Michigan House Bill HB4173

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/23
• Refer: 3/2/23
• Report Pass: 6/6/23
• Engrossed: 6/14/23
• Refer: 6/15/23
• Report Pass: 12/11/24
• Refer: 12/11/24
• Report Pass: 12/5/24
• Report Pass: 12/20/24
• Enrolled: 12/23/24

Caption

Criminal procedure: sentencing; criminal justice policy commission; create. Amends 1927 PA 175 (MCL 760.1 - 777.69) by adding sec. 34a to ch. IX.

Impact

The bill will have significant implications for state laws governing criminal procedure, particularly in establishing a structure for evaluating and recommending changes to sentencing. By creating a dedicated commission comprised of various stakeholders, including legal experts, law enforcement representatives, and former inmates, the legislation aims to incorporate diverse perspectives into the criminal justice system. This could lead to a reduction in disparities in sentencing outcomes, promoting more equitable treatment for offenders, as the commission may propose adjustments that reflect contemporary views on justice and rehabilitation.

Summary

House Bill 4173 aims to amend the 1927 PA 175 in Michigan, introducing a new sentencing commission tasked with providing guidance on criminal penalties and the overall administration of criminal justice in the state. This bill seeks to address gaps in the existing laws concerning sentencing policies, as well as ensuring more consistent and fair application of these penalties across different jurisdictions. The bill's establishment of the Michigan Sentencing Commission reflects a broader movement toward criminal justice reform, focusing on creating a more standardized approach to sentencing within the state's judicial system.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment around HB 4173 is notably supportive among criminal justice reform advocates, who see the creation of a sentencing commission as a step toward greater fairness in the legal system. However, there are concerns among certain groups regarding the potential for political influence on the commission's recommendations and the extent to which they may prioritize rehabilitation over punitive measures. The bill has sparked discussions about the balance between maintaining public safety and implementing compassionate reform in Michigan's criminal justice system.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around who gets appointed to the sentencing commission and the balance of interests represented. Critics worry that the commission might not sufficiently consider the victims' perspectives, with some advocating for a more pronounced representation of victim advocates. Additionally, the discussion addresses the commission's authority and scope in making recommendations, as some stakeholders argue for a clearer delineation of its powers to avoid overreach into judicial discretion.