Michigan House Bill HB4187

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/7/23
• Refer: 3/7/23
• Report Pass: 5/18/23
• Engrossed: 10/31/23
• Refer: 11/1/23

Caption

Environmental protection: air pollution; asbestos emissions program for demolition or renovation activity; require annual report on sufficiency of number of inspectors. Amends 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.101 - 324.90106) by adding sec. 5519b.

Impact

By requiring the department to conduct and report on these activities, the bill aims to enhance transparency and oversight within Michigan's asbestos management programs. This amendment could lead to improvements in air quality and public safety concerning asbestos exposure by ensuring that the regulatory framework is adequately staffed and responsive to the demands of ongoing removal and renovation activities. The new reporting requirements are anticipated to facilitate better resource allocation within the department and allow for timely interventions where staffing or enforcement actions may be insufficient.

Summary

House Bill 4187 aims to amend the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act by introducing a new section (5519b) that mandates the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy to prepare an annual report on the state's asbestos program. This report is required to include crucial metrics such as the number of inspectors employed, the number of inspections conducted, and the effectiveness of the department in enforcing asbestos regulations. Specifically, it evaluates whether the department has adequate personnel to oversee compliance with the National Emission Standards for Asbestos, based on established metrics related to renovation or demolition notices received.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HB 4187 appears to be supportive among legislators focused on environmental health and safety, highlighting the importance of properly enforced regulations to protect citizens from the dangers of asbestos. However, as with any legislation, there may be underlying concerns regarding the costs of implementation and the effectiveness of state oversight. While proponents advocate for enhanced accountability, critics may express concerns about the feasibility of meeting these new reporting requirements without adequate funding or resources.

Contention

Notably, discussions surrounding HB 4187 may reflect broader tensions regarding state versus local authority in managing environmental hazards. Some stakeholders could argue that comprehensive enforcement strategies should also consider local contexts and variations in asbestos exposure risks across different communities. The bill's effectiveness will be scrutinized, particularly as it relates to actual improvements in environmental protections and public health outcomes following its implementation.