Michigan House Bill HB4420

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 4/13/23
• Refer: 4/13/23
• Report Pass: 5/23/23
• Engrossed: 6/7/23
• Refer: 6/8/23
• Report Pass: 10/3/23
• Refer: 10/3/23
• Report Pass: 10/17/23
• Enrolled: 10/24/23
• Chaptered: 11/8/23
• Passed: 11/8/23

Caption

Crime victims: other; information sharing by law enforcement of victim contact information with survivor programs; allow. Amends 1927 PA 175 (MCL 760.1 - 777.69) by adding sec. 21b to ch. XVI.

Impact

The passage of HB4420 modifies the existing framework of Michigan's criminal procedure laws, particularly in regard to how information can be shared with victims of domestic and sexual violence. The new measure creates a legal avenue for the exchange of information, which is intended to empower service providers to reach out to victims more effectively. By notifying victims when their information is shared, the bill seeks to maintain a degree of transparency and ensure that victims are aware of the support available to them.

Summary

House Bill 4420 aims to enhance the support system for victims of domestic and sexual violence in Michigan by allowing law enforcement officials, such as police officers and prosecuting attorneys, to share certain information with designated service provider agencies. Specifically, the bill amends existing laws to permit the provision of a victim's demographics and contact information to these agencies, facilitating access to supportive services aimed at helping victims during critical times. This legislative change is designed to improve victim support by ensuring they are offered relevant resources promptly after an incident occurs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB4420 appears largely positive among lawmakers and advocates who support enhanced protections for victims of abuse. Proponents argue that the bill represents a step forward in addressing the needs of vulnerable populations and ensuring they receive timely assistance. However, there are nuances to this perspective, as discussions might also highlight concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of disclosed information. Overall, the bill seems to reflect a progressive approach to victim advocacy within the state's legislative framework.

Contention

While the bill broadly receives support, there are points of contention particularly related to privacy concerns. Critics may cite fears that sharing victim information, even for supportive purposes, could potentially place victims at further risk or deter them from seeking assistance. Such discussions underscore the delicate balance between facilitating access to resources and ensuring the confidentiality and safety of victims. This balancing act remains a critical focal point in the discourse surrounding the implementation of the bill.