Michigan 2023-2024 Regular Session

Michigan House Bill HB4920

Introduced
7/18/23  
Refer
7/18/23  
Report Pass
9/13/23  
Engrossed
10/12/23  
Refer
10/17/23  
Report Pass
11/2/23  
Refer
11/2/23  
Report Pass
11/7/23  
Enrolled
11/8/23  
Chaptered
12/31/23  

Caption

Courts: judges; number of judges in Kent County district court; increase. Amends sec. 8130 of 1961 PA 236 (MCL 600.8130).

Impact

The approval of HB 4920 is anticipated to enhance the judicial capacity in Kent County, allowing for a more efficient processing of cases. The increase in judges is viewed as a necessary response to the rising number of civil and criminal cases that have strained the current judicial resources. This legislative change is expected to improve overall service delivery within the courts, providing timely resolutions to legal matters and enhancing public confidence in the judicial process.

Summary

House Bill 4920 aims to amend the current statutes regarding the number of judges in the Kent County district court system. Specifically, it seeks to increase the number of judges in the sixty-third district, which consists of the majority of Kent County excluding certain cities. The bill is positioned to support better accessibility to the judicial system in response to the growing demands placed on the courts in this jurisdiction.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4920 has been overwhelmingly positive, with strong support noted among lawmakers and stakeholders involved in the judicial system. The necessity for additional judicial resources is widely acknowledged, and the bill has been accelerated through the legislative process with little to no opposition. The unanimous vote in the Senate indicates a bipartisan agreement on the importance of bolstering the district court’s functional capabilities.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support, there are implicit concerns regarding budget implications and the long-term management of additional judicial appointments. Critics have pointed out that increasing the number of judges also necessitates allocations for administrative resources and facilities, which could pose challenges in budget-limited environments. However, this debate has not significantly hindered the passage of the bill, as the overall need for improved judicial services remains a priority.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

KY HR1

A RESOLUTION establishing the 2025 membership of the Kentucky State House of Representatives.

KY HR2

A RESOLUTION establishing the 2022 membership of the Kentucky State House of Representatives.