized health organizations. It further stipulates the integration of these plans within local emergency medical services protocols. By doing so, LD587 seeks to enhance the safety and preparedness of school environments, ensuring that vital resources and trained personnel are available to act swiftly in emergencies involving cardiovascular incidents.

Summary

LD587, titled 'An Act to Require Cardiac Emergency Response Plans and Athletic Emergency Action Plans for Schools and School-sponsored Athletic Events', mandates that all school administrative units develop comprehensive cardiac emergency response plans starting in the 2026-2027 school year. This legislation addresses the urgent need for preparedness in schools to respond effectively to incidents of sudden cardiac arrest or similar life-threatening emergencies on school grounds. Plans must include the formation of response teams, training for personnel, and the placement of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in accessible locations.

Sentiment

The sentiment around LD587 appears to be largely positive, with many advocates emphasizing the importance of increased safety measures in educational settings. Proponents argue that the bill reflects a proactive approach to safeguard students' health during athletic activities and other school functions. However, there could be discussions on potential funding and logistical challenges related to the implementation of such plans, particularly for economically disadvantaged schools.

Contention

While most stakeholders seem to support the intent behind LD587, there are concerns about the practical implications of mandating these changes. Critics worry about the financial and operational burdens that might be placed on less affluent school districts. Additionally, discussions around the adequacy of existing training programs and resources needed for effective implementation may arise, particularly around how schools will manage the training of staff and maintenance of AEDs.