Michigan House Bill HB4634

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 5/23/23
• Refer: 5/23/23
• Report Pass: 9/19/23

Caption

Juveniles: other; juvenile fines, fees, and costs; eliminate. Amends secs. 2f, 18, 28 & 29, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.2f et seq.); adds sec. 29a to ch. XIIA & repeals sec. 18m, ch. XIIA of 1939 PA 288 (MCL 712A.18m). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4635'23, HB 4636'23, HB 4637'23

Impact

If passed, HB 4634 would significantly alter the financial dynamics of the juvenile justice system in Michigan. Currently, juveniles can be subject to fines and costs, which may contribute to recidivism as they navigate through their legal obligations. By eliminating these financial penalties, the bill could encourage more juveniles to engage with the legal process positively and complete necessary rehabilitation programs. Furthermore, this bill aligns with a growing trend towards reform in juvenile justice, emphasizing rehabilitation over punitive measures.

Summary

House Bill 4634 seeks to amend the Probate Code of 1939 by removing financial burdens placed on juveniles involved in the court system. The bill specifically prohibits the court from ordering juveniles or their guardians to pay fines, fees, or costs associated with their court cases. This measure aims to alleviate financial obstacles that could inhibit a juvenile's ability to fully participate in rehabilitative programs or to reintegrate into society after adjudication. Additionally, starting July 1, 2024, the bill mandates that any previously ordered but uncollected fines and fees against juveniles will be vacated and deemed unenforceable.

Contention

Notably, HB 4634 aligns with other proposed legislation (HB 4635, HB 4636, and HB 4637) that collectively aim to reform various aspects of the juvenile justice system. While proponents argue that eliminating fees enhances justice and rehabilitation, concerns may arise regarding accountability for juvenile actions. Critics may voice worries that without financial repercussions, juveniles may be less incentivized to rectify their behavior or contribute to victim restitution. This debate reflects broader tensions in balancing rehabilitative goals and maintaining accountability within the juvenile justice framework.