Michigan House Bill HB4335

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/23/23
• Refer: 3/23/23

Caption

School aid: other; funding for pupil transportation; provide for. Amends 1979 PA 94 (MCL 388.1601 - 388.1896) by adding sec. 22e.

Impact

If enacted, HB4335 will have a notable impact on how transportation is funded for schools in Michigan. The bill defines eligibility based on student density, with provisions for different reimbursement amounts ranging from $250 to $54 per pupil depending on the number of students per square mile. This tiered approach to funding takes into account the varying challenges that different districts face in providing transportation. As such, it could significantly benefit rural schools, allowing them to allocate more resources to instructional needs and improving the overall educational experience.

Summary

House Bill 4335 aims to amend the State School Aid Act of 1979 to provide additional financial support for school transportation costs in eligible districts. The bill allocates up to $50 million from the state school aid fund specifically for the 2022-2023 fiscal year. The funding model is designed to support school districts that demonstrate a low density of students per square mile, which often translates into increased transportation costs due to longer travel distances for students. This initiative seeks to alleviate financial strains on rural and less populated school districts, ensuring that all students have equitable access to education.

Contention

While many legislators support HB4335 as a necessary step to support underfunded and underserved school districts, concerns could arise about the adequacy of the funding allocation and the program's potential reach. Critics might highlight the risk of insufficient funding if the proposed amount of $50 million does not fully cover the costs for all eligible districts. Additionally, the proration mechanism outlined in the bill, which would distribute funds equally if the budget is limited, could result in some districts receiving less than necessary, potentially leading to disparities in transportation quality. As such, there may be debates regarding the long-term sustainability of this funding approach.