Michigan House Bill HB4769

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/15/23
• Refer: 6/15/23

Caption

Mental health: other; certain references in the mental health code; make gender neutral. Amends sec. 800 of 1974 PA 258 (MCL 330.1800). TIE BAR WITH: HJR F'23

Impact

If enacted, HB4769 will require all references in the mental health code to be revised to eliminate gender-specific language, which would align with contemporary values of equality and inclusiveness. This will result in a broader understanding and application of mental health services that are not defaulted to any specific gender. The changes will directly impact not only how services are delivered but also how individuals identify and are identified by services meant to support them. Additionally, this could set a precedent for other areas of law that also require modernization in terms of gender representation.

Summary

House Bill 4769 aims to amend the 1974 Mental Health Code in Michigan, specifically focusing on creating gender-neutral language throughout the text. This bill is significant as it addresses the need for inclusivity and modernity in legislative language, reflecting societal changes regarding gender identity and roles. By making these amendments, the bill promotes a more equitable approach within mental health services legislation, which has traditionally used gendered terms that may not adequately encompass all individuals receiving services.

Contention

The bill ties itself to House Joint Resolution F of the 102nd Legislature, indicating that its effectiveness is contingent upon a change in the state constitution. This tie-in may generate debates regarding the constitutional implications and the necessity of aligning existing laws with societal advancements in gender considerations. Some stakeholders might argue that while the intention behind the bill is commendable, the process requires careful navigation to ensure it does not disrupt existing frameworks for delivering mental health services. The potential for friction arises from differing views on how best to represent gender in legislation and its necessary implications for service provision.