Michigan House Bill HB4824

Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/15/23
• Refer: 6/15/23
• Report Pass: 10/31/23
• Engrossed: 11/9/23
• Refer: 11/9/23
• Report Pass: 2/6/24
• Refer: 2/6/24
• Report Pass: 2/13/24
• Enrolled: 2/20/24
• Chaptered: 2/27/24
• Passed: 2/27/24

Caption

Administrative procedure: other; cross-reference to administrative procedures act within the natural resources and environmental protection act; update. Amends sec. 20120a of 1994 PA 451 (MCL 324.20120a). TIE BAR WITH: HB 4826'23

Impact

The implications of HB 4824 on state laws are significant, particularly in how cleanup procedures for contaminated sites will be managed. The department will be authorized to create generic cleanup criteria based on assessments of human health risks associated with various land use patterns. By mandating the use of current toxicity values and research methodologies, the bill intends to ensure that the cleanup standards reflect the latest scientific knowledge about hazardous substances' health impacts. This could lead to more effective remediation efforts and improved health outcomes for communities living near contaminated sites.

Summary

House Bill 4824 proposes amendments to the 1994 Public Act 451, which pertains to the protection of the environment and natural resources in Michigan. The amendments primarily focus on updating the criteria for cleanup and remedial actions for properties affected by hazardous substances. This bill empowers the relevant department to establish cleanup criteria based on specific categories of land use, including residential and non-residential, and to approve remedial action plans that meet the new requirements. By streamlining the process for setting environmental standards, the bill aims to enhance efficiency in addressing contamination issues while considering areas of public health and safety.

Sentiment

General sentiment around the bill appears to support its provisions, with proponents emphasizing the need for timely and effective remediation of contaminated areas to protect public health and the environment. However, there may be concerns regarding the adequacy of the criteria established and whether they sufficiently address all potential hazards presented by various contaminants. The balance between economic development and thorough environmental protection remains a key topic of discussion amongst stakeholders.

Contention

Noteworthy points of contention include the methods by which cleanup criteria will be determined and the potential implications for existing properties under different zoning classifications. Critics might question the risk assessment methodologies and the reliance on specific toxicity values to inform decisions on public health. Furthermore, considerations regarding local governance could emerge, as local authorities may want to maintain stricter standards than those set by the state.